AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
22v.2 - Moriah = "chosen by Jehovah". It is also the site of Solomon's temple 2Chron.3:1. This, we are told, here in Chronicles, was the site of the threshingfloor that David bought 2Sam 24:18-25. David was commanded by God 1Chron.21:18 (Araunah and Ornan are the same person) to buy back the land - the very place where Abraham sacrificed Isaac and make it a place of sacrifice again - and soon the site of the temple - where God chose to place his name - hence Moriah. We are this temple 1Cor.3:17
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
23v.9 - Abraham's desire to buy at the proper price regardless of their willingness (v.6) to provide the service for free fits with the principle of 'owe no man any thing' in Rom.13:8
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
ch 22 - When Abraham took Isaac to Mount Moriah to offer him as a burnt sacrifice do we think that Abraham had any thoughts about Melchisedec whom he had met in that area [Genesis 14] some years earlier?
23:4 - In describing himself as 'a stranger and a sojourner' Abraham demonstrated that he expected the promises to be fulfilled at a later date - by implication when he is raised from the dead.
This sets the pattern for our life. We should live in this world as 'strangers and pilgrims' 1 Peter 2:11 and as such should not follow the behaviour of those amongst whom we live.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
ISAAC AND JESUS
There are some amazing parallels in the story of the offering of Isaac by Abraham that match up with the sacrifice of Christ.
Abraham was told, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah and sacrifice him there as a burnt offering." We read in John 3 v 16 that "God so loved the world that he gave his one and only son." Jesus was the Son God loved who was sacrificed for our sins.
The burnt offering was the only offering that was totally sacrificed to God, totally consumed. Jesus gave up every part of his life completely to God - just like a burnt offering.
Isaac was sacrificed in the region of Moriah. This is where the temple was eventually built and where Christ was crucified. It became part of the city of Jerusalem.
Abraham said, "God himself will provide a lamb for the burnt offering." God provided Jesus, "The lamb who takes away the sins of the world." (John 1 v 29).
Isaac was as good as dead as Abraham raised his knife to slay him, but he was given back to Abraham alive. Christ died and was raised back to life again.
We read that "Abraham returned to his servants," (Verse 19) but Isaac is missing from the record. So, after his resurrection, Jesus ascended to heaven. His next appearance will be at the wedding feast in the kingdom. So with Isaac. His next mention is concerning his marriage to Rebekah, the bride selected by God.
There are many more parallels in this story for us to find. Try it. It makes you think, doesn't it?
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
22:2 Isaac was not Abraham's 'only son' at this time because Ishmael was alive. However the word translated 'only son' 03173 is a rare word in Scripture and seems to always be in a prophecy of Jesus
Genesis 22:2 | only son | * |
Genesis 22:12 | only son | * |
Genesis 22:16 | only son | * |
Judges 11:34 | only child | * |
Psalm 22:20 | Darling | * |
Psalm 25:16 | Desolate | |
Psalm 35:17 | Darling | * |
Psalm 68:6 | Solitary | |
Proverbs 4:3 | Only (Beloved) | * |
Jeremiah 6:26 | only son | |
Amos 8:10 | only son | * |
Zechariah 12:10 | only son | * |
*indicates places where it is quite clear that we have a prophecy of Jesus.
23:12-13 In insisting in paying for the land in which he buried Sarah we see that Abraham lay no claim on the land which he had been promised.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Genesis 22 - How old was Isaac in this record? Most certainly it appears he was now a grown young man, not the little boy of some of the more fanciful tellers of the story for little children. Josephus claims that Isaac was around 25 years of age, which means that this incident took place when Abraham was 125 years old, and Sarah 115 years old. However, it is not impossible that Isaac may have been approaching 40 years of age, which would put his age close to the age of our Lord when He too was sacrificed and raised from the dead. In ancient Hebrew terms, a man was "young" until he reached the age of 40. Abraham would then have been 140, and Sarah dead for three years. No mention is made in Genesis 22 of Sarah, and what follows in Genesis 23 need not necessarily be in chronological order. If this latter proposition be correct, how much greater does Abraham's faith here appear? If Sarah is now dead, and Abraham knowing that the promise referred only to that seed produced between himself and Sarah... what must his thoughts have been as he contemplated sacrificing his only begotten son?
Genesis 23:2 - It is worthy of remark, that Sarah is the only woman whose age, death, and burial are distinctly noted in the Sacred writings. What is meant in this verse that "Abraham came to mourn for Sarah?" Can this imply that Sarah died whilst Abraham was away from the compound, perhaps tending his flocks in another area?
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
Gen 22 - We see in the way that God tried Abram that Abram was being tested that he might appreciate the strength of his faith. The trial was not for God’s benefit. He knew what Abram would do. Abram need to learn about himself. The same is true of ourselves. Our trials are for our benefit that we might learn about ourselves.
23:2 In saying that Abram ‘came to mourn for Sarah’ we might conclude that Abraham was not present at the time and place of her death.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
The ram was caught by his horns in a thicket. Is this a foretaste of Christ’s crown of thorns?
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
Gen 22:2 To the best of my knowledge, no other man has ever been asked of God to offer his son as a sacrifice.
Gen 22:5 Bro. Cliff (above) asks. "How old was Isaac" we have heard it suggested that he was 33. (same as Christ) The Hebrew word translated "lad" is NAAR (5288). In Gen 41:12 it is translated a "young man", we see in Gen 41:46 that Joseph was was thirty years old at the time. We do not know Isaac's age, but it is possible he was 33.
Gen 22:2,13 Abraham was told to offer Isaac as a burnt offering, and the ram that was caught in the thicket was offered as a burnt offering. The sin offering followed the burnt offering. Even though Isaac was a type of Christ, he could not have replaced Him.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
22:2 The pattern of animal sacrifice had been firmly established pre-Mosaic Law. It had first been performed as a covering for Adam and Eve (Gen 3:21) and then through the acceptable sacrifice of Abel (Gen 4:4). The Sons of God (Seed of the Woman) subsequently would have continued the practice. Would they not have understood that sacrifice represented the coming messiah of promise (Gen 3:15) in the light of that which is expressed in Heb 9:22?
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
Gen 22:14 The authorised version Bible says: "And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovah-Jireh: as it is said to this day,In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen"
The Hebrew Bible says: And I will call Abraham name the place he the Yahweh Yeereh that
he will say the day in mountain Yahweh will be seen. Hebrew is an economical language, there are no punctuation, and Capitals and small letters are never in the same sentence (it is one or the other). also there are no vowels used, one must learn how to say a word from a teacher or some one that knows Hebrew. Also there is no 'j' in Hebrew instead the letter 'y' is used.
Beryl Butler [London West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Beryl
22:8 - How much truth there is in this statement that Abraham makes 'God will provide himself a lamb'. Abraham had first hand experience of God's miraculous provision in Isaac himself, but as well as this, he recognised that one day there would be a greater son - the lamb of God - who would take away the sins of the world.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
some parallels with Christ's sacrifice
22:2 - Moriah is where Solomon's temple was built and we read here of a sacrificial offering. Mention of your only son whom you love. Adam was a son just as Ishmael was a son but Christ and Isaac were manifestations of freedom not slavery. 22:3 - we have mention of a donkey leading the way to the sacrificial journey. Mention of servants with Isaac just as Jesus had others with him. 22:4 - reference to the third day. Jesus' servants abandoned him so at the end he was alone with his father for the final journey. 22:6 - wood placed on Isaac and Christ. 22:8 - the lamb. 22:12 - neither son saw corruption. 22:13 - a ram in a "thicket" Heb. "sebak" (5442) is similar to the Matt 27:46 "sabachthani" Jesus actually said which means why hast thou "entangled me" as opposed to the passage referring to Christ's crucifixion beginning with the Psa 22:1 quote using the word "forsaken" Heb. "azab" (5800) means "relinquish, permit, commit self, forsake, leave", etc. derived from the Septuagint. Thus Jesus was pointing to the two prophesies at once and was preaching/clarifying till the end. Jesus knew why he was being sacrificed, it wasn't a question for him to ponder. Rather, it was a question raised for others to read scripture and consider the ramifications of. Gen 23:9 - we find the full price was paid for a burial cave just as Christ (and his Father) paid the full price.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
22 The offering of Isaac provides the basis for the way in which Jephthah’s daughter dealt with her father’s vow.
Genesis 22 |
Language |
Judges 11 |
language |
|
Come again |
|
Return in peace |
|
Burnt offering |
|
Burnt offering |
|
Only son <03173> |
|
Only child <03173> |
|
Mountains |
|
Mountains |
|
The mountains |
|
Upon the mountains |
|
Come again |
|
returned |
Jephthah’s daughter was a living sacrifice as was Isaac
23:4 Abraham had been promised the land – Gen 17:8 – yet he describes himself as a ‘stranger and sojourner. An indication that he saw the promise of the inheritance of the land as a future thing and this informed the way he viewed present possession. How do we view the things of this life?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
GOD PROVIDES
Abraham was tested. God asked him to take his only son Isaac and to sacrifice him. Abraham did as he was told but at the crucial moment was stopped by the angel who explained to Abraham what the test was all about.
In the past I have always looked at Abraham's actions during his test. He obediently followed all the instructions he was given in a supreme display of faith, perhaps far more than we might ever dream of achieving. But there is a subtle theme that comes through the text to tell us how Abraham completed his task. Along with the theme of testing there is the refrain, "God will provide." When Isaac was asked where the lamb for the burnt offering was, Abraham's reply was, "God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son." (Gen 22:8) And then after the sacrifice had been made, "Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide." Then we read, "And to this day it is said, 'On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided.'" (v.14)
The key to having faith in God is knowing that he will provide. When we get tested in various ways - through lack of finances, in grief, in sickness or with other loss - knowing that God will provide will help get us through. He has never left me without anything I have needed and I am sure he never will. Let's trust in God's provision and, like Abraham, develop a great faith in the LORD who provides.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Robert
Gen 22:6,8 Notice the twofold us of ‘both of them together’ so we are left in no doubt that Isaac was willing. But more than that they were in fellowship – agreement – on this matter. Whilst Isaac did not know what was to happen Abraham did and he associated himself with the offering of Isaac., though one is left wondering how Abraham slept on the three day journey knowing what God had called him to do.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
22:16 In saying ‘by myself have I sworn’ God is making the most sure promise. He cannot lie.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
22:3 Abraham may actually have set off ‘early in the morning’ when he had been called to offer Isaac. However rather we are being shown an attitude of mind. A mind which puts the things of God before anything else even when the thing required is unpleasant. Likewise we will show that spirit if we are enthusiastic about being involved in ecclesial activities. Rather than waiting to see if anyone else volunteers to do that unpleasant job we would be quick to offer ourselves.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
22:2 the land of Moriah refers to the mountains of Jerusalem (Moriah means seen of Jah. The specific mountain where Abraham attempted to sacrifice Isaac is not stated. The distance from Beersheba to Jerusalem is about 42 miles (68 km.). That translated into a three-day journey for Abraham and his party (22:4).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
23:1 Sarah was 127 years old when she died. Before the flood, people lived for great ages, some approaching 1000 years. Yahweh was angry with the sinfulness of people, and determined to reduce the human age for life to 120 years (6:3). Sarah's age reminds us of this.
23:2 Kirjatharba (Kiryat-arba) means either the town of Arba or the town of four. It was founded by one of the giants (Anakim) (Josh 14:15; 15:13). The town could have been named after a giant named Arba, or after him and his three sons Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai (see Num 13:22).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
The whole theme of the Bible points to Christ's return to earth and establishment of a new world order:
The promises to David - 2Sam 7:10-16; Luke 1:31-33.
The promises to Abraham - Gen 22:16-18 (Abraham because of his faith will be blessed Acts 3:24-25); Gen 17:19-21 (covenant with Isaac); Gen 12:2,3,7 (will make of Abraham a great nation, promised offspring/seed referring to Christ); Gen 13:14-17 (the land is promised); Gen 15:3-5 (an heir is promised); Heb 11:8-13; Acts 7:1-5 (Abraham and other men of faith died not having received the promises); Acts 2:34 (David not in heaven); Gal 3:6-9,16,24-29 (the law leads us to that promised seed, Christ); 2Pet 1:2-4 (promises were given so believers can be partakers of the divine nature); Acts 1:11 (Christ will return to the earth in like manner as he left); Dan 2:44 (an everlasting kingdom established on earth).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
Gen 22:2-13 - Abraham reasoned God could raise the dead Heb 11:17-19;Dan 12:1-2.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
23:15-16 Whilst Abraham paid 400 shekels of silver for a piece of land to bury Sarah David paid Araunah 50 shekels of silver for the threshingfloor and the animals – 2Sam 24:24. We can conclude that the price that Abraham paid was way above the market value of the piece of land he bought. But he did not complain. This is the attitude of a sojourner in a foreign land. He accepts the customs of the land if they do not violate the principles of his beliefs.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
Gen 22:8,13 - God provided a ram for the sacrifice, the lamb would be provided later (John 1:29;Acts 8:32;1Pet 1:19).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Charles
22:4 We know that Jesus rose on the third day ‘according to the Scriptures’ 1Cor 15:3-4. Have you considered what Scriptures Paul had in mind? Maybe this is one of them. At the end of a three day journey Isaac is sacrificed and raised from the dead ‘in a figure’.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
The parable of Abraham's field
Was Abraham using "all that he had" to buy the field, namely a stake in the promised land? And is this what Jesus is commenting on in Matt 13:44? Was Sarah, his wife, Abraham's greatest treasure?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Rob
"And it came to pass after these things, that God (Elohim) did tempt Abraham... "
In James 1:13 we read, “Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man.”
“Tempt” is # 5254, nachah, and means “to test… prove.” We must make the distinction between “test” and “tempt.” This passages reads: “…after these things God tested/proved Abraham.”
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
“And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.”
The verb here in the Hebrew actually states, “we will return to you.” By faith, Abraham knew that God would raise Isaac, his son of promise, from the dead, and they would both return (Heb 11:17-19). This event prefigured the Father who would actually offer His Son of promise, Jesus the Messiah, as a sacrifice for us by his death on a wooden stake. Isaac foreshadowed Jesus, in that he willingly and responsibly submitted to being sacrificed. Isaac could have fought it tooth and claw like I expect most would have done. It is not hard to imagine, though, how difficult the situation must have been for both of them (as it was for Messiah, who sweat as it were drops of blood - Luke 22:44), but by their total acceptance and submission to obey God, God blessed Abraham and promised him many offspring and that through him and Isaac the promised Messiah would descend (Gen 21:12; Gen 22:17-18; Matt 1).
This chapter is a beautiful chapter of faith, love and obedience, not just on the part of Abraham, but also of Isaac. Sadly, some wrest this passage, and by means of analogy teach that infant to adolescent salvation is taught here in the family of believers! Without doubt, so much anguish and pain is appeased by such a thought when one loses a child, but if we are to be the children of Abraham and of his seed, Isaac (Rom 9:6-9), then we must uphold the Divine standards of redemption. God selects whomsoever He wills, we must accept that, and it is a very grave matter to wrest His teaching on this, or even go so far as to condemn Him for it. It is a false teaching, which we must not embrace. Isaac was special only in the sense that he was the son of promise, which none of us can claim.
“Lad” is the Hebrew word, nazar, # <5288>, and has a range, “from the age of infancy to adolescence… lad, servant young (man).” From the narrative it is easy to deduce that Isaac was, indeed, a young man at this particular time. He and his father, Abraham walked for three days to a mountain in the land of Moriah; Isaac’s knowledge and enquiry about a lamb for a burnt offering, and his willing submission to what he knew was about to transpire, are all indicative of this. This mountain received the name of Mount Moriah, on which later King Solomon built the Temple of Jerusalem (2Chron 3:1).
Brother John Thomas taught correctly that Scripture is about God-manifestation, not human salvation. I cannot emphasize strongly enough the importance of manifesting God in our lives, IF we are to obtain salvation, and not engage in fuzzy syncretism.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
22:17 The promise that Abraham’s seed would be as great as the stars was made after Abraham had demonstrated his willingness to offer Isaac. Thus built into the Genesis narrative is the route through which the multitudinous seed would come – the resurrection of the one typified by Isaac.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
A sister writes: “…I would be very grateful if you could clarify and expand a bit more on the following, if/when you have time? ‘Brother John Thomas taught correctly that Scripture is about God-manifestation, not human salvation. I cannot emphasize strongly enough the importance of manifesting God in our lives, IF we are to obtain salvation, and not engage in fuzzy syncretism…’”
Brother David Perry wrote an excellent exhortation, My Name’s Sake, which deals with this very subject. You may read it in its entirety at: http://www.genusa.com/Truth/ForMyNamesSake.htm
Let me present the following, though, in a nutshell:
We read in Eze 20:9,14, 22, 44– “for my name’s sake.”
We read in Isa 48:9; 60:21the LORD’s purpose for doing what He does is - “for mine own sake.”
Then in Eze 20:11,13,21 – “which if a man do.”
We read in Matt 10:22; Matt 19:29; Matt 24:9; Mark 13:13; Luke 21:12,17; John 15:21; Acts 9:16; Rev 2:3 wherein Jesus says, “for my name’s sake.”
From these passages, it is easy to discern that the LORD’s purpose for us is through Christ (2Tim 1:9). We have been called to the Truth not for our sake, but for His sake that the LORD may be glorified in us through His Son. It is not about us; it is about Him, and our manifestation of Him by the power of His word. Jesus tells us, “He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself unto him.”
Our identification with Christ is expressed in the preposition “with,” which we read throughout the New Testament: “dead” with Christ; “buried” with Christ; “made alive” with Christ; “risen” with Christ; “hidden” with Christ; “appear” with Christ (see Rom 6:1-11; Col 3:1-4; 1John 2:28). The Bible teaches salvation is not possible in any other way. God-manifestation MUST precede IF we are to be granted eternal life.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Valerie
Gen 22:4 “on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes and saw the place afar off.” God directed Abraham to the place where the sacrifice of his “only son” (Gen 22:2) was to take place.
Gen 22:13 “Abraham lifted up his eyes and looked…”. Abraham saw the ram the sacrifice of the Lord’s providing. How glad he must have been to see this sacrifice provided.
Gen 22:14 “called the place Jehovah-jireh…in the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.”
Abraham had seen and understood that the Lord was to provide a sacrifice and would provide the one through whom all nations would ultimately be blessed.
This is why Jesus was able to say of Abraham (John 8:56) that he rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad.
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
23:10-11 The casual use of ‘the gate of the city’ actually conveys that the gate was a significant place for the giving of judgements. Lot ‘sat in the gate’ Gen 19:1 and was accused of making himself a ‘judge’ Gen 19:9 Later – Ruth 4:11 – matters to do with land and inheritance were concluded in the gate.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
1. v. 12. Here the angel tells Abraham, "Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son." Was there something in Abraham's life just before this test that cast doubt on whether Abraham really did fear God?
2. v. 17. What is the significance of this unique part of God's covenant - "Your seed shall possess the gate of his enemies" - in relation to Jesus Christ?
1. One possibility is that the angel could have been alluding to the incident in ch. 20 where Abraham for the second time said that Sarah was his sister, because he was afraid of what might happen to him. Of course, it is also possible that the angel simply meant - "You (Abraham) passed the test! I wasn't sure whether or not you would, but you did!" This concept that the angels, though immortal and very powerful, have incomplete knowledge of future events is seen in a number of places in Scripture. Here are a couple of examples -
Mark 13:32 - (Jesus speaking) "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."
1 Pet. 1:12 - "It was revealed to them (the prophets) that they were not serving themselves but you, when they spoke of the things that have now been told you by those who have preached the gospel to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven. Even angels long to look into these things."
2. In Biblical times cities were surrounded by walls with, of course, a gate to enter. Whoever conquered a city would have control over the gate and would therefore have the authority to let in or keep out whomever he wanted. Jesus, the seed of Abraham (Gal 3:16), through his death and resurrection gained the authority to possess the gate of his enemies - hell and death (Rev 1:18). Therefore he and he alone can say who will stay in the grave for eternity or who will come forth to eternal life (John 5:22, John 5:28,29; Acts 17:31). Also, in the process of establishing the kingdom, Jesus will rule in the midst of his enemies (Psa 110:2). The seat of judgment also was in the city gate (see Gen 19:1,9{Lot was judging there}; Ruth 4:1 {where the transaction between Boaz, Ruth, and the near kinsman took place}). So another aspect of this is likely that of Jesus being the great Judge, the dispenser of life or death.
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Wes
22:6 Isaac carried the wood that was to be used in his sacrifice and in so doing typified Jesus – John 19:17 – in that Jesus carried the cross on which he was crucified.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
Gen 22:2 The Lord chose a mountain in Moriah for Abraham to offer Isaac his “only son” (Heb 11:17). Abraham called the place where Isaac was to be offered Jeho-vah-jireh which means “in the mount of the Lord shall it be seen.” (Gen 22:14) or margin “The Lord will see or provide”. When Abraham’s faith had been tested, with the sacrifice of Isaac. The Lord stayed his hand and prevented the sacrifice of Isaac and the Lord provided him with a ram (Gen 22:12-13). This is the same spot on which the Lord was to stay the hand of the destroying angel from brining judgements on Jerusalem. This same spot was known as the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite where the Lord commanded David to build an altar to the Lord (1Chron 21:15-18).
The threshing floor of Ornan, also known as mount Moriah was the same place where Solomon was to build the house of the Lord (2Chron 3:1).
It is also the area where our Lord was crucified. God provided the greatest expression possible of his love for His people, in giving His only son as a sacrifice for sin (John 3:16). So, as we read through Genesis 22 we should be looking for links with the sacrifice that God was to provide, around 2,000 years later, in providing His only begotten son to die for the sins of the world. How marvellous and merciful are the ways of the Lord.
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
The place I will show you
Gen 22:2 Why did God ask Abraham to go to a specific place to carry out this sacrifice? Could Abraham not have demonstrated his faith in God anywhere? Notice in the wording of the verses; God will show him a specific mountain in the place called Moriah. So he takes a journey to Moriah, but while he is still a long way away, he leaves his servants behind (v4-5). Again, why? We assume it was because he needed to be alone with his son, which I'm sure is part of the answer, but could it also be that he didn't want to reveal the place that God was to show him? Again, in v9 the wording specifically emphasises the place:
"And they came to the place which God had told him of"
Abraham recognises the special significance of the place God has shown him, because after he has demonstrated his faith, and God provides a sacrifice of a ram instead of Isaac; he calls the place:
"in the mount of the LORD it shall be seen" (v14)
He now returns to his men, and returns home. No-one is any the wiser about what occurred, and no-one knows about the place except Abraham and Isaac.
Come with me forward in time several hundreds of years. Fourteen generations have passed, and all knowledge of the place has been forgotten. The story of Abraham and Isaac has been written down in scripture for any Israelite to read, and the story is handed down from generation to generation, but the location of the place is never revealed. But now we come to David, and a time in his life where his sin has caused great wrath from God upon his people Israel. The angel of death has been sent out and is ravaging the land with plague. David wants desperately to plead with God and offer sacrifices at the tabernacle, but is too afraid of the angel (v29-30). With nothing else to do, and in desperation, David throws himself down before God and pleads that there may be some other way to atone for his sin. God answers him with the name of a place...
"Then the angel of the Lord commanded Gad to say to David, that David should go up, and set up an altar unto the Lord in the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite." 1 Chron 21:18
Why should there be an altar there, in that place? Perhaps there is something special about the place...
David knew. God answered his prayer from heaven (v26) and sanctified the altar. David remembered the story of Moriah, and the place revealed to Abraham but now lost in the mists of time. He remembered a specific detail from Genesis 22:9
"And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there"
Then David said,
"This is the house of the Lord God, and this is the altar of the burnt offering for Israel. And David commanded... to build the house of God." 1 Chron 22:1
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
22:9 We might think the laying of the wood in order was just a practical matter. However this phrase only occurs on two other occasions in Scripture – Leviticus 1:7 and 1Kin 18:33 demonstrating the sacrificial element of what Abraham was doing.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
In this sacrifice as all sacrifices we see the need for blood to be spilt. Lev 17:11
Whatever Abraham thought would happen to Isaac he was prepared to shed blood, but it wasnt only the physical shedding of blood, it was also the spiritual blood shedding that Abraham was prepared to do as we should and as Christ did.
Blood shedding for us is in service to God and blood shedding isnt a natural thing to do it only comes through and act of violence. Our service and walk to the kingdom then wont be easy it will be hard so much so it will be like pouring out our blood in sacrifice. Christ sweat blood as his mind fought against the flesh in the garden so must we!
stephen cox [Sedgley UK] Comment added in 2015 Reply to stephen
22 There are significant links between the call of Abram here and the call to Abraham to offer Isaac.
Chapter 12 |
Chapter 22 |
· ‘Get thee’ · ‘to a land I will show you’ · Involved a separation from his country, his kindred, his father’s house · Immediately in faith he departed · God’s response was the first of the seven promises and blessings |
· ‘Get thee’ · ‘to a mountain I will tell you of’ · Involved a separation from his son, his only son, his beloved son Isaac · Immediately in faith he departed · God’s response was the seventh and final promise and blessing |
Taken from comments by Brother Andrew E Walker
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
22:2 When God speaks of Isaac as the son who Abraham “lovest” we have the first occasion when love is mentioned in Scripture.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
22:14 The only other occasion when we read of “the mount of the Lord” is in Num 10:33. Of course the two locations are not the same. This one is Moriah in Jerusalem. The other is Mount Sinai. The point being made is that both places are the Lord’s mountain because the events there figure significantly in the redemptive plan of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
22:5 the way in which Abraham said the he and Isaac would “come again” is a clear indication that even at this time Abraham understood that he would not be required to kill Isaac. When he saw the ram in the thicket he would have realised how God was going to ensure that Isaac was not killed.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
Gen 22:2-13 Abraham was commanded by God to take and offer his only son who he loved (v.2) for a burnt offering to the LORD. We find there are six references to the fact that the offering was to be a burnt offering (Gen.22: 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 13).
Abraham’s faithful obedience to the commands of God foreshadowed the requirements of the Law that was given to Moses. The Book of Leviticus opens with the requirements for atonement, if a man wanted to bring an offering to the LORD, Lev 1:2-4. For a burnt offering:
Abraham’s – Burnt Offering |
Law - Burnt Offering |
Lord Jesus Christ |
Gen 22:2 “…take thy only son whom thou lovest…” Gen.22:6 Abraham “laid the wood on Isaac…they went both together.” Gen 22:9 “Abraham built the altar, laid the wood in order bound Isaac his son and laid him on the altar upon the wood.” Gen 22:12 “Lay not your hand upon the lad…”
Heb 11:18-19“in Isaac shall thy seed be called: Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.” |
Lev 1:2-5; Requirements for a burnt offerings were: 1. It was to be a male Without blemish 2. To be voluntary act 4. He was to put his hand on the head of the burnt offering 5. He shall kill it before the LORD
Lev 1:13 Burnt offerings “made by fire would rise a sweet savour to the LORD.”
|
1. Matt 3:17 “…my beloved son I in whom I am well pleased...”
2. Luke 22:42“…nevertheless not my will but thine be done.” John 10:15 “… even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.”
3. John 3:16“…God gave His only begotten son…” Psalm 16:10-11 “For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.” |
When we read Genesis 22 we should be looking for links with the sacrifice that God was to provide, around 2,000 years later. His only begotten son to die for the sins of the world. How marvellous and merciful are the ways of the LORD!
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
23:19 So there is no mention of Isaac. The next time we meet him in the record is in Gen 24:63 where he sees his wife. This is a figure of the death of Jesus and his return. The offering of Isaac answers to Jesus’ death. The seeing of Rebekah – his wife – answers to the time when Jesus returns to take his wife – the believers – to himself.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
Gen 22:1 - "did tempt<5254>"; "...that God did tempt Abraham" in respect to the action of sin God tempts nobody (James 1:13), but He does try all His servants and the Hebrew word used for "tempt" here is translated "prove" in Exo 15:25;Exo 16:4, etc.).
Gen 22:2 - "Moriah<4179>"; Gen 22:2,5,18 - the first mentions of "love[st]", "worship", and "obey[ed]".
Gen 22:9 - Isaac, like Christ, yielded to his father's will and allowed himself to be bound and layed on the altar.
Gen 22:11-12 - the "me" of V12 refers to God manifestation through an angel.
Gen 22:17 - "thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies" points to Christ who Samson in some respects echoes (Judg 16:3;Isa 9:6).
Gen 22:18 - all nations blessed; the blessing is the forgiveness of sins and salvation (Acts 3:26;Acts 26:6-8;Gal 3:8,27-29).
Gen 22:19 - "Beersheba<884>".
Gen 22:20 - "Milcah<4435>" means queen. Gen 22:20-24 - Abraham's brother Nahor had 12 sons.
Gen 22:23 - "Rebekah<7259>" was beautiful echoing the bride of Christ.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
Gen 23:2 - "Hebron<2275>".
Gen 23:2,16 - Sarah was the first believer we know of who was buried in the promised land and the full price paid with the metal silver refers to redemption.
Gen 23:9 - "Machpelah<4375>"
Gen 23:17 - "Mamre<4471>" refers to an oak grove (and perhaps reminds us of a later altar, rest at a tree, by Christ who continues to feed believers Gen 13:18;Gen 18:1-7).
Gen 23:19 - the cave of Machpelah, where Sarah was buried, is on the western slope of Hebron, and in 1862 the Prince of Wales was allowed to view the stone tombs of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Rekekah, and Leah.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
23:15-16 If our assessment is correct Abraham willingly was overcharged for the land. Doubtless he would not have sinned by haggling over the cost. However he did not. A greater principle was at stake. The land was a future promise, not something that he could buy at a good price on that day. Are we willing to allow the principles of the gospel to modify our behaviour even if the consequences are that we lose out materially?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
22:4 Abraham had been promised the land for an everlasting possession but notice how he views himself. He is a “stranger and sojourner”. Because he had received the promise he was looking to the future – not the here and now. He was looking to the resurrection and eternal life for the fulfilment of the promise. Hence he was a sojourner. Is this how we view ourselves? Or do we feel that we are really settled in the place where we live?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
23:6 Abraham w a sojourner in the land that God had promised to give him. However it is evident that Abraham never behaved in the land as if it was his. Notice how respectful the “children of Heth” are in their words to him. We should not assume that this is just eastern courtesy. If Abraham had alienated himself from them they would not have been so courteous towards him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
23:6-9 Whilst, it appears, the inhabitants of the land of Canaan recognised Abraham as a great man we see that Abraham still wanted to demonstrate that he was a “sojourner” in the land. If we have established ourselves amongst the society in which we live as a person with a degree of importance do we forget that we are “strangers and pilgrims” and rejoice in the status we are ascribed by those around us?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
GIVE AND IT WILL BE GIVEN TO YOU
Jesus said, "Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” (Luke 6:38).
This is exactly what happened to Abraham when he offered Isaac on the altar at God's request. Isaac was his promised son, the son for whom he had been waiting for a hundred years. He was Abraham's only son - especially now that Ishmael had been sent away. But when God asked Abraham to offer his son as a sacrifice, Abraham obeyed, tied up his son, the son he loved, and was about to kill him, obeying God to the letter, when he was stopped.
Abraham gave his one and only son at the request of God. Because of Abraham's great faith and obedience in giving the son he loved back to God, God's good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over was promised back to Abraham. "I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore." (Gen 22:17).
When we give, God's blessing and repayment to us will be much more than we could ever imagine.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Robert
22:5 I and the boy [Isaac] will go over there and worship and come again to you
How old was Isaac at this time? Josephus says 25 years old, but there is nothing stated in Scripture about his age. I suggest he was about 13 years old.
Consider the following:
21:6 shows that Isaac was old enough to bear the wood for the offering
21:7 suggests that Isaac was unaware of what was to follow but deferred to his father Abraham regarding obtaining the lamb
21:9 Isaac was bound by Abraham on the altar. Clearly Isaac was very trusting of his father Abraham and may have wondered, but not rebelled, at what was happening, not believing that Abraham would kill him.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
22:12 now I know that you fear God
"Now I know" doesn't suggest that Abraham's fear of God was previously in doubt, or wavering, or unknown to God - it just needed to be objectively demonstrated or outwardly proven. It is like when we require evidence to back up a claim that we might make in a public situation. This statement by the angel supports James' argument in James 2:21,22: Faith need to be tested so that it could be demonstrated. The faith that Abraham possessed in Genesis 15 that resulted in God declaring that God counted it to Abraham for righteousness (Genesis 15:6) was still untested and undemonstrated. Genesis 22 and the near slaying of Isaac provided that objective evidence.
LESSON: Our faith, though real, will likely receive testing by God so that it is obvious to everyone that our faith really does exist.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
26v.6 - innocency = niqqayown - only here and Gen20:5, Ps.73:13, Hos.8:5 and Amos 4:6(trans. cleanness). The Hosea reference suggests that it is a state which can be obtained by turning away from idolatry. Hos.8:4-6. As David described in one of yesterday's Psalms (24:3-6).
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
27v.11 - a plain path is a path on the plain - in the most desirable areas - the word (miyshowr - 04334) is used elsewhere mainly in this context, but is also translated 'righteous' and 'upright', so we have a vision of the kingdom here for the person to whom God teach his ways.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
Psa 26 - This is a very challenging Psalm. How many of us are able to speak like this to our God?
27:4 David's desire to dwell in the house of the Lord was partially fulfilled when he 2 Samuel 7:18 'sat before the Lord'. David had his heart's desire granted because he was a man after God's own heart.
28:3 The duplicity exhibited by the wicked is the same as having 'divers weights' [Deuteronomy 25:13] which is something the Lord hates Proverbs 20:10, 23. Of course one does not have to be a shop keeper to have divers weights. We all have divers weights when we say one thing and do another.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Psalm 26:10 - "In whose hands is mischief, and their right hand is full of bribes" - Margin: "filled with." The word here rendered "bribes" means properly "a gift," or "present;" and then, a gift offered to a judge to procure an unjust sentence. The general meaning is that the Psalmist did not desire to be identified either with men who openly committed crime, or with those who could be corrupted in the administration of justice. How different is the picture in this Psalm to the picture painted in Psalm 24:4, where the one who dwells in the Holy Hill of Zion has "clean hands and a pure heart." When our lives are consumed with the pursuit of politics, either in the workplace, or our place of worship, then it is impossible to treat people equally, and with the magnanimity that our live in Christ prescribes.
Psalm 27:12 - "...for false witnesses are risen up against me, and such as breathe out cruelty" - To "breathe out injustice" would imply that those who do so are full of such malignity, as Saul of Tarsus was before his conversion - Acts 9:1. Those who "breathe out injustice" wish to be in control of others, for they are not in control of themselves. Our Lord was in total control of Himself, and He only ever breathed out the Spirit of "wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD" - Isaiah 11:2. What spirit do we breathe out? Are we in control of ourselves? Or do we seek to control others by issuing and supporting edicts designed to this end:- that by controlling others, rather than ourselves, we retain the power?
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
26:12 So David sees that the ecclesia is the place to be when there are problems
for that is what the ‘congregation’ is.
27:2 David speaks in the past tense of his enemies. They ‘came’ – so David now speaks to his God after his deliverance. How often do we thin to thank and praise God when He had delivered us from a problem we have had?
Psa 28- in this Psalm David highlights his complete dependence upon his God. Whilst he does not want to go the way of sinners bur realises that unless God hears his prayers and responds to them he will fall. How often do we feel that we are in control of our own destiny? If we do think like that we forget our dependence upon our Father.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Psalm 27 A bold statement of David's confidence in God, combined with a humble prayer for strength, when life becomes difficult and threatened.
Psalm 28 This Psalm was probably written when David's life was endangered at the rebellion of Absalom, and when the Kingdom of Israel was under great strain.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
Psa 26 This Psalm is a statement of David's past and present intention to walk in God's Truth, also it is a prayer for the preservation of his life.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
Psa 27:5 For in the time of trouble he shall hide me in his pavilion: The word pavilion in Hebrew is succah which means booth. This passage echoes Succot, the feast of booths (Lev 23:39-43). This feast was established by the Lord as a remembrance of the Israelites' deliverance from Egypt. In deliverance, the Lord's hid (sheltered) them from harm.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
28:4 - This is not the language of passion or revenge. It is a prophecy that there will certainly come a day, when God will punish every man who persists in his evil deeds. 5:10, 59:12-13, 69:22-24
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Psa 27:1 gives an almost all-round picture of God filling David's life. God is his light - giving him the ability to see where he is going; God is his salvation - providing his certain hope for the future; and God is his strength, or his fortress - his safety and protection. We don't need anything else, if we can echo David's words.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
In giving due praise to God, and in an expression of his desire to serve the Lord, David offers this statement:
"LORD, I have loved the habitation of Your house, And the place where your glory dwells." (Psa 26:8).
Of all people in scripture, David was the best placed to sincerely praise God in this way. David did love the house of God... or would have, had it been built! What a strange statement for David to make. How could David love the house of God if it wasn't there yet? How could David say he loved the place where God's glory dwelt, when that glory did not appear until the time of his son? (26:8, 2Kin 8:10-11).
In Psalm 27 David continues his theme. Here we see in v4-5 that he sought to dwell in the house of God. In v5 he declares that God will hide him in that place, and save him from trouble. But since when has God's temple been a refuge? How could David take refuge in an unbuilt house! What's more, in 26:8 we read that he had been there, and he had loved inhabiting it.
In 1Chron 17:1-8 we have the request of David that he might build God a house. The reply of God was "haven't I always been with you anyway?" The comment on this in Acts 7:46-49 is "the Most High does not dwell in temples made with hands". We, like David, can forget that God's concern is not with material things, but with spiritual. God's dwelling place is in heavenly places, and not in earthly. So how had David dwelt with God? Every time David was in trouble, he put his trust in God. His faith and hope was in God. In God. David's salvation was in God, and none other. His trust was in heavenly things and not earthly. David lived in faith. He lived in faith in God. Notice the underlining?
A reading of 27:1-6 shows us that whenever David was in trouble, he fled for refuge in God. It is this that is defined as dwelling in the house of the LORD. God himself is a refuge. Our trust in Him is a concrete and solid thing. The bunker or tower that is God is more real, more impenetrable, more un-assailable than anything earthly. When one trusts in the Lord that safety is so sure and so complete that one is actually in a heavenly tower, house, or habitation. V5 "He shall hide me in His pavilion". It is by faith that one enters into that house.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Rob
26:5 What are our feelings about those who work evil? Do we watch what they do on the Television? Do we associate with them in their activities thinking that we will not be affected by their actions because we are ‘strong’?
27:2-4 David had been encompassed by his enemies. We might be forgiven for expecting him to desire to be delivered from them. But no, David saw deliverance as being in God’s temple. The reason? God’s enemies do not go there so one is safe in His presence!
28:1 David’s concern is that his fellowship with his God might be destroyed – that he might not hear God’s word. Whilst our Father does not speak directly to us He does speak to us through His word. Failing to ‘listen’ to Him by reading will have as it’s consequence that we will not hear him and lose contact with Him completely.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
27:8 David desired to be in God’s house. He was granted his request – 1Chron 17:16 - it was because he responded to God’s call to him ‘seek ye my face’
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
26:3 David, recognising God’s ‘loving-kindness’ in his life is moved to walk ‘in thy truth’. How often does our appreciation of what He has done for us cause us to modify our actions?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
26:2 In saying ‘Examine ... and prove me’ David is asking for God to chasten him. He is not making some arrogant claim that God will not find any fault in him,
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
26:1 The word integrity is misunderstood and misused in the modern world. People today use it to suggest that the one who has it is a good person. But, the standard of good is a worldly one which falls far short of the divine standard. Actually, integrity means honesty. If one is honest in keeping stated principles, ideals, or goals, then that person has integrity. But, this can have negative applications also. For example, if one believes that robbing people is OK. (amoral) and participates fully in that activity, then he is honest to his beliefs - he has integrity. In v.1, the word integrity comes from the Hebrew tom which carries an understanding of completeness while denoting a sense of innocence. This shows that David fully worshipped Yahweh while maintaining avoidance of wrongdoing.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
28:5 Today, most people do not recognize Yahweh, nor give credence to His creative wonders. They are only interested in their worldly activities (28:4). They have no future.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
The being taken up by God when forsaken by family, accused by false witnesses and repaying evil for good reminds us of what Christ endured - Psa 27:10,12;35:11-12;Matt 26:60-61;Mark 14:55-61;3:21,31-35.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
26:6 In saying that he has washed his hands in innocency David is saying that he is not guilty of the blood of any dead man, appealing to the language of Deut 21:6 where the elders of the city declare their position about a dead body found near to their city.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
26:2 reins literally means kidneys. The word survives in modern English in the word renal - the renal unit is where you would go for treatment to your kidneys. The ESV translates the second part of the verse as test my heart and mind, conveying the idea of trying the whole being.
26:3 David walked in truth, v12 he stood in an even, (i.e. a safe place - contrast with v1) and he declined to sit with the vain (v4), or the wicked (v5). Compare with a similar progression found in Psa 1
26:6 I will wash my hands - compare with the actions of Pilate in Matt 27:24
Ken Trelfer [Rockingham Forest, UK] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Ken
27:12 is clearly Messianic. Virtually the same words occur in Mark 14:57
Ken Trelfer [Rockingham Forest, UK] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Ken
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
28:3 “draw me not away” shows David shared the sentiments in the Lord’s Prayer – Matt 6:13. Is this our prayer? Or do we think that we have the strength to resist temptations and so do not ask God to direct our steps away from temptation?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Psa 26:1 - "slide" ( <4571> Heb word "ma'ad", means "to waver, make to shake, slide, slip, to totter") - Jesus never slipped.
Psa 26:3 - NIV "...I walk continually in your truth" - Jesus walked continually in God's truth.
Psa 26:4-5 - "sat...sit" ( <3427> Heb word "yashab" means to dwell, remain, sit, abide, to marry) - yet David had Ahithophel and Jesus had Judas; Jesus met sinners but as the bridegroom he wasn't/isn't married to them (Psa 1:1).
Psa 26:6-8 - The setting could be David after having brought the ark into Jerusalem; it describes an innocent priest on duty at the altar and temple - true especially of the one David forshaddowed who became priest, altar and sacrifice.
Psa 26:8 - Jesus purified the habitation of God's house on two distinct occasions (1st occasion - John 2:12-22. 2nd occasion - Matt 21:12-17;Mark 11:15-19;Luke 19:45-48).
Psa 26:9 - Christ wasn't a sinner nor did he shed the blood of others.
Psa 26:10 - could this have some application to Judas?
Psa 26:11 - NIV "...I lead a blameless life" - no question that Christ lead a blameless life and was redeemed.
Psa 26:12 - NIV "...the great assembly..." perhaps of the redeemed in the kingdom age (Psa 22:25;40:9;68:26;89:5) when Christ rules the earth from Jerusalem?
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
Psa 27:2 - "...they stumbled and fell" (could this have an application to John 18:6 ?).
Psa 27:12 - "...false witnesses are risen against me..." (Mark 14:56-57;Psa 35:11-13;Isa 59:3-4).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
Psa 28:2 - "...I lift up my hands..." (is this in crucifixion, prayer, or both? - 1Tim 2:8).
Psa 28:3 - "...who speak cordially with their neighbors but harbor malice..." - betrayers, hypocrites.
Psa 28:8 - NIV "...his anointed one" - perhaps this has application to Christ.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
27:11 David was a mighty and powerful king. However, despite his power, he recognised that God was the one who he needed in order to be saved from his enemies.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
TRUSTING GOD
As Sharon and I were discussing an issue of faith that we have been challenged by, I made the statement that it is easy to trust God, it's just a little more difficult to put what we need to do into action. Sharon quickly corrected me, saying that if we can't put it into action, then we don't trust as we should. She is right, and our personal struggle between faith and action has now moved into action.
As we learn about God, read the Bible and hear the examples of faith such as Noah, Abraham, David, and so on, it is quite easy to gain a knowledge of what it means to trust in God. Without that knowledge being tested we might think that we trust in him. But when the testing comes, when we need to act outside of our own logic and experience, stepping out in faith and truly trusting God with all our hearts as well as with our minds, can be a huge challenge.
Trusting God from the heart as well as the mind is what David did. He said, "The LORD is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped." (Psa 28:7) So let's grow our faith and trust in God from our heads to our hearts, so that we can put our trust in him into action.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Robert
28:4 In asking God to give his enemies according to their wickedness shows David understood the fact that vengeance belonged to God – Deut 32:35
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
28:7 Notice the use of the word “heart” a response to God is not merely an intellectual exercise. It has to both affect our emotions and stir an emotional response to the things we have learned of Him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
Psalm 28
In v7 David call the LORD his strength and shield. God revealed Himself to Abraham in the same way:
"Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward." Gen 15:1
In contrast, the shield of Saul was no use to him for protection:
"the shield of the mighty is vilely cast away, the shield of Saul, as though he had not been anointed with oil." 2Sam 1:21
His comment of Saul is that it was as if he hadn't been anointed. So is the Psalm perhaps also a comment on Saul in the day that David was finally delivered from him, because the Psalm goes on to say:
"The Lord is their strength, and he is the saving strength of his anointed." Psa 28:8
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Rob
We all have enemies, whether we realize it or not. We all have troubles, afflictions, sufferings and hardships (cf. Job 14:1), and so we all need strength, endurance and patience (cf. Rom 15:4). This Psalm shows us how to handle our difficulties, and instead of talking about all the things that go wrong in our lives, we need to focus on the fact that the LORD is there to help us. This is experiencing our faith, and the level to which we do this determines the level of our faith.
The Psalmist wrote he desired “one thing,” and the apostle Paul also said something very similar to this. He wrote in Phil 3:13, “… this one thing I do…” Paul shows us in Rom Rom 5:1-5 how our problems shrink as our faith deepens. During times of trouble, we need to focus on one thing – God. What is the first thing most people tend to do when things go wrong? For one thing, they start missing Sunday Meetings, or they stop praying altogether because they are just too overwhelmed (cf. James 5:13; Phil 4:6,7). Yet, we are told to do the very opposite. The Psalmist sought refuge from his problems in God’s tabernacle, the LORD’s house, where he desired to dwell (Psa 27:4). Too often we inquire without seeking, dwelling, or beholding. We want answers from God, but not God, Himself.
Without question, trouble moves us; the real question is, which way will we move? If we let our problems come between God and us, we will move further from God. If we put our problems behind us, we will move closer to God. We can use our problems to push us closer to God, or we can use our problems to drive us further away from Him. It all depends where we put our problems - ahead or behind.
We can always tell from peoples’ body language when they are feeling really down; their head is drooped, but the Psalmist tells us that knowing whom we serve and approaching God in heartfelt and passionate prayer will cause our heads to be lifted up and to rejoice in singing praises to the Father. We need to look up to be lifted up. This is not easy when we hurt the most, and it is usually at times like this when we least want to sing songs of praise to God, that we need to do it the most. Yes, our Father will with His loving hands lift up our heads, and when He does, we begin to look at our problems and hurts from an entirely different perspective.
God invites us to seek Him out in times of trouble and submit to Him, and when we do, it is our way of responding to God. Isn’t it amazing that sometimes we go to God as a last resort, when all else fails! We all get these moments of discouragement, I know I have, I feel disappointed, prayer feels hopeless, and my faith is like a flickering flame. In one way, this is a good thing because it causes us to reflect on the level of our faith. It is at that point we may turn to look inwardly and wonder “what is wrong with me?”
This Psalm reveals that genuine faith is actually the believer’s response to the omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent God who comes near to us in times of our problems. We sometimes have this attitude that if we muster up enough faith, God will intervene and act on our behalf, but this Psalm teaches otherwise. Someone once said, “An unexamined life is not worth living.” You see, sometimes we don’t get help straight away, and do we hate to wait! It is the hardest thing to do when we are hurting now and it seems that God simply is not there. How wrong we are because it is precisely during these times that God is and says, “Seek ye my face.”
The Psalmist tells us to be courageous, God will strengthen us, but we must also be patient - wait on the LORD. The One who is the strength of our life while in the land of life, also wants to be the strength of our heart. We trust in people who let us down, sometimes we trust in our own abilities, and we get hurt. The Psalmist’s advice is not to faint, or grow weary (cf. Gal 6:9), to seek out God who is our refuge and our strength (Psa 46:1), believe in what God has said and seek Him, rather than others and not try to fight our battles alone.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Valerie
27:4 This Psalm, it seems, relates to David bringing the ark to Zion. We know that his desire was to bring the ark to the place of God’s choosing – Psa 132:2-5 – but it was a lot more than just wanting to the place the ark in Zion. He wanted to be personally involved in the matter, having fellowship with God. In short bringing the ark to Zion was not just a doctrine to be accepted, it was something that affected his whole life. He wanted fellowship with God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
27:1 David’s confidence, against the difficulties he faced in life is amazing. Or maybe his confidence is because he has experienced so many difficulties and been delivered from them. Do we see the difficulties we experience in life and our continued survival as an evidence of God’s care for us?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
Psa 27:5 Pavillion- It is always interesting to consider the English dictionary for the meaning of these words and a pavillion is used for shelter, refreshment (normally a tent or temporary structure) and in cricket a place to change.
The Hebrew trelates to booth. So Yahweh will shelter us in his Booth. The feast of booths meant the Israelite was to dwell in a booth for 7 days. Lev 23:43
It was a reminder of the temporary cover provided a temporary covering for Israel in the wilderness when they seperated from Egypt reminding them of a future time when a permant dwelling would be provided.
But scripture teaches us that dwelling in booths could also be a spiritual resting place. Gen 33:17
Here Jacob builds pavillions for his cattle, but it is the place where he built that is interesting, Shalem in Shechem. Shechem means peace or rest, but it wasnt just a physical place that Jacob sought it was spiritual rest or state of mind.
Jacob sought peace of mind in a place of peace by building booths.
Josh 24:1-5 we see Joshua reminding Israel; of the promises Yahweh had made to Abraham in v3, Jacob in v4, and Moses in v5. Joshua then was looking back at those promises at Shechem.
So Shechem then was good place to build pavillions it would remind Joshua, Jacob, Moses of the promises Yahweh made to them, it would bring them peace of mind.
David in bulding pavillions also sought peace of mind (shechem).
The lord Jesus Christ when he sought peace of mind is recorded also, John 4:3 (wearied means more than tired it is related to grief)to remember the booths that could provide shelter and the promises would have been a comfort to him, however the Lord Jesus Christ was kingdom minded he looked forward and Zech 14:16 is that furture promise and place of shelter for us, because for now we can only get temporary shelter until the kingdom comes with its permanent shelter and I am sure that is what David looked forward to also!
stephen cox [Sedgley UK] Comment added in 2017 Reply to stephen
DIFFICULT TIMES (Psalm 27)
"The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the LORD is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?"
We live in difficult times today. There is much fear and concern not only about the future, there is fear of the here and now. Yet the beautiful thing is that God is eternal, and the principles of His Word do not change - Even in a changing society. And we can take great comfort in this.
In the 27th Psalm, David presents several principles that enabled him to handle difficult times in his life. These principles will help us deal with whatever may come our way as well. With God we have an anchor that holds us steadfast in the midst of the storms of life. Our confidence is in God and that He will accomplish what we has promised. May the Lord guide our footsteps to His kingdom.
"Trust in the LORD with all thine heart ... and he shall direct thy paths."
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
Nick Kendall [In Isolation] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Nick
I WOULD LIKE TO BE...
Where would you like to be right now? A tropical island holiday sounds quite good to me at the moment, having just come though a long winter. Maybe you enjoy going to the gym, to the cinema, shopping, by a lake, in the forest, at the beach or even at work. I'm sure you can picture a place you would love to be.
David had a favorite place too. This is what he said: "I love the house where you live, O Lord, the place where your glory dwells." (Psa 26:8).
Was God's house on your list of favorite places? Do you love going in with praise, hearing the word of God read out loud, being inspired or taught by the messages that are given? Do you long for that time of intimate fellowship with God?
If we are honest, many of us would still rather choose somewhere else.
What we need to do is to grow our desire to be with God in his house. Get to know him. Grow to love him and develop a longing desire to be be with him.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Robert
A LEAPING HEART
What has God been doing in your life this week? It would be really encouraging if more of us talked about what God has been doing in our lives. If you told me how God has been working, it may help to build up my faith as well. And then, if we started to talk about it, imagine the excitement we could grow!
David said, "The LORD is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped. My heart leaps for joy and I will give thanks to him in song." (Psa 28:7). "My heart leaps for joy," David said.
It all starts with recognizing what God has done in our lives. When we begin to see His work in our lives as something extra-ordinary, it will make our hearts leap for joy too! It does for me!
So let's look for the ways God has answered prayer, has done miracles, or has moved circumstances, and rejoice in them, giving thanks to God for all he has done.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Robert
28:7-8 Notice twice the Psalmist speaks of God being his strength and this will be, ultimately, his salvation. If only we could have such confidence then we would be less likely to rely on our own strength.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
28:5 To avoid being like the “wicked” we should always reflect on the way that God has worked in the past. It is His past actions that give us the faith to believe that he will keep His word for the future.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
28:1 Whilst we might think that people called God their rock on many occasions it is only David who actually uses the phrase to speak of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
Psa 26:2 - "prove<5254>", "reins[<3629> figuratively it refers to the mind]", "heart<3820>".
Psa 26:4 - "vain<7723>"
Psa 26:5 - "congregation<6951>"; V12 - "congregations<4721>"
Psa 26:9 - "soul<5315>", "life<2416>"
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
Psa 27:4 - "house<1004>", "temple<1964>", "tabernacle<168>"
Psa 27:11 - "Teach me your way, O Lord" (we need to be taught, David needed to be taught, and Jesus needed to be taught Prov 4:3,4,13; Isa 7:14-15)
Psa 27:14 - "Wait for the Lord" (we must be patient Luke 18:1-7;2Pet 3:3-9).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
Psa 28:1 - "my rock[<6697> figuratively means my refuge]".
Psa 28:3 - "those who do evil, who speak cordially with their neighbors but harbor malice in their hearts" (don't be a phoney or a hypocrite for God knows our inner being).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
27:4 For David it was dwelling I the house of the Lord. For us it should be the desire to spend time in fellowship with those who share our beliefs. Do we view the company of fellow believers’ as something that we would not wish to give up for anything?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
28:1-2 It would appear that the last thing that David wanted was to lose contact with his God. Hence his request “be not silent”. Whilst we do not get direct answers to our prayers and requests we can ensure that our God is not “silent”. The Father speaks to us through His word. If we are not reading it we are, in effect, making our Father “silent” to us.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
28:3 Jesus and James instruct us to be honest in our speaking Matt 5:37, James 5:17. Is this the way that we always thing or are there times when we are at least economical with the truth?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
28:2 the word translated “oracle <1687> is only used elsewhere of a location in Solomon’s temple – though it is related to the word translated “word”. Clearly David understood the principle that motivated Solomon to put the ark where he did.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
v.31 - I'm sure I would have been just like Peter. So where should we turn to try to dispel our doubts and build our faith? Try these passages. Ps.138:7, Isa.63:12, Mark 11:23, Jas.1:6-8 (faith is single-minded) or back with Abraham in Gen.22:14
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
John the Baptist had said of Jesus 'He must increase, but I must decrease.' [John 3:30]. The death of John is only referred to here incidentally to explain Herod's perplexity. Thus John passed off the scene with no mention - demonstrating the ascendancy of Jesus against the background of John's decrease.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
:3-12 The account of the death of John recounts events which had happened earlier. They are included here to provide an explanation of Herod's unease about Jesus. As such we see that Herod was both superstitious and had a high regard for John.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Matthew 14:3 - What a record of contrasts this is. Herod was an immoral man, an adulterer - John was upright before God, and a eunuch. Herod locked John in prison - John, by his great message, would have set Herod free of his imprisoning lusts.
|
CONTRASTS |
BETWEEN |
|
|
HEROD'S BIRTHDAY PARTY |
& |
CHRIST FEEDING 5,000 FAMILIES |
|
Unlawful Wife/Adulterer |
|
Bride in Prospect/Eunuch |
|
Palace of Macchaerus |
Green Mountain Slope |
|
|
Shore of Dead Sea |
|
Shore of Galilee Sea |
|
Feast of Hatred |
|
Feast of Love |
|
Immoral Party |
|
Frugal Meal |
|
Rich & Influential |
|
Poor & Insignificant |
|
Herod “The Fox” - Adulterer |
|
Christ “The Harmless” - Pure |
|
Egotistical Offer |
|
Divine Principles |
|
Drunken Stupor |
|
Sweet Fellowship |
|
Feast of Death |
|
Feast of Life |
|
Head on a Plate at the end of party |
|
12 Baskets of Bread left at end of meal |
|
|
|
|
If any wish to pursue a fuller study of this greatest of incidents recorded of our Lord, I am happy to e-mail a copy of a short study entitled "He Gave Them Bread From Heaven To Eat." Send your request to the link below or click here to read it on line.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
14:2 That Herod spoke to his servants about Jesus maybe explains, partly, why Chuza’s steward’s wife (Luke 8:3) ministered unto Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
:4 - Like his 'predecessor' Elijah, John too had to stand before the King and speak words of condemnation. e.g. 1Kings 21:17-19
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Matt 14:28-31 It is certainly comforting to know that if we cry out to the LORD to be saved as Peter did here, to know that Christ is there with His hands stretched out to catch us as we fall.
Matt 14:36 This is the second time in the past few days that we have read of the sick reaching out to touch the hem of Christ's garment to be made perfectly whole.( The woman with the issue of blood) Matt 9:20-22
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
V.6 The name of the Herodias' daughter is not mentioned but Josephus suggests it is Salome. She and her famous Dance of the Seven Veils have become popularized in the art world.
V.36 Touching the hem of Christ's garment was sufficient for healing. The example of the woman diseased with an issue of blood also comes readily to mind (Matt 9:20-22). The Greek word translated hem is kraspedon and implies a border or fringe.
Malachi also makes reference to this when he talks of Christ: But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall (Mal 4:2).
The word, wings in Hebrew is kanaph which means extremity or edge, particularly of a garment, and thus a hem. Kraspedon is equivalent to kanaph.
Israelites had to wear blue on the borders (kanaph) of their garments (Num 15:38). This colour represents heaven, the throne of Yahweh, from whence emanates all commandment and power. Thus, the heavenly power to heal is embodied in the blue border of the garment.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
v.15-20 Here we have an incident that not only showed the wonder of God's power and Jesus' ability to wield it, but also set up a deputation of the Scribes and Pharisees in the next chapter (see tomorrow's comment). On many occasions Jesus went out of his way to antagonise the Pharisees and show them up for what they were.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.31 We have a strong exhortation for each one of us in this verse. Not only do we have the comfort of knowing that our master is always there to assist us when we ask, but also we can see the responsibility we all have to help our Brethren and Sisters when they cry out for help. We have to ask ourselves, are we always there, and are we always willing to help, regardless of what the need may be?
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
14:13-14 On hearing of the death of John Jesus must have considered what fate awaited him. This might explain why he sought solitude. However, when he saw the multitudes, he ministered to them. How often do we ignore our brethren and sister's needs when we are in distress? Jesus didn't.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
V.31 Strictly speaking it would not have been necessary for Jesus to reach out his hand to rescue Peter. A simple command would have been enough. Reaching out to assist Peter would have proven more reassuring. Peter would also felt his master's love also.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
a) First of all, a little point for Sunday School teachers. (See Matt 14:15-21). Think of this sum:
5 thousand people
5 loaves
2 fishes. Add these together
= 12 baskets of food left over! This makes an easy way for children (and adults) to remember the parable.
b) Even Jesus Christ needed quiet, personal time. At the death of John the Baptist, He wanted to be quiet, (Matt 14:12-14). He knew that this spoke of His Own death. But when He saw the great multitude of people He put His own feelings behind Him, and had compassion on the people, and healed them. He really was a lovely Man.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to David
Matt 14:29 - "Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore"
Only Matthew records this incident, and it was a valuable lesson to learn: With the power of Christ, they could do the impossible.
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
22-27 In these few verses we once again have a lesson which can be applied to our lives. The disciples appear to be left on there own, Christ has left them (physically) and gone up the mountain to pray. During this time a storm came up, and the twelve were afraid. Christ has also left each one of us in a physical sense, we all have faced a storm of one sort, where we were afraid. We must always remember, like Peter, if we cry out, our pleas will not go unheard. What a wonderful blessing!
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
14 There is a powerful contrast between the end of Matthew 13 and the beginning of this chapter. Matthew Matt 13:56-58 shows Jesus’ countrymen in unbelief. So he did not ‘many mighty works’. Here we see, by contrast, Herod the Idumean, looking at the work of Jesus, from a distance, and concluding that something special was happening!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
DEGREES OF FAITH
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Robert
14:1-2 Herod, on hearing about Jesus’ miracles, slips into superstition rather than wishing to enquire more about Jesus’ works.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
UNDER RESOURCED
Everyone has needs that have to be met. Sometimes God brings people with needs far greater than anything we could ever imagine being able to deal with. Yet in some way God anticipates us being able to help out with meeting those needs somehow. We are told that "We are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." (Eph 2:10) So when opportunities, problems or people with needs come knocking at our door, they are probably one of the good works God has prepared for us to do.
The disciples of Jesus faced a huge need. It was far greater than they could ever imagine coping with. They were surrounded by perhaps ten or twenty thousand people who were all hungry. The local fast food shop was not prepared for an order that big, and neither did the disciples have the money to pay for it. But Jesus had said, "They do not need to go away. You give them something to eat." (Matt 14:16)
Realising how unprepared they were for the challenge of such huge proportions, they apologetically said to Jesus, "We have here only five loaves of bread and two fish." (v.17) This small offering was given to Jesus. With a great miracle their offering was enough to fill the need.
We may not feel we have much to offer either, but whatever we have to offer can be increased immeasurably with the blessing of God in the hands of Jesus. Let us not give up when we are faced with needs seemingly greater than what we can cope with. Instead let us give what we have and let God's blessing do the rest.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Robert
14:2 Herod’s ‘he is risen from the dead’ provides a valuable insight into the mind of this man. He had already recognised that John was a good man and had sought to hear his message, even when he was in prison. Mark 6:20 Now here is an indication that he believed in the resurrection – though his belief was rather muddled.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
Two evening events took place: the feeding of the multitude (v.15); and later when Jesus went up a mountain to pray (v.23). The word for evening in Greek is opsios. There are two meanings for opsios: late afternoon and nightfall. Clearly, the first evening event was late afternoon (3 p.m. or later). The second evening event was nightfall (about 6 p.m.). The night was divided into four watches: (1) 6 - 9 p.m. (2) 9 p.m. - Midnight (3) Midnight - 3 a.m. (4) 3 - 6 a.m. And so, we see that Jesus walked on the sea sometime between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. (v.25).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
There are various similarities between John the Baptist and Samson, not least of which is the way they died. Both of these men died because of scheming women. See in v6-8 how much planning must have gone in to this public show of John's death. In v3 it appears that it was Herodias who asked for John's imprisonment in the first place (Mark 6:19-20 makes this clear).
So Herod appears blameless of John's death. Or was he? His rash oath caused John's death, and his pride didn't allow him to overrule this oath "because of those who sat with him" (v9). We should be careful what we say, because we can never take back what proceeds from our mouth (James 3:5-6).
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Rob
14:14 It is easy to take it for granted that Jesus was ‘moved with compassion’. However this attitude was not common amongst the religious leaders. There were not above using the sick to try to trap Jesus. Jesus’ behaviour manifested the attitude of the true shepherd which contrasted with the false shepherds that the leaders were.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
14:23 Doubtless Jesus went into the mountain to pray because of the temptation to submit to the desires of the people to make him king.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
14:24-25 The way in which Jesus walked on the waves shows that he was showing God’s qualities for Job describes God in this way –Job 9:8. Thus we see that Jesus’ walking on the water here was not a mere convenience in order to get to the disciples. Rather it was a manifestation that he was come doing God’s works.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
14:9 The inspired wise man advises us not to vow rashly as such vows have consequences. – Ecc 5:2. Jesus’ counsel is not to make oaths in the first place – Matt 5:34
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
14:4 John’s reproof of Herod indicates that God’s laws are applicable to all – whether circumcised Jews or not.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
14:8 Given that Herodias’ daughter knew what to ask Herod for we can conclude that Herodias has planned the whole thing – the dance so that Herod would be pleased enough to offer her something.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
14:28 The call of Jesus to “come unto me” is seen in John 6:37 after the parallel account of the feeding of the 5,000.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
14:8 The detail of the subterfuge of mother and daughter to entrap the husband – Herod – is tasteless. Such behaviour – entrapment and scheming – is not part of a rue marriage where the “two become one”. As such openness should be the watchword between wife and husband,
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
Matt 14:23 Away from the fevered life and contentious rancour of the city, alone upon the mountain top, in the calmness of the night, withdrawn from the irritating contact of prosperous wickedness, he could forget “the contradiction of sinners,” and “in prayer all night to God,” draw deep comforts from the realisation that despite the unbelief and repudiation of men, God was really his strength, his shield, his glory, his defence, the lifter up of his head. This was the exercise of his faith.He was driven upon the resources of faith as much as we.
- Brother Roberts
Nick Kendall [In Isolation] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Nick
14:13 A practical point. Jesus and the disciples were in a ship moving across the Sea of Galilee. The crowds did not know where he was going but clearly followed round the coast, keeping the small rowing boat in view. Such was their commitment to listening to Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
14:20 in that they were all filled and there was food left over matches exactly how God takes care of His animal creation. There is always more fruit produced on trees than the birds actually need.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
14:25The “fourth watch of the nights” would have between 3.00 and 6.00 so depending how far into the watch it was it may well have been just getting light enabling them to see Jesus. As Jesus sent the disciples away in the evening – John 6:16-17 Jesus had spent a night alone in the mountain. The indication is that he was praying for most of that time.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
Matt 14:3-4 - marriage to one's brother's wife, while the brother was still living, was forbidden under the law of Moses (Lev 18:16); Herod Antipas abandoned his own wife and lured Herodias away from her husband who also happened to be his brother.
Matt 14:11 - "damsel [<2877> used in the KJV is closely related to the word "raven"<2876> which refers to an unclean bird of prey]".
Matt 14:15,19,23;Mark 6:39 - "evening[<3798> can refer to afternoon or the beginning of nightfall]", this would seem to be an allusion to the 2 Passover evenings in a day plus the green grass is during Spring when Passover takes place.
Matt 14:19 - the 5 loaves (5 suggests mercy, grace, or life on the 5th day of creation while the bread suggests flesh) and 2 fish (2 may suggest Jew and Gentile while fish may represent blood) so we have Christ giving thanks for this as he did at the last supper memorial feast.
Matt 14:20 - 12 basketfuls left perhaps suggests the 12 tribes of Israel and governmental perfection that will soon occur.
Matt 14:21 - the 5000 men besides women and children fed echoes the the spiritual food and eternal life giving bread from heaven (John 6:26-27,31-41,47-53)
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
Matt 14:25 - the fourth watch between 3 to 6am has Jesus walking on the water seems to suggest the about to dawn resurrection; Jesus has sin and death underneath his feet unlike the Egyptians from the land of bondage to sin and death who drowned in the Red Sea; Jesus is figuratively walking in newness of life and extending a saving hand to Peter.
Matt 14:26 - "spirit<5326>".
Matt 14:30 - we too will sink like a rock if we become distracted and take our focus away from Jesus.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Charles
14:9 The only way that we can know that Herod was “sorry” for his promise is through God telling the gospel writer this. There are many times in scripture where we learn of people’s thoughts – things that can only be known by God. A little detail but it reinforces our understanding that the bible is God’s word – not the words of man.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
14:20 Often we discuss why there were twelve baskets full of fragments. Whatever the reason for the number 12 there is an overriding point being made. God always provides far more than any of us need. This was true of the manna – that which was left, by implication, melted as the sun rose – Exo 16:21
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
14:16-17 The disciples’ reaction demonstrates that they still had not grasped the implication that Jesus would not ask them to do what they were unable to do! Their reaction shows that they were simply thinking in practical terms.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
14:22 Whilst we do not learn here why Jesus sent the disciples away John 6:15 so we see the value of comparing the different records of the same events in scripture.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter