AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
3 v. 5 - Here is the first time that we are shown the stuff that Moses is made of - he has no confidence in human terms - borne out by the rest of the chapter - and yet here was one who was to get closer to God than anyone before him (see note on Rom. 9 below), who was possibly only exceeded in this closeness by Jesus himself after him. His atoning work for the people by his repeated trips to the mountain demonstrates this closeness, to save the people Exo.19:12,21. Even Aaron could not - Lev.10:3. The exhortation for us in the context of Exo. 3:5 comes in Eccles. 5:1. This surely means 'develop the mind of Jesus'.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
4 v.4 - Further bravery here from Moses. Would you pick up a snake by its tail? In this I admit to absolute cowardice and substantial fear. I'd like to think I would do it if God told me to do it - but it would take a massive amount of faith. Where I live, there are no snakes, so I have no experience, but some of you who read this will live in parts of the world where there are snakes. My guess is that you will feel even more strongly than I do that this act of Moses was one of extreme faith in God's protective power, and it is glanced over in the record as if picking up a snake by its tail was something Moses did every day!
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
3:17 I will bring you out Genesis 15:14
3:17 affliction Genesis 15:13
So in proclaiming the Yahweh name to Moses, who clearly was knowledgeable about what had been said to the fathers, God is showing Moses that deliverance from Egypt was but a manifestation of the work of God. The full manifestation, as we know, was in Jesus who bore the Father's name.
4:24-26 seems to be completely irrelevant to the theme of deliverance being developed in Exodus. However the issue of circumcision and Genesis 17 is intimately connected with the theme. We will now see additional links to Genesis 17 and the covenant of circumcision.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
There are a number of verbal links between Moses at the burning bush and Gideon.
Exodus
|
Language
|
Judges
|
burned with fire
|
Judg 6:21 | |
see this great sight
|
Judg 6:17 | |
Hid his face … afraid
|
Judg 6:22 | |
heard their cry
|
Judg 6:7 | |
mayest bring forth my people
|
Judg 6:14 | |
I will send thee
|
Judg 6:14 | |
Who am I
|
Judg 6:15 | |
I will be with thee
|
Judg 6:16 |
4:22 This is the first time that Israel are presented as God's 'firstborn' as such this language and the idea that Israel is God's son passes into Biblical use. So whenever we read of Israel as God's son we should think of the deliverance from Egypt. A typical use which makes this point very clearly is Hosea 11:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
The Lord answers Moses' question this way: "I am who I am". French it translates: "I am the one who is". Both languages use the present tense of the infinite of the verb 'to be'. Hebrew translates: "I will be who I will be". Hebrew language uses the future tense of the infinite of verb 'to be'. The infinite of verb 'to be' is: Yahweh, the Jews say it without the vowels 'a' and 'e': YHVH (pronounced short and sharp). There is no present tense in this verb, only past and future, and it is meant to stress the Lord is limitless.
Usually, when 'thou' is used in the AV Bible, the Hebrew version will translate it as 'Yahweh'. Modern versions translate 'thou' as 'you', so we miss this valuable lesson. 'Thou' is an old English word, and during that time, 'thou' was used only when talking to a member of the family, because it implied 'dear' or 'darling'. Some languages like: German, French, Holland etc. Still keep this personal form of address to use within their families. They also have a polite form of address, for use with non-family members, eg: German personal 'du', polite 'zie'; French personal 'tu', polite 'vous'. If you check a German Bible for example, you will see the Lord uses the subject pronoun 'du', when He talks to Israel; sometimes God is angry with Israel, yet He will still uses the pronoun 'du', the implication is, no matter what the Israelites did, God still considered them a part of His family. It is helpful to keep in mind, that we are God's children, and blessed to be so, even though sometimes, we let our feelings get the better of us.
Beryl Butler [London West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Beryl
Exodus 3:1 - "The backside" - i. e. "to the west of the district." Among the Hebrews the East is before a man, the west behind him, the south and north on the right and left hand.
Exodus 3:2 - "out of the midst of a bush" - The wild acacia or thorn, with which that desert abounds, and which is generally dry and brittle, so much so, that at certain seasons, a spark might kindle a district far and wide into a blaze. A fire, therefore, being in the midst of such a desert bush was a "great sight." It is generally supposed to be a symbol of the Israelites' condition in Egypt - oppressed by a grinding servitude and a bloody persecution, and yet, in spite of the cruel policy that was bent on annihilating them, they continued as numerous and thriving as ever. The reason was "God was in the midst of them." The symbol seems also to represent the present state of the Jews, as well as of the Ecclesia generally in the world. Or perhaps the thorny, prickly bush represents Moses himself, despised and rejected of men, but one through whom God was going to speak, yet Moses would not be consumed.
Exodus 3:13 - "What is his name" - "What is his reputation". Every deity in Egypt had a reputation, and a certain aspect of life that they were supposed to look after. The scene is being set for a battle of Deities - Egypt’s many gods vs Yahweh God of Israel
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
ch.3 - The memorial name of God appears to be a parallelism even though it doesn't come across terribly well in the English AV - the Hebrew definitely suggests the following rendering:
'This is my name for ever,
This is my memorial for ever'
which can obviously be paraphrased as:
'This is my memorial name for ever and ever'
I just thought it was interesting since this added emphasis on 'for ever' implies what I believe, that God's name will always be the same and will never change.
Ibrahim David [Cardiff East (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Ibrahim
3:8 That God had ‘come down to deliver’ marks a powerful contrast with Him going down to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. (Gen 18:21)
4:1 Moses could be forgiven for thinking that Israel would not believe him because they did not believe that he was the deliverer when he slew the Egyptian 40 years earlier – see Acts 7:25 when he had called upon them to turn from their idol worship (Eze 20:7)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Exo 3:12 God promised Moses that he would worship God in Israel’s company on this Mountain
(Horeb = Sinai). This of-course came true in ch 19
Exo 4:1-9 God’s 3 signs for Moses to help prove that God had sent him:-
a) Rod turning into a snake, and back again. Could this symbolise the Tree of Life and the biting power (serpent) of sin?
b) Hand turning leprous after being placed over heart, and then recovering. Is this a
sign that the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked Jer 17:9
c) Water turning into blood is obviously the Gospel.
These 3 magnificent signs are therefore the whole hope of God’s New Testament which God revealed to Moses for the benefit of Israel as in v1
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
Exo 3:7 Once again we see God's power and His love displayed in three single syllable words. Seen, Heard, Know. God had seen all their afflictions, He had heard all their pleas and prayers for deliverance from the bondage of Pharaoh, and was fully aware of all their suffering. What wonderful words of comfort and exhortation for all of us. God delivered the children of Israel out of Egypt under the leadership of Moses. Likewise with each one of us, our Heavenly Father is aware of all our difficulties, He hears all our prayers, and is fully aware of all our hardships. As He delivered Israel, we also know that we will be delivered, by His Grace, if we serve him to the best of our ability. We have that assurance from His promises which we know can not be broken. Even so come Lord Jesus. Rev 22:20
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
All Gods of the Near East had names and distinct characteristics. The God of the Hebrews, by command, was YHVH (3:15). These four consonants are known by the Greek term tetragrammaton which means four letters.
Jews historically had been reluctant to utter the holy name of YHVH and so they substituted the name adonai which means my lord. Later on they combined YHVH with the vowels of the word adonai to produce the name Jehovah which is used by some groups today. Religious Jews, today, write God as G-d which, they believe, gives reverence.
YHVH implies a forward-looking aspect of the deity. The Name is really bound up with God-manifestation and given light in Christ (Matt 1:23) and, by extension, in us (1Cor 15:28, Rev 22:3,4).
Today, God as a generic term is used by all and sundry who claim to believe in him/her. We strive to make a distinction between the Truth and worldly religion. A case, then, could be made to call our God YHVH (Yahweh) which would show our understanding and future hope? At least, if LORD is used, it should be done being fully persuaded as to its significance.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
4:24-26 Whatever exactly happened here, we see a weakness in Moses, both spiritually and physically. For whatever reason he had failed to circumcise his son, and the implication is that this why in v.24 the Lord sought to kill him. Moses, it seems, is bailed out in his cowardice by the courage of his wife, and suffers her obvious contempt as a result. Note that no further punishment seems to have been meted out on Moses for this error, but that now he is sent forth to do the set task that God has for him. It should be a source of great comfort to us that God chooses and works with people who are flawed, just like us, and forgives them and moves on. Oh that we could learn to do the same with each other.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
Moses showed a lack of confidence when Yahweh called him to go back to Egypt. He had run away from there with a price for murder on his head and was scared of retribution. Yahweh assured him that those seeking his head were all dead. Then he doubted whether he could deliver Yahweh's message effectively in Egypt. Yahweh allowed Aaron to accompany him as spokesman. Little by little, Moses confidence grew as he asserted his leadership role. Hopefully, as we grow in Christ, our confidence will also grow.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
3:1-6; 23:20-21; 33:11,20; 34:1,2,5,6; Acts 7:30,31,32,33,35,38,53; Gal 3:19; 1Tim 6:16 - Here we have examples of God manifestation where an angel is acting as a representative of God and bearing the name of God.
4:2-9 - Here we have three signs that are perhaps echoes of Christ and his 3 day victory over sin. We have a staff (ie, wood, crucifixion?) that overcomes a snake (the initiator of sin). We have the restoration of sinful flesh to clean. And finally we have water (burial of sin via baptism?) turning into blood (sacrifice of Christ's blood atoning for sin?) which perhaps echoes the beginning and end of Christ's three year ministry.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
3:10 ‘bring forth my people’ is another element of the way in which God is showing Moses that he is to be involved in the fulfilment of the promise to Abraham – Gen 15:16.
4:10 Moses’ claim that ‘I am not eloquent’ actually qualified him well for the job. God was not interested in using Moses’ words. He was to speak God’s words. We might reflect on whose words we think we speak when we talk about the gospel. Do we think that we are inadequate to speak about Him?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
3:12 it is interesting that the sign he is given will actually only take place afterwards - after he has brought the people out.
4:2,6 God often uses something that one has/possesses.
4:22-26 the firstborn son of God, of Pharaoh, & of Moses tied together in this incident.
4:14 despite Moses' unwillingness, God already knew what he would need, and had already sent Aaron, who arrived before Moses had left for Egypt 4:27
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
EXCUSES
"Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey all I have commanded you." (Matt 28:19-20) Many have called these words of Jesus the Great Commission. This was his last instruction to his followers, and as Christians, something we should take very seriously. Mark puts it a little more simply, saying, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation." (Mark 16:15)
My guess is that many of us, myself included, try to use the same excuses to get out of preaching the word as Moses used to get out of going back to Egypt. Moses had two excuses and one plea.
1 - "What if they do not believe me or listen to me and say, 'The LORD did not appear to you?'" (Exo 4:1) Moses was scared of rejection. Rejection is a fear that we all must face up to. Not everyone will believe our message, but like Moses, we have been given signs - fulfilled prophecy is an indisputable one - that proves that our message is true.
2 - Moses said, "O LORD, I have never been eloquent, neither in the past nor since you have spoken to your servant. I am slow of speech and tongue." (v.10) Another of our fears is physically having to speak to people. But God's answer to Moses also applies to us. God made our mouths and tongues and we must use them to glorify him.
3 - Then Moses said, "O Lord, please send someone else to do it." (v.13) At that God's anger burned against Moses. Let's overcome our fears and preach the word lest God's anger burn against us also.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Robert
3:9 The cry of people can come up to God in one of two different ways. On this occasion God heard their cry and sought to deliver them. In Gen 18:20-21the cry of the people brought God’s judgment upon Sodom and Gomorrah.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
3:2-4 The manifestations which God made were always accompanied by unmistakable signs that it was the LORD. Look at the evidence given to Moses on this occasion. He saw fire, but no one to ignite it; he heard a voice, but no human lips from which it came; he saw no living Being, but one was in the bush, who knew him, and called him by name. It had to be the God of Israel.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
Exo 3:13-15 God's name is an affirmation of His existence & presence, not a meaningless title. As He is outside time, the relevance of possible present, past & future tenses is only for us. So we are reassured that whenever we are present in time, He is present & active. He affirms that He was working with the Patriarchs, is working with the current generation, & will continue to work to bring about the fulfilment of what He had promised to them.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Wendy
4:30-31 Whilst the people initially believed God’s word through Moses and Aaron when things did not go smoothly they stopped believing that God was going to work to deliver them. How often are we willing to believe His word when things are going well only to start to doubt when things are not going smoothly?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
3:12 In an earlier entry I set out a number of links between this chapter and the life of Gideon. The links are not just an academic exercise. Rather they help us to see that Gideon had a role model – that role model was Moses. Who do we imitate?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
3:1 Horeb means dried up which is indicative of the arid desert region in which it is found. The region possesses a rugged mountain range approximately two miles long and one mile wide.
Some believe that Horeb is this mountain range, and that Mount Sinai is a peak in that range. Others think that it is the other way around, Horeb being the peak in the range called Sinai. Scripture does not clarify this as it uses the two names interchangeably:
Horeb: Exo 17:6; 33:6; Psa 106:19 etc.
Sinai: Exo 19:11,18,20,23; 24:16; 31:18 etc.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
4:21 Yahweh does not deliberately implant evil in an individual. Doing so would be inconsistent with the free will that Yahweh has given humankind. What Yahweh does is to strengthen the path that an individual chooses to take, either for good or for evil (Rom 9:18). In the case of Pharaoh, he chose to take an evil path in opposing Yahweh. Yahweh strengthened Pharaoh’s decision by hardening his heart. The word harden in Hebrew is chazak which means strengthen. The overall purpose of Pharaoh’s opposition to Yahweh was to be an object lesson for Israel (and by extension to all nations) to understand the power and exclusivity of their unique God (Rom 9:17).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
3:8This is the first time that the promised land is described as flowing with milk and honey For it to flow with milk meant that there would be lush pastureland for cattle (sheep and goats provided most of the milk and milk products at this time). For it to flow with honey there would be an abundance of wild flowers (honey eaten at this time was wild honey). Later we'll see other evidence of the land's fertility when the spies brought back grapes, pomegranates, and figs (Num 13:23,24).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
Exo 3:18;Exo 5:3 - 3 days connected with sacrifice perhaps foreshadows/echoes Christ's sacrificial offering and deliverance from sin and death.
Exo 4:10-15;Exo 6:12 - Moses grew powerful in speech Acts 7:22.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
3:16 When Moses was told that he was to go to pharaoh ‘that thou mayest bring forth my people’ Moses was being reminded of the promise that God had made to Abraham – Gen 15:16 highlighting another link with the promises in Gen 15– I have highlighted others in previous years.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
4:16 So Aaron is appointed as Moses’ spokesman as can be seen in Exo 4:30. Whereas Moses speaks the words of God eventually – an example is in Exo 8:29. A little encouragement goes a long way. We should remember that when someone says that they are unable to do a job. Offer to do it with them. Eventually you may well find that they will be willing to take the job on themselves.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
Exo 4:24-26, The incident regarding Moses and his wife Zipporah, fits appropriately in this chapter immediately after Yahweh’s statement Exo 4:22-23. Pharaoh was a ruler and also a parent. God expected him to obey His command to let Israel, the Lord’s firstborn, go free. The Lord was prepared to slay Pharaoh’s firstborn if he did not obey.
The Lord therefore expected Moses as a leader in waiting and also a parent to obey the Lord in the matter of circumcision of his son.
The law of circumcision was an everlasting covenant given to Abraham (Gen 17:12-14). It was imperative that this law was kept because the soul that was not circumcised was in breach of Yahweh’s covenant with His people and therefore would die, being “cut off from his people”.
Zipporah, Moses wife, was more faithful than Moses in this matter. Apparently, Moses had neglected to circumcise his son on the 8th day of the child’s life (Genesis 17:12). The Lord was going to kill, not Moses, but his son for Moses lack of obedience. Hence Zipporah’s retort to Moses “a bloody husband thou art”,(Exo 4:26).
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
3:20-21 God’s assurance that Israel would leave Egypt ‘not empty’ was a long time coming, it might seem from the time that they were made to serve Egypt . However when Israel left Egypt – Exo 11:3, 12:36 – God’s words were fulfilled.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Exo 4:1-9 – Before the Law was given, God established the principle that matters should be resolved in the light of two or three witnesses. Moses was to present three witnesses to Israel to establish his God given authority.
First sign was the miraculous changes to his rod (Exo 4:2-5) for the purpose that Israel should believe that the Lord God of their fathers had appeared to Moses (Exo 4:5). Second sign was the leprous hand (Exo 4:6-9). If two signs failed to convince his brethren then a third sign was to be given, to turn river water into blood (Exo 4:9). See, Deut 19:15; Matt 18:16
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
in·ad·e·quate
Adjective
1.(of a person) Unable to deal with a situation or with life: "inadequate to the task".
Exo 3:10-12 - Moses made excuses because he felt inadequate for the job GOD had asked him to do. This might be a natural tendency in all of us. Our problem is we all put limitations on ourselves and God! Worry about being inadequate is also a sin because it shows a lack of trust in God. Robert Frost once said, “The reason why worry kills more people than work is that more people worry than work..”
Our Lord Jesus gave us the remedy against worry when he taught us - “Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life … But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness.”
We should not hide behind our own inadequacies as Moses did, but look beyond ourselves to the greater resources available in Christ. It's only then, that God can use our unique contributions to the furtherment of His grand purpose. Phil 4:13 - "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me."
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
3:27,32 Pharaoh’s unwillingness to allow Israel to go into the wilderness contrasts with the Pharaoh about 200 years earlier who allows Joseph and his brothers to take their father’s body to Canaan to bury him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
Moses and Zipporah split up
Notice how easily Moses accepts all God is telling him. None of that was easy stuff to absorb. Moses demonstrated faith like that of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob by accepting God's words at face value and believing it. His wife, however, found it more difficult. Zipporah was only very distantly related to the people of Israel and perhaps didn't have the same drive to go and rescue them from Egypt. It is a testament to her faithfulness that she agrees to come with Moses, leaving everything she has ever known behind, and setting off into unknown territory with only the stuff she could carry and their young children. The incident regarding circumcision (Exo 4:24-26) shows us that Zipporah had not accepted circumcision, which meant that she had not fully accepted Moses's God. This appears to have been a great source of contention in their marriage, as you can see from her words in v25, where she blames Moses. At this stage it appears that Moses and Zipporah (and the children) parted company. She and the boys went home, and he went on. Perhaps they both agreed that this mission was too much to expect of her and the children - and in hindsight, knowing all we do about the Exodus, I think we would agree. The story has a happy ending though, because Moses, his wife and children were reunited in chapter 18. Fittingly it is in the same place where Moses received his mission, the mountain of God, where Moses and his family were reunited with the mission of God now accomplished.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
Hardening Pharoahs heart?
This always puzzled me because it seems God made Pharoah stubborn.
However in Egyptian custom when a pharoah died his heart was rremoved and placed on scales. A list of sins were read out to the dead body, if the heart overcame the scales the Pharoah was said to be innocent and would get eternal life. If the weight overcame the heart (as it most certainly always did) the dead Pharoah would go to destruction.
Perhaps how the churches came up with heaven and hell?
To counteract this confession, upon death the heart would be removed and replaced with a stone scarab enscribed with such things as "bear not witness against me" naturally this "hardened heart" would overcome the scales and make the person innocent his fleshly heart would then be with him in the afterlife.
Such bodies in arhceology have been found with such stones in theri chest cavity!
Here in Exodus Yahweh hardened Pharoahs heart and completley reversed Egyption ideology by making it impossible for Pharoah to resist letting the Jews go, knowing that Pharoah had an impossible task infuriated him and he realised isntead of destroying the Jews he was actually saving them, but in turn Yahweh by hardening Pharoahs heart led to his destruction!
Sourec... The Stones cry out.
stephen cox [Sedgley UK] Comment added in 2014 Reply to stephen
3:12,13,14,15 Notice the repeated emphasis that Moses was sent by God. This sets the scene for the way in which Moses and Aaron were to stand before Pharaoh.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
3:5 Whilst holiness was clearly understood by faithful men and women this is the first time that the word <6944> is used in scripture.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
IT'S IN YOUR HAND
"What is that in your hand?" God asked Moses.
Moses had just been commissioned to go back to Egypt to bring the Children of Israel out of slavery and into the Promised Land. It was a task that Moses felt he was under prepared and under resourced for. But God knows what He is doing. When he called Moses, God knew exactly what assets He had to use, right down to what Moses carried in his hand. "The LORD said to him, 'What is in your hand?' 'A staff,' he replied. The LORD said, 'Throw it on the ground.' Moses threw it on the ground and it became a snake and he ran from it." (Exo 4:2-3).
Moses had the staff that would become a snake, he had the hand that would become leprous, he had the mouth that would speak the word of God, and he had a brother who would help. Most importantly, Moses had ears that would listen to God, and an obedient and humble spirit.
If God calls us to do something, He will give us everything we need to be able to do it, right down to what we are carrying in our hands. It seems that Moses had little more than any of us might have to offer when it comes to serving God. We can do it. God has already given us all we need to do the work He has planned for us. Now it is up to us. Are we ready to listen and obey?
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Robert
4:31 Moses, at the burning bush, believed that God had “visited His people” and now the people who listened to Aaron believed also. However their belief was short lived.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
3:18 Whilst Moses is told that he and the elders of Israel were to go in to Pharaoh it would appear – Exo 5:1 – that only Moses and Aaron went in to Pharaoh.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
Nick Kendall [In Isolation] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Nick
3:6 Yahweh introduces himself significantly as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – the God of the promises of inheritance of the land of Canaan.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE ETERNAL? This is a tract published and written by Brother Dr. John Thomas in 1864
“The Angel in the Bush replied to Moses, who asked this question—Ehyeh asher Ehyeh, i.e., I WILL BE WHO I WILL BE: Thus shalt thou say unto the sons of Israel—Ehyeh, or I WILL BE, hath sent me unto you—‘This is my name for the Age (olahm, or hidden period): and this is my memorial for a generation of the race.’ ‘I am Yahweh: and I appeared unto Abraham, and unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as AIL-SHADDAI (the strength of the Mighty Ones); but by my name YAHWEH (He who shall be, mispronounced Jehovah) was I not known to them.’—Oracle to Moses 3,555 years ago; Exo 3:14; Exo 6:2,3.
Forty years after Moses made proclamation, saying, ‘Hear, O Israel, HE WHO SHALL BE (or Yahweh) our Elohim (or Divine and Mighty Rulers) is One Yahweh.’ In this formula, Moses teaches that there was a future time in the history of the Hebrew Nation, when it should be ruled by a ‘King and Princes,’ or Elohim, who should all be the ETERNAL SPIRIT, a self-styled Yahweh, manifested in glorified humanity, and though a ‘multitude which no man can number,’ yet constituting in the aggregate a DIVINE UNITY, or One Yahweh: who ‘shall be for King over all the earth,’ says Zechariah; ‘in that day there shall be one Yahweh *(or Jehovah), and his name one” (Zech 14:9).” *So inserted by Brother Thomas. Jehovah was actually coined by Roman Catholicism sometime during the Middle Ages.
There is and always has been a lot of controversy over the Father’s name and its pronunciation, as the Masoretes added vowels, dots, and tenses to the Paleo Hebrew, leaving even the most astute scholars disagreeing amongst themselves! “Members of one group known as the Assemblies of Yahweh have produced a revision of the Rotherham version entitled The Restoration of the Original Sacred Name Bible (Buena Park, Calif.: Missionary Dispensary Bible Research, 1970).” [My copy is called, The Sacred Scriptures]. “Their Statement of Doctrine says, ‘We affirm that it is necessary and most important to our salvation that we accept the revealed, personal Name of our Heavenly Father YAHWEH and the Name of His Son, our Savior YAHSHUA the MESSIAH. We affirm also that the most accurate transliteration of these Names from the Hebrew into the English is by the spellings employed above.’” (Bob Larson, Larson’s Book of World Religions and Alternative Spirituality [Tyndale House, 2004], p. 48).
http://www.bible-researcher.com/tetragrammaton.html/
What a strong statement! God’s name is not a magical amulet that must be spelled or pronounced with great precision in order to conjure Him up to hear our prayers and save us! His name conveys His character, the essence of His person (cf. Exo 34:6,7). God is not expounding on Hebrew grammar. The fact is, we simply do not know how God’s name was pronounced in Paleo Hebrew, nor was it spelled out for us. There were four consonants, YHWH, a Tetragrammaton, as the Dead Sea Scrolls verify. Modern Hebrew changed the pronunciation W, “waw,” to V, “vav,” YHVH - Yahveh. The best we can say in our modern English is, Yahweh, that being in the third person, “He will be,” not Ehyeh, being in the first person, “I will be.” If salvation depends on exact spellings and pronunciations, then we are all doomed! Cf. http://www.jewfaq.org/ashkseph.htm
Too much focus is on The Name, or Ha-Shem, when what it really is about is God defining Himself to us, who He is, and His plan - past, present, and future. “I will be,” or “He who shall be,” as Brother Thomas pointed out, has to do with Christ and the saints manifested as ONE with the Father at the appointed time still in the future. The Tetragrammaton, the only personal name given to identify God – YHWH, is best understood as I am, I was, and I will be, and so identified by Christ! He said, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty” (Rev 1:8; cf. Exo 3:15). The significance of the two verses shows they are ONE, as is our hope to be ONE with the Father and His Son (John 17:21-23).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Valerie
Exo 3:1 At 40years of age Moses fled from the Egyptian court of Pharaoh (Acts 7:23-29) and went to Midian. There he tended the flock of Jethro the priest of Midian who was to become his father in law. This work of shepherding was to occupy Moses for a further 40years (Acts 7:29-30). At 80 years of age Moses left tending flocks of sheep to begin the work of leading God’s people out of Egypt (Exo 7:7). The Lord promised that He would raise up a prophet like unto Moses (Deut.18:15). So we see the LORD working in the life of Moses to bring about the exodus of His people from Egypt to go to “…a land flowing with milk and honey.” (Exo 3:17). The Lord Jesus Christ is that prophet (Acts 3:20-22). Jesus is the good shepherd who was prepared to lay down his life for the sheep (John 10:11).
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
When coming to this verse we might reasonably wonder why there are words written, without explanation, in capital letters. There is nothing to suggest this should be so in the Hebrew.
We can see straight away that the translators are doing more with the Hebrew than just translating.
(The KJV,ESV, NIV, NET all follow the same pattern).
The capital letters refer to the Hebrew phrase transliterated "ehyeh asher ehyeh".
By “comparing spiritual with spiritual” it can be seen that ehyeh has previously been translated in Ex 3:12 as “I will be”.
Exo 3:12And he said, Certainly I will be with thee; and this shall be a token unto thee, that I have sent thee: (The KJV,ESV, NIV, NET follow the same translation).
Checking this with 5 of the other occurrences:- Exo 4:12,15: Deut 31:23: Josh 1:5, Josh 3:7 it becomes clear that ehyeh should be translated as I will be.
What about ‘I am’ as a possibility?
There is no present tense of the verb ‘to be’ in Hebrew.
No present tense therefore dismisses “I am” as a possible translation of Ex 3:14
I was?
Unlike “I am”, “I was” does occur in its own right in a number of passages but Ex 3:14 is not one of them.
One of the references for ehyeh (I will be) was Joshua 3:7 where the translation was clearly seen as “I will be”. More helpfully, this verse also contains “I was” (hayiti) showing a clear difference (opposition) and contrast to ehyeh - while at the same time showing that “I was” it is not a possibility for Ex 3:14.
Josh 3:7And the LORD said unto Joshua, This day will I begin to magnify thee in the sight of all Israel, that they may know that, as I was (hayiti) with Moses, so I will be (ehyeh) with thee.
Conclusion
The correct translation of Ex 3:14 by, comparing spiritual with spiritual, is I will be who I will be.
It concerns God manifested in Moses and is not an expression of His existence.
Simon Foster [London South] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Simon
“… What is his name?… I AM THAT I AM… I AM…”
In the Revised Standard Version’s margin, it has, “Or, I WILL BE THAT I WILL BE.” The difference between the two is the tense. In Hebrew we read there are only past and future tenses, no present tense, so the name is I WILL BE THAT I WILL BE: Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh. The fact is, ancient Hebrew only had the perfect and imperfect tenses. According to v. 12, though, we assume the future tense is correct. https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-there-are-no-verb-tenses-past-present-future-in-Biblical-Hebrew
Most of the rabbinic works I read and researched also use, I AM. An early translation of the Bible into Aramaic translated by Jonathan ben Uzziel, a pupil of Hillel and doctor of the Law in Jerusalem during the time of King Herod used, I AM. According to Judaism, I AM (Ani Hu) reflects the three tenses, “He was, He is, He forever shall be.” https://www.oneforisrael.org/bible-based-teaching-from-israel/bible-teachings/the-name-of-god/ (cf. Rev 1:8).
Brother Alred Norris, in the book, What is His Name, p. 73, made a good point, in that if the people asked for God’s name and Moses replies, I will be that I will be, this would sound ambiguous and perplexing. However, if Moses replied, 'The One who Is' (in every sense of the term), distinguishes Himself from the other named gods, who are no gods.. Jesus, in John 8:58, used, 'I am.' In the Greek translation of the Old Testament (LXX), in the form we have it, it is by this expression ‘egO eimi ho On’, that >ehyeh >asher >ehyeh is rendered. The expression ho On is found in Revelation 1:4, translated as ‘He which is’ and the RV reference, surely correctly, relates the two passages together.”
“Translating the ehyeh of 3:14b as ‘I am’ does present considerable interpretational difficulty but so too does translating it as ‘I will be’. The crucial difference between the two is that whereas the words ‘I am’ standing alone can be reasonably understood to be God’s self-designation, the absolute declaration ‘I will be’ cannot.” [I will be.... what?]
https://exodus-314.com/part-ii/textual-analysis-of-exodus-313-15/
“The words that God addresses to Moses in Exodus 3:14-15, in response to Moses’ enquiry of Exodus 3:13, can now be confidently understood as being equivalent to the following simple statement, ‘I am I AM.' Tell the Israelites that I AM has sent you to them, and tell them also that they are henceforth to address Me and refer to Me by my proper name YHWH.” (Yud, Hey, Wav, Hey).
https://exodus-314.com/part-ii/the-meaning-of-ehyeh-asher-ehyeh/
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Valerie
3:19 The way that God explained that Pharaoh would not let Israel go out of Egypt contrasts markedly with the Pharaoh in the days of Joseph. Joseph wanted to bury Jacob in the land of Canaan and Pharaoh sent him to do that.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
3:19 It must have been quite discouraging to the nation to learn that, despite Moses’ intervention, Pharaoh would be obstinate and not let Israel go. For those who did not understand the significance of Gen 15:13-14 the sings and words would all seem to be pointless,
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
Exo 3:4-10 We should remember that Moses had already sought to deliver Israel from Egypt – Acts 7:24-25 – so this was not the first time that Moses had considered the plight of his family in Egypt. But not he is reticent. In fact whereas on the previous occasion he took things into his own hands we will see now that he leaves things in God’s hand.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
3:16 One wonders how many of the Jews in Egypt were still familiar with the promises of Gen 15 made to Abram?
We know that Joseph did – Gen 50:24. And now Moses is reminded of what Joseph said
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
“NOW Moses kept the flock of Jethro the father in law, the priest of Midian…”
We are first introduced to Jethro in Exo 2:18, a priest of the Kenite clan (Judg 1:16).
“Jethro” Strong’s # <3503>, “Yithrow, his excellence.” Rather than a name, it is a title: “His Excellency, the priest of Midian,” named Reuel, Moses’ father-in-law (Num 10:29). When Moses met Jethro, he “bowed down, and kissed him (Exo 18:3, NIV).
To bow down is to show respect, which represents the degree of respect given to that individual person. Prominent in Middle Eastern and Asian cultures it also represents respect to nobility and aristocracy, much like we do today when bowing before a queen or king.
Customarily, when we meet people, we usually greet them with a handshake, but not so in Middle Eastern cultures – they kiss to show their respect using endearing body language be they family members, or other prominent figures. It is a sign of friendship and trust.
Moses in bowing and then kissing showed his very great respect and love for his father-in-law.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Valerie
4:2-5 In response to Moses feeling that he would not believe God gave Moses two signs which were completely outside Moses’ experience. Whilst the signs seem to have had the desired effect on Moses we will see in time that similar signs had no impact on Pharaoh.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
56 v. 3,4 - It seems amazing that in the multitude of adversaries David had that he could state his faith so clearly, and it is not only here. Ps.34:4, 1Sam.30:6. What would we do? Well, one way to clarify our minds is to turn to 2Cor.1:9,10 and then be comforted by the fact revealed in 1Cor.10:13, which of course is borne out by many events in David's life.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
57v.3 - The word truth is predominantly in the Psalms and the writings of John. Where, as here, we read of mercy and truth together we have a vivid picture of the Salvation to be wrought by Jesus. In Psa.85:10-11 we see the significance. Mercy represents God but truth (John 14:6) represents Jesus who sprang out of the earth, in his birth, as we do, growing with out nature that he might overcome sin in the flesh. If you substitute the concept of salvation through Jesus for the word truth wherever you read it, it gives beneficial insight into the meaning of the passage.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
56:1 This Psalm probably relates to the same time as Psalm 34. In that Psalm David shows that fear of God is to be preferred above fear of the Philistines. In this Psalm David recognises that his deliverance is through the mercy of God.
Psalm 57 - This Psalm relates to the time recorded in 1 Samuel 22. So as well as instructing his 400 men as we saw from Psalm 34 he still sees that he has need which only God can meet :1 'be merciful …':1, 10
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
56:6 Those who 'mark' David's steps are not the Philistines - rather David is speaking about Saul and those who are seeking his life. The reason why he fled to Achish in Gath.
57:3 The one who would 'swallow me up' is Saul.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Psalm 56 - "To the chief Musician upon Jonath-elem-rechokim" - properly belongs as the subscription to Psalm 55. The superscription to this Psalm begins "Michtam of David, when the Philistines took him in Gath" - 1 Samuel 21:10-15.
Psalm 57 - The superscription to this Psalm begins "Altaschith, Michtam of David, when he fled from Saul in the cave" - Al-taschith means "do not destroy."
Psalm 57:1 - "shadow of thy wings" - It is obvious that Almighty God does not have wings or feathers, though both these aspects are used from time to time throughout scripture to describe God’s providential care for His children, as a mother hen or even as an eagle. The wings here refer to the wings of the Mercy seat, where, though the ordinary Israelite could not see it, his heart dwelt in faith, knowing that the Mercy Seat, and all that it signified to the mind of faith, was his only hope of life eternal
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
56:4 So we learn where David’s confidence was. He learnt, as Psa 34 shows, that he could not work out his problem and had to rely on his God. It took David time to get to the position where he trusted God rather than seeking his own solution – the going down to Gath was his solution. We do well to realise that we have to rely on God and cannot rely on our own wisdom and planning.
57:4 David’s description of Saul and his men, who sought his life, in terms of wild beasts matches the way that God views the Godless nations – see Dan 7 for example.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
The two Psalms that we read today once again go together as is so often the case.
Psalm 56 This Psalm was written when David first went to Gash. 1Sam 21:10
Psalm 57 Written when David is in fear of his life in the presence of the servants of Achish. 1Sam 21:11
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
56:8 David's Heavenly Father is mindful of his exile and remembers his tears. The custom of "bottling the tears " of mourners as a memorial, which existed in some Eastern nations, may explain the figure.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
56:11 - We do well to stop and meditate on this verse. All of us will have had times - rarely as extreme as the experiences of David, but nevertheless times we can relate to - when men and women have made attempts to do unacceptable things to us. Let us remember, as David clearly did here, that no man can ever take away our eternal inheritance - even if they take our life.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
Both of today's Psalms start with the same words, (Psa 56:1 and Psa 57:1). Merciful means gracious, that is giving me a lot more than I deserve. Psalm 56 is David asking God for protection from his enemies, but the next Psalm (Psa 57:1-4) is stressing how God is a refuge from trouble. If we accept what the title says, then David wrote this when he was hiding from Saul in the cave.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
56:13 David’s continuing confidence that God will deliver him is based on his experience of his God – ‘thou hast delivered me’
57 Title. ‘Altaschith’ means ‘destroy not’. David, on more than one occasion, had the opportunity to kill Saul but would not destroy him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
56:11 If we would only at all times be like David and put our trust in God as he did, we would then be able to truly say that we had no fear or were not afraid of what man could do unto us. God will be with each one of us, if we allow Him to do so.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
These psalms are messianic, and give us an idea of the thinking of Jesus & of his communication with his Father when he was beset by his enemies. He never gives in to despair, but rejoices in the care of God. This is a wonderful example for us.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
56:3 This Psalm was written by David as a consequence of the events of 1Sam 21:10. So we see, like we do in Psalm 34, how David dealt with the trauma of that event.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
Psa 57:1 David says he will take refuge under the wings of God until the disaster has passed. In the context of the cave, we have the refs 1Sam 22:1, 24:3 Although David had taken refuge in a cave, Saul inadvertently came very close to him, but did not discover him. When we, in our lives, take shelter in God, the "disaster" may still come uncomfortably close, but we have to maintain our trust in God that he will be with us & keep us safe.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Wendy
57:4Isn’t it interesting that whilst David had saved sheep from a lion – 1Sam 17:36 - he did not react with violence towards his persecutors.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
Psalm 56: The giants of Gath
Referring to the title of the Psalm, it seems unbelievable that David would flee from Saul into the hands of the Philistines. But such was his fear of the 7ft giant (Saul) that he failed to take into account the giants dwelling in Gath. We read in 2Sam 21:22 that at least four giants had been born to Goliath. We should not underestimate the threat that these men posed to David, who had, after all, killed their father. This threat rose above the threat of Saul when David heard them quote the song which had been sung after his victory over Goliath (1Sam 18:6-7, 21:11). He realised that, whilst the king had no animosity toward him, those sons certainly did. We read at the end of David's life that these giants had dogged him until the end, so much so that at the death of the last one, he penned the song recorded in 2Sam 22 "on the day when the LORD had delivered him from the hand of all his enemies" (2Sam 21:22 - 22:1). In 22:49 he writes "You also lift me up above those who rise against me". And so the end of his struggle with men who towered over him.
When we take Ps56 in the context of that song we can derive an account of what may have happened in Gath. See 2Sam 22:17-19 and Psa 56:5-6 to see how they conspired to turn Achish against him, and finally confronted him openly as we have seen in 1Sam 21:11.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Rob
UNDER THE WINGS OF GOD
As David fled for his life from the envious king Saul, Saul got closer and closer. Finally in desperation David and his men hid in the back of a cave. Their hope was that Saul would pass by and not notice them. But imagine the stress levels inside that cave as Saul, instead of passing by in a frantic pursuit of David, decided to use the cave as a rest room. Inside there was no escape for David and his men. A cave has only one entrance and Saul with his heavily armed guards filled it. Was this the end of the road? Was there to be no escape?
We are not likely to be trapped in the back of a cave, but we do have similar experiences from time to time of being trapped, in danger and completely out of control. It may be in an employment situation, in relationships, financially, or like David, with people that are out do do us in. In that desperate situation, knowing there was nothing he could do to get out of it, David called out to God. "Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy on me, for in you my soul takes refuge. I will take refuge in the shadow of your wings until the disaster has passed." (Psa 57:1)
David's plea was for God to shelter him until the trouble had passed. Like a baby bird sheltering under the mother bird's wings, David felt safe. Let us also go to God for our shelter from the desperate circumstances we find ourselves in. We can be truly comforted under the wings of God.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Robert
56:13 - We have on this occasion [my "soul" (KJV) or "me" (NIV)] being delivered from death indicating the nearness and potential for death. The word used here is the Hebrew "nephesh" <5315> which means a breathing creature man or animal and it's variously rendered person, creature, self, life, soul.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Charles
55:13 the man who was David’s ‘guide’ was Ahithophel. 2Sam 15:12
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
57:1 The phrase shadow of thy wings denotes Yahweh’s protection and mercy (Psa 36:7).
The image of the mercy seat overshadowed by the enfolding wings of the cherubim is an image that also comes to mind.
The word, wings in Hebrew is kanaph which means extremity or edge, particularly of a garment, and thus a hem. Israelites had to wear blue on the borders (kanaph) of their garments (Num 15:38). This colour represents heaven, the throne of Yahweh, from whence emanates all commandment and power. Thus, the heavenly power to heal is embodied in the blue border of the garment.
Malachi also makes reference to this when he talks of Christ: But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings (kanaph); and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall (Mal 4:2).
Touching the hem of Christ's garment was sufficient for healing (v.36). The example of the woman diseased with an issue of blood also comes readily to mind (Matt 9:20-22).
May we always remain in the shadow of His wings, and obtain the ultimate healing at the judgment (1Cor 15:53,54).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
The title for Psalm 57 says "when David fled from Saul into the cave" and the margin refers to the occasion of 1Sam 22:1 but this doesn't fit the Psalm. At this time David wasn't in danger from his own men. It does however fit with 1Sam 24 where his men urged him to kill Saul. v7 tells us he had to restrain them, and v4 and 10 that they applied pressure to him to do it. This appears from the Psalm to have been a make or break moment for David, whose men were "set on fire" and "their tongues a sharp sword" (v4). They saw the answer to all their problems in murdering Saul, God's anointed. These men and their violent nature would have brought David down had God not delivered him by providing a peaceful way out, because Saul realised he had fallen into his own trap (v2-3, 6). 1Sam26 also fits, especially as David's restraining words to Abishai are "do not destroy" which is in the Psalm's title (1Sam 26:7-11). So is this Psalm an amalgamation of these incidents?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Rob
57:1 There is an added dimension to David's use of the figure of sheltering in the shadow of God's wings. In 1Sam 24:4 we read how David cut off the skirt of Saul's robe to use later as a sign to Saul that it had been in David's power to kill him. In 1Sam 24:5 it seems that David regretted doing so - perhaps because he realised how close he had come to taking matters into his own hands and not relying on God by sheltering under His wings. The word translated here as skirt is the same Hebrew word that is translated wings in the Psalm.
Ken Trelfer [Rockingham Forest, UK] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Ken
56:10 In his dire straits David had already put his trust in God. He did not wait until he had been delivered and then said that God had delivered him. His confidence was, when in deep trouble, that God would deliver him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
57:7 When David says “fixed” he uses a word whish elsewhere – Gen 41:32 for example – is translated “established” which is a typical translation. David is wholly committed to God even though he is fleeing from Saul (See the Psalm title). Can we say that we are always focussed on God as our helper even in difficult situations?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Psa 57:1 - subscription to Psalm 56 contains "Al-Taschith" [<516> means "do not destroy"].
Psa 56:2 - "most High" <4791>.
Psa 56:3-4 - "I am afraid...in God I have put my trust; I will not fear" - an oscillation of feeling but seeking comfort by trusting in God.
Psa 56:4,10,12 - we have 3 mentions of "praise" <1984> and 1 mention of "praises" <8426> which uses a totally different word.
Psa 56:5 - "they wrest my words" (John 10:30-36;2Pet 3:16).
Psa 56:6 - "they mark [<8104> can mean "to hedge about (as with thorns), wait (for), etc."] my steps [<6119> can mean "a heel, etc."] when they wait for my soul <5315> - could this have application to the sacrifice of Christ? (Gen 3:15;Psa 41:5).
Psa 56:7 - "Shall they escape by iniquity?" - wicked clever men (such as those opposing Jesus) using law and authority as a cover for their bad intentions.
Psa 56:7 - "cast down the people [<5971> can mean "a people, a nation, a tribe (as those of Israel), troops, attendants, countrymen"] O God" - because of their rejection of Jesus, the people of Israel were cast off for 2000 years. This could refer more specifically to the rulers of Israel set on destroying Jesus.
Psa 56:9 - "When I cry unto thee, my enemies shall turnback" (Matt 26:36-39;Luke 22:42-44;John 18:6).
Psa 56:13 - "before God in the light of the living" - could this refer to the resurrection?
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
Psa 58:1 - subscription to Psalm 57 contains "Al-Taschith" [<516> means "do not destroy"].
Psa 57:1 - "merciful...in the shadow of thy wings will I make my refuge, until these calamities be overpast" - this reminds me of the 2 winged cherubim looking down at the mercy seat KJV / atonement cover NIV and the 2 angels at Christ's tomb (Exo 25:17-20;John 20:11-12).
Psa 57:3 - "save me from the reproach of him that would swallow me up" (Matt 27:39-44).
Psa 57:3 - "God shall send forth his mercy and his truth" - crucifixion would be the method to fulfill God's purpose.
Psa 57:4 - "My soul is among lions...whose teeth are spears and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword" - the "lions" were of the tribe of Judah (Psa 22:12-13;Luke 22:52).
Psa 57:6 - "prepared a net for my steps" (Mark 3:6;11:18;John 11:46-53).
Psa 57:6 - "they have digged a pit before me, into the midst whereof they are fallen themselves" - after the crucifixion of Jesus there would be a destruction of Jerusalem, the temple and the nation.
Psa 57:8 - "I myself will awake early" (Mark 16:2-4).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
PRAISE GOD ANYWAY
At another low point in David's life, this time when he was seized by the Philistines in Gath, he wrote a psalm, a prayer, asking for God to deliver him. Part way through his prayer, he said this: "In God, whose word I praise, in the LORD, whose word I praise - in God I trust; I will not be afraid. What can man do to me?" (Psa 56:10-11) David did not say, "I will praise God once he has delivered me." Praise to God is not something we can or should use as a bargaining tool. David's attitude was that he praised God anyway, whether his circumstances were good or whether he had been seized by the enemy. Good or bad, David praised God. In his praise he reinforced his trust in God.
When do we praise God? Does our praise come and go with our circumstances, or do we praise God anyway?
A lovely phrase springs to mind from the movie, Facing Giants, where an American Football coach motivates his team to praise God, saying, "If we win, we praise him. If we lose, we praise him. Either way we honour him in our actions and attitudes."
Let's do it. Win or lose, good or bad, let's praise our God.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Robert
56 Title. This Psalm is to be seen as complementing Psalm 34. David was going to Gath when, as this Psalm title says, David was captured by the Philistines. David is then arrayed before Achish. Psa 34 talks of that incident.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
56:5 The ones who wrested David’s words were Saul and his followers, not the Philistines who had captured him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
56 Title From the historical account in1Sam 21 we might conclude that David simply went to the Philistines in Gath. But the use of the phrase “took him” would imply that he had no choice in his fate.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
“Thou tallest my wanderings: put thou my tears into thy bottle: are they not in thy book?
Perhaps one of the strangest requests recorded in the Bible, at least to our western way of thinking, is for Yahweh to put our tears in His bottle. In Middle Eastern countries and ancient Rome there was a tradition that when a person was ill, or in great distress, friends would bring a tear bottle with them and collect the person’s tears and bury it with the deceased as a symbol of love and respect. Many of these bottles have been found in ancient tombs. Markets in Yahrusalem to this day sell them. They are called lachrymals.
This is what David was referencing. But even more than this, David trusted that Yahweh would store his tears (cf. Psa 42:3) in His bottle not just any bottle, and keep it in remembrance in His book. David was no stranger to the “Tears in a Bottle” phraseology.
This verse reminds us that Yahweh is intimately concerned with every aspect of our lives. He records our good deeds (cf. Neh 13:14; Mal 3:16), our griefs, collects our tears, and writes them in His Book of Remembrance. The day is coming when our tears and lamentations will no longer cover the altar of God. Rather, our faces will be lit up with the beams of the Sun of Righteousness with praise to Yahweh our Father.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Valerie
57:8-11 David’s desire to speak of God to others was because of God’s mercy.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
56:4 When David was before Achish he was “sore afraid” – 1Sam 21:12 – but by the end of that ordeal David had come to the realisation that man can do nothing that God is not willing to happen. He reflects the same sentiments in Psa 118:6
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
56:4 When we read “afraid” we remember that when David was before Achish he as “sore afraid” 1Sam 21:12
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
Life is not Always Plain Sailing
Moses’ request of Pharaoh, initially, increased the difficulties that the Israelites experienced. Those Israelites charged with making the Israelites work harder complained to Moses that their task had been made more difficult. We should understand that doing God’s will is not necessarily something that is easy.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
56:11 notice that David says he has put his trust in God. He is reflecting on how he thought as he was in the hold in Gath – 1Sam 21:10-15.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
57:4 Here David speaks of Saul and those with him as “lions”. Elsewhere –Psa 59:14 - he speaks of such men as “dogs”
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
56 Like Psa 34 – a Psalm written as a consequence of being afraid before Achish.
David was “sore afraid” of Achish (11Sam 21:12). In fear and in dire straits David placed his confidence in his God (Psa 56:11) which enabled him to realise that he need not fear what men could do to him (Psa 56:4,11). This was not just theory any more for David. Looking back he could see God’s hand in his life, delivering him (Psa 56:13) This is our challenge – to look back and see our Father’s hand for good Heb 12:11 – it is the “afterwards” that comes from being “exercised”.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
FAITH, FEAR, PEOPLE
I was discussing fear verses faith after our Sunday morning service some time ago. We listed quite a few different fears that we and others experience - fears in particular that turn us away from faith. What we discovered in the end was that just about all our fears were to do with people: What if they disagree? What if they hate me for it? What if they get everyone else to hate me? What if they slander me? What if I lose my job? Maybe in another time or place we might be wondering, What if I get attacked for this? What if I lose my life? What if I get persecuted? Or injured? Or end up running for my life? All these are fears of what people can do to us.
David was having issues with people. He complained of trampling, attacking, injury, evil thoughts, strife, lying in wait, and no doubt there was more. But David also said, "In God whose word I praise, in God I trust: I shall not be afraid. What can flesh do to me?" (Psa 56:4). And, "In God I trust; I shall not be afraid. What can man do to me?" (v.11).
Love and faith should cast out fear. Let's be like David, with a confidence that God is much stronger and has greater plans for us. His love is greater than anything man can do against us.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Robert
57:7 In speaking of his heart begin “fixed” we should appreciate that the word <3559> carries the sense of being “prepared” as the word is often translated. It was “fixed” in that David had prepared his heart and now was focused on the things of God in contrast with the man whose heat might be equally “fixed” on doing evil.
In what way is our heart “fixed”?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
57:1 here, and often on other occasions, David asks God to be “merciful” to him. We may be so familiar with the idea that we don’t think about the implications of the request.
David recognises that he has no right to God’s mercy. He has not earned it. He has to rely on the graciousness of his God.
He can have confidence that God would be merciful because he had said that s how he behaved – Exo 34:6-7 - when speaking with Moses.
What is our attitude to asking God to show mercy towards us?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
v.14-16 - Refers to the time when Moses came close to God (Ex.33,34 esp. 33:19, 34:6,7). It is important that we realise the 'goodness and severity of God'. Rom.11:22 as demonstrated so clearly in these events. Isa.27:11, Mic.7:18. This all hinges round our calling. Compare v.16 of Rom.9 with John 1:12,13 and Eph.2:4-10.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.25-29 The quotations from the Old Testament - use your marginal references - highlight that the call of the gentiles was part of God's plan even before Jesus' birth.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
:32 So we see again that the pre requisite is 'faith' - So we are back considering the 'father of the faithful - Abraham who Paul considered in Romans 4.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
v.29 - The phrase 'Lord of sabaoth', we are more used to as 'LORD of hosts' (cp. 1Sa 1:11, 17:25). 'Sabaoth here is simply a Greek transliteration (4519) of the Heb. word for 'hosts' (06635) carried through untranslated from the LXX (Septuagint) version commonly used by New Testament writers. God is, Lord of the hosts of heaven (the sun, moon, and stars), of the angels (the multitude of the heavenly host, that do His pleasure, fight under Him, and for Him Ps 103), and of the hosts of nations all of whom are under His government.
Derek Palmer [Tenby (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Derek
Romans 9 - "How then does Jewish nationalism fit into the plan of God?" could well be the overall title of this chapter.
Romans 9:18 - "hardeneth" - Three words are used in the Hebrew to describe the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. The one that occurs most frequently, properly means to be strong, and therefore represents the hardness as foolhardiness, infatuated insensibility to danger. The word is used in its positive sense, "hardens", not merely "permits to become hard."
Romans 9:21 - "Hath not the potter power over the clay; of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another to dishonour" - The objection is founded on ignorance or misapprehension of the relation between God and we, His sinful creatures here on earth. Men generally suppose that He is under obligation to extend His grace to all, whereas He is under obligation to none. All are sinners, and have forfeited every claim to His mercy; it is therefore perfectly just for God to spare one and not another, to make one vessel to honour and another to dishonour. So for a time Israel received the blessings of God, and now Paul says, the turn of the Gentiles has come. Make the most of it, be thankful for it, and do not boast in your own strength or achievements - but remember Israel and be mindful that as He cast them off for wilful disobedience, so He can also cast us away. The Jews have not been cast off forever as we know, but their treatment from God must remain a salutary lesson for all of us.
__________________________________________________________
The Golden Thread - David reminded us in Psalm 57 that we find refuge under the overshadowing wings of the Mercy Seat in the Ark of the Tabernacle [as it were]. Israel as a nation, and Moses as an individual in Exodus, were safe under God's overshadowing wings, even though Pharaoh was bent on destroying them all. Though Israel has been "cast off" by God "until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled," the nation of Israel still benefits today from God's overshadowing care and providence, just as we as God's children also do, as Paul shows in Romans
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
9:2 Paul’s ‘great heaviness’ for Israel contrasted starkly with their self satisfaction that was manifest, for example in them saying ‘we be Abraham’s seed …’ (John 8:33)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Rom 9:10 Salvation is a matter of Grace. Paul shows this clearly in this verse, After dealing with the case of Isaac and Ishmael, Paul turns to the example of Jacob and Esau. They not only had the same father, but also the same mother. They were conceived at the same moment. Both Jacob and Esau were born in answer to prayer.(Gen 25:21) Never the less in spite of their similarities, before they were born Rebecca was told. "The elder shall serve the younger" Gen 25:23
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
:12 - Here we have a principle that we see repeated throughout scripture so much - God chooses whom He will. He does not go for the ones we would expect. Let us therefore spread our net of preaching wider and wider that we might enclose those fish that He has called.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Vs.15-21 run counter to the Pollyanna attitude that some have about God. Those who quote God is love (1John 4:8) etc. as proof of an all-accepting God, misunderstand.
The God of the Bible is not obliged to any man. Therefore, in the unfolding drama of God's plan, we must count ourselves extremely fortunate that He has called us to salvation.
In God's drama, we are in leading roles while the rest of the world is supporting cast. We should also count our brethren, who share the same hope, as precious (1Pet 2:3,4). To all others we preach, not knowing to whom God will extend His grace.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
v.31,32 - Here we see where Israel failed. Their failure was not due to their determination to do wrong under the law, but because they sought God's grace by the law, instead of by faith. Let us make sure that we do not make the same very human mistake of thinking that we will be rewarded according to what we do. Our reward is based on why we did it.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
9:3 Paul’s wish that he ‘were accursed …’ is rather like the way in which Moses asked that God might blot him out of the book of life rather than destroy Israel – Exo 32:32
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
May I please point out a very easy error? In Rom 9:12,13 there are 2 quotations from the Old Testament. It is so easy to run these two verses together, and think that Paul is saying that before Esau and Jacob were born, God said that the elder should serve the younger, for God loved Jacob and hated Esau. That is quite wrong. Yes, the first of these references comes before the twins the born (Gen 25:23), but the second one about loving and hating is from Mal 1:2,3, which comes right at the end of the Old Testament. This quotation is not a prophecy, it’s a commentary on what happened.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to David
9:22-24 "...endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction." God in His wisdom provided a way to overcome sin, by having his face shine (I think of this as smiling on) the "vessels of mercy." His wisdom decreed that this grace would be given only after suffering, part of which would be by "the vessels of wrath" who are a necessary, though abhorrent, part of the environment on the path to salvation.
These objects of God's destruction are one of the ways whereby we come to realise that we need to be saved! God be praised, not because He will save all, but for the wisdom of His plan to have mercy on a remnant, bringing them to glory though so undeserving. I'm sure we all feel this, and wonder at it. We see in this chapter that we cannot hope to earn salvation by anything we do (especially by Law), but, throwing ourselves into God's hands, serve Him out of love for all He has done and continues to do for us each day.
Michael Bull [Vancouver, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Michael
9:14 Here we have another rhetorical question – just in case some would argue that God was not fair in the way He had dealt with Israel. Paul then demonstrates, by quoting Exo 33:19, that God is fair. We must, therefore, develop an understanding of God which takes account of what we learn in Exo 33.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
Rom 9:2,3 "I have great sorrow & unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were cursed & cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers.." Is this the way we think about those of our brothers & sisters who have gone astray & followed the wrong path, one which has taken them away from God? Do we join Moses & Paul in fervent prayer, as well as actual effort to bring them back? Does it impact us unceasingly, as it did Paul?
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Wendy
9:4 There were benefits in being born a Jew. The Jew had the advantage of familiarity with Scripture. How valuable do we see our knowledge of Scripture? Do we take it for granted or treasure it?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
9:6 Having emphasised the benefit of being a Jew in verses :4-5Paul reminds those Jews that being Jewish is of itself not the important thing. It is a matter of being of the seed of Isaac – verse:7 (and by implication not the seed of Ishmael. These two lines of the seed of Abraham mark the mind of the spirit – Isaac and the mind of the flesh – Ishmael. So there was a lot more to it all than simply being the seed of Abraham.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
V.5 Trinitarians like to point to this verse as proof that Jesus is God.
We must remember that there is no punctuation in Greek, and so different versions will have different punctuation. Look at the KJV: …the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. And the ESV: …is the Christ who is God over all, blessed forever. The KJV leaves room to separate Jesus from God, but the ESV does not.
However, the RSV clearly separates Jesus from His Father: To them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh is the Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen.
But, no version poses any problem if we understand God-manifestation.
It is clear that the Bible teaches Yahweh is over Christ (1Cor 11:3). Jesus, Himself, states that he cannot act without the power of the Father (John 5:19,30). Jesus has been given all power, but when His role is completed, He (and His immortalised brethren) will yield to Yahweh and He will be manifested in all (1Cor 15:24-28).
In the Old Testament, those acting in the Name of God were called God (called by His Name). For example, the angels who appeared to Abraham were called Yahweh (Gen 18:1,2). And so, it should not be surprising that Jesus, who acted in the Name of His Father, should not be called God. In fact, with that very understanding, Thomas called Him God (John 20:26-28).
And so, if we understand the nature and role of Jesus; His relationship with His Father; the principle of God-manifestation, then we will not be confused with erroneous doctrines such as that of the Trinity.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
This is a hard chapter. And however much we don't like it, the conclusion of the matter is:
"how can the clay say to the potter 'why have you made me like this?' " (v20-21)
God created us and can choose either to save or discard us. The following verses emphasise this in relation to salvation, and are well worth reading: (v15-16, 18, 23). This does not leave our salvation to chance, however, because to whoever asks, salvation will be given (Matt 7:7, John 4:10, Rom 8:32).
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Rob
9:15 We should be so thankful that God is not ‘unrighteous’ shouldn’t we who are not Jews. God’s mercy is shown at His discretion, and we are the beneficiaries.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
9:6 ‘not all Israel ...’ is speaking to the Jews who, whilst having great privileges, where not the only ones who had responded to God’s offer of inheritance.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
"For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh."
"Could wish," or euchomeen is in the imperfect middle tense and is rendered, "I was wishing," "I wished," or "I did wish." Paul imprecated a curse upon himself - a past action while he was in an unconverted state - another thing in the past. But when enlightened neither all Israelites "nor any other created thing" could induce him to wish himself accursed again. HERALD 1853
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
9:11 The parenthetic comment here written under inspiration by Paul show that birth is not the criterion for salvation. Rather God has the prerogative to do as He pleases.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
9:13 Paul quotes Mal 1:1-3 to highlight God’s feelings toward Jacob and Esau. Whilst we may have difficulty understanding that God hated Esau when we realise what his life style and focus was we may understand God’s feelings better. Esau was “profane” Heb 12:16. We should take a leaf out of God’s book and appreciate how we should react to those who despise God’s promises.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
Rom. 9:5.
"Theirs (Israel's) are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, for ever praised. Amen."
How are we to understand what Paul is saying here in light of the falseness of the trinity doctrine?
My brother George wrote in with a pretty detailed response, giving several different possible ways of reading this passage. Here it is -
On the other hand, "God over all", if accepted as a correct rendering (and punctuation), testifies that Jesus is the fullest manifestation of Almighty God -- the express image of the Father's person in human flesh (cp Col 1:15; Heb 1:2; Phil 2:9). Compare the ideas in Matt 23:39; Zech 14:9: Jesus of Nazareth is the one who comes in the "name" of the Lord. Also compare Psa 45:6,7(cited in Heb 1:8,9): Jesus is addressed as "God", but only because he has been "blessed" by his God forever. Compare also Psa 45:2, which has the very phrase of Romans 9:5: "God has blessed you forever."
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Wes
9:1-2 In saying that he is not lying about his heaviness Paul is probably responding to those Jews who would miss represent him as they have by implication as seen in Paul's’ comments already made in Rom 3:8, 6:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
9:30-31 Having laid out a powerful argument form the Old Testament Paul is now concerned to block the possible argument that gentiles simply obtained access to the promises by default – because the Jews rejected them. This is not so. Access to the blessings of the promises is by faith from both Jew and gentile.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
9:27 It is not quantity but quality that God is looking for. There are a multitude of those who are Abraham’s seed. However being born of Abraham is not sufficient. The remnant – quoting Isa 10:22– are those who do the works of Abraham.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
9:33 A characteristic of enthusiastic Bible students is that, from time to time, they make pronouncements about what is going to happen in the light of [their perceived understanding of] Bible prophecy. Not infrequently these pronouncements are found to be inaccurate. We must take care to ensure that these pronouncements are not stumbling blocks to our confidence in the promises of our Father. The antidote is to remain firm in our beliefs of those things which are certain. One of which is the future re-establishment of the kingdom of God on earth subsequent to the return of Jesus Christ.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
“Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises.”
Paul addresses the problem associated with the condition of the unbelieving Israelites. He brings to mind Israel’s Covenants of Promise Yahweh made with Abraham (Gen 12:1-3), Moses (Exo 20; Deut 5:2), David (2Sam 7; Psa 89:3,4), and His New Covenant (Jer 31:31-34). Natural Israelites who embraced Christ, including now Gentile converts (Eph 3:6; cf. Rom 11:17), are referred to as “children of God,” (1John 3:10) and if truly converted are spiritual Israelites (Rom 9:6-8).
Paul enumerates here what the children of God possess, all of which receive attention elsewhere in Romans. They possess God's "adoption," making them children of God, heirs of His "glory." God made "covenants" by which to bless them. They received and possessed God's "law," God's own Words (torah: "instruction") for holiness and righteousness. They "service" or worship the one true Yahweh, as revealed by Him and made concrete "promises" via the patriarchs. The Law is the Word of God, which revealed the righteousness of God and the righteousness He requires of His people (cf. Psa 119). What a privileged people we are and as such are responsible to reveal God’s righteousness in our manner of living!
Jeremiah describes the New Covenant not as a new law, but as the same law written on the heart and not stones (Jer 31:33). Jesus said he did not come to abolish the law (Matt 5:17). Jesus quoted the commandments as authoritative (Matt 19:18,19). Paul said, the law is holy and good, and quoted the commandments as authoritative (Rom 7:12; Rom 13:9,10). Timothy taught that the Old Testament (only Scripture extant in his day) is God-breathed from which we may be instructed (2Tim 3:16). James quoted the commandments as authoritative (James 2:11). Revelation tells us that the saints are commandment keepers (Rev 14:12).
While the Judicial and Ceremonial Laws and Ordinances that regulated the Levi priests’ temple services and sacrifices with its statutes and judgments were abolished by Christ’s sacrifice, God’s Moral Laws were not part of the sacrificial system. In fact, the Moral Laws existed long before the Decalogue was given; they are not new, and those who claim only the Decalogue applies today, gravely err (cf. Lev 11:45; Lev 20:26 - reiterated in 1Pet 1:15,16)! God’s laws go beyond the Decalogue. We are to emulate God! It is more than just “shalt” and “shalt nots.” God’s Moral Laws reveal His heart and His mind for us and He does not change (Mal 3:6). This did not start with Moses nor end with him (cf. Gen 16:4; Gen 26:4,5).
Sin is transgression of the law and it started with Adam sinning (cf. Rom 4:15; 5:12-14; Rom 6:23; 1John 3:4). Numerous of the 10 Commandments were broken and all subsequently in the book of Genesis alone! If we teach God’s Moral Laws given in the Torah are limited to the Decalogue, we do not know God, as He reveals Himself through all His laws, throughout the 66 books of the Bible! Thus, we witness even today His laws on hardened, cruel and stony hearts instead of soft, loving, fleshly ones! “They are not all Israel [brethren], which are of Israel [of the brethren of Christ]” (Rom 9:6). “… which say they are Israelites [brethren], and are not, but do lie” (Rev 3:9). This teaching was greatly emphasized by the pioneer brethren, but, regrettably, seems to have gotten lost through the years, wherein anyone who calls themselves brethren/sisters of Christ are, despite what they say and do.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Valerie
9:14 We often hear the argument that God is not fair in the way in which He treats men and women. We might agree that, from a human viewpoint, God is not fair. However He is always right in His actions. If we think things are unfair then we need to change our view of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
9:4 “the service of God” was a wonderful privilege that Israel had. Namely that God had called them so that they could serve Him. Do we see our calling as a privilege? If so how do we respond to that calling and privilege?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
“However, Israel, even though they kept pursuing a Torah that offers righteousness, did not reach what the Torah offers. Why? Because they did not pursue righteousness as being grounded in trusting but as if it were grounded in legalistic works. They stumbled over the stone that makes people stumble.”
JEWISH NEW TESTAMENT, translation by David H. Stern
What a tragedy it would be to devote our entire lives to diligent spiritual efforts to attain a right standing with God, only to die and face God’s wrath! It is so important to understand God’s way of righteousness - the right way to be right with God. We cannot be saved by our good works alone, which the Israelites were guilty of, and so they stumbled over Christ. To approach God, it must be through faith in Christ, resulting in righteousness and salvation. The contrast is stark!
While the actions of faith are illustrated throughout the Old Testament, the word, “faith,” appears only two times! Deut 32:20, # <529>, and Hab 2:4, # <530>, “emunah.” In Exo 17:12, we find emunah, # <530>, translated as “steady.” Faith carries with it the idea of, “firmness, fidelity, stability, established.” It is a trusting faith! To have faith is not just about knowing that God and Christ exist, or knowing their will. One with emunah will act with firm conviction toward growing in God's righteousness. An unstable man, is a double-minded man, a faithless, untrusting man, and these should not expect to receive anything from the Lord (James 1:8).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Valerie
9:27 The inspired Paul brings two ideas together to highlight that whilst the promise that Abraham’s seed would be as the sand of the sea – Gen 22:13 – only a remnant would respond to God’s offer – Isa 10:22-23.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
9:14 the Jewish way of thinking was that they, by birth, were God’s special people. It is against this background that Paul deals with the questions that a Jew might raise - whether God was righteous or not in making selection by promise. The example of the way in which God dealt with Pharaoh is used because no Jew would argue that God was not righteous in delivering them from Egypt.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
9:16 There are two conflicting views on salvation. One is that one is saved by “works” and the other “one is saved by faith”. In reality there is a blend between the two views and the resolution is that salvation is not earned through works or faith. It is achieved as a gift from God because of His grace.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
1. Rom 9:1-5 - Paul's love of his Jewish brethren.
2. Rom 9:4;Rom 8:14-15 - "adoption<5206>" can refer to sonship.
3. Rom 9:4 - "covenants<1242>" (plural) refers to both the Abrahamic (Genesis 12-22) and Davidic (2Samuel 7) covenants of promise.
4. Romans 9:4 - the "law<3548>" refers to the divine law to Moses (Exodus 20; cp. Psa 147:19).
5. Romans 9:4 - the "promises<1860>".
6. Rom 9:4-5 - Jesus knew the priviledges the Jews had would soon be taken from them, unless they believed in the gospel which he preached to them.
7. Rom 9:8,4 - not all Israelites where/are God's children; the reference is to the Israel of faith (Gal 3:26-29).
8. Rom 9:5 - Various English translations insert commas in various places in verse 5 but this can be confusing at times as the original Greek didn't have punctuation (including commas etc.). Additionally, the Greek for "God<2316>Theos" can have various meanings from God to godly to god-like to Christ to human magistrates and judges. Christ was the literal descendant of Abraham and David thus, Christ didn't exist before his birth, and wasn't/isn't God. Note Michael Parry's helpful 2009 comments.
9. Rom 9:9 - "Sara<4564>".
10. Rom 9:10 - "Rebecca<4479>"
11. Rom 9:10-16,20-21 -God extended the same privilege to Gentiles as had been shown to the Jews though not by works, just as Jacob was selected at the expense of Esau before either had done good or bad. God can select whom He will. Esau was in Jacob's line but older Esau was rejected, thus God can reject the unbelieving Jew, or any individual descendant of Isaac, even though of Jacob's line. In Jer 18:5-10 - if Israel was workable in God's hands He would devise good for them. However, in Jer 18:11-23 Israel would not be workable in God's hands so they had to be broken as a nation.
12. Rom 9:13 - "hated<3404>" can simply mean to love less.
13. Rom 9:14 - "God forbid<1096><G3361>".
14. Rom 9:15 - "mercy<G1653>"; "compassion<3627>".
15. Rom 9:17 - "Pharaoh<5328>" according to Thayer "Pharoah means "his nakedness".
16. Rom 9:18 - Pharaoh hardened his heart from his own free will (Exo 8:32) and God added to Pharaoh's hardness of heart (Exo 7:3).
17. Romans 9:18 - "mercy" vs "hardeneth" - there are two sides to God's character "goodness and severity" (Rom 11:22).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Charles
18. Rom 9:24-26 - Jews and Gentiles can both be God's people.
19. Romans 9:25 - "Osee<5617>", Hosea means salvation. From Hos 2:23 - the 10 tribes had become not my people but they will become God's people along with the Gentiles.
20. Romans 9:26 - from Hos 1:10
21. Rom 9:27 - Only a remnant of many Israelites will be saved. Many are called but few are chosen (Matt 22:14). The majority are usually wrong regarding spiritual matters.
22. Rom 9:27-28 - from Isa 10:22-23 - only a remnant of Jews will be saved due to most lacking faith; Gentiles who manifest faith will be accepted.
23. Rom 9:29 - from Isa 1:9 - it is only through God's mercy that a remnant survived, but Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed and Sodom didn't have 10 righteous... Lot was allowed to flee to Zoar (Gen 18:32;Gen 19:23-25). "Sodomah<4670>" according to Thayer means "burning"; "Gomorrha<1116>" according to Thayer means "submersion".
24. Rom 9:30-33 - Faith trumps works. But faith w/o works is dead (James 2:14-18) - if one truly has a strong faith it will produce works.
25.Romans 9:32 - "stumbling stone <4348><3037>" according to Thayer 3037 metaphorically refers to Christ.
26. Romans 9:33 - "rock<4073>", "of offence<4625>"
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Charles
9:1-3 Has anything changed regarding Israel since the days of Paul? Have we now reached a time when it is not necessary that we should be concerned for the repentance of Israel?
Clearly not. They are the natural seed of Abraham and despite their current godless behavior – or maybe because of the godless behavior – we should be praying for them to repent as much now as Paul was in the first century
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
9:23-24 Whilst we might have thought that we would here read of “the riches of His grace” it is in fact the “riches of His glory”. The greatness of God’s glory is seen more abundantly in the calling of Jew and gentile, not just the Jewish people.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter