AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
The genealogy here in Gen 11 is fascinating. Notice the change in life expectancy after the flood. People before the flood were living approx 1000 years (see ch. 5) Now they are living approx 500 years until Peleg, where it halves again. This second halving takes place at the Tower of Babel incident (see ch.
This simple (and fairly approximate) timeline shows that Shem enjoyed seeing the birth (and death except in the case of Eber) of the next nine generations - and in fact, although it is not in this chapter, he was alive for the birth of Isaac and almost certainly the death of Abraham, though he may not have physically seen them. One other thought - looking from Abrams point of view. Look how much family he left behind in Ur of the Chaldees. What an act of faith. Heb 11:8
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
12:4-5 - Abram believed that the blessing of the Almighty would make up for all he could lose or leave behind, supply all his wants, and answer and exceed all his desires; and he knew that nothing but misery would follow disobedience. Such believers, being justified by faith in Christ, have peace with God. We can too if we follow in this way. Phil.3:10-14
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
The tower of Babel forms a basis for the language in Daniel 4
11:4 unto heaven Daniel 4:11
11:4 face of the whole earth Daniel 4:11
11:7 let us go down Daniel 4:13
11:8 scattered Daniel 4:14
The call of Abram was 2024 years after creation - 443 years after the end of the flood
12:10 That Abram went to sojourn in Egypt shows that he viewed the excursion into Egypt as a temporary event.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
WILD CARDS
In playing chess a whole strategic plan can be ruined by one completely unexpected but well thought out move by your opponent. We might have thought out our strategy and considered all the countermoves our opponent may make, but there is always the move we were not expecting.
The same happened at Babel. God wanted the earth populated but men thought they knew better and began to build a city and a tower which became known as Babel. It was then that God threw in the "Wild Card". It was the move that had not even crossed their minds. God created a diversity of languages and because people couldnt understand each other, they split up and began to do what God had planned for them to do in the first place - populate the earth.
The same can happen in our own daily lives. We may consider all the possible future outcomes for a decision, only to discover that God has thrown in a "wild card" which throws us into absolute confusion and turmoil. But in all the confusion we can be sure that God is working out his plan and that everything is going to work out for the best. Trust him. He knows what he is doing.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
11:30 In telling us that Sarai was barren the scene is being set for the things that are to follow in Abrahams life - that it is recorded before he left Ur tells us that this piece of information will be crucial later in the record.
12:17 That God plagued Pharaoh was essential lest it might be said later that the first child Sarai bore was not Abrahams but an Egyptian.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Genesis 11 - The Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge suggests that this chapter is set just 100 years after the flood. How soon men forget the most tremendous judgements, and go back to their former crimes! Though the desolations of the deluge were before their eyes, though they sprang from the stock of righteous Noah, yet even during his lifetime, wickedness increases exceedingly. Nothing but the sanctifying grace of the Holy Spirit can remove the sinful lusts of the human will, and the depravity of the human heart. Gods purpose was, that mankind should form many nations, and people all lands. In contempt of the Divine will, and against the counsel of Noah, the bulk of mankind united to build a city and a tower to prevent their separating. Idolatry was begun, and Babel became one of its chief seats. They made one another more daring and resolute. Let us learn to provoke one another to love and to good works, as sinners stir up and encourage one another to wicked works.
Genesis 11:4 - "And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. " - What were these people trying to do? Did they really imagine that they could build a structure tall enough and strong enough to withstand another flood? What of the promise to Noah that God would no more flood the globe in that manner again? Man seems to have a fascination with building taller and taller structures. One good earthquake, and God brings them crashing to the ground! Oh that man would put his energy into learning the ways of heaven, looking for a city whose builder and maker is God, becoming part of His great name - Acts 15:14 - and using the scattering of God to spread the Good Seed of the Kingdom.
Genesis 12 - Abraham has truly been called the Father of the Faithful [though you will look in vain in your Bibles to find that exact title]. At the age of 70, when most people today have already been retired a number of years, Abram chooses to respond to God, and taking his wife and family and retinue of people, leaves the comforts of city life, with their two story houses, flourishing markets, running water and sewerage facilities, to spend the next 105 years living in a tent, in a land he has never seen. Yet for all his greatness, Abraham needed reassurance, he made mistakes, he told lies, he made disastrous decisions, his faith took many years to develop... and God was patient with him. You will no doubt have drawn comfort from the fact that every patriarchal family suffered serious dysfunction... but Gods strength is made perfect in our weakness.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
a) 12:7,8 The first altars to God in the Promised Land were built by Abraham
b) God didnt say, "Stay where you are, Abraham, and I will make you a great nation." God had
chosen His land, and His people had to go to it
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to David
11:31 Whereas we tend to think that Abram was the instigator in the departure from Ur here we learn that his father was the moving force.
12:1 We are so familiar with the details of all the promises to Abram that we maybe forget that the promises developed over time. The first promise spoke of ‘land’
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Not too long after the flood, people forgot God's way and embarked upon their own system of worship. One expression of this arrogance was the building of the Tower of Babel. The tower was, actually, a ziggurat (terraced pyramid). Ziggurat means to build on a raised area. The people built this structure as an expression of their desire to reach into heaven; and acted as a visual (religious) rallying point that all could see from a distance. This was probably done by the instigation of Nimrod who was the influential leader of that time.
Yahweh was displeased with what He saw and scattered the people throughout the earth in their various language groups. As they journeyed they took with them the idolatrous forms of worship that Nimrod had introduced in Babylon. Today, in different religions throughout diverse regions of the world, these influences can be seen. Have you ever considered why the world's great Cathedrals and temples have steeples and spires that reach upward to heaven?
Abram was called by God to leave his home in Haran and go to Canaan (
Gen 12:4,5).Haran was situated north of the River Euphrates. And so, Abram had to cross the Euphrates to journey south to Canaan. Subsequently, he was called a Hebrew, a term coming from the verb ābhar meaning to cross over (14:13). Abram had crossed over the river from a land of idolatry to the Promised Land. This, of course, is a figure of baptism. Through the waters of baptism, we have crossed over from idolatry to newness of life which will find its true expression in the Kingdom (our Promised Land).
Abram, the chosen of God, had to go to Egypt because of famine. Later, the chosen nation of Israel would have to do the same thing (
Gen 42:3,5, 45:18-21). And, of course, the chosen Son of God had to sojourn in Egypt because there was a spiritual famine (Herod) in the land (Matt 2:13-15).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
Gen 12:2-3 Once again when we take a look at this covenant made to Abram, we see that it is made up of seven parts, making it a compete and perfect covenant.
Will make of thee a great nation.
Will bless thee.
Make thy name great.
Thou shalt be a blessing.
I will bless them that bless thee.
Curse him that curseth thee.
In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
12:10-20. We see here a story of deception and unfavourable behaviour from Abraham. We see him make his way to Egypt - and we can see from what little detail we have that this was not an appropriate move for a man of faith. Spiritually, to 'go into Egypt' is never a good thing.
Maybe we should conclude that he should have had faith that God would see him through the famine? Clearly Abraham had things to learn, and it seems that he did not cement that learning until Gen 14 when he makes the choice between the riches of the King of Sodom and the blessing and bread and wine of Melchizedek (14:17-24).
It would seem logical that the time needed for acquisition of this required learning which Abraham needed in God's eyes, was the primary factor in God keeping the fulfilment of His promise to Abraham for such a long time into his life. What marvellous faith this man had in the end, but it seems that he had somewhat less at this point in his life in today's chapter.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
The promises to Abraham and the hope they offer: 12:1-3; Gal 3:8-9; Gen 12:7; Gal 3:16,26,27,28,29; Gen 13:14-17; Gen 15:4-5; Gen 22:16-18. Also, note in Gal 3:16; Gen 12:7 that Christ was the prophesied seed of Abraham.
Sarah was Abraham's wife and half-sister: 12:12-13; 20:11-12.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
11:30 Consider how many barren women eventually bore significant sons. This is a hint into the way that God would be the father of Messiah.
12:10 That Abram was to ‘sojourn’ in the land promised to him sets the precedence for how all God’s servants should live in the earth. That is as strangers and pilgrims Heb 11:13
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
The word babel, in today's English, means a confused noise. Its homonym babble means to chatter indistinctly or foolishly.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Michael
12:3 So whilst the promise was to Abraham and his descendants God always had in his mind to bless gentiles – This was the gospel – Gal 3:8
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
Abram was considered righteous because he believed Yahweh (Gal 3:6). He is, thus, recorded as one of Yahweh's faithful (Heb 11:8-10). As we hear about Yahweh's promises to Abram, we should take careful note. The reason is, that whatever promises were given to him applies to true believers in Christ (Gal 3:29).
12:12,13 Abram tried to lean to his own understanding rather than rely on Yahweh's guidance (see Prov 3:5,6). It seems that he told a half-truth. Sarai was, indeed, Abram's half-sister (Gen 20:12). There is much to be gained from Abram's example. But, let us rely on our Heavenly Father's direction rather than our own understanding.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
11:10 Gen 10 has given us the table of nations, all the sons of Noah’s children. Now we return to Shem because it is through the seed of Shem that the promises are going to be fulfilled.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
11:4 The thinking of the flesh has not changed and of man wanting to make a name for himself, this year the worlds newest tallest building is due to be completed in Dubai. These tallest structures are a show of confidence, pride and affluence. Yet all these edifices which man builds to make a name for himself above God's, will meet a time when once again God will put in place one language and a united people. As we read in Zeph 3:9, a people not building a name for themselves but rather united in praise and glory in serving God.
Pete Barrett [Milnsbridge UK] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Pete
11:6 both times the word 'one' is used in this verse the meaning is to be properly united, this is also the same for both occurrences in v1. This shows us that the people were very much united in what they were doing and v6 spells out the power of being united even though in this instance a negative way. We are reminded that Paul many times exhorts us to be united/of one mind, because by being united we can achieve so much more by God's grace 1Cor 1:10, Eph 4:16, Phil 1:27.
Pete Barrett [Milnsbridge UK] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Pete
v 1-5 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
The Kingdom was intimately connected with Israel. The following important points of Israel's history are to be carefully noted.
1. Abraham was to be called the father of a great nation Gen 12:1-5
2. Isaac, Abraham's son has a son called Jacob Gen 16 go there for more references
3. Jacob's name was changed to Israel Gen 28:13-14 go there for more references
4. Israel has 12 sons Gen 35:21-26
5. Israel, his sons and families went into Egypt Gen 37 Gen 42-46 Acts 7:1-18
6. 12 tribes of Israel descended from the 12 sons of Israel. They remained in Egypt until the 400 years expired. Gen 15:13 go there for more references
7. At the end of this time, God raised up Moses to be their deliverer. Ex 2-4 Acts 7:18-36
8. The Wilderness Journey from Egypt to Canaan was 40 years long. Exo 16:35 go there for more references.
During the 40 years wilderness journey, the nation became organised, laws were given, officials appointed, the commonwealth of Israel came into existence and BECAME KNOWN AS THE KINGDOM OF GOD. Exo 19:6 go there for more references.
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Roger
Gen 12:1 First Principles>Kingdom of God
1. The Kingdom of God existed in the past Gen 12:1-5
2. The Kingdom of God was overturned Exo 19:5
3. Restoration of God's Kingdom clearly foretold Eze 21:25-27
4. Restored Israel to be God's Kingdom Acts 1:3,6
5. The Gospel concerns the Kingdom of God Acts 4:23
6. The Kingdom of God will be everlasting and worldwide Dan 2:44
First Principles: For more aspects of First Principles go to Acts 8:12
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Roger
Gen 12:2 First Principles>Promises made to the Fathers
God has unfolded His purpose in the past by promises made at certain stages of human history. Peter calls them exceeding great and precious promises by which we might become partakers of the divine nature 2Pet 1:3-4.
The first promise was made when Adam had transgressed God's law in Eden, and revealed that one would be born whom sin would be overcome and through whom all the evil that resulted from sin would be abolished. Gen 3:15.
1. The hope of the Christian in the promises - Paul's confession - go to Acts 28:20
2. The Promises to Abraham - go to Gen 12:2-7
3. The Promises were repeated to:
a. Isaac - go to Gen 26:2-4
b. Jacob - go to Gen 28:13-14
c. David - go to 2Sam 7:12-16
4. The Promises have not yet been fulfilled - go to Heb 11:39-40
5. The Promises were made on oath - go to Gen 22:16
6. God cannot lie - go to Heb 6:13
7. The Promises are to be established in Christ - go to Acts 13:32-33
8. The future fulfilment of the Promises:
a. National - go to Jer 31:10
b. Personal - go to Luke 13:28
c. Ancestral - go to Matt 1:1
d. International - go to Jer 31:10
9. All the earth will be filled with God's glory Num 14:20-21, Hab 2:14
First Principles> For information about other First Principles topics, go to Acts 8:12
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Roger
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
12:2 The promise of being a ‘great nation’ was to be fulfilled through Israel because of the way that their faithfulness to God would cause the nations to notice their righteousness – Deut 4:6-8
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
BUILDING GREATNESS
If there was ever a time of world wide communication and the storing up of knowledge as it was in Babel, it must be today. With the low cost of the printed word in books and magazines, and the wealth of information and experience stored on the internet, we, like never before, are able to take advantage of the great minds around us, and those who have gone before us, to build on the foundations others have already laid. In a society like this we have made and can make greater advances in technology than ever before. Along with the growth in technology also comes he spreading of ideas that take us away from God and encourage immorality.
In Babel, because the people were all together in one place and had one language, they were able to build their "tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of the whole earth." (Gen 11:4) This is just what people have started to do today with the mapping of DNA, advances of computer and communication technology, and more. God's comment was, "If they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them." (v.6)
In many ways we too are heading toward that realm of limitless possibilities. But God put a stop to it all in Babel. One day soon he will put a stop to it all in our world too. So let us not get carried away with the "greatness" of our society, but always remember that God is greater than us all.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Robert
Nimrod and the tower of Babel:
Gen 10:8 - "Nimrod"<5248> (can indicate "rebellion"), "mighty one"<1368> (can indicate "powerful, warrior, tyrant"); Gen 10:10-11 - "And the beginning of his kingdom was 'Babel'<894>...in the land of 'Shinar'<8152>"...and builded 'Nineveh'<5210>..."; 1Chron 1:10 - "...Nimrod: he 'began'<2490> (can mean "to profane, defile")..."; Mic 5:2-6,15 -foreshadows deliverance from a latter day Assyrian, V2 - Christ as a ruler, V6 - land of Assyria and land of Nimrod.
Is it plausible Nimrod directed the building of the tower of Babel? What might the tower of Babel/Babylon and Nimrod/land of Nimrod echo as regards the latter days?
Gen 11:1-4,6-9: V1 - "...one 'language'<8193> and of one 'speech'<1697>" ("speech" suggests a topic of discussion); V2 - "Shinar"; V3 - they used brick (bricks made by man from the earth not God made) and tar in the mortar instead of stone; V4 - "...let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto 'heaven'<8064>; and let us make 'us a name'<8034>, lest 'we be scattered abroad'<6327>..." (they were prideful and didn't rely on God); V6 - "begin"<2490> (can mean "to profane, defile"), "they have imagined"<2161> (can mean "to plan, think; usually evil"); V7 - "...'confound'<1101> their language..." (1Cor 14:33 - "...God is not the author of 'confusion'<181>..." - by confounding their language God was deterring sin and confusion); V8 - "So the Lord scattered them abroad..."; V9 - "Therefore is the name of it called 'Babel'<894>...".
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Charles
12:2 That Abram was to be made into a ‘great nation’ is a reason why he keeps himself separate from the inhabitants of the land. He was a foreign national; - but the nation to which he belonged had not been made yet. Our ‘new nation’ has. We are citizens of God’s kingdom and as such don’t belong in this world’s organisations. Thus we are conscientious objectors.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
v2-7 First Principles>Promises made to the Fathers>The Promises made to Abraham
Abraham acted on the will of God by faith Heb 11:8, Acts 7:2-4
The promises were not fulfilled in his lifetime but they were re‑iterated after his death and are to be fulfilled in Christ.
Briefly:
A National Promise Gen 12:2; Gen 18:18
A Personal Promise: Abraham’s name to be made great Gen 12:2. He, personally together with his seed would inherit the land for ever. Gen 13:14-17; 15:7; 17:8; Acts 7:5; Heb 6:14
An Ancestral Promise: Abraham’s seed would possess the gate of his enemies Gen 22:17-18, Acts 7:5
An International Promise: All nations to be blessed Gen 12:3, Gen 22:18
More specifically:
1. Abraham to be made a great nation Gen 12:2; 18:18
Extended Gen 13:16; 17:4
2. Abraham to be blessed Gen 12:2
Extended Gen 13:15
Re iterated Heb 6:14
3. Abraham’s name to be made great Gen 12:2
Extended Gen 17:4
4. Abraham to be a blessing Gen 12:2
Extended Gen 12:7
5. Those that bless Abraham are to be blessed and those that curse him are to be cursed Gen 12:3
Established in Christ Psa 2:6
6. In Abraham, all families of the earth are to be blessed Gen 12:3; 18:18
Established in Christ Gal 3:8
7. Israel to be given to Abraham’s descendant(s) Gen 12:7; Gen 15:18; 24:7
Extended Gen 13:15
Re iterated Exo 6:3-4
8. Abraham to be given the land Gen 13:15, 17; 15:7
Extended Gen 17:8
Not fulfilled in his lifetime Acts 7:5
9. Abraham’s seed to have the land for ever Gen 13:15; 17:8
Established in Christ Rev 11:15
10. Abraham’s seed to be as the dust of the earth for number Gen 22:17; 13:16
Re iterated Hos 1:10
11. Abraham to be the father of many nations Gen 17:4
Established in Christ Rom 4:17
12. Abraham to be given the land for ever Gen 17:8
13. Abraham’s seed to possess the gate of his enemies Gen 22:17
Established in Christ Rev 11:15
More specifically:
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Roger
11:27-30 This is another of the regular genealogies in Genesis which set the scene for events which are recorded immediately after the genealogy. So, rather than being a simple family tree, they set the structure for the subsequent events – in this case the promises to Abram.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Considering Genesis 11 and Genesis 12 we read of the tower of Babel – Gen 11:1-9 and the call of Abram in Gen 12:1. Separating those two incidents are family tree details. No historical data. Thus we are expected to see a connection between those two events. Simply put. The men who built the tower were interested in planning their own future whereas Abram was content to do what God requested, having no plans of his own.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
Near the beginning of the Bible is this story of an unsuccessful effort to build a tower that would reach into heaven - the tower of Babel. Near the end of the Bible in Rev. 21 is Jesus' description of a "heavenly" city, New Jerusalem. What are some of the major contrasts between the two?
A chart form may be best to show these contrasts:
Babel New Jerusalem
1. To heaven 1. From heaven
2. For glory of men 2. For glory of God
3. A false religion (implied) - 3. A true religion
to honor their own knowledge and expertise
4. Incomplete 4. Finished, perfect
5. Priests of human appointment 5. Saints made "kings and priests" by the
blood of Christ, see Rev 1:5,6; Rev 5:9,10
6. The nations scattered 6. Nations assembled to walk in its light
7. Languages confounded 7. Nations given a pure language (see Zeph 3:9
- language is "pure lip" - R.V. margin)
8. Earthy materials 8. Materials most precious
..............................
An aside here on the word "Babel". For years I just assumed that the word literally meant "confusion" due to what is said in v. 9 - "That is why it was called Babel - because there the LORD confused the language of the whole world." But if you look in your marginal footnote, you'll likely see the following - "That is Babylon; Babel sounds like the Hebrew for confused." In looking into this further, I found out that the Hebrew word for "confuse" is actually "balal" which is similar but one letter different (the "l" and "b"). The actual meaning of Babel is likely "gate of God". And in Old Testament times, a gate was the place in the city where judgments were made. Remember that Lot sat in the gate of Sodom (Gen 19:1) likely as a judge. And Jesus, Abraham's seed, will one day possess the gate of his enemies (Gen 22:17). So here Babel was an appropriate name for 2 reasons: 1) there God sat in judgment on men's willful disregard of His law 2) by confounding their language.
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Wes
For thousands of years men have sought for a one world government, one world religion, and one world monetary system. We read in Gen 11 about the first attempt to establish a New World Order by a united humanity of the generations following Noah’s Flood, who spoke a single language and migrated from the east. They came to the land of Shinar and built the Tower of Babel, which God destroyed and confounded their language.
Adolph Hitler said on January 30, 1941 at the Berlin Sports Palace: “The year 1941, will be, I am convinced, the historical year of a great European New Order.” During WWII, Hitler declared: “National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order.” Hitler’s philosophies are embraced by many world leaders. Just listen to their rhetoric.
Mikhail Gorbachev in his historic address to the United Nations on December 7, 1988, made this dogmatic and prophetic statement: “Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.
President George H.W. Bush said on September 11, 1990:“We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward a historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge...”
Vice President Joe Biden recently stated: “The affirmative task we have now is to create a new world order.”
The new Roman Catholic pope, Pope Francis, has announced his ambition to unite the world’s religions of Christianity, Islam and Judaism. He is hopeful to establish a one world religion. In March 2013, Francis declared: “...It is important to intensify dialogue among the various religions, and I am thinking particularly of dialogue with Islam” declaring that he and Islam worship the same God! This is totally in opposition to the apostle Paul’s teaching in 2Cor 6:14-17.
How close was Malachi’s prophecy on the last pope? The prophecy described the last pope as being “Petrus Romanus.” Pope Francis was born Francesco di Pietro di Bernardone. Pietro is Peter. Pope Francis is also of Italian descent, so the Romanus applies too. The last pope is also described as being the Black Pope. Pope Francis is of the Jesuit order. Petrus means rock or stone, and the "stone of Rome" is a black stone. The head of the Jesuits is called the Black Pope, black tied to the Jesuits.
The global economy of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa has already begun to take place to establish a new monetary system. This prompted India’s trade minister to say that these countries will“have a defining influence on the global order of this century.”
The U.S. President, Barack H. Obama campaigned with the slogan: “Change we can believe in.” Change is coming, but the change will bring about not a new world order, but a new world disorder. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs, July/August 1995 said: “We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” David Rockefeller said in a statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994, “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order.”
Change is upon us. The climate is in chaos, economic upheaval threatens to unravel financial institutions globally, tensions continue to rise among ethnic groups, social unrest around the globe, the planet’s magnetic field is weakening, the biosphere is under increasing amounts of ecological pressure from natural disasters like volcanic eruptions, and rising food demands from an ever-exploding population, tectonic plates continue to shift and sift the planet from one disaster to another.
We are on the verge of the return of Messiah in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up (2Pet 3:10).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Valerie
11:10-31 The move away from historical narrative about the tower of Babel to deal with family trees should not stop us seeing the relationship between the tower of Babel and the call of Abram. The call of Abram is the next historical event recorded after the Tower of Babel. The family tree is introduced to set a framework for the history that was to follow.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
Gen 12:10-20 - Abram somewhat echoes Christ in that both went to Egypt, and the lives of both bridegrooms were good as dead (though both lives were restored) due to the bond with their beautiful bride (the body of faithful believers). The brides encounter bondage to sin and death (symbolized by Pharoah of Egypt) but are freed to the bridegroom.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Charles
12:4 “so Abram departed” is such a simple statement. However the move was a massive change in his circumstances. We should remember that he did not know what the outcome would be – he acted in faith believing that his God would keep His word. Are we so confident in His promises?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
Gen 12 There are significant links between the call of Abram here and the call to Abraham to offer Isaac.
Chapter 12 |
|
· ‘Get thee’ · ‘to a land I will show you’ · Involved a separation from his country, his kindred, his father’s house · Immediately in faith he departed · God’s response was the first of the seven promises and blessings |
· ‘Get thee’ · ‘to a mountain I will tell you of’ · Involved a separation from his son, his only son, his beloved son Isaac · Immediately in faith he departed · God’s response was the seventh and final promise and blessing |
Taken from comments by Brother Andrew E Walker
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
Gen 11:10 Noah was blessed with long life 950yrs (Gen 9:29) and permitted to see 8 generations of his offspring through the line of Shem. The Psalmist writes, “Now also when I am old and grayheaded, O God, forsake me not; until I have shewed thy strength unto this generation, and thy power to every one that is to come. Thy righteousness also, O God, is very high, who hast done great things: O God, who is like unto thee!”(Psa 71:18-19). This also suggests a link with faithful Noah. The Lord had indeed done great things in the life of Noah!
Genesis |
Father - Son |
Years |
|
11:10 |
Shem's son Arphaxad born |
2 |
After flood |
11:12 |
Arphaxad's son Salah born |
35 |
age at birth of his son |
11:14 |
Salah's son Eber born |
30 |
age at birth of his son |
11:16 |
Eber's son Peleg born |
34 |
age at birth of his son |
11:18 |
Peleg's son Reu born |
30 |
age at birth of his son |
11:20 |
Reu's son Serug born |
32 |
age at birth of his son |
11:22 |
Serug son Nahor born |
30 |
age at birth of his son |
11:24 |
Nahor's son Terah born |
29 |
age at birth of his son |
See * below |
Terah’s son Abraham born |
130 |
age at birth of his son |
Years from the flood to birth of Abraham |
352yrs |
* Terah’ died at the age of 205yrs in Haran (Gen 11:32) and at this time Abraham at the age of 75yrs (Gen 12:4), left Haran (Acts 7:4). This suggests that Terah was 130yrs old when Abraham was born. Therefore Noah died 2 years before Abraham was born.
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
In Gen 11:31 it says that Terah took Abram and Lot and Sarai to Haran. It does not mention Nahor and his family, yet we know that they too made there way to Haran. IN Gen 27 we read when Jacob is being sent away by Isaac.
Alex Browning [Kitchener-Waterloo] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Alex
12:18-20 This is the first time that Abram learns that he has misjudged other people. He had presumed, rather arrogantly, that Pharaoh had not got any moral scruples. We do well to take the lesson to ourselves. It does not follow that people around us who do not worship the God of Israel have no moral values.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
12:1 the call to go to a land that God would show Abram is echoed in a very similar way inGen 26:2when God is instructing Jacob not to go down to Egypt.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
12:1 It took three generation before Abraham’s seed no longer sought to their father’s house. Isaac and Jacob’s wives came from their homeland. However – Gen 31:52 – Jacob’s arrangement with Laban precluded Jacob finding wives for his sons there.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
Gen. 12:4-7 Abraham first received the covenant promises when he was in Mesopotamia (Acts 7:2). He then travelled to Haran where he lived until his father was dead and then continued his journey to the promised land (Acts 7:4).
Haran is located to the North of the River Euphrates. Following the command of the LORD he left Haran, (Gen 12:4). To get to Canaan it was necessary for Abraham to cross the Euphrates. So the act of passing through water was necessary for his salvation.
The significance of this principle is recorded in Josh 24:2-3. “I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood”. Therefore we, like Abraham must pass through water (our baptism) before by God’s grace we can enter the land.
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
The Apostolic Bible Polyglot is very useful for OT study. It is the Septuagint with English interlinear with the Greek text . Plus Strong's Greek numbers!
In Genesis 11: 6 the name of the city is #G4799, Σá½»γχυσις, which is anglicised to sygchysis.
The Blue Letter Bible also has the LXX reading at the bottom of each verse if you expand it:
https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/11/6/t_conc_11009
In Acts 19:29 that same word for confusion appears with the riot in Ephesus.
Ellen Reid [St Arnaud, Australia, Isolation] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Ellen
Gen 11:3 - (KJV) "Brick<3843>" - implies white like Laban who appeared righteous but was quite flawed; "slime<2564>", "morter[<2563> to bubble forth".
Gen 11:4 - (KJV) "name[<8034> suggests pride"
Gen 11:7 - (KJV) "language<8193>", "speech<8193>" but in V1 a diiferent Hebrew word is used for "speech<1697>".
Gen 11:16 - (KJV) "Eber<5677>", "Peleg<6387>"
Gen 11:20 - (KJV) "Serug[<8286> means branch"
Gen 11:27 - (KJV) "Lot[<3876> means covering"
Gen 11:28 - (KJV) "Ur[<218> "means "flame", a well to do city, had running water, studied mathmatics and astrology, Moon worshippers]
Gen 11:29-30 - (KJV) "Iscah<3252>" is the same person as Sarai.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Charles
Gen 12:4 - (Abram was 70 and 5) perhaps the "5" suggests mercy grace and life to "70" representing all the nations as we read in Genesis 10 and Exo 15:27.
Gen 12:5 - "souls<5315>" referring not to immortal creatures that depart from the dead but living breathing human beings.
Gen 12:6 - the great tree of "Moreh[<4176> perhaps this echoes the cross]" at "Shechem[<7927> which means place of burdens and perhaps it echoes Christ who bears our burdens]".
Gen 12:7 - promise that Abram's offspring would inherit the land (Gal 3:29).
Gen 12:8 - Abram's tent (or people) would be between "Bethel[<1008> house of God]" on the west and "Hai[<5857> a heap of ruins]" on the east, so perhaps this suggests that as the sun begins in the east and sets in the west that God's witnesses would start out as a ruin but ultimately will be blessed when Christ returns to Establish his father's kingdom on earth.
Gen 12:10 - Egypt represents bondage to sin and death; "Abram[<87> means high or exalted father]".
Gen 12:11 - "Sarai[<8297> means dominative or princess]".
Gen 12:17-20 - God's way of light and man's way of darkness (Egypt symbolically represents man's way of darkness) don't mix well.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Charles
“… and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee… and I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”
This promise was conditional on the Israelites’ obedience (Deut 28). God separated the land of Israel from all the other nations, and His people were to be separate from all the people of the Gentile nations (Exo 19:5,6). They disobeyed and did not separate themselves. This promise was to Abraham and his seed, Christ, heir to the world (Gen 12:7; Exo 32:13; Gal 3:16). Through Christ, Israel will become a great nation and by whom all the nations of the earth will be blessed with the 12 tribes of Israel united. This promise to Abraham is unconditional. The blessing certainly did not belong to the idolatrous Jews in their day; did not apply to the Jews who did not rejoice in the presence of Messiah in his day, nor does it apply to idolatrous Judaizing Jews in our day who reject Messiah: desiring to go back to the weak and beggarly elements in Temple worship and animal sacrifices (cf. Gal 4:9; Titus 1:14). They do not serve our YHWH who is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ (Rom 15:6; 2Cor 1:3; Eph 1:3; 1Pet 1:3).
The premillennial concept of all the Jews being blessed just by virtue of their Jewishness is unscriptural. All those with the faith of Abraham in Christ are justified and considered righteous just as Abraham was (cf. Gen 15:6; John 8:56; Rom 4:1-5,13-17). The majority of the Judahites in Christ’s day did not accept Yahoshua as their Messiah, and most certainly did not rejoice at his presence (cf. Heb 4:2). The covenanted promise was not by the Law, but by the Faith in the Messiah - the kind of faith Abraham embraced (Gal 3:6-9,15-24; cf. John 8:56). Jesus said, “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me” (John 10:27). In the shadows of the past we see in type the blessing of obedience and the curse for missing the mark of the high calling.
It is important to note that the people of the land are not the same as the land. The land is Yahweh’s; the people of the land are His “tenants,” and so distinguished in LOGOS’ Bible Notes (Lev 25:23; Joel 3:2). "The Land of Israel does not belong to the Jewish People; the Jewish People belong to the Land of Israel” – Rabbi Menachem Froman. The land of Israel has to exist when Christ returns, as prophesied, but the full blessings are still in the future.
The Israelis have many teachers, Rabbis, but, we have one Rabbi, Christ (Matt 23:7,8). They embrace false doctrines like immortal soulism, literal devils, reincarnation, heaven-going, etc. and use the Torah and other writings as proof, just as the Gentile Christians do, but neither embrace the Christ! Jerusalem is filled with idolatry and idolatrous practices! The majority of the Israelis are poor tenants, indeed! Paul said in Rom 9:6,7, cf. vv. 24-27,30-32; Rom 2:28,29; Rom 4:11-13,16-18). “But it is not that the word of God has taken no effect. For they are not all Israel who are of Israel.” Christ said, “I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan,” and “are liars” (Rev 2:9; Rev 3:9, NIV). If there are those who call themselves “of Israel,” but scripturally are not, and some that are not “of Israel,” but scripturally are, who fits the promise God made to Abraham?
Part of America’s foreign policy and the Evangelicals is that as long as they are friends of Israel, God will bless them, the reverse being a curse on them and all the nations that oppose the Jewish people. This is not what Yahweh said! At the right time, Yahweh will honour His unconditional promise made to the patriarchs in whom all the nations of the earth will be blessed through His son. Those who have not embraced the faith in the Messiah are not the true children of Abraham (cf. John 8:31-47). The faithful in Christ are the children, or seed of Abraham (Col 3:3,4; Gal 3:27-29). They are heirs of the promise because of their faith (Rom 4:16,17). The true children of Abraham are not dependent on physical descent (Gal 3:28,29) and are blessed with Abraham (Gal 3:7-9; cf. Rom 9:6-8). To be a child of Abraham means being like Abraham (cf. John 8:39). Today’s Jews claim this applies to them by physical descent! It is significant that two different Hebrew words are used in Gen 12:3. Curse is # <779>, arar, - “to execute a bitterly curse.” Curseth is # <7043>, qaial, “to make light of, slight, bring into contempt.” those who treat faithful brethren and sisters in Christ, the children of Abraham, with indifference and contempt will bring upon them God’s wrath, the reverse also being true.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Valerie
12:3 The two words £curse” are two different words. The second word <07043> carries the sense of “lightly esteem”. So God is saying that the ones who hold Israel in poor regard will suffer.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
11:3 It is significant that the last time we read “let us” it was God speaking. He was laying out His plan. Now men say “let us” as they lay out their plan. The contrast is unmistakable. God did not like man’s plan and so thwarted it. This was so that His plan could, eventually, come to fruition.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
12:4“As the Lord had spoken unto him” – such a simple statement but it has immense significance. God had spoken and so Abram responded – even though he did not know where he was going – Heb 11:18
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
11:6 The people on the earth had been of “one language” right from Creation. So what was different here?
It is evident that this was the first occasion when men united with one objective – to defy Yahweh, thinking they could escape another flood indicating that they did not believe His promise that He would never flood the earth again.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
12:4 Lot being with Abram means that up to this point Abram has not followed completely the command from God to leave his family and go to a land that he would be shown – see 12:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
12:13 Say you are my sister, that it may go well with me because of you, and that my life may be spared for your sake
Abram had just received the promises (Genesis 12:1-4) which ensured his survival. Yet here Abram is practising deception to save his life. God dealt patiently with Abram even though Abram's faith occasionally let him down.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
12:1 Now the LORD said to Abram
How did God appear to Abram - dream, voice, angelic appearance, messenger? We are not told. But Stephen states that "the God of GLORY APPEARED to our father Abraham" Acts 7:2. This suggests an angelic appearance with a glorious light, like the Shekinah glory, or maybe simply a voice coming through the Shekinah light that enveloped Abram.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
Psalm 15:2 uses the word uprightly. The Hebrew is tamiym. It is used of Noah Gen.6:9, Abraham Gen17:1, the sacrificial animals (translated without blemish) eg. Exo.12:5, God himself (translated perfect) eg Deut.32:4. Many exhortations ensue eg. Prov.2:21(perfect), 11:5(perfect), 11:20(upright).
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
14 - This Psalm is recorded twice (Psa.53) It must therefore be of special significance. It is almost word for word, with just one or two phrases changed just before the final verse. This final verse gives us great hope in the promises of God, where the rest of the Psalm shows us the folly of going other ways.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
14:2-3 This language is used by Paul [Romans 3:10] as part of his argument which has as its terminus all men are sinners. In so doing he reinforces Jesus' words [Matthew 19:17] when he says that there is non good - echoing Psalm 14:1] but God.
Psa 15 - A beautiful Psalm which teaches us the way to please our Father.
Psa 16 - This Psalm was possibly written by David when he was fleeing from Absalom. The instruction in the night season [v7] could answer to when David was surrounded by his faithful men in Mahanaim - 2 Samuel 17:27-29 - it seems that this marked a turning point in David's flight from Absalom.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
Psalm 16 - ABSOLUTE TRUST - EGGS AND BASKETS
They say that putting all your eggs into one basket is not a good thing to do - drop the basket and all your eggs get broken. This may be the case when it come to things of this world - money, possessions, friendships, employment and so on, because none of them are reliable and any could break on us without warning. But it is a different story when it comes to god. As far as God is concerned, he wants us to put all our eggs into his basket because we can be sure that he will never let the basket drop. We can trust God absolutely.
This Psalm is a picture of the implicit trust that the Psalmist had in God. God was his refuge, his safe place to hide in times of trouble where nothing and no-one could harm him. God was the best thing in the Psalmists life. He says, "apart from you I have no good thing." If thats not putting all your eggs into one basket, I dont know what is! The LORD is his councillor and instructor. He is his example, his friend and his support. He has made God his security and his joy. He has absolute trust and confidence in God - much like a very young child places the same confidence and trust in their father. He is the same God today as he was then. Put your eggs in his basket and place your absolute trust in him.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
14:6 Whilst the AV has because the Lord … the RV has but the Lord .. which makes far more sense. Despite the way the wicked treat the poor (in spirit) God is their deliverer and will cause them to stand at the last.
15:1 David was not asking who? because he did not know. Rather he was asking so that he could outline the things that he knew would enable him to inherit the kingdom. We should do likewise - think about those things which please the father - Philippians 4:8
16:8-11 If, as I suggested last year, that David wrote this Psalm because of the uprising of Absalom, these verses, whilst also speaking of Jesus, take on great significance in David's day. He got to the point when he knew that God would deliver him from Absalom.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
- Psalm 14:1 - "The fool says in his heart, there is no God"
- Psalm 15:2 - The true citizen of Zion, "speaks the truth in his heart."
- Psalm 16:9 - The Lord Jesus Christs "heart was glad" when He faithfully considered the certainty of His resurrection from the dead.
Our heart is in that list somewhere.
Psalm 15:5 - "He that putteth not out his money to usury." What do these words mean for us today. We all take interest when the banks pay it, so do we believe that these words do not apply to Gentiles who have embraced the Promises? Under the Law, a brother who was blessed with this worlds goods, was bound to share the blessings of God with his poor brother who might have fallen on hard times - Lev 25:35-38. Only the principle was required to be repaid. The brother blessed with abundance was not permitted to extract more from his brethren than what the Lord required... which was simply the principle sum, nothing extra. So the lesson for today? Do we expect more from our brethren than what the Lord has required or commanded? God requires that we be tough on ourselves, but magnanimous or open handed to our brother - Deut 15, Matthew 5:29-30.
Thought for the Day
"Our duty is not to see through one another... but to see one another through!
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
Psa 14- The ruler (Matt 19:17) should have realised that Jesus would reprove him for his flattery – Psa 14:1 shows clearly that there is none good.
Psa 15 - Following last year’s comment maybe, when you mark your Bible, you would underline the repeated use of ‘He that’ which provides a summary of the way in which we have to behave.
16:4 Those who ‘hasten after another God’ are Absalom and his followers. They were not only rejecting David, the Lord’s anointed. By their rejection of David they were rejecting God. God had explained this type of relationship to Samuel (1Sam 8:7)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
"Their drink offerings of blood I will not offer, Nor take up their names on my lips." Psa 16:4
What a strange thing for David to say. Why would he want to offer someone's blood offering anyway? That was the task of a priest or Levite.
In v5 David confesses that God is the portion of his inheritance. He proclaims that he is glad with that portion allotted to him. He says the same in Psa 119:57 "You are my portion, O LORD". This portion can be found in Num 18:20-24. God had told the children of Levi that they were to have no share in the dividing up of the land. Everyone else was to have a portion, but their portion would be to do the service of the Lord, for which they would receive an adequate living. God said "I am your portion and inheritance".
In saying what he did, David was declaring that he wanted God to be his inheritance. He loved the things of God far more than any temporary inheritance he could gain in this life. By offering himself in this service, he had become the same as a Levite, and as such he saw it as part of his duty to present to God the offerings of the people. This status as a servant to God has always been open to anyone who genuinely desires it, and are chosen by Him according to His foreknowledge. It is gained by separating oneself to Him (Exo 32:26). Some examples are Melchisedek, Moses, David, Samuel, Samson, and John. Are we amongst them?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Rob
Psalm 14 A description of the morally foolish man and the extent of ungodliness in the earth. Rom 3:10-12. Psalm 15 A description of the character and actions of those who will invited to dwell in God's house. Psalm 16 An expression of joy and delight for God's present and future blessings...... particularly the resurrection Acts 2:25-31
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
Psalm 14 - GODLESSNESS DESTROYED
This Psalm should be read alongside other chapters in the Bible like Matthew 24, Luke 21, Mark 13, 2 Timothy 3, 2 Thessalonians 2 and with the days of Noah and Lot in mind. It no doubt applied to the life of David as he wrote it, but I believe it applies to our days even more strongly.
Today, more than ever, with the influence of Darwinism, Communism and Humanism, people are saying that there is no God. We come from a Big Bang, they say, and evolved out of a soup in an ever progressing circle to what we see today. For that reason many question and rebel against the moral laws of God, believing that they are nothing but the stuffy traditions of a past generation. I understand from what I hear that two of the reasons for sending robots up to Mars is to search for life on that planet - and hence to prove evolution, and secondly to prove that there is no God.
David summed all this up so well in verse 1, "The fool says in his heart,'There is no God.' They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good."
It will not be long before this Psalm reaches its dramatic conclusion. Jesus Christ will appear in glory from Zion to save the righteous and to put an end to the godless society in which we live. "Oh, that salvation for Israel would come out of Zion! When the LORD restores the fortunes of his people, let Jacob rejoice and Israel be glad!" (v.7)
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Robert
16:11 - here we have a lovely picture of everlasting beauty - fullness of joy. The word fullness <07648>
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Psa 16:8-11 speaks of Christ. Of that there is no doubt, because Peter says so in Acts 2:25. I wonder if David wrote the whole Psalm to refer to Christ? If that is so, the expression in Psa 16:6, where he says that the lines, or boundaries, or coasts, have fallen to him in pleasant places, also refers to Christ. Jesus would know of this Psalm, and would therefore look at the land of Israel and apply it to His reign in the Kingdom.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
Sometimes the Psalms can have dual applications or part of a Psalm may refer to one individual and another part of the same Psalm could be messianic, etc. We run into the same situation at times when reading of the last days, be they 70AD or future. I agree with David Simpson there are at least some messianic applications to Psalm 16. V.5 would seem to have a messianic application referring to "my cup". V.10 (as mentioned) "nor let your 'Holy One<2623>' see decay/corruption" would seem to have a messianic application (Acts 2:27-32). V.11 - may have a messianic application "...path of life, in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand" (Psa 110:1;Acts 3:21;Heb 1:13).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
14:4 Godlessness is something that is in the world and has, therefore, an impact upon us. It is the Godless, not the righteous, who ‘eat up’ God’s people. An example is the way in which the Jewish leaders Luke 20:47 devoured widows’ houses. The wicked, by their actions, undermine the faith of the faithful.
15:4 It is wrong to ‘vow and pay not’ Ecc 5:4. Our word should be our bond. Our Father is always reliable. If we are to emulate Him we should likewise be reliable, even if our promise is inconvenient to us.
16:8 So despite the fact that David is fleeing from Absalom and he is separated from the house of God David’s focus is still on his god just as it had been from his early years – Psa 132
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
15:2 Whilst, under the law of Moses, men might have thought that it was all about observing detail and knowing – a matter of the head – what one should do, David realised that if the law did nothing to affect his heart then there was little point in his service to God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
Ps. 14 is identical to Ps. 53 with small changes to vs. 5 & 6.
The fool in 14:1 refers to a person who is morally wicked and not to one who is stupid.
16:10 is quoted by Peter (Acts 2:27,31), and by Paul (Acts 13:35).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Michael
16:7 In saying ‘my reins also instruct me in the night season’ David is showing us that he meditates upon Scripture. His ‘reins’ here speak of his mind. The mind can only ‘instruct’ if it has been instructed already through reading the Scriptures.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
16:1 Michtam comes from a root word meaning engraving. The reference is to fine, stamped gold. And so, one can interpret this psalm as: a poem that is a precious as stamped gold.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
16:5-6 David speaks as if he is talking about a parcel of land. However David sees his inheritance differently. It is not just a parcel of land. It is ‘the Lord’ because he sees his inheritance as being forever as he speaks of his own resurrection 16:11 speaks of David having pleasure ‘for evermore’.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
14:7 The perennial problem of the wicked living among, and influencing, the righteous will only be resolved when Zion is at peace and the Law goes forth from Zion Isa 2:3
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
15:4 We are bound by our word. Even if what we have said turns out to be inconvenient. There is an English expression ‘An Englishman’s word is his bond’. Whilst this is not a Biblical phrase it encapsulates the principles of the truth and as such is not country specific. We might say ‘a Christian’s word is his bond’ so when we say we will do something we do it.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
16:11 The “pleasures for evermore” that David speaks of is the “joy” – Heb 12:2 - that motivated Jesus. Does unhindered fellowship with God motivate us to faithfulness?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Psa 16:3 - The "saints<6918>" would profit from Jesus' life and inherit the earth (Matt 5:5) and Jesus will see his offspring (Isa 53:10-11).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
16:8 The word “always” is crucial. We can all, from time to time, set God before our eyes. It is especially easy when we are with fellow believers but ever so hard when in the company of those, or those things, which do not have God at the centre. It follows, therefore, that the company of fellow believers is to be preferred above company with those things which do not focus on God. But how easy it is to choose unhelpful situations rather than helpful.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
TRUTH FROM THE HEART
"Lord, who may dwell in your sanctuary? Who may live on your holy hill? He ... who speaks the truth from his heart."(Psa 15:1-2)
If we want to be one of those people whose dwelling is in God's sanctuary and on his holy hill, who speak the truth from our hearts, there are two things to consider.
Firstly, in order to get the truth out of our heart, we have to put it in. In order to speak truth from our heart, we have to fill our hearts to overflowing with the truth we want to come out. We are a little bit like a computer in this respect, in that all we can get out is what we have put in.
Secondly, in order to be this person, we need to open our mouths and speak the truth that comes out of our hearts. It is no use just having truth, truth needs to be shared. We need to let people know of the way God wants them to live, God's principles, his likes and dislikes. We need to be honest in our speaking, not swayed by money, threats, promises, or awed by the looks or status of another person.
So let's work on getting God's truth into our hearts and sharing it with others. In doing so we will be one more small step to living the way God wants us to live and nearer to his promise of dwelling with him.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Robert
THE fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.”
The British scholar, preacher, and one of the most witty and prolific authors of the 17th Century wrote: “… he does not believe who does not live according to his belief. We can say we believe in God, but do we put our faith and trust in Him?
Here, the word “fool” is the Hebrew, nabal, # <5036>. Abigail’s husband was named Nabal, and he was a fool (cf. 1Sam 25:3,25)!
This verse is not talking about an atheist. A nabal may believe in God and claim that God is in his life, but sees God as an “absentee landlord” and lives as if He did not exist. Now that is being foolish!
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Valerie
16:9-10 It is the lot of all mortals for their bodies to corrupt and moulder to dust. However this was not to be so for Jesus. After three days he was raised to immortality. That realisation caused his heart to “rejoice”. The promise to Jesus is also extended to us. Do our hearts “rejoice” at the prospect of being freed from the corruption associated with sin and death?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
16:7 The way in which David speaks of meditating on God’s word is seen elsewhere. For example he wanted the night watches to not end so he could think about God –Psa 119:148
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
Psalm 14
The words of his Psalm are echoed in Psalm 53. What differences can you find between the two? What might the reason be for repeating these words?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Rob
Psalm 15
"Lord, who may abide in Your tabernacle?
Who may dwell in Your holy hill?" 15:1
To answer this question, it is a little known fact that there was someone who lived in the tent of God. It is said of Joshua that he "departed not out of the tabernacle" (Exo 33:11). He therefore becomes the example of the character we must adopt in order to dwell with God. Samuel also lived in or around the Tabernacle while he grew up (see 1Sam 3:1-15). Take a look at the list of character traits in v2-5. Can you find examples of this in the lives of Joshua and Samuel?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Rob
16:2 Whilst the KJV is not particularly clear here – implying that David did not extend his goodness to God the RV is clearer “I have no good beyond thee …”
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
16:10 Whereas the phrase “Holy one” occurs a number of times in the Old Testament one use clearly speaks of Jesus – Psa 89:19. All occurrences in the New Testament refer to Jesus Mark 1:4, Luke 4:34, Acts 2:27, 3:14, 13:35, 1John 2:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
SECURITY
Every time we see a picture of the president of the United States of America, there is always someone, or a small group of men in suits with ear-pieces in their ears, standing around him. Bodyguards. No matter where he goes, whichever way he turns, his bodyguards will be right there with him. Presidential security must cost a lot of money!
David had a similar position to an American president. He knew how important security was. This is what he said about his security force: "I have set the LORD always before me. Because he is at my right hand I will not be shaken." (Psa 16:8). David put God in front of him, and in return, like a team of security guards, God surrounded David.
The same security is available for us today. Like David, all we need to do is to keep God in front of us as the focus of our lives. In return, God will make sure that whatever happens to us is only for our best.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Robert
16:11 The joys “at Thy right hand” speaks of the resurrection of Jesus to sit at God’s right hand – Psa 110:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
16:8-11 we know that these words speak of Jesus because of their use in Acts 2:25-28. But do we see them as applying to ourselves as well? If we do not have the same focus that Jesus had the reward Jesus obtained will not be ours.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
Psa 14:1 - the atheist's holiday is April 1st (April fool's day), and it contrasts with Psa 15:2.
Psa 14:7 - salvation for Israel (1.e. Christ) to come out of Zion (Jerusalem).
Psa 15:5 - (i.e. he who doesn't take advantage of others will never be shaken).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Charles
16:11The pleasures spoken of is unrestricted fellowship with the Father – freed from the constrains of our human nature.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
16:11 if Jesus could endure the things that happened to him so that he could enjoy pleasures for evermore maybe we could try to look to that time when we are in difficulty.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
16:8-11 David here speaks of the expectations of Jesus Christ. It was the certainty of these things which encouraged Jesus through his life of persecution and opposition. He looked beyond the “here and now” to the future – after the resurrection. That which comforted and encouraged Jesus can sustain us also. The promise made here to Jesus is made to all faithful servants of God – fellowship with the Creator, sharing His nature – (2Pet 1:4)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
15:1-5 We do well to ask the very same questions as avid asked. How do we measure up? Of course it is what we aspire to that matters as not one of us will ever attain to the idea – that is why Jesus died for us.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
16:8 Who do we set before our face? Many follow sports teams, or even individuals on social media that we “like”. We may spend time “following” what they post. They may be “influencers” whose advice and recommendations we take.
Do we spend as much time setting God and His instruction before our face?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
14:1 The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'
The heart is the seat of the real man - where his genuinely held values, desires, aspirations, beliefs and musings reside. (For example: "For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also" Luke 12:34). So the fool may outwardly masquerade as a member of the believing community (probably for gain) but his true self, hidden from other people (albeit imperfectly) is one of atheism.
By contrast, the genuine believer "speaks truth in his heart" (Psalm 15:2). That is, the true believer is true to God even when other people are not around. He is genuinely a believer whether there is an audience or none.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
v.19 - A scribe comes and makes a claim that is not, it would seem, from the heart, since the context suggests that he was put off by Jesus' reply. But we must mean it. Luke 14:25-27, then v.33. Peter really thought he meant it John 13:36-38 but he didn't. What do we think/say/do?
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
Chapters 8 & 9 list 10 miracles
8:2 a leper
8:5 centurion's servant
8:14 Peter's mother in law
8:24 stilling the storm
8:28 two possessed with devils
9:18 The raising of Jairus' daughter
9:20 The woman with an issue of blood
9:27 Two blind men
9:32 A dumb man
You will notice that the miracles are blocked together in the gospel record though it is doubtless the case that Jesus performed miracles all the time. The blocking together of the miracles is part of the way in which the writers, by the Holy Spirit, develop themes in the gospels. It is our privilege to review those themes.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
CALMING STORMS
Jesus is Lord! What other man could ever have stood up in a boat in the middle of a raging storm, rebuked the wind and the waves and had the result of a total and complete calm? Jesus had the powers of nature at his command and he could control them at will. What awesome power it must be that can control the clouds and the wind!
But the wind and the rain are not the only type of storms that come into our lives. Sometimes our schedules and the events that go on around us get out of control and we find ourselves stressed and wondering where it will all end and if we will ever get out of it. Sometimes we feel pressured by people, or sickness, and other trials press down on us. Other times we find that all we relied on or took comfort in is taken and moved. But Jesus is still Lord! He is still able to calm storms and especially able to calm our storms - whatever type they may be. All we need to do is to cry, "Lord, save us." May he calm your storms too.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
:17 In quoting Isaiah 53:4 and applying it to Jesus' healing work we see that Isaiah 53 speaks of far more than Jesus crucifixion. His sacrifice was his whole life. He identified with those he came to save.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Matthew 8:12 - "...there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. " Four times in Matthew's record, he uses these words to paint a very poignant picture. Those described have not simply missed out on something that could not have been theirs anyway... the "weeping and gnashing of teeth" describes the absolute anguish of those who now realise that the prize is not theirs because of their own folly! It is not like they have missed out on the "Lotto" - which they did not expect to win anyway... they have missed out on eternal life... and it was all their own fault. God desperately wants you and me in His great Kingdom. He did not create us to dash us to pieces in judgement. If we miss out on the cherished goal, it will be because we have determined not to be there, either by our actions or by our attitudes.
Matthew 8:21 - "And another of his disciples said unto him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. " It is by no means certain that this man's father was dead. The probability is, that this disciple means that, after his father is dead and buried, he will then be free to follow Jesus. "At the present day, an Oriental, with his father sitting by his side, has been known to say respecting his future projects: ‘But I must first bury my father!’." Jesus wanted first things first. Some feel that this man was not prepared to commit to Jesus, until after the will had been read.... which may have been many years hence. Leave the dead to bury their own dead. The spiritually dead - Eph 2:1 - are always on hand to bury the physically dead, if one’s real duty is with Jesus. It is a good deed to bury the dead, it is a better one to preach Christ.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Cliff
8:4,13 Notice Jesus told the leper and the centurion to ‘go thy way’ which is then contrasted (:19,21) two who would follow Jesus – on their terms and finally (:23) the disciples actually did follow Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
It seems that v.2 cannot carry straight on from v.1. In v.1 there were multitudes following him but the happenings and the dialogue of v.2-4 do not seem likely to have happened in front of a lot of others
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Matt 8:26-27 Not only would the men marvel at Christ's power over the sea and the waves, but they also would have marvelled at the fulfilment of the 89th Psalm. Psa 89:9 "Thou rulest the raging of the sea: when the waves thereof arise, thou stillest them."
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
Here we notice that Peter is married (v.14). Peter is considered by Catholics to be the first Pope, and yet that church, ironically, forbids its priests to marry. Scripture warns us that there would be a departure from the Truth, and this is one example (1Tim 4:1-3). We must always look to scripture as the sole authority for spiritual matters (2Tim 3:16).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
v.5-13 - Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed. But here we have a man who was prepared to ask Jesus to heal from a distance with no desire to witness, and with a recognition that these things could be done without the laying on of hands. And this man was a gentile.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.8 The faith of the centurion points forward to the work of the apostles during the first century, as recorded for us in the Acts. More often, than not, it was the Gentiles who accepted the truth as taught by Paul, and those with him.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
8:4,13 In saying 'go thy way' Jesus is concerned that those he had healed would not publish abroad what had been done to them. Jesus' concern was that they would respond personally to his message.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
There’s a hidden meaning in the first part of this chapter. a) Jesus comes down from mountain, and heals a leper. In symbol, He comes from God in Heaven, to heal the outcast and sinning Jews (Matt 8:1-4).
b) Matt 8:5-13He heals a centurion’s servant. Just as the leper would have been a Jew, so a centurion would have been a Gentile. So this miracle is for the non-Jews. Finally c), Matt 8:14-15 Jesus heals Peter’s mother-in-law. She was woman, a type of the Bride = us, please God.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
V.7 Christ's answer to the centurion was all that anyone could have wished, and far more than he expected. It was a thrilling, concise, and positive assurance "I will come and heal him". The pronoun "I" is emphatic, as if to say. "I myself' or "Without doubt I will come". We think back to yesterday's reading "Ask, and it shall be given you."
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
27 Man can do a lot of things, he can repair a large number of things, such as an automobile, a leak in the plumbing system. A mother can heal a major hurt with a kiss. A surgeon can remove diseased parts of the body. Many family problems are solved by professional counsellors. But, the weather, man can only complain about it. Here we see that Jesus not only commands the sea and the winds, they obey him.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
8:16 ‘When even was come’ is the end of the sabbath as the parallel account – Luke 4:31,38– shows. So we see, incidentally, the opposition of the Jews to Jesus healing on the sabbath.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
TRUST AND PEACE
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Robert
We cannot explain the miracles that the Lord performed because they do not comply with known natural laws (see Bro. John Bilello's book Miracles for some ideas). Take for example the quietening of the storm (vs.24-26). Firstly, this was no mere gust of wind but a furious storm which put life and limb in danger. Jesus, with one rebuke, instantly brought about great calm. Normally, after a storm abates, there would be water sloshing about for some time until it finally came to rest. But here the transition was from storm to calm instantly - what a miracle! Who can understand the power of Yahweh? (Job 26).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Michael
8:8 In saying ‘speak the word’ expecting that Jesus would ‘send’ the healing to the servant the centurion recognises the way in which God’s healing power works as outlined in Psa 107:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
Vs.28,31 People, today, who have mental illnesses are not considered as being possessed with demons. Symptoms and behaviours are better understood, and labels have been attached to identify them. The first century had no such nomenclature. And yet, there are people today, who believe in demons, as evil spirits, that exist to roam the world to torment people. They believe that these superhuman entities have been allowed to move freely, throughout history, to affect their nasty deeds. But Yahweh, creator of all things, did not make supernatural phenomena to torment individuals. However, He did create evil (Isa 45:7). That means Yahweh created the conditions whereby the negative expressions of imperfect human nature could manifest themselves. Mental illness is one such presentation.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
The request from the man to bury his father (v.21) was not that his father had just died. Jesus would have allowed him time out to do this. When Elisha was called by Elijah, Elisha requested time to bid farewell to his parents, and this was granted (1Kin 19:19-21). A temporary time out to put affairs in order is acceptable. However, the request of the man wishing to bury his father was different. He was asking for time until his father was dead before following Jesus. This open-ended amount of time was not acceptable to the Lord. We should not let things in our lives delay our service to the Lord.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
8:3 That Jesus ‘touched’ the leper shows that he identified with those he came to save – see in particular the way that Isa 53:4 is used in Matt 8:17. The prophecy teaches that Jesus' association with those who came to save is what the prophecy is talking about.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
WILLING
"A man with leprosy came and knelt before him (Jesus) and said, 'Lord, if you are willing, you can make me clean.' Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. 'I am willing,' he said, 'Be clean!' Immediately he was cured of his leprosy" (Matt 8:2-3)
Leprosy is a lot like sin. Unless we can be cured of it, it takes hold of us and consumes us until we die. To be leprous is to be an outcast, and so it is with sin. Sin separates us from God. Yes, Jesus cared about the suffering of other people and he was certainly willing to relieve the suffering of this particular man with leprosy. But Jesus' real mission was to "save his people from their sins." (Matt 1:21)
Jesus was willing to save one man from his leprosy, and he is even more willing to save us from our sins. Living a life of sin leads us to death. "If you are willing ..." the man asked. "I am willing," Jesus replied. It is the same when we repent and ask for our sins to be removed. Jesus is very willing to forgive us and to cure us from the terminal disease that leads to death.
So let's not put up with sin and it's effects any longer, but come to Jesus and ask for healing. He is willing to make us clean.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Robert
8:12 We see an example of Jesus’ words being fulfilled in Acts 7:54 where the opponents of Stephen responded thus when they could not deal with what he said.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
Have you noticed that the wind and waves, the gentile, the demon possessed and the outcast leper all knew who Jesus was, yet his disciples did not? (Matt 8:27). This is to demonstrate the lesson in the previous chapter (7:21-25): Do we actually know Jesus and do what he asks us?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Rob
8:9 When speaking of himself being like Jesus – under authority – the centurion is acknowledging two things. The first being that Jesus did not perform miracles through his own power and second that he understood that the authority he had was unconditional. That is he had total authority of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
8:24-25 If the disciples recognised Jesus as their saviour they would not have had the anxieties they had, despite the storm. Likewise we would not be anxious about our lives if we truly believed that this life is by transient and belief in Jesus as Messiah will bring everlasting life. A hard thing to do, but a pre-requisite of Jesus’ disciples.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
“And another of his disciples said unto him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.”
The common practice during the first century AD was to place the body in a cave hewed out of bedrock with a chiseled niche in the wall. When a person died they were immediately buried (cf. Deut 21:22-23; John 19:31; Acts 5:6-10). The initial mourning would last for seven days, a period called shiv’ah. This was followed by a less intense 30-day mourning called shloshim, but the entire mourning period did not end till the flesh was completely decomposed, usually about one year.
After this one-year period, the bones were gathered, washed, and placed in an ossuary and the niche could then be reused for another burial. This was referred to as burial rites (this form of care for the bones), and not to be confused with funeral rites (when the body is placed in the tomb and mourned for). This being the case, it would have been impossible for this disciple to make this request to bury his father if his father had just died. He would have acted contrary to Jewish burial practices! Archaeologists have discovered numerous ossuaries, which attest to this practice.
These passages go beyond the popular opinion of letting the spiritually dead bury the physically dead (as we know it), a conflict of loyalty, or about being covetous in waiting to see what the disciple would inherit. This disciple had requested time to finish the rite of this secondary burial referred to as ossilegium before returning to Jesus. As in the case read in Luke 9:59-60, Jesus answered in a way that would appear stern to us. These disciples already honoured their father by giving him a proper funeral and period of mourning. Jesus was not asking them to dishonour their father contrary to the Fifth Commandment. In each case, Jesus wanted them to keep following him because this concept of a second burial, took on a different meaning in his day - in that rabbinical teaching stated that the complete decomposition of the body atoned for sins! It was a corrupted theological practice, not necessary, and not worth delaying following Jesus! Only Christ’s redemptive work can atone for sins (Acts 4:12; Eph 2:6-9; Heb 9:26), and not rotting flesh!
“Follow me” is the ever-present guiding echo that encases our pilgrim journey as we navigate the challenges of life. It gives us the sense of, “one going in the same way” (Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words) – the Jesus way - who is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Valerie
8:8 In saying ‘say the word’ the centurion is accurately describing how God would heal people - Psa 107:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
8:19-20 In telling the scribe of the privations is an example of Jesus encouraging those who would follow him to count the cost of discipleship.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
A GOOD TEACHER
What makes a good teacher? Reading through the gospel of Matthew in chapters 5 - 7, we find an intensive focus on the teaching of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. Three whole chapters are dedicated to a word-for-word record of Jesus' teaching. People loved to listen to him and by the time he had finished crowds of people had thronged around him to hear what he had to say.
But in Mathew 8 the record switches to a very different tack. Everywhere Jesus went he met people and healed them or met their needs in various different ways. This is what makes Jesus the brilliant teacher that he was. He spoke about giving, praying, having compassion, forgiving, relying on God, and then he went out, and in a very public way, lived the lessons that he taught. He was a teacher who not only said, "Do what I say," but one we could watch and do what he did.
If we want to be teachers like Jesus, we need to do the same. Lessons are great but learning and teaching by example are even better. Teaching by example has a far more lasting effect. So let's make sure we, like Jesus, practice what we preach.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Robert
8:3,15 Here and on two further occasions - Matt 9:24, 20:34 – Jesus is presented as touching to heal.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
8:11 In talking about people coming from the east and west to sit in the kingdom Jesus may have had in mind, amongst other passages, Zech 7:8
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
8:4 Jesus’ injunction to the man who was healed not to broadcast that he had been healed was because Jesus wanted people to believe him because of what he taught, not because of the miracles. The miracles were to give credibility to his words, not to eclipse them.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
8:5 When we read of a “centurion” we should realise that he was a gentile. As a gentile he makes an appeal on behalf of a Jew! A gentile in authority could see the miracles submitted to the whereas the Jewish authorities who saw the same miracles rejected Jesus’ ministry!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
8:2 healing the leper is the first recorded miracle in Matthew’s inspired gospel. This is noteworthy. Under the Law of Moses the priest could not cleanse the leper. The best he could do was to recognise that the leprosy has abated. Jesus’ on the other hand, could do what the Law of Moses could not do – remove the leprosy completely.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
Matt 8:8,9,13 - the centurion recognized he was also under the authority of Jesus and Jesus told him "go" just as the centurion told his subordinates "go".
Matt 8:14-17 - echoes those spiritually sick/dead (who are covered by Jesus' sacrifice) who are healed and resurrected, or those out of the waters of baptism, and who then serve Jesus.
Matt 8:20 - in contrast with the religious leaders who love money and live in mansions, Jesus didn't even have a place to lay his head.
Matt 8:22 - i.e. the spiritually dead can bury the literally dead.
Matt 8:23-26 - when the waves swept over the wooden boat while Jesus was sleeping on it perhaps suggest Christ's death on the cross, and then when Jesus awoke perhaps this suggests the resurrection. When the storm calmed could this refer to the future peace among the nations in the millennial age of rest?
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Charles
Matt 8:28 - "Gararenes[<1046> house of escape - perhaps this refers to escape from sin and death]"; 2 demon-possessed men (Jew and Gentile?) symbolically in sin meet Jesus.
Matt 8:31 - sins joined to the unclean pigs
Matt 8:32 - sins destroyed and washed away by water (baptismal burial).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Charles
8:2-3 Touching a leper rendered the one who touched him unclean. So did Jesus keep himself apart for seven days having been made unclean?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
8:18 there would be many times when the crowds would throng Jesus. On some occasions even seeking to make him king - John 6:15. Taking the boat across the lake would have the effect of diffusing such situations.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
t 8:11 so early in the ministry of Jesus we see him talking about gentiles becoming part of Abraham’s family.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
8:1Jesus went up the mountain in chapter 5. People followed him up the mountain and listened to what we call The Sermon on the Mount. Now he has finished speaking and leaves the mountain many follow him. His message has had an impact and affected the hearts of many. These are the ones who are now following him.
Following Jesus is not a “flash in the pan experience” – it is a lifetime commitment.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
“And when Jesus came to the port on the other side, to the country of the Gadarenes, he was met by two lunatics,* who were just coming out of the cemetery. They were exceedingly vicious so that no man would dare to pass by that road.”
“Aramaic Devana means lunatic or insane; those suffering from mental diseases were supposed to be possessed of devils or evil spirits.”
HOLY BIBLE FROM THE ANCIENT EASTERN TEXT, George M. Lamsa Translation From The Aramaic Of The Peshitta
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Valerie
8:5 Centurions, in the New Testament, often are seen as individuals who had insight into the teaching of Jesus. They doubtless had the responsibility of keeping the peace and would take particular interest in individuals who appeared prominent or who had a following. So they would give particular attention to Jesus. So it is not surprising to find some of them accepting Jesus’ teaching. Are we as attentive to his teaching as they must have been?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
CLEAN OR UNCLEAN?
Matthew 8 begins with a healing; in this case it is a man with leprosy. This man had no doubt whatsoever about the power the Son of God had. He says "I know you have the power to heal me. Are you willing?" Matt 8:2- to which Jesus responds "Yes, absolutely; I am willing".
Have you considered the action Jesus took, which many would find repulsive: He reached out and touched the leper! (There is some doubt as to whether it was leprosy as we know it, or some other disease, but let's go with the possibility that it was, because for the sake of the work of Jesus the same rule applies). Jesus touched an unclean person, which, under the Law of Moses, rendered him unclean also. But in a split second THERE WAS NO LEPER! Jesus was touching, and subsequently took his hand away from, a clean person. If there were onlookers, they would have to admit that there wasn't a leper in sight!
The blessings don't stop there. If that man had lost body parts to the disease we can be sure Jesus restored them.
So it is when we are guilty of sin. We are unwell, and have lost part of our being; our relationship with God is broken. But when we are forgiven, that which was lost is restored. We are made whole again - and the Lord lifts His hands from a clean person.
Do we say, "Lord, can you forgive me?" or "Lord, I know you can forgive me, and I thank you for the promise that you will".
Steve Brinkman [Pakuranga Auckland New Zealand] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Steve
8:24-27 This is a rare occasion when Jesus performed a miracle that did not benefit any in the nation but focussed on the needs of the disciples. It certainly had the desire effect for they said “what manner of man is this?”
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
8:31 And the demons begged him, saying, "If you cast us out, send us away into the herd of pigs"
Assume that demons are real, intelligent, but evil, supernatural creatures that inhabit people to destroy their faith and mental faculties. Why would these demons see any value in being hosted by a herd of pigs (not humans), especially that the madness caused by the demons will result in the destruction of their hosts? They would then be free to go and find some hapless humans to afflict, somewhere else. So why don't they just allow themselves to be set free to inhabit humans, without this irrelevant detour with the pigs? Their request to Jesus makes no sense, even to themselves.
But if the words of the demons were really the mixed up ramblings of madmen, then it all makes sense.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce