AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
9 v.13 - Continuing from yesterday's comment - this loss of life and indeed this act of public vengeance by the hanging of Haman's ten sons on the gallows - does not seem to be condemned by God. It is right that those who act against His people should be removed and that this removal should be public and witnessed.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
We have said that this is the end of the battle to deal with Agag who Saul did not kill.
Saul had been told not to take any spoil, but he did 1 Samuel 15:3, 19 On this occasion Israel were told that they could take the spoil Est 8:11. But even though they had been given permission they did not Esther 9:10. As if to show that they were finishing the work that Yahweh had given to Saul to do.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
9 v.15,16 - In both these verses we are told specifically that they did not take of the prey of the battle. On some occasions the spoils of war have been a notable feature of their battle, but in this case they were not touched.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
To this very day the Jews keep the feast of Purim and celebrate the deliverance from Haman's wicked devices. It parallels with the deliverance from Egypt in that the nation were delivered from one who wanted to wipe them out from being a nation. In a similar way Hitler tried to annihilate the Jews - and failed. Whilst these might seem to be natural deliverances we should, on thinking of them, truly appreciate that God will not cast off His people and will not break His covenant with the seed of Abraham.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
9:17-18 The way that the Jews 'rested' presents the end of the battle with Amalek which was the background of Haman (see Ch 3) - See Deuteronomy 25:17-19
10:1 Do we conclude that the 'tribute' was a direct response to Haman's behaviour and if so how did it benefit the Jews?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Est her 9:1,12-15. We see in these two declarations of Ahasuerus the necessity of Christ. The first decree cursed the Jews and provided no hope of life, it made evident the need of a Saviour. The second did not set the first aside, but delivered them from its curse, thus nullifying it.
Redemption in Christ--- the Law of Moses, seems to be thus foreshadowed.
Esther 9:22. Even though the prophet Zechariah does not mention the feast of Purim, he certainly eludes to the day when the fasts will be turned into days of feasts (Zech 8:19-23) The day when many strong nations shall come to seek the LORD of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the LORD.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to John
9:3 "lieutenants" <0323> is a word unique to this time found only here and Ezra 8:36, Est 3:12, 8:9 and here. It is of Persian origin and speaks of the rulers of each of the provinces.
10:3 In promoting Mordecai to "next unto the king" he is like Joseph (Gen 41:40) Both men saved their people from destruction. Joseph by actions after he had been exalted, Mordecai by actions before he had been exalted - but consequent upon his faithful advising of the king of a plot against his life (Est 2:21)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
The celebration called Purim is not mentioned by name in the New Testament, but we know from Zech 7:3-7 that extra fasts had been introduced to the Jewish calendar in Babylon. I presume then that Purim likewise was added to the calendar.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
10:3 - we read Mordecai was made second in command (like Christ) to the king. Mordecai earned that position by working for the good of his people and speaking up for the welfare of all his seed. Like Esther, many Gentiles are now adopted heirs to the promises. Gal 3:29 - by conquering sin and death Christ offers hope for Esther and hope for all believers.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
The Book of Esther is a wonderful reminder that God is ever present to help, even though there appears for the moment, no tangible evidence of His presence. Let us never lose our faith in Him, for ultimate deliverance is certain (Isa 54:17).
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
Although not a feast under the Law, Purim (Feast of Lots) was kept by subsequent generations of Jews; and is still kept today (9:24,26,28). Unfortunately, for Jews, it serves to bolster the belief in their own ability to overcome enemies rather than giving credit to the LORD.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
9:22 The turning of ‘sorrow to joy’ quotes Jer 31:13. The context in Jeremiah is of a regathering of Israel. So the Jews would be comforted in their captivity that their God had not forgotten them but that He was still working for them as He had promised.
10:2 That Ahasuerus wrote of ‘his power and of his might’ shows that he elevated himself in this matter even though he was the one who had signed the original decree to allow the Jews to be killed! The deliverance of the Jews was effected by God but Ahasuerus wanted to bask in the glory of the deliverance!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
9:19 The sending of gifts at a time of rejoicing is turned on its head – Rev 11:10 – where gifts are sent when the two witnesses are killed.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
The feast of Purim foreshadows the rejoicing of the nation of Israel after their regathering from among the nations where they have been subdued by the Gentiles, and the rebels among them are purged out. (Isa 35, Isa 66, Isa 60:16, Eze 20:33-34) It is a commemoration of Divine deliverance. It points to Divine grace which was shown to the nation at this time, and is a token of that grace that has been extended to all mankind which in Christ Jesus is mighty to save.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
9:12 We should not think that the Jews wantonly went on a killing spree to kill the 500 men in Shushan. It is more likely that there were men who, hoping for favour with Haman, sought to bring about Haman’s desires despite the king’s decree.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
9:4 Mordecai – and by implication – his behaviour became renowned throughout the whole kingdom. If only our faithfulness to God cause many far and wide to be known thus glorifying God!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
Est 9:5,6,12,15,16 - perhaps this figuratively echoes purging that which can destroy God's children - i.e., sin/evil.
Est 9:10,12,13,14 - "10" (some feel the number "10" signifies judgment or perfection of divine order) sons of Haman were killed.
Est 9:10,15,16 - they did not take any plunder though they were allowed (Est 8:11). We are to seek first the kingdom of God, worldly riches are not what we should seek (Matt 6:31-33;Luke 16:13;Matt 19:16-24;1Tim 6:9-10).
Perhaps we have an echo of the deliverance kingdom age: Est 9:16 - gathered together, personally responsible for their lives, rest; Est 9:17 - rest, feasting, gladness; Est 9:18 - 3 days which perhaps suggests resurrection or divine perfection, assembled together, rested, feasting, gladness; Est 9:22 - rested, sorrow to joy, mourning into a good day, feasting and joy, gifts to the poor (Matt 5:3;2Cor 8:1-15;1Kin 4:25;Mic 4:4).
Est 9:24-28 - the "pur" [(6332) means "a lot (as by means of a broken piece)] was cast by perhaps a personification of sin (Haman) intended for Mordecai (and all God's children) but perhaps in a figurative sense the "lot" fell on Christ whose human flesh was broken (Heb 2:14-15) but in the process destroyed the devil (personification of sin/Haman) via a resurrection, and in the process saves the true children of God. This lot or Purim should be remembered and never cease to be celebrated just as believers should remember the sacrifice and victory of Christ over sin and death through the bread and the wine (Matt 26:26-29).
The two decrees of Ahasuerus - The first (Est 3:8-14) cursed the Jews and provided no hope of life - it made evident the need of a saviour. the second (Matt 5:17;Est 8:10-11) did not set the first aside, but delivered them from it's curse (Deut 21:23;Gal 3:10-14), thus nullifying it. Perhaps we have echoes of the law and the new covenant redemption in Christ.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Charles
As if out of nowhere, in Est 10:1 we read "and King Ahasuerus imposed tribute on the land and on the islands of the sea". Why does it say this here? What has it got to do with the story? Let's investigate.
Type tribute into a bible search website, or use a concordance. Can you see anything relevant? How about the first passage that comes up? In Numbers 31 God tells Israel to take vengeance on the nation that hated them, Midian. They defeat Midian and take much spoil (Num 31:7-11). What they do now is interesting - they bring the spoil to Moses (v12) and God commands Moses to count up the plunder and share it out, keeping a tribute portion for God (v25-30). Can you see the similarities to Esther? Remember in 8v11 the Jews had been commanded to plunder their enemies. And in 9:11-12 the number of those killed (and presumably plundered) is brought to King Ahasuerus, just as was done in the time of Moses. So it is reasonable to assume Ahasuerus would want a tribute portion from the Jews of the spoil they took. The Jews were after all a nation in subjection to him, and the enemies they killed were his subjects too. It might even have been Mordecai who suggested it as a way of compensating the king for the 10,000 talents he lost (Est 3:8-10). This rings true, because one of Esther's arguments to the king is that the tax raised from the Jews would outweigh the sum Haman had paid into the treasury (Est 7:4).
Once again the Bible shows itself internally accurate, precise and correct.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Rob
9:25 The ‘wicked device’ is echoed exactly in the Hebrew of Eze 38:10 "evil thought". So the Gogian invasion is a pattern of Haman’s desire with a matching deliverance.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
9:20 So the plan and purpose of God has come full circle and is fulfilled. Haman – Est 3:12– had, by writing, engineered (as he thought) the destruction of the Jews. Mordecai, by writing, that they should memorialise the destruction of Haman.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
9:3 The decree had gone out throughout the whole of the kingdom. Clearly also the whole of the kingdom had been told of the wicked plans of Haman and also of the status of Esther. In helping the Jews the heads of state identified with Israel.. this situation is actually better than a revocation of the original decree. That would have required no action on the part of the people. Because the decree could not be changed and another option was provided people had to make a conscious choice to associate with Israel.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
9:25 The idea of bringing punishment upon his own head has been seen many times before in Scripture – 1Sam 25:29, 1Kin 2:32, 2Chron 6:23, Neh 4:4, Psa 7:6, Eze 17:3, 33:4, Joel 3:4,7, Obad 1:15
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
Est 9:20-32 Mordecai wrote letters to the Jews throughout the provinces instructing them to observe the 14th-15th of the month Adar (12th month) as a period of feasting and celebration for the triumph over Haman the Agagite, the enemy of the Jews. The celebration was to be an annual event for every generation to come. There does not appear to be any reference to the celebration of this feast in New Testament times. However, in John 5:1 there is a reference to a feast “there was a feast of the Jews”. Perhaps this is a reference the man-made feast of Purim?
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
9:6 That in Shushan the Jews killed 500 men indicates that, or so it seems, that Haman had a lot of supporters who shared his opposition to the Jews.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
9:27-28 Notice the feast of Purim which the Jews inaugurated was for both Jew and gentile.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
9:4 The way in which the status of Mordecai increased seems to reflect the principle outlines in Prov 4:18
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
9:2 The way in which the Jews were delivered speaks of a principle laid out in the Psalms – Psa 71:24
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
9:29 Esther being made queen and Mordecai’s elevation might seem completely unrelated. However their independent ascendancy in the kingdom was “of God” for just this time. Throughout the whole of the book of Esther we have seen on many occasions the wonderful, unseen, providence of God in preserving His people.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
9:29 this is the sixth time that Mordecai’s name is associated with him being “a Jew”. Helping us to realise that the book of Esther is concerned with the survival of the Jews. It was Haman that wanted to be rid of “Mordecai the Jew” – 5:13
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
10:3 Notice the high ideals and principles of Mordecai. He sought the wellbeing of his people. Society today teaches that to advance oneself one might have to “stab others in the back” and disregard moral values once cherished. Others who reach positions of status forget from where they have come and move in different circles. Such should not be the behaviour of the servants of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
9:24 Notice how Haman is spoken of – the Agagite – reminding us of his position inEst 3:1. It is significant that the word “Agagite” only occurs in the book of Esther.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
10:1 Haman offered Ahasuerus a monetary benefit in exchange for ridding the kingdom of Jews – 4:9 – and now the king seeks a monetary tribute on all his subjects except, it seems, the Jews. Another example of a contrast between to circumstances.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
COMMUNICATION WITH ATTITUDE
Mordecai wrote letters to all the Jews. His primary aim was to confirm the days of celebration that were to be kept in order that the Jews would never forget the days of deliverance God had given them from Haman’s evil plot. His letters could have been written briefly and to the point, but Mordecai chose to put attitude into his words along with his message.
“And Mordecai sent letters to all the Jews in the 127 provinces of Xerxes’s kingdom – words of goodwill and assurance – to establish these days of Purim at their designated times.” (Est 9:30-31).
The attitude Mordecai added to his letters was that of goodwill and assurance. What a positive and uplifting letter that must have been. So much for the formal state letter that leaves you feeling washed-out and confused!
Since the days of Mordecai, postal and communication systems have improved hugely. Any of us can communicate with almost anyone at any time. Let’s make sure our communications are filled with attitude – an attitude of goodwill and assurance. It doesn’t matter what we say, it’s how we say it that counts.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Robert
9:17-20 And now, after the Jews are delivered from wicked Haman, that “feasting” is mentioned four times. It is the Jews “feasting” because of their deliverance.
In a way it reflects that rejoicing of those delivered form sin and death.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
v.2 - In sending Jonah to Nineveh, God is turning to the Gentiles and offering them the way of salvation through repentance. Maybe this was part of the reason for Jonah's reticence, given that even many years later, Peter, who had been with the Lord, had to be persuaded by a vision. Jonah also knew just how embarrassing it would be for his own people if a Gentile city repented. This, presumably, is what God intended, that they might be shamed into repentance themselves.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
1:1 Jonah was from Gathhepher 2 Kings 14:25 Gath Hepher is a small village, in Biblical times, just a few miles West from the Southern end of the Sea of Galilee. Thus Jonah was a prophet from Galilee. See the comment of the Jewish leaders to Nicodemus John 7:52
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.5,15-16 - Quite an incidental extra to this story, it seems, is that the people on the boat turned from their gods in v.5 to worship the true God by v.15-16 having seen the way he had dealt with Jonah, and His power over the elements.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
1:3 Whilst Jonah was fleeing from the presence of the Lord it is clear that in reality he realised that was not possible - else he would not have prayed out of the belly of the fish - Jonah 2:2 - however he still fled to Tarshish. We can behave in a similar way. We know that God can always see our actions and know our thoughts but we still stray from His way.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
Whilst Jonah takes a back seat in the storm account this contrasts powerfully with Paul (Acts 27:10-44) who is a major player in the narrative. A contrast. Jonah was fleeing from God - or trying to. Paul saw his journey to Rome as an opportunity to preach.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM THE LORD
Jonah didn't like what God told him to do. As there was no use complaining or saying "NO!", Jonah decided to run away and hide from the LORD instead. He caught a ship going in the opposite direction from where God wanted him to go and went into the bottom of the ship and fell asleep. If anywhere was going to be safe from the eyes of God, this was going to be it. Jonah was far from the place he should have been, in the middle of the sea, in the bottom of a boat and asleep. It had about the same amount of impact on God as a child standing in the middle of a room with his eyes shut, shouting, "You can't see me!" But God knew exactly where Jonah was and he sent a storm to prove it. Jonah was about to learn a lesson. He thought God couldn't see him in the middle of the sea, in the bottom of the boat with his eyes shut. But then he was thrown overboard and swallowed by the fish. Now he was hidden by God, and he knew that God knew where he was. God had hidden Jonah better than he could hide himself. He was in the middle of the ocean, at the bottom of the sea, inside a fish and in total darkness. From there Jonah learned that God can see everything, everywhere and that he hears prayer from even the remotest and most well hidden of places.
The lesson is that no matter how well hidden we are, no matter how many curtains we pull and how many doors we shut and lock, God sees us and he knows everything we do. But if we repent and turn back to God he will hear our prayer from where ever we happen to be..
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Robert
Jonah 1:3. The lesson for us is that we must at all times, discern the will of God, accept the will of God, and always be aware that we can not hide from God.
Jonah 1:4. This storm that blew up must have been unusual and unexpected, the sailors of this period would have been aware of weather patterns, and would not have set out to sea if any storm warning had been present. You will remember that on Paul’s journey to Rome the sailors were aware of the weather patterns.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to John
Jonah came from Gath Hepher (2Kin 14:25). Today Gath Hepher is called El Meshed and is situated two miles from Nazareth (in Galilee). The (supposed) tomb of Jonah is there and revered by the locals. The proximity of Gath Hepher to Christ's home town adds even more weight to the statement in John 7:52.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Michael
1 When we read the prophecy of Jonah we should realise that we are being shown the problem that Jonah had with the righteousness of God. His actual words of prophecy are very few. Look for them in your reading.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Jonah, whose name means dove, prophesied about 760 BC during the reign of Jeroboam II. He tried to flee from the presence of the LORD (v.3) to avoid going his responsibility in going to Assyria. We are reminded that wherever we are, we cannot evade the presence of the LORD. The psalmist says it best: Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there (Ps 139:7,8). And so, let us remember that whatever we say, or in whatever activity we are involved, the LORD hears all and sees all.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
Jonah seems to be an echo of Christ's resurrection and mission to all nations.
1:4 - here we have a ship (which would be constructed of wood) passing through water which reminds one of the ark which saved people passing through the water (like the burial of baptism) and also might remind us of Christ on the cross who defeated the power of sin and death. 1:5 - here we have the mention of a deep sleep (death has been described in the Bible as like sleep). 1:7 - we have the casting of lots (not unlike the casting of lots for Christ's clothing). 1:12 - Jonah chose to be thrown into the sea (symbolic of burial or water baptism and the burying of sinful ways) to save others much like Christ who offered his life for others. 1:14 - the concept of not being accountable (Jesus said, "Father forgive them...") for taking another's life. 1:15 - the actual throwing of Jonah into the sea (like the actual killing/burial of Christ) prepared the way so others could survive. 1:16 - the mention of sacrifice. 1:17 - being buried or swallowed up in a place of darkness for three days. 2:2 - we have mention of the righteous Jonah being in "hell" which is the Heb "sheol" (7585) meaning "grave, pit", etc. the same place where Christ went for three days upon his death and where all dead people and animals go (Psa 49:12-20). Jon 2:4 - Jonah has faith that he will see a holy temple (much as Christ looked forward to the kingdom age when he will return to the earth). Jon 2:6 - we have a resurrection from "corruption" Heb. "shachath" (7845) means "corruption, grave , pit", etc. (similar to Christ being spared from corruption in the grave). Jon 2:7 - praying to God as his life ebbed away (much as Christ prayed to God on the cross). Jon 3:2 - Jonah reached out to Nineveh a Gentile city (Christ died for Jew and Gentile). Jon 3:3 - the mention of three days to reach Nineveh (it took three days to be able to reach out to Nineveh just as Christ's sacrifice grafted in Gentiles as heirs of the promises to Abraham. Gal 3:26-29). Jon 3:4 - we have the mention of 40 days (Christ roamed 40 days after his death and earlier fasted the same). Jon 3:5 - Nineveh puts on sackcloth and thus mourns their sins and repents.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
You cannot escape from God. The Lord told Jonah to go east, and he went west. And look how many people and how much sea was disturbed just to get Jonah back to where he should be! Even a special fish was created. That hadn’t happened since the 6th day of creation!
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
1:2 In speaking of Nineveh as a ‘great city’ God is harking back to His description of the city in Gen 10:12.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
1:13 We can conclude that the ship was not far from land because we are told they ‘rowed hard to bring it to land’ – something that would not be attempted if they were a long way from the land. So we conclude that the storm arose only a very short while after they had left port.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
1:9, In telling the mariners that he was a Hebrew we have confirmed that Jonah was not frightened to speak about his God. His concern was that the Ninevites would repent and God would forgive them – Jon 4:2
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
The use of 'great' (Gadowl 01431) in Jonah is interesting.
Great city
|
|
Great wind
|
|
Great tempest
|
|
Great fish
|
|
They repent from the greatest to the least
|
|
Great kindness (different word, synonymous idea?)
|
There are a few others where gadowl is translated 'exceeding'.
James Walker [Milnsbridge UK] Comment added in 2008 Reply to James
In 700 BC, Nineveh was Sennacherib's great capital city of Assyria. In Jonah's time, the capital was Calneh which lay some 20 miles south of Sennacherib's city. Calneh, however, was part of the city-state which included Nineveh.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
1:2-3 Notice the contrast that the wording forces us to see. God told Jonah to ‘arise’ – Jonah did ‘rise’ but in direct opposition to the instruction of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
1 That this book of Jonah focuses upon the problem of Jonah is seen more clearly when we do see – 2Kin 14:25– that he did have a message for Judah.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
1:3 The Psalmist - Psa 139:7 – had highlighted his appreciation that one cannot hide from the omnipresent God. It seems, at least at the beginning of this charge to the prophet that he did not accept what the Psalmist said. Doubtless he was aware of what the Psalmist had said but it did not impact on the way he thought. We are, so often, like that. We are aware of Bible truths intellectually but that knowledge does not cause us to change the way we live. A powerful warning.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
“NOW the word of the LORD (Yahweh) came unto Jonah the son of Amittai, saying, Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry against it; for their wickedness is come up before me. But Jonah rose up to flee unto Tarshish from the presence of the LORD (Yahweh) and went down to Joppa; and he found a ship going to Tarshish… and went down into it… from the presence of the LORD (Yahweh)."
The Ninevites were Assyrians, much feared as a military force to be reckoned with, from back in King David’s time. Nineveh was the oldest and most populous city of the ancient Assyrian Empire, situated on the east bank of the Tigris River opposite modern Mosul, in Iraq. They are the descendents of the rebellious Nimrod.
When God asked Jonah to warn the Ninevites, Jonah was scared as these pagan Assyrians were the traditional enemies of the Israelites. Not only where the rulers of Assyria terribly cruel, they boasted of their cruelty on monuments that exist in museums to this day! Some of their boasts read: “I cut off their heads and formed them into pillars.” “I cut off the limbs of the officers, the royal officers who rebelled.” Jonah decides rather to take a ship in the opposite direction, but the ship was caught in turbulent waves. After being swallowed by a whale specially prepared by God and miraculously saved, Jonah then proceeds to Nineveh and they repent.
It is very interesting to note the events prior to Jonah's preaching to them around 758-757 B.C. - factors which may have prepared the people to receive Jonah’s message of destruction unless the inhabitants repent for their sins of idolatry, violence and immorality.
In 765 B.C. Nineveh, the mightiest army in the world became powerless before a plague!
In 763 B.C. on June 15th, there was a solar eclipse. They were afraid of eclipses, thinking they were bad omens!
In 759 B.C. another plague hits Assyria. This was just one to two years prior to Jonah’s preaching to them!
It would appear that they were ripe for repentance at that time, but later turned back to their evil ways.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Valerie
1:6-8 Jonah is asleep in the boat during the storm – rather like Jesus when the disciples come and wake him up –Mark 4:36-38 – but whereas Jonah was cast into the sea Jesus calmed the sea with a word. So there was a similarity both Jonah and Jesus calmed the storm with words.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
“Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry against it; for their wickedness is come upon before me… And the LORD (Yahweh) spake unto the fish, and it vomited out Jonah upon the dry land.”
“Great” is the Hebrew word, gadowl, # <1419>, which also carries the meaning of a “large city, insolent, proud.” The LORD was not extolling Nineveh for its greatness. Indeed, history records the gory cruelties incurred in this “great city,” the name of which brought fear into the hearts of men at its mere utterance. Nineveh, a major Assyrian city is located at present day Mosul, Iraq.
These Ninevites believed God and repented after Jonah tells the Ninevites of God’s judgment (Jon 3:4-10) in spite of very little evidence from him! It would make one wonder how such an Assyrian race, Israel’s worst enemy, could respond to a Hebrew prophet with such a sudden conversion, especially in light of the fact that Christ, a greater than Jonah, provided numerous evidences of who he was in his day, but few repented (Matt 12:38-41; Luke 11:32)!
There have been discoveries of fish-god sculptures found in Nineveh, Assyria. Did the worship of Dagon, their fish-god, make them more susceptible to Jonah’s preaching? Given Jonah’s extraordinary arrival upon the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, that Jonah had just been spewed out from the belly of a great fish, smelled like fish, possibly witnessed by some superstitious Ninevites - it is possible that this incidence would have reached right up to the King of Nineveh, heed Jonah’s words, and cause the city to proclaim a fast and repent in sackcloth and ashes.
Jonah often gets a bad rap for his behaviour, but his behaviour reminds me of Moses’ behaviour when he was asked to go back to Egypt to speak with Pharaoh (Exo 3 - Exo 4:14). It is truly amazing that the first thing God revealed to Moses about Himself when Israel rebelled against Him was that He is merciful and compassionate (Exo 34), and now He wanted Jonah to learn this very important lesson.
Jonah had to go it alone, but one fact often over-looked was his compassion toward the sailors. He gave them a plan designed to release them from God’s wrath, which would result in his own death! Jonah was not a compassionless man, as also evidenced by his reaction even to the gourd, he just could not believe that the Assyrians could repent within forty days, just as today’s critics of the Bible find Nineveh’s repentance hard to believe.
Jonah had no compassion toward the Ninevites. However, he learned that we are to show compassion toward all, just as God was compassionate and merciful and gave even a city like Nineveh space to repent. History reveals that this repentance did not last and Nineveh was destroyed as prophesied by the Hebrew prophets, especially Nahum.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Valerie
1:6 Jonah, who had already told the mariners of the reason for his journey, – Jon 1:10 - behave in a way so out of character from the mariners. Why was Jonah so relaxed about the storm that he was able to sleep? The record does not provide a reason.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
The story of Jonah may have taken place during the reign of Jeroboam II because of a reference to Jonah in 2Kin 14:25. He is from town belonging to the tribe of Zebulun called Gath Hepher, or Gittah-hepher, see Josh 19:10-13, which is in the North of Israel near to Galilee. That means his journey to Joppa (modern Jaffa) could have been 100km, at least a three day journey.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
1:14 The mariners must have had some knowledge and regard to Yahweh for they cry to Him asking that killing Jonah would not be held against them.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
1:2-3 Often, even though God does not directly command us, we see work that has to be done. All too often, maybe, we hang back or find excuses for not doing that work. Jesus told a parable about men who made excuses –Luke 14:16-20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
1:4 From the reaction of the mariners we have to conclude that this storm was like nothing that they had experienced before.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
1:4 The seemingly casual comment that the Lord sent a great wind highlights that God is actively working in His creation to fulfil His purpose.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
By comparing Jon 1:1 with 2Kin 14:25, we learn that Jonah’s father was Amittai. This is the same Jonah, the prophet after Elisha, of the Northern Kingdom of Israel under King Jeroboam II circa 786-746 BC. This was before the Assyrians under King Shalmaneser conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel in 722 BC. Nineveh, a city founded by Nimrod (Gen 10:7-11), was the ancient capital of Assyria.
Unlike the other prophets who were sent to prophecy to Israel and Judah, Jonah was sent to prophecy to Nineveh. It was the capital of the Gentile Assyrian Empire, one of Israel’s fiercest enemies! Historians record the Assyrian King at this time was Ashur-Dan III. These people were outside of the Mosaic covenant relationship with Yahweh, nonetheless, they were accountable to His moral laws (Jon 1:2). Since sin is the transgression of Divine law (1John 3:4; cf. Rom 4:15), specifically designed to regulate human morality, it was not meant only for the nation of Israel, as some believe and teach!
Jonah chose to be disobedient to Yahweh’s command and fled from Him. No other prophet is recorded as doing so! He went down to Joppa, boarded a ship going down to Tarshish, while going through a fierce storm, Jonah went down in the ship to sleep (Jon 1:5) while the mariners wrestled to save the ship! Everything Jonah did took him further from Yahweh!
The “great fish” (Jon 1:17) “prepared” by Yahweh for Jonah is not a whale even though so translated in the New Testament (cf. Matt 12:40). “Whale” is mistranslated, and should only read as, “a huge fish” as described here in Jonah. A whale is a mammal, in the cetacean family, and not a fish. What Yahweh has foreordained, He will accomplish, so there is no point in running away from Him (Isa 46:9-11). No artful dodger can thwart His plans!
Crying out by reason of affliction certainly indicates conscious suffering (Jon 2:2). Yahweh brought Jonah down more than he could ever go (Jon 2:6) before bringing him up again after his praying for deliverance (vv. 2:2-9). Jonah was sorry for what he did, but not repentant as some allege. Repentance is not just being sorry, but requires turning away from our evil conduct. This Jonah did not do, and his prayer, though pious, was a mere death-bed confessional prayer. Since repentance is essential to salvation, salvation is not exclusive of all types of works (Luke 13:3,5).
After Jonah was rescued from the great fish's belly, he entered Nineveh with his blunt, simple, and brief message, “Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown” (Jon 3:4)! History records that Nineveh suffered from severe plagues in 765 BC, a revolt from 763-759 BC, which was followed by another plague at the end of their revolt. Nineveh was ripe to receive Jonah’s prophecy, and “turned from their evil way” (Jon 3:10). They repented (Matt 12:41).
We read in Jon 4:1, that Jonah was exceedingly displeased and very angry! Jonah did what he was commanded to do, but did so grudgingly. He hadn’t changed at all! He left the city of Nineveh pouting, having compassion on a gourd, failing to learn the lesson Yahweh wanted to show him.
Being sorry is not enough. Judas was sorry, but unrepentant! Jonah failed to love, he failed to forgive when Nineveh repented and strived to get right with Yahweh (Jon 3:5-10). Jonah did not want Nineveh to repent, he wanted them destroyed. His disobedience, rebelliousness, unfaithfulness, lack of compassion, stubbornness, and hardness of heart actually typified the nation of Israel!
A true prophet does not run from Yahweh, and this Israelite prophet was “vomited out” (Jon 2:10; cf. Rev 3:16). While the Gentiles are viewed with increasing admiration and respect; the pagan sailors viewed with compassion (Jon 1:12-15), Jonah was viewed in a bad light. The pagan sailors perceived Jonah to be “innocent,” (Jon 1:14) not having done anything worthy of death, but Jonah was anything but innocent! The book ends with Jonah grumbling and arguing with Yahweh; the hero and villain reversed! What powerful lessons for a book with only 48 verses!
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Valerie
1:12 Jonah’s selfless act – being willing to be sacrificed for the safety of the other sailors shows a commitment like we see in Jesus – willing to die to save men and women.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
THEY KNOW MORE THAN YOU THINK
You never know who is watching you, or how much they know about your God.
Take Jonah, for example. He had run away from God and taken a ship to Tarshish. No doubt all the sailors and most of the people on board were Gentiles and did not know the LORD. In fact, when the storm blew up and they all felt out of control,"the mariners were afraid, and each cried out to his god." (Jonah 1:5).
It seems that Jonah was the only Hebrew on the boat, because when the captain woke him up and told him to call on his god, and when they all cast lost to find out who had caused all the trouble, they discovered that Jonah was a Hebrew who served the LORD. This was their reaction: "Then the men were exceedingly afraid." (v.10). They knew more about what it meant to be a Hebrew and of the power of the LORD than what we might realize.
My guess is that the people around us know more about God than we realize too - maybe they just don't want to let on what they know for fear of responsibility. So let us always try to live up to the standards God expects from us, so that we are witnesses to those we don't realize are watching.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Robert
1:7 that the mariners cast lots to find the cause of the storm indicates at least two things.
1 the storm was like nothing that they had seen before. And
2 they were so superstitious that they thought casting lots would, in some way, help them. Though what they thought they would do with any information the lot gave them one wonders. As it happens God was in control so he used their superstition to bring about his will.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
1:7 the outcome of casting lots here is consistent with what we read in Prov 16:33. However we should not think that God always makes the choice though clearly in situations where He has a de sired outcome he influences matters.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
1:9 Notice how Jonah described his God? He describes Him as the Creator. We might have thought that he would describe God as the God of the Hebrews which is, indeed, what He is. However the mariners needed to understand that Yahweh was not a territorial God but controlled everything. Thus “Creator” is so appropriate.
The same is true today. Our God is not just the God of Christians. He, as Creator, controls everything and is lord of everyone.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
1:3 It is a little word. However “but” introduces us to Jonah’s unwillingness to do God’s bdding. We will see again – 4:1 – how Jonah was unwilling to recognise God’s will was for the good of mankind.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
1:8 We need to be clear in our own minds. Jonah was not afraid of speaking about his faith in Yahweh – It is just that he was selective in who he would tell. The men of Nineveh were not to hear the word of God if Jonah had anything to do with it.
Are we selecting in our preaching? Are there certain groups of individuals that we think that the gospel message should not be preached to some?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
6:1 - There is surely only one way in which this verse makes sense - in encouraging us to move forward from the basic understanding that we had when we believed. Clearly we are not being encouraged to turn away from Christ, but instead to move on from the first principles and develop our spiritual lives. ch.5:12-14
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
6:19-20 Demonstrate that the route that Jesus took is the route that we will follow. The implication being that because Jesus has overcome those who imitate him will do so also.
ch.7 - This chapter demonstrates, from the Old Testament, that the Aaronic priesthood was inferior to the Melchisedec priesthood in order that the exalted status of Jesus - above that of the Aaronic priesthood can be seen.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
6:18 Fled for refuge reminds us of the way in which an accidental manslayer could seek sanctuary in a city of refuge. We are all unintentional manslayers - we destroy ourselves! However the death of the High Priest (Numbers 35:25)- Jesus - provides us with a city of refuge.
7:25 The contrast is between the Levitical priest who could not minister for ever 7:23 'by reason of death:' and Jesus who 'ever liveth'
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
6:15 The example of Abraham's patient endurance would be very necessary for the brethren in Jerusalem who would be suffering greatly through their willingness to accept the sacrifice of Jesus. In accepting Christ the many priests that believed (Acts 6:7) would have lost all the status they had in society and would have also lost their livelihood.
ch. 7 - Whereas some have, in the past, suggested that Melchisedec was in fact Shem there is no value in such suggestions. The very point of the argument in Hebrews is that there is no need to know his ancestry.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
6:19 'within the veil' quoting Lev 16:15 is yet another quotation of the details of the day of atonement.
7 The idea of getting the order of events clear figures prominently in this chapter
7:2 First after that
7:7 Less blessed by greater
7:9 Levi paid tithes being in the loins of Abraham
7:27 first then
In making these points Paul is stressing the superiority of the work of Christ over the law of Moses in that whilst coming after the giving of the law its principles pre-date the law.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
6:3 "if God permit" Spiritual understanding leading to maturity can only come by the closeness of the mind to the things of God, which things expressed in His Word, come from from God Himself (1Cor 2:13, James 1:5)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
Jesus was to be a priest after the order of Melchizedek (6:20; 7:3). Trinitarians use these passages to prove that Jesus is God because He has no human family tree, and that He lives forever. Melchizedek was a man, and like all men he must have had parents and a family tree. The phrase Without father, without mother, without descent (7:3) simply means that his genealogy is not stated. The phrase having neither beginning of days, nor end of life (7:3) tells us that the dates of his birth and death are not disclosed. Jesus, on he other hand, had a stated human genealogy (Matt 1:1-17; Luke 3:23-37). The date of His birth is known (4 BC), and his death, some thirty-three years later, is well documented. Melchizedek (means King of Righteousness) shows forth Jesus in spiritual type and not in physical attributes.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
6:8 The ‘thorns and briers’ described the consequence of Adam’s sin in general terms and the state of the ‘vineyard of the Lord’ – Isa 5:6 – which was the reason why God was going to uproot Judah from the land which happened in the days of Zedekiah. A veiled warning about AD 70 to the inhabitants of Jerusalem to whom the letter to the Hebrews was written.
7:11 And so the point made in December this year is concluded. Notice it is not whether the Levitical priesthood was of any use or not. It all revolves around ‘perfection’
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
7:3 The writer purposely avoids speaking about Christ. He places the greatness of Melchizedek in historical perspective in order to compare Christ with the king-priest in the succeeding verses. The superiority of the Son of God, however the author demonstrates by saying that Melchizedek is "like the Son of God"
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
7:4‘Consider’ is a recurring theme in Hebrews (3:1, 7:4, 12:3) encouraging the Hebrew priest that believed to reflect on the contrast between Jesus and the Levitical priesthood.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
6:15 Paul is saying that Abraham waited after he had been called by God. He was called from Ur and it was not until he had been in the land for some years that God gave him the promise of the birth of the son through which the promise of inheriting the land would be fulfilled.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
6:16 The believing priests would be well aware of the way in which an oath stopped discussion on a matter. This was the principle they would be used to using when dealing with disputes – Exo 22:11
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
7:5 Just as Melchisedec took tithes of Abraham the Levites were instructed to receive tithes of the people – Num 18:21,26 – thus Melchisedec’s status is confirmed.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
THE ANCHOR HOLDS
As a child I still vividly remember going out fishing with my grandparents. We would row out into the bay from the beach outside our holiday home, drop the anchor and wait for the fish to bite. Then after we had caught what we wanted, my grandfather would pull up the anchor and we would row back in. I also recall a time or two when the anchor would not come up no matter how hard or from what direction my grandfather pulled. On one occasion I remember him cutting the anchor rope because the anchor was so firmly embedded into the rock or weed on the bottom.
It was this firm hold that the writer to the Hebrews was referring to when he spoke about the need to anchor our souls to the promises of God. He spoke about the promises to Abraham, "I will surely bless you and give you many descendants" (Heb 6:14), then after describing how certain these promises are to be fulfilled, said, "We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain, where Jesus, who went before us, has entered on our behalf." (v.19-20) With our hope in God's promises, it is like we have put down our anchor, which has been taken by Jesus into the most firm hold possible, then to be watched over by him as a final precaution against it coming loose.
Let us anchor our souls to the solid rock of the promises of God.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Robert
Christ Our City of Refuge
Heb.6:18-20– “That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie , we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge … even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.”
The Greek word in Hebrews that is translated "refuge" is the same one used in the Septuagint in the passages describing the cities of refuge. The writer of Hebrews is telling us that the only way to experience the power of God that saves us is when we run to Him in desperation--for refuge.
And to understand one of the clearest explanations of entering into the refuge of Christ, we turn to Joshua 20. When Israel entered the Promised Land, God gave them a constant reminder of His salvation. This reminder was ordered by God to be set up in the Land as a visible symbol of Him as God their Savior 24 - 7 across the entire land.
What was that reminder? A strategically placed group of six cities called the Cities of Refuge. There is actually a whole chapter of the Bible (Joshua 20) devoted to these cities. There are many pictures of salvation in God's Word--Jesus used the serpent lifted up, Passover lamb, and so on. But one of the most beautiful, is found in the lesson of the “Cities of Refuge”
The name of Yahweh, in all its fullness, is manifested in the Lord Jesus Christ (Col. 1:9), who, in the terms of the title now before us, comprises a city of refuge for believers.
Matt.11:28“Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden , and I will give you rest”
This picture is one that shows Jesus is always waiting, His arms are always open to be our “City of Refuge”, both now and forever.
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
6:10 It would appear that even though the brethren in the Jerusalem ecclesia were in need of a reminder about the superiority of Jesus over the law of Moses that they were faithful and enthusiastic for the gospel.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
"... without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life, but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually."
Melchizedek did not have a recorded lineage; he had a natural mother and father, and he was mortal.
Without mother and father: He was not restricted to a tribe.
Without descent: No genealogy.
Beginning of days or end of life: The Levites began their ministry at age 30 and retired at age 50. Since Melchizedek was not of the Aaronic or Levitical order, he had no beginning or ending date for his ministry. He was an order all by itself.
It was the Melchizedek type of priesthood that Jesus was a part of. The apostle Paul explains that, as with the Melchizedek priesthood, the priesthood of Christ is valid, being appointed by God. Jesus was from the tribe of Judah, not Levi, and this was a foreign concept to the first-century Jews whose priests descended from Levi.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
“And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise.”
Abraham obtained the promise by faith, not literally. It does not contradict Heb 11:13, “These all died in faith not having received the promises (in actuality)… God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect” (Heb 11:40). It is still in the future, after the resurrection and judgment when Christ returns and brings his reward with him (Rev 22:12). “Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompense of reward… that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise” (Heb 10:35-36), "ye" - i.e., we being part of the promise, being the children of Abraham in having his faith (Rom 9:7-8).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
“Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.”
The question is often asked if Christ died once for all, why should animal sacrifices be a part of the daily routine during the Millennium? We read in Eze 40 that there will be a Millennial Temple with an outer and inner court with gates facing East, North, and South, and of the preparation of animal sacrifices (verses 38-39). Then in Eze 45 to Eze 46:15 we read that the Feasts of Passover, Unleavened Bread, and Tabernacles will be kept, and in addition to the yearly sacrifices, the monthly, weekly and daily sacrifices will also be observed. Claims have been made that this Temple would have been built at that time IF Israel had not fallen away, and it is not a future prediction! This is purely an assumption based on false logic, and a false interpretation and understanding of the inspired Scriptures, which does not make such a claim and Ezekiel shows to be prophetic and literal.
The fact that there were animal sacrifices before the present dispensation of the Age of Grace, and Scripture records there will be animal sacrifices after the present dispensation shows that they were not eliminated forever, but only suspended during this Age of Grace. Let me repeat: the Age of Grace under Christ did not end the Mosaic Age of animal sacrifices; it just interrupted it! In this Age of Grace Christ instituted the “Breaking of Bread” in remembrance of him till he returns (1Cor 11:23-26), the bread symbolizing his sacrificed body and the wine his poured out blood being the sacrificial Lamb of God.
When Christ returns, Ezekiel’s Temple will be built, as a Temple is required for the purpose of animal sacrifices. The Jewish system of worship requires it. The people will once again offer sacrifices in admission of their fallen, sinful state, just like they had to do during Old Testament times (Zech 14:16-19), but in the Millennium it will be the evidence that the Messiah has come. During the Mosaic Age, God demonstrated the perfection of His Law. In this present Age of Grace, it is the incomparable riches of His Grace, and in the Millennial Age, the people will experience both simultaneously.
Having said this, the bottom line is only Jesus (Yahshua) can take away sins. “It is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins” and “can never take away sins" (Heb 10:4,11). Heb 7 to chapter 10 explains how the Old Testament sacrifices were a “shadow of good things to come” based on their faith pointing to Messiah, the “better sacrifice,” who had not yet come. The Old Testament sacrifices looked FORWARD in faith to the (first) coming of Messiah. At present, we look FORWARD to the second coming of Messiah, and “Break Bread” in faith in the fulfillment of the covenanted promises. And, during the Millennium, the animal sacrifices will be object lessons to those who look BACK in faith at the finished work of the shed blood of the Lamb of God, without which no one can be saved. At the end of the Millennium when sin will no longer exist, then and only then, will these ordinances be completely abolished.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
6:4 The use of two passages from the events of the wilderness journey “tasted” Exo 16:31 ‘partakers of the Holy Spirit” Num 11:25 shows how the details of the Old Testament narrative matches the experiences of the first century believers. “tasted” answers to remembering Jesus’ death in the breaking of bread. Tasting of the Holy Spirit relates to the giving of the Holy Spirit to first century believers.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Here the Law of Moses is referred to as weak and unprofitable (K.J.V.). Paul in Rom. 7:12 says, "the Law is holy, and the commandment holy, just, and good." How are these two passages to be reconciled?
The context of Paul's comment about the Law of Moses in Rom. 7 is interesting. The 2 preceding verses read,
"I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death. For sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment deceived me, and through the commandment put me to death." Now v. 13 -
"Did that which is good, then, become death to me? By no means! But in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it produced death in me through what was good, so that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful."
In other words, the fault was not so much in the Law of Moses - God's law! - which was holy, just, and good, but in the sinful nature of man who was, is, and will always be incapable of completely keeping the Law (Jesus, of course, being the one exception). So since this is obviously true, a different means had to be provided for man to be saved since it simply would not come about by means of man's ability to obey God's law. This then helps to explain the writer to the Hebrews' reference to the Law as weak and unprofitable. By its very nature, it was not designed to save. So in a sense it could be described as weak and unprofitable, but only because human nature was "weak" and therefore incapable of making keeping the Law the means of one's salvation.
Having said this, it's good to keep in mind how valuable the Law was in the life of all Jews who were under it. Because, if followed, one would generally live a longer and healthier and better life than if it were ignored. And if truly understood, so many of the rituals and types did point to the means of one's salvation - the Lord Jesus Christ - and therefore would enhance one's faith - the true means of salvation. But it did have built into it - due again to the sinfulness of men - a tendency for even the most diligent adherents of it to trust in the Law, the Tabernacle, and eventually the Temple itself and not look in faith toward what it all pointed forward to. And so the means to an end became, for many, the end itself. And that was not good.
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Wes
6:20 ‘high priest forever ... Melchisedec’ quotes Psa 110:4 and is one of the many quotations of this Psalm in the letter to the Hebrews
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
7:20-21 Another benefit of the Melchisedec priesthood is emphasised. Whilst the Levites were priest because of birth Melchisedec differed as he was “called of God”. That is was singled out for special position.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
Have you gone back to drinking milk like a baby?
"For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; but if it bears thorns and briers, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned." Heb 6:7-8
Here we have the writer giving a clear warning to the Jews to whom the letter is directed. They appear to have been in danger of turning back to the old law of Moses. The writer describes that life as fruitless, bring forth thorns and briers. The problem the Hebrew ecclesia had was that they had become stagnant;
"you have become dull of hearing. For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food." Heb 5:11-12
Could this be said of us too? Can you imagine regressing so much as an adult that you'd started taking a teated bottle again instead of bread and meat? If a new testament apostle wrote us a letter, would he call us spiritually mature or a baby? Would he describe us as fruitful or thorns and briers? The answer to stagnation is to grow by daily absorbing the word of God and trying to live by its principles:
"For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil." Heb 5:13-14
The only difference between those who will be rejected as fruitless, and those who will be accepted as fruitful, lies in this quality of being able to discern good and evil, which in turn is a product of reasoning on the word of God. The act of reasoning on the word is also called "chewing over" or "ruminating", which is impossible for a baby to do. There's lots of analogies here to the rest of scripture, such as the people of God being called sheep or "the flock".
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
7:7-10 Abraham, as the father of many nations and of whom God had made exceeding precious promises, was blessed by one “better”. The process is emphasising that Levi, who was still in the loins of Abraham was “less” than the priesthood of Melchisedec. An important point to make to Jews who were from the priesthood – Acts 6:7 – in the church in Jerusalem to which the letter to the Hebrews was written.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
COUCH POTATO
I don't want to be a spiritual couch potato. The writer to the Hebrews doesn't want us to be spiritual couch potatoes either. A couch potato is a person who sits in an easy chair facing the television, has control of the remote, and does nothing more. So a spiritual couch potato is also one that fills a seat, relaxes, gets lazy and does nothing more.
The Hebrew writer puts it this way: "We do not want you to become lazy, but to imitate those who through faith and patience inherit what has been promised." (Heb 6:12).
So how do we move from being a spiritual couch potato to having a vibrant and active faith that truly lives while we wait for Jesus?
Firstly, make the decision to move. Nothing can even begin until your decision has been made.
Second, take note of the people around you who have the active faith you know you need. Hang around with them. Talk to them and find out what it is that gives them spiritual energy and motivation.
Third, follow their example. Get busy. Pray, reach out to others, study the word, preach, worship, praise, and encourage others to do the same.
And lastly, remember that Jesus could come any day. Today might be your last. Live each day as if it is the only one you have.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Robert
I WANT TO BE PERFECT
If you look in the mirror, are you satisfied? I can almost guarantee that almost everyone would see something they are not happy about. Too fat, too thin, acne, knobbly knees, skin colour, sticky out ears, big nose, need more muscle or a smaller bottom, and the list goes on. We all want to be perfect. Whether it is in looks or in our characters, we all just want to be that perfect person.
The writer to the Hebrews gives us a choice of two paths to perfection. The one most of us usually try is the first one. Work harder, put in more effort, practice self discipline, make up for your faults. This was what happened under the law of Moses. "If perfection could have been obtained through the Levitical priesthood ... why was there still need for another priest to come?" (Heb 7:11). We can try all we like, we can even keep all of God's laws, but they will not make us perfect.
The second way has nothing to do with our effort. Jesus did it for us. Our own sacrifices cannot make us perfect, but his perfect sacrifice can. "By one sacrifice he has made perfect for ever those who are being made holy." (Heb 10:14). That's us! Jesus makes us perfect. We are forgiven and perfect in God's sight. He is developing perfect characters in us, if we let him, and one day he will "transform our lowly bodies so they will be like his glorious one." (Phil 3:21).
All that's required of us is a thankful response of faith!
I want to be perfect. I want to be like Jesus.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Robert
7:3 A human trait which is often seen in believers is to speculate about things we cannot know. So there are suggestions as to who Melchisedec was. Clearly he was a man who lived at the time of Abraham. However speculation about his identity misses the point of what the narrative is talking about. Such speculation, therefore, gets in the way of correctly understanding the significance of the Melchisedec incident in Genesis.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
6:13 In saying that God “sware by Himself” the writer is quoting Isa 45:23. The context there is of total submission to Jesus as can be seen in the way that “unto me … swear” is quoted in the New Testament – Phil 2:10 – to speak of Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
6:1 The only other place where the word translated “perfection” <5047> is seen is Col 3:14 where it is translated “perfectness” and is associated with “charity”. The Hebrew readers needed to understand that there was more to serving God than following rules. The obedience had to be motivated by love.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
7:10 That “Levi” was “in the loins” of Abraham relies heavily on the way that Jewish ancestry is marked and who one’s parents were is crucial when considering status.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
7:14 How, to the believers in Jerusalem was it “evident” that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah? The only “evidence” is to be found in the gospel of Matt 1:1-20 and Luke 3:3-38 where it is evident that those mentioned were of the tribe of Judah. So we have to conclude that at least one of those gospel records were available to the believers in Jerusalem at that time.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
6:16 God, as the Creator. So He needed no one to authenticate his promise. And yet to confirm the covenant God doubled the certainty of his promise by making an oath appealing to His position. This is the extent to which our God went to assure us of the certainty of His words. So, we should conclude, it should be easy to accept that those promises will be fulfilled.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
7:6-7 So we see here that the writer to the Hebrews stresses that Melchisedec is greater than Abraham. This is important because the Jews focussed, to some extent rightly, on Abraham and their heritage as being his sons. But the writer here is emphasising, by implication that the promises were of little value without an ever living priest.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
6:6 The writer, here, is reminding the believers in Jerusalem that when the nation refused to enter the land the first time even though they later said that they were willing to go up it was too late. Their rejection of the witness of the two faithful spies was not a casual rejection. In like manner the Jews here who wanted to go back to the Law of Moses were forcefully rejecting the work of Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
6:13 Do we consider the authority of God’s words of promise that He will give eternal life to faithful believers?
If the Creator of everything makes a promise we can be absolutely certain that he will fulfil it. If we doubt that then we are putting our own thoughts in place of the words of the Creator!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter