AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
v.5 Clearly Jehoiakim should have had the throne anyway, being older, though apparently it takes an Egyptian Pharaoh to come in and sort this out.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
36:13 Notice that hard heartedness is first seen in Pharaoh Exodus 4:21 7:3,13 8:15,32 9:12,34 10:1,20,27 11:10 14:4,8 So when it is used to speak of how Israel behaved the message is very pointed. You are being like the oppressing Egyptians from whom you have been delivered. Deuteronomy 15:7 2 Chronicles 36:13 Psalm 95:8 Isaiah 63:17 Mark 10:5 16:14 John 12:40 Romans 2:5
36:22 Cyrus is called Cyrus king of Babylon on only one occasion. Genreally he is the king of Persia 2 Chronicles 36:22 23 Ezra 1:1 2 7 8 3:7 4:3 5
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.4 - There is a simple significance in the changing of this name. Eliakim = "Whom God will raise up" and Jehoiakim = "Whom God has raised up". It is an understandable change! But the interesting thing is that it was effected by the King of Egypt.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
36:22 The mention of Cyrus in this verse indicates that this part, at least, of the book of Chronicles was written at the time of the return from Babylon or even later.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
This chapter is sad. It describes the final death throes of the kingdom of God on earth. Notice the strict father - son descent of the king of Judah is now lost as different kings are put in place by different powers because of their own political ends.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
36:21 The word of Jeremiah that was to be fulfilled was Jer 25:9-11 amongst other prophecies he spoke.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
The very good news in the last 2 verses of this book, tells us that God's prophecy through Jeremiah came true, and Judah was released from their captivity (2Chron 36:22,23). The Jews had to be back in their land before Jesus was born. God really does rule "in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever He will"(Dan 4:25)
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
V.6 Shortly after Josiah's death at Megiddo, Nebuchadnezzar defeated Pharaoh Necho at Carchemish in 605 BC. The Babylonians were now supreme while the Assyrians and Egyptians took a back seat.
In the same year Nebuchadnezzar's first invasion of Jerusalem took place. Jehoiakim became the first Babylonian captive. Then, about seven years after Josiah's death, the Babylonians conquered Jerusalem (598 BC) and sent exiles to Babylon.
Eleven years later (587 BC) they destroyed the city. During that turbulent eighteen year span, four kings had office. The first three came and went quickly, the fourth, Zedekiah, reigned eleven years (v.11) before being dragged to Babylon in disgrace. Josiah was spared seeing these awful events, according to prophecy (34:28).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
36 We are reading about the kingdom of God, though we might be forgiven for thinking that it was the kingdom of men. :1 the people made Jehoahaz king. :4 The king of Egypt made Eliakim king. :10 Nebuchadnezzar made Zedekiah king.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
It was as a result of Josiah's own stubbornness in fighting Pharaoh, that the final downfall of Judah came about, even though it was God's will that the end would come. Pharaoh uses the occasion of his defeat of Josiah to, 3 months later, depose Jehoahaz & subjugate the kingdom to Egypt.
Jehoahaz & Zedekiah had the same mother 2Kin 23:31, 24:18 , although there was about 13 yrs difference in their ages, & these 2 are therefore possibly the kings referred to in Eze 19
Jeremiah's words are here endorsed as being inspired by God. v 12,22
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
36:22-23 The language of these verses is replicated in Ezra 1:1-3 marking the seamless continuity between the end of 2 Chronicles and Ezra.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
36:13 Even though he had been given a place on the throne by the king of Babylon Zedekiah rebelled – but not so that he could serve God. The foolish man wanted to replace oppression by the Babylonians by his own sinfulness!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
The quick succession of Judean kings was, of course, orchestrated by Yahweh. Ironically, it was the invader Nebuchadnezzar who was taught to realize this fact (Dan 5:21). These kings were instrumental in bringing the downfall of Jerusalem and Judah, but they were not the essential reason. It was the sin of Manasseh that prompted Yahweh to vow retribution (Jer 15:4).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
36:1 Notice that whilst the people made Jehoahaz king Judah is going to lose control of its own affairs for it was the ‘king of Egypt’ that made Eliakim king – 36:4 and then Nebuchadnezzar who made Zedekiah king – 36:10
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
2Chron 36:6 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment
5. Judah (the Southern Kingdom) continued for another 200 years after Israel, the Northern Kingdom and the last king was Zedekiah. It was overturned three times (prophesied Eze 21:25-27), then to remain desolate for many years Hos 3:4.
- The first overturning was in BC 606 in Jehoiakim's reign. (Prophesied Jer 27:6) 2Kin 24:2, Dan 1:1, 2Chron 36:6.
- The second overturning was in BC 597 in Jehoiachin's reign 2Kin 4:10, 2Chron 36:10.
- The third overturning was in BC 587 in Zedekiah's reign. (Prophesied Jer 21:7, Jer 34:2) Jer 38:28, Jer 39:1,2, Jer 52:4-5, Eze 24:1-2, 2Kin 25:2, 2Chron 36:7.
6. The Jews were taken into captivity in Babylon 2Kin 24, 2Kin 25 to last for 70 years. (Prophesied Jer 25:8,12) 2Chron 36:20-21. Jerusalem was desolate. Neh 2:12-15.
Go to Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning.
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Roger
V.1 Jehoahaz means whom the Lord sustains.
V.4 Eliakim means raised up by God. Jehoiakim means whom Yahweh sets up.
Jehoahaz was taken to Egypt where he died (Jer 22:10-12).
V.5 Estimates for Jehoiakim’s eleven year reign vary from 610-599 BC to 608-597 BC.
V.9 Jehoiachin means appointed by Yahweh. Jehoiachin was a also known as Coniah (Jer 22:24); and Jeconiah (Mal 1:11,12).
V.11 Zedekiah means justice of Yahweh. He was Judah’s last king whose eleven-year reign was from 599 BC to 588 BC.
V.22 This was in 538 BC.
V.23 This was in 536 BC.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
36:15 sent to them by his messengers is quoted by Jesus – Matt 21:34 – in the parable of the wicked husbandmen. His hearers would recognise the origins of Jesus’ words and see the implications.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
2Chron 36:6 - KJV reads "...bound 'him in fetters"' [(5178) Heb. "nechosheth" means "fetters of copper or bronze; copper or bronze; base metal"]; given some feel bronze indicates the flesh it could suggest being in bondage to the flesh.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Charles
36:9-10 So the kingdom of God has finished by now. The king is not appointed by God but by one of the enemies of Israel. The death throes of the kingdom of God must have been a terrible thing for the faithful to watch, even though it was prophesied
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
36:12 Notice the mention of Jeremiah. Jer 1:1-3 list the kings that Jeremiah prophesied to. Jeremiah, then, was one of the prophets God sent testifying, who were unheeded
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
2Chron 36:5,11 - some believe the number 11 refers to disorder, disorganisation and disintegration.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
Verse 6 here indicates Nebuchadnezzar's intention to take Jehoiakim as a prisoner to Babylon. Did he ever get there, and if so, whatever happened to him?
Apparently not, and here's what ended up happening to him as can be seen by comparing the following accounts in these passages - Eze 19:9; Jer 22:18,19; Jer 36:30; 2Kin 24:1-6. He was taken prisoner by the Babylonian army when Jerusalem was first captured. He was put in a cage and taken to Nebuchadnezzar's headquarters near Jerusalem. There he was imprisoned and later put in chains to go to Babylon, but the rigors of imprisonment so weakened him that he collapsed and died. So Nebuchadnezzar then commanded that his body be exposed as a further humiliation to the Jews.
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Wes
36:9-10 Whilst it may appear that Jehoiachin was taken to Babylon by a power mightier than he actually the captivity was simply because of his sins.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
The close of Act II
At the end of this chapter it is as if the stage lights go dim and the curtain draws closed. This act is finished, and when the curtains open again we will be in Babylon with Daniel, Ezra, Ezekiel, and in its provinces with Esther and Mordecai. Matthew tells us what the main acts of this great play are in Matt 1:17
"So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations."
The story we are witnessing through the pages of scripture is the story of a nation, called away with Abraham from the world which was descending into idolatry, established as the new centre of the world at the end of David's reign, but quickly descending into idolatry itself despite constant warnings to repent by the prophets. So our second act closes with the words:
"But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, till there was no remedy."
At this juncture we are at crisis point, just as we were at the time of Abraham. If God didn't act then His saints would be destroyed from the earth, and true religion would vanish. The captivity in Babylon would be a desperate but necessary step to save a special nation and the true religion from extinction.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Rob
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
36:22 We should realise that there is a 70 year gap between the previous verse and this verse.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
36:14 Whilst we read that the king was rebellious here we learn also that the priesthood was also corrupt, also the people. The whole nation was corrupt. There was not one, so it seems, who tried to serve God faithfully. Consider the awful circumstances in which Jeremiah had to work.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
36:3 The “king of Egypt” who put Jehoahaz in chains would be the same king who had told Josiah not to meddle in his battle with him – 2Chron 35:21
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
36 this chapter covers the reigns of four kings in a very brief manner. It is as if the death of Josiah marked, in reality, the kingdom of God on earth and now we are watching its death throes.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
36:16 This sorry state in Judah where godlessness was rife brought about the situation that Jeremiah describes when he says God has not pitied – Lam 2:2
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
36 The last four kings were not appointed by God, nor were they subject to His word. Jehoahaz was made king by the people (:1). Eliakim was made king by the king of Egypt (:4) Jehoiakim was taken to Babylon (:6) and Jehoiachin was taken to Babylon (:10) and the king of Babylon made Zedekiah king (:10) So just over 22 years is covered in a few verses. During this time God sent prophets – Jeremiah and Zephaniah to mention two – to try and bring about repentance so that the final captivity might not come. So merciful is our God that against all the odds he was willing to try to win His people. This should encourage us as we strive to serve Him and His son.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
36:23 Cyrus’ claim that God had charged him to build the temple is not quite correct. It is certainly true that God had said that Cyrus would be involved I building the temple. However God said he would lay the foundations – Isa 44:28not that he would build the temple
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
36:14-16 we might wonder what hope was there for the people when their leaders were corrupt! Whilst the prophets sent were mocked by the leaders the common people had the opportunity to listen to their words. They had to make a choice. Whose word would they believe?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
v.11 Consider the following passages in this context - Prov.6:32, 20:1, 23:27-35, Isa.5:12, 28:7, Luke 21:34, Rom 13:11-13
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
4:1 Lord hath a controversy Micah 6:2
4:3 Land mourn ... languish Isaiah 24:4
4:6 people destroyed for lack of knowledge Isaiah 5:13
4:9 like people like priests Isaiah 24.:2
4:10 They shall eat ... not enough Leviticus 26:26
4:11 wine ... take away the heart Isaiah 28:7
4:13 spouses ... adultery Amos 7:17
4:15 come not to Gilgal Amos 5:5
4:18 her rulers with shame ... Give ye Micah 7:3
4:19 they shall be ashamed ... sacrifices Isaiah 1:29
At the border of the land, in the plains of Moab, Israel made a covenant with Yahweh, saying 'amen' to all that he said. The 'amen' is found repeatedly in Deuteronomy 27. Yahweh throughout the prophets utilises the language of the covenant to demonstrate that Israel's behaviour is a demonstration of the fact that they have broken the covenant.
The language of Hosea repeatedly draws on the fact that Israel have broken this covenant.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.7 - This lesson is repeated over and over again in the whole of the scriptures. Time after time we are reminded by the example of Israel just how easy it is for us to drift away and take the glory for that which we do to ourselves. Let us remember - let us remind ourselves every day when we pray, that it behoves us to give the glory for what we might term our own achievements to God, who has achieved those things for us.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
Notice in last year's comments the way in which the language in Hosea matches that in the contemporary prophets - a fruitful area to review when trying to clarify what Hosea is speaking about.
4:10 The quotation from Leviticus 26:26 should have taught Israel that they were astray from God. As the curses were coming upon them it must be that they were astray from God. He was punishing - chastening - them for their sins.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
4:17 That Ephraim was joined to idols and was to be left alone indicates that Assyria had not taken the northern kingdom captive at this point in Hosea's prophecy.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
4:6 In saying 'my people are destroyed for lack of knowledge' God is condemning the priests for it was the priest's lips which should have taught knowledge (Mal 2:7)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.10 We can clearly see from this verse that we can never be satisfied with what the world has to offer
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
The type of Hosea taking a harlot as his wife is continued in today’s chapter. Israel has so forsaken God, committed adultery with false gods, and gone the way of other nations, that God says in Hos 4:1, “There is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.” We must pray that the Lord doesn’t say similar things about us.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
V.15 The location of Bethaven is not known; and there were several different locations of Gilgal. But the appeal to Judah neither to go to Gilgal nor Bethaven has nothing to do with visiting geographical places.
Gilgal means a circle (connoted by a rolling wheel), and probably refers to a circle of stones set up as an altar. Bethaven means the house of idolatry. Thus, Gilgal and Bethaven are being used figuratively to appeal to Judah not to follow the idolatrous example of Israel.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
4:13 Here and in the contemporary prophet - Amos 7:17 - Israel are shown to be unfaithful – this is how they were towards their God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
4:3 The way in which the ‘land mourns’, echoing the language of Isa 24:4, shows how contemporary prophets speak a united message.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
4:1 In speaking of a ‘controversy’ Hosea is using the same idea as his partially contemporary prophet – Mic 6:2
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
4:7 God was going to mar the glory of His people because they marred His glory by their idol worship – Psa 106:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
FAITHFULNESS, LOVE, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
God had a charge to lay against the Israelites. This is what he said, "Hear the word of the LORD, you Israelites, because the LORD has a charge to bring against you who live in the land. 'There is no faithfulness, no love, no acknowledgement of God in the land,'" (Hos 1:4) This was a pretty bad state of affairs, and it is no wonder it was only a very short time later that God removed Israel from their land because of their wickedness.
We may feel that we are not like them and that the accusation of no faithfulness, no love and no acknowledgement of God does not apply to us in the same way it applied to the Israelites who were guilty of it 100% of the time. But if any of these deficiencies are in our lives, even in a small part, there is the potential for them to increase. We must aim to be completely faithful, to be completely loving and to acknowledge God in every area of our lives, no matter how small.
Are we faithful? Are we 100% committed to the LORD, no matter what? Would we deny our Lord? Do we faithfully tell others about him?
Are we loving? Does acting in love for God take first priority in even our smallest decisions? Does 1Cor 13:4-6 describe our way of life?
Do we acknowledge God's hand working in even the smallest ways in our lives? Do we tell others of the way he works in our lives?
Let's be faithful, loving and acknowledge God in every way and at all times.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Robert
Several verses in this chapter link the reason for Israel's failings with the priests who should have taught them about God. For example:
no knowledge of God in the land
|
|
destroyed for lack of knowledge; rejected from being priest (as a nation); you have forgotten the law of your God
|
|
[the same punishment] like people, like priest
|
|
My people ask council from their wooden idols
|
But when we look into the recent history of Israel we find that the priests and Levites had been forced to flee the land of Israel to seek refuge in Judah (1Kin 12:31-32, 2Chron 11:13-17). Jeroboam then made priests of "every class of people", meaning without any entry qualification, which would explain Israel's later predicament.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Rob
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
4:9 The way in which the priesthood failed the people is a powerful warning to us. If we have any understanding of the things of God it is our responsibility to ensure that those with whom we have contact are also kept aware of God’s principles.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
4:17 ‘let him alone, is a terrible situation to get into. God had been working with the nation seeking repentance but had got to the situation where they would not listen so God stopped appealing to them – Psa 81:12 speaks similarly.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
4:3 The mourning and languishing of the land is echoed in Joel 1:10 who spoke at a similar time to Hosea.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
4:6 the prophet returns to the matter of knowledge – Hos 6:6– where knowledge of God is more valuable than animal sacrifices. It is evident that the lack of knowledge prevented them from knowing their God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
4:16 That Israel was backsliding is seen in a number of other places in Scripture. Jer 31:22 is a later prophet who uses the same phrase and as such is pointing to the experience of Israel in the days of Hosea.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
4:5 We should realise that the prophet that shall fall is the false prophet, not the faithful prophet of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
4:19 That Israel are to be ashamed of their sacrifices is echoed in the contemporary prophet – Isa 1:29.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
4:15-17 Israel in the North was a corrupt kingdom and the warning to Judah in the South is to keep away from Israel and her activities. The company we keep affects the way in which we behave – 1Cor 15:33
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
“Therefore shall the land mourn, and everyone that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea shall also be taken away.”
The Israelites had not appropriated to themselves qualities of goodness and demonstrated no trace of God’s covenant standards for their lives and would now face the consequences (cf. Isa 5). They had no truth, mercy, and knowledge of God! They swore (Hos 4:2), i.e. # <422>, alah, to swear “in a bad sense,” i.e., in having misused their oaths and vows (cf. Hos 10:4), lied, stole, killed, committed adultery, and idolatry!
The basic foundation and fountain of true knowledge is to have a reverential trust in God (Prov 1:7, Prov 9:10). They failed to have a right relationship with God; there was no real commitment. Had they truly known God, it would have been reflected in their lives. They did not diligently seek knowledge. Knowledge in Scripture implies experience, not just intellectual pursuit. They were disobedient; they were covenant breakers and forfeited their covenant blessings (Hos 4:3,9,10; cf. Exo 19:8; Exo 24:3,7; Deut 7:11-26). History is repeating itself, and the violation of these very moral laws will bring about a time of trouble such as never was upon us (cf. Dan 12:1; Matt 24:21). God’s moral principles do not change and if violated, it will bring with it dire consequences. We live in an age wherein people worship the sun, fish, trees, birds, animals, self, just about anything, but God! There is no love, no faith, no God, just cursing, swearing, lying, murder, stealing, adultery, and so much more. The environment is a toxic nightmare, and it is global.
It is not just the world that comes under condemnation, but God’s children too, who have made a covenant with Him and His Son, and broke it (cf. Matt 24:10-13; 1Tim 4:1,2; 2Tim 3:1-9; 2Pet 2:1-22; 3:3,4; Jude 1:17-19). Many of us may well be involved in some of the same sins as Israel was, and not even realize it, but as with Israel, punishment awaits if unrepented of. This is why self-examination is so important (2Cor 13:5). We can easily recognize backsliders by taking note of their ungodly lives, their ungodly speech whose fruit clearly reveals that the tree is bad (Matt 7:16-20).
Dr. James Lovelock, Scientist, who once worked with NASA, is quoted as saying in 2008, “Enjoy life while you can because, if you’re lucky, it’s going to be 20 years before it hits the fan.” He attributes the “it” to extreme climate change that will trigger global famine. Stephen Hawking, Theoretical Physicist, Cosmologist, warned, “We have given our planet the disastrous gift of climate change… When we have reached similar crises there has usually been somewhere else to colonize… But there is no new world, no utopia around the corner. We are running out of space, and the only places to go to are other worlds.” He also sees destruction coming from an asteroid strike, which he said is guaranteed by “the laws of physics and probability.” They claim our planet is dying and cannot support the billions of its inhabitants; its destruction is sure.
There are massive die-offs with sea life, birds, animals, referred to as Mass Mortality Events, or MME. It is described as a “terrifying phenomenon” – extinction level, which will greatly reduce our food supply.
Sin plays havoc even with nature and the lower creations (Joel 1:10-12,17-20; Rom 8:19-22). A change in creation came about after Adam and Eve’s disobedience. The entrance of sin and death changed creation and Rom 5:12-19 is a clear reference to the curse pronounced on all creation, as related to Gen 3:14,17,18. Deut 28 speaks of the curses that would come upon Israel’s land, crops, and animals if they were disobedient. Animals do not have moral nature, and could not be guilty of committing sin, but they also shared in the curse (cf. Rom 5:12,14).
The “just shall live by his faith” (Hab 2:4; Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:38). Works are our faithful responses to times of trials! It is so much more than being evangelists and about our claims of good works. Faith that endures under trials and tribulations is the only kind of faith that will commend us to God and Christ (cf. Matt 7:21,23; Matt 16:27; James 2:14-26). We must strive to be obedient and maintain our faith even in difficult times. This pleases our Heavenly Father, who is our Sun and Shield, and because we trust in Him, He will bestow on us His grace and glory, and withhold nothing good from those who walk uprightly before Him (Psa 84:11).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Valerie
4:4 Deut 17:12 speaks of how one who disregarded the words of the priest was to be dealt with.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
4:3 notice therefore shall the land mourn. The godless behaviour impacts on the inanimate land. How was this? We learn elsewhere that God sends drought and other pestilences on the land because of Israel’s rebelliousness. This is how the land would “mourn”.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
4:2 we can doubtless see godlessness in stealing etc. But notice that the prophet accuses them of “killing”. We should realise that those who were godless would stop at nothing – not even murder – to achieve their ends. So godless and depraved was the northern kingdom at this time.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
4:1Society today places great emphasis on “knowledge”. Truth and “mercy” are not words that seem to figure highly in conversation today. Indeed society encourages us to have our own “truth” – that which is true for ourselves but not necessarily the same as others believe. But notice the order in which God places them in His inspired word. “Truth” and “mercy” come before “knowledge”. Adam and Eve thought that they had “knowledge” when they listened to the serpent but in reality they did not have “truth”. We must resist the temptation to show knowledge when we should be showing mercy because of the truth revealed in God’s word.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
4:4-5 By the time Hosea was speaking to the northern kingdom of Israel a substantial number of the faithful priests had left the north and moved to the less rebellious kingdom of Judah in the south. However this did not stop the people opposing those priests who were left in the north.
How do we react when we are told things that we do not like, even when what we are told is right?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
4:12 The contemporary prophet Isaiah speaks often about the making of idols by the people. Hosea makes the same point. The “whoredoms” are the turning away from Yahweh to these “stocks” rather than to sexual immorality even though sexual immorality was often associated with the worshiping of the idols.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
v.7-11 - This is the only occasion we are told of an all night vigil of this sort, but it is described with a certain matter-of-factness that makes me inclined to feel that it was not that rare an occurrence. They were so full of the things of God that they could not stop talking about them. Are we?
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
20:1 Paul having established the ecclesia moves on - but we note (20:31) that he had spent three years in Ephesus consolidating the work.
20:13 Notice at this point that Luke takes a different route from Paul. We have to realise that Luke was not always with Paul in his journeying.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
:13 Another indication of a time when Luke was not with Paul. We should not assume that even though Luke wrote the Acts that he was with Paul all the time. It is not Luke's diary or his journeys. It is the record given by the Holy Spirit.
Peter Forbes
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
20: 17-31 Paul, when writing to Timothy, draws on the language of the sea shore and the elders from Ephesus.
Acts 20:23 afflictions 2 Timothy 1:8
Acts 20:24 none of those things ... 2 Timothy 1:7
Acts 20:31 tears 2 Timothy 1:4
This is because the letters to Timothy are written to him whilst he was in Ephesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
20:33 Following on my comment in May this year notice 'I have coveted no man's silver, or gold or apparel' quotes Moses again (Lev 16:15) where, it seems, that there were accusations against Moses' integrity which we know was often a problem for Paul.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.35 "It is more blessed to give than to receive" This saying of Jesus is not recorded in the Gospel records. However the Lord's teaching was consistent with this. 2Cor 8:9 We also have the words recorded by Luke in his Gospel "Give and it shall be given unto you"
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
ETERNAL THINGS
When Paul popped in at Ephesus on his way through to Jerusalem, he told them many things. Two points from what he said stood out for me in particular. The first one was that none of them would ever see him again, and the second was that after his departure people would come into the church like savage wolves and distort the truth, drawing many disciples away after them. At the end of his short time with the believers they prayed, wept, embraced, kissed and then parted company.
We read this of the Ephesians: "What grieved them most was his statement that they would never see his face again." (Acts 20:38) When we love someone, the fact that we may not see them again has a real pull on the emotions. It will cause us to grieve and weep. Yet we also know that if we are in the Lord, we will meet again at the return of the Lord Jesus. The uniting we will share will far outshine any grief we might have had today. Paul's departure was really only temporary.
Perhaps what should have grieved them more, and should concern and grieve us also, was that disciples from their own number were going to be lost from the faith - eternally. Something still future does not pull on the heart strings so much, but in this case requires much more energy and concentration.
Let's be sure we focus on things that are eternal.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Robert
V.33-35 - Paul took care of not only his financial needs but those of others. He wasn't in it for the money.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
V.19 Serving here means to serve as a bond slave; (douleuo 398) It is an exhortation to all to consider themselves under bondage to Christ, not free to do their own will, but to be ready at all times to serve the Lord in His Work. We must remember that our spare time is not our own. If spare time is used in the Lord's Service, the bond slave is giving no more than his reasonable service.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
20:28 When brethren were described as ‘overseers’ the great responsibility of that task is demonstrated by the way in which Paul describes what they were to take care of. It was the ecclesia. But the way Paul describes its origins highlights the responsibility . It was ‘purchased with his own blood’. Not doing the job properly would mean that some who Jesus had died for would be lost.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
V.4 All the travellers would have carried the contribution from the places named with them. It is interesting to note that no one is mentioned by Luke as being from Corinth in Achaia. Why is this? We certainly do not know, but it is suggested by many writers that Titus may have been entrusted with the contributions from the believers in Corinth. It is also worth noting that Titus is not mentioned by Luke in his recording of the events concerning the first century ecclesias.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
v 26-29 Paul's words here are reminiscent of Ezekiel's description of the watchman & his responsibility Eze 33 Of course it also echoes the imagery of the Lord Jesus concerning shepherding the flock John 10
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
20:24 Paul is so single minded in his purpose that he was willing to accept troubles though he could easily have avoided them by changing his plans.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
20:24 The grace of God was the power of the Holy Spirit which was given to the apostles to preach the gospel to the world. This grace was given to Paul for the express purpose of enabling him to preach the unsearchable riches of Christ (Eph 3:8) The grace was given also, to enable the Gentiles to understand the mystery of the gospel which aforetime was hidden, but is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the spirit (Eph 3:5,5.9-10)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
Eutychus means fortunate. He was aptly named since the Spirit revived him by the hand of Paul (vs.9,10).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Michael
20:11 The misfortune of Eutychus provided an opportunity for God’s grace to be seen. How often do we look for good when something untoward happens to us?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
20:16 So Paul did not stop at Ephesus even though he passed by and there was a small group of believers there who were all very young in the faith. Maybe the reason why Paul did not see the need to stop there was because he was confident in the abilities of Timothy to take care of them. 1Tim 1:3
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
V.7 Sunday has become the day of meeting to break bread based on this verse. We have ordered our lives around it and it has become convenient. However, it is not a divine law and we are free to break bread on as many days or occasions as we wish.
Vs.22,24,26,27 Show the faith and confidence of Paul. Although he did not know what was in store for him at Jerusalem, he was prepared to lose his life knowing that he had given a good account of himself. This is an excellent attitude for us to emulate.
Vs.29,30 We look back through history and can see the development of false doctrines. The great false system of worship which we see in Christendom today grew out of the errors that Paul warns about here.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
20:30 It is complacent to think that false teaching always emanates from without the Christian community. Such a view leads one into a false sense of security with one’s brethren. Here Paul warns that their own number will bring forth error in belief and practice and those who are not wary will be led astray. It is easy to spot error when it is coming from outside the community but we are far less likely to spot it in the early days of its manifestation in our own community.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
20:19 ‘with all humility’ is echoes in Eph 4:2 where Paul encourages the brethren in Ephesus to behave likewise. Of course Paul could not have exhorted the brethren thus if they could not see that sort of behaviour in him. It was not a case of ‘do as I say and not as I do’ with Paul. It should not be with us either.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
20:13 going ‘afoot’ doubtless was more time consuming that travelling by ship. So we have to conclude, even though the record does not say, that Paul went by foot so that he could stop off and visit believers or undertake a specific preaching opportunity.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
20:18 Paul appeals to his lifestyle when speaking to the elders from Ephesus. He makes a similar comment to Timothy – 2Tim 3:10
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
20:35 In telling us what Jesus said – ‘It is better to give than to receive’ we see evidence that the gospel records do not record all that Jesus said.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
How to detect wolves in sheep's clothing
From v17 onwards Paul has assembled the Elders of the believers at Ephesus and is warning them of the time to come when he will not be able to protect them any longer from spiritual threats:
"Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears." Acts 20:28-31
Jesus spoke of this time too, when he used the same phrase "wolves" and warned of the trials to come (Matt 10:16-23). These wolves are characterised by seeming to be harmless members of the flock, but inwardly being "ravening wolves":
"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." Matt 7:15
So both Jesus and Paul warned us about these people. We too should be on the alert. Legitimate members of our flock are sheep and act like sheep. They possess humility and try to live simple lives serving their master. Wolves in sheep's clothing may look like us outwardly, attending meetings and quoting scripture, but will give themselves away in their pride and ambition. Ironically it is the ones who most want to be our leaders that we should be most wary of.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
20:26 In saying ‘I take you to record’ Paul is quoting Deut 30:19 where, Moses, at the end of his life challenges Israel to be faithful – just as Paul is doing here.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
20:31 That Paul had warned the ecclesia echoes the responsibility of the prophet – Eze 33:3-9
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
20:14 Mytilene is only mentioned on this one occasion in Scripture. There is no record of any believers there., An indication, maybe, that not all preaching activities brought a response. We should take this as a comfort when our preaching activities seem to be fruitless.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
20:3 An almost incidental point that the Jews were lying in wait to kill Paul. However this was an ever present problem that Paul had to deal with all his life after his conversion.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
“For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God.”
The apostle Paul made this asseveration to the elders of Ephesus, and by declaring the whole counsel, that being, the will and purpose of God, Paul was innocent of anyone’s choice to turn from the truth (cf. Eze 3:17-19; 33:1-9; Acts 20:27-31), and thus fulfilled his ministry among the Ephesians.
We, likewise, must preach the whole counsel of God, Scripture being inspired by God, God-breathed, and is profitable to all who will receive it (2Tim 3:16). Paul did not share half-truths, or parts of the gospel (cf. 1Thess 2:1-5). He did not shirk from the responsibilities given to him, and having been a Pharisee of Pharisee parents, the Gospel message, initially, did not come easy to him.
Every doctrine in the Word of God is balanced by some other doctrine, and many of our differences arise by laying on one aspect of the Word and neglecting the other, altogether. Studying the will and purpose of God in the whole Bible, Old and New Covenants, is essential to understanding the specifics.
A correspondent wrote the following to the editor of the Christadelphian Family Journal in June 1933: “It seems now, so far as a faithful upholding of the whole counsel of God is concerned, as if the brethren could no longer look to the big ecclesias, and that henceforth, the Truth will be in the custody of a struggling few. When a big ecclesia is seen to use its power and influence to cover over corruption it is time for the faithful to take warning.” To this A.T. Jannaway wrote: “There is, we fear, ground for the correspondent’s remarks. The present laxity and strife in the brotherhood amply justify what is said. Confidence in the Truth has been largely replaced by confidence in numbers, even though the numbers include ‘evil men and seducers.’ The situation need cause neither astonishment nor anxiety to those who are watching. These know the history of the Truth is only repeating itself, and that the prophecies concerning the present times are being fulfilled. It is for the faithful to cling fearlessly to the Truth, knowing that the promised reward is not to be accorded to large or small ecclesias, as such. It is to be an individual bestowal upon ‘him that overcometh.’”
It has been prophesied that the characteristics of sinful human nature would emerge in mammoth proportions. It would seem that now in 2018, we are at its tipping point (2Tim 3:13).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Valerie
20:27 When we realise that the word translated “sunned” is the same word translated “kept back” in :20 we see the force of the point. Paul was not limited in any way in how he preached to those in Ephesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
"Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears."
"'Why the tears? Because of the activity and subtlety of seducers. Paul knew that for his brethren to have abandoned the doctrines he had delivered to them would have meant their rejection at the judgment. He knew, too, the willing ear which human nature has for the wrong. These were the reasons which caused the apostle continual heaviness-he ceased not to warn (Phil 3:18; 1Thess 5:8-22; 2Cor 2:4; 2Cor 11:19-33). Is there less cause for sorrow, anxiety, and warning to-day than in the first century? Are the dangers to those in the Truth less? Is man more wont to walk in wisdom's ways? To these enquiries the words of Christ suggest the answer- 'When the Son of Man cometh shall he find (the) faith on the earth?' Let us not then be indifferent or callous to one another's standing in the Truth. Let us in love and humility carry out the counsel of Paul-'We exhort you, brethren, warn them that are unruly, comfort the feebleminded, support the weak, be patient towards all men.'"
Brother A.T. Jannaway, MEDITATIONS-NO. 48, June, 1928
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Valerie
20:27 Paul speaks of declaring “the counsel of God” to the Ephesians and returns to this theme – Eph 1:11 – when writing to them later.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
20:7 it is usual for believers to meet in the morning or afternoon to remember the death of Jesus. However, it would seem, in the first century the believers met on what would be our Saturday evening. Scattered through the New Testament there are a number of occasions where we are given almost incidental information as to how and when the believers met. Noticing them helps us to build a picture of how the early believers worshiped together.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
HOW TO GIVE REAL ENCOURAGEMENT
There are some people we love being around. Very often those people are the ones that spread encouragement. They say things like, "Wow, that is perfect!" and, "I am so glad you told me that," and, "I think you will be amazing doing that."
Paul was one of those people. As he travelled around, he encouraged people all over the place. This is what we read about him: "...Paul sent for the disciples and, after encouraging them, said good-bye and set out for Macedonia. He travelled through that area, speaking many words of encouragement to the people..." (Acts 20:1-2).
Paul's encouragement was not just nice words. Yes, the nice words enthuse us, but Paul's encouragement would have been to press on toward the kingdom of God, to rejoice in the Lord, to get on with one another, to pray, to rely and trust in the Lord, and to persevere through tribulation. How do I know this? Because these are the encouraging messages he reminded the Macedonian believers about later in his letter to the Philippians.
So let's be like Paul. Let's go around spreading encouragement, and especially encouragement to live victoriously in Jesus Christ.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Robert
20:6 the use of “we” indicates that Luke was with Paul in Philippi and with him though there is no indication that he was imprisoned with Paul and Silas –Acts 16:19. Notice also the “we” in Acts 16:11-13.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
For Presiding brothers.....Why is it recorded that they all knelt and prayed?
“Come, let us worship and bow down, Let us kneel before the LORD our Maker.” Perhaps a presiding brother, should simply say to the congregation 'Let us pray' and let each person decide for themselves which posture they wish to take. Food for thought!
Stuart-Caleb Art Courtonel [Rugby] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Stuart-Caleb Art
20:8 We might ask why there were “many lights” in the room. Clearly it was night time and so would be dark. However one or two lights would have sufficed to provide enough light to enable Paul to be seen. We might conclude that there were “many lights” because the audience, or at least some of them, would be comparing what Paul was saying about the Old Testament with their own copies.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
20:15 the way Paul’s journey and placed he spent time are passed over with few words should make us appreciate that what we are told about certain groups of believers is important to focus on. God, in His wisdom, has chosen to give us “worked examples” of the lives of some that we might learn about commitment to Him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter