AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
v.7, 8 - Here we have the memorial bread, associated, not for the first time [ch.2:2] with frankincense - the symbol of Jesus' priesthood - our high priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek. We also see the idea of continual remembrance every Sabbath and its association with an everlasting covenant. So many passages spring to mind. Here are just two. John 6:35,51, Heb.6:20, 7:25-28
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
Notice the repetition of 'pure'
24:2 pure olive oil
24:4 pure candlestick
24:6 pure table
24:7 pure frankincense
The oil is for light and the shewbread, typically at least, is for food for those who minister in the tabernacle. Both of these provisions were for the priests who ministered. Yahweh did not deed the light - he dwells in light unapproachable whereas the priest dwelt in 'darkness' which was only lightened by God's law. So purity and holiness are being stressed in worship and service.
24:3 This is the fifth time that the phrase 'a statute for ever' has occurred 23:14 23:21 23:31 23:41 24:3
24:10 - 11 This event seems to be out of place and unrelated to the details given above but it is not. It shows an example of how purity and holiness were not manifest in Israel. The son was born of two 'unequally yoked'. He blasphemed God having striven with one of God's sons. The tension between the origins of the two men is seen in 24:10.
24:12 That they 'put in him ward' stresses that the law did not have an immediate answer to the problem - by contrast to the freedom we have in Christ. Having been 'made free from the law of sin and death' we are governed by principles which answer every aspect of life. Therefore we see that even the purity and holiness of the Law of Moses could not address every problem of life.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.19,20 - Familiar words because of the way Jesus quotes them in Matt.5:38 in showing the more excellent way based on love, but do we apply these spiritually? Jesus does - Matt.7:2.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
:2 The command to bring the oil for the lamps matches the request [Exodus 27:20] for the oil which provided the material for the making of the oil which is recorded in Exo 39. So we might conclude that Lev 24 records what was spoken in Exo 27, and therefore was spoken before Exo 39. If this is so it is possible to date sections of Leviticus very precisely.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
:22 That the stranger and the Jew were to live by the same law teaches that God is not a respecter of persons. Also it teaches that we should not expect of the non believer behaviour which is better than that which we manifest. Actually, as we know what God requires, we should expect higher standards of behaviour and thought of ourselves than of those who do not believe.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
24:10 We do not need to know about the mixed parentage of the son who gathered sticks. However we are told. Maybe the lesson is that mixed marriages – believer and unbeliever – are liable to bring forth children who do not understand the commandments. This is not to say that children from such relationships cannot accept the gospel. However it points up that such unions are not to be recommended.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.5 "Twelve cakes" For the shewbread, as previously appointed Exo 25:30 The cakes were baked by the Levites, the flour being furnished by the people 1Chron 9:32, 1Chron 23:9 The oil, wine , and salt being the other ingredients. Lev 2:13
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
It is important to understand the distinction between the words continuous and continual. Continuous means never ending without an interval, whereas continual means never ending but with a break. The lamps were to be burned continually from evening until morning (vs.2-4). Aaron would light the lamps in the evening, and extinguish them in the morning (Exo 30:7,8). This practice would occur each day.
The twelve loaves of bread were to be a memorial for Israel (v. 5-8). They would, naturally, become mouldy and so would have to be replaced by new loaves each Sabbath day. This, like the lamps, was a continual service. We are like the shewbread in that we need to be (spiritually) renewed. That is the reason for meeting around the table of the Lord each week, to remember Him who is the incorruptible bread of life.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
The commandment to fill the lamps with olive oil, and to bake the holy
bread out of "fine flour" had to be kept right from the beginning, in the wilderness
Lev 24:2-9. The Israelites must have brought out sufficient from Egypt to keep
the Tabernacle supplied for 40 years. How precious it would be in the sight of
the priests, whose job it was to maintain the light and the bread before God!
There's a useful lesson for us there, too.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
24:2,5 The linking together of the oil for the lamps and the shewbread in this chapter draws together two separate elements from the Exodus record. Exo 27:20speak of the oil and Exo 25:30 speaks of the shewbread. Thus we see these two separate elements of the law of Moses as recorded in Exodus are actually related to each other when it comes the service of the tabernacle.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
V.23 With the stoning or execution of the son of Shelomith for blaspheming the name of the LORD (24:11) we see stoning one to death become the established punishment in all cases for blasphemy, it illustrates the fate of Stephen (Acts 7:58-59), who suffered under a false charge of speaking blasphemous words against both Moses and God (Acts 6:11-14).
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
Vs.10,11: the man who blasphemed was a member of the mixed multitude that came out of Egypt (Exo 12:38). Yahweh showed early that He would allow Gentiles to participate in the Hope of Israel. The fact that this Gentile abused the privilege is not significant in itself. Undoubtedly, there were other mixed multitude members who cherished the opportunity. On the other hand, we know that there were Israelites who rebelled, such as Korah, Dathan, and Abiram. The lesson is that regardless of being either a Jew or a Gentile, one is personally responsible to the Laws of God (Eze 18:20). The same applies to those under Christ (Gal 3:28; 2Cor 5:10).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Michael
24:15 Here is an example of a case where a specific law is enunciated as a direct consequence of a prior action. The boy cursed God and a law was instituted which became a universal law.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
V.16 Cursing Yahweh's Name meant death. Job and his family knew this principle. When Job’s situation seemed hopeless, his wife urged him to end his life by cursing God (Job 2:9).
Vs.19,20 This does not mean, literally, that body parts must be taken for ones lost. The law is one of equitable compensation. That is, there must be reparation to the value of whatever was lost. That is clear from v.18. However, if a man kills another man, then the killer must pay with his own life (v.21). Later, in the land, a distinction would be made between murder and accidental death (Num 35:15).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
Publically challenging God
The penalty given here for blasphemy seems very harsh. But this incident has more to it than we initially suspect. Checking "blasphemy" in a concordance we see this is the very first occurrence of it in the bible. So the first thing to note is that this didn't happen often. This is backed up by v12 - the judges didn't know what to do because this was the first case of its kind in the newly formed nation of Israel.
Following the other occurrences this word, we find it's used to describe someone who publically insults and challenges the God of Israel's power. One noteworthy example is Assyria who sent an army to taunt the God of Israel (Isa 36:2,4,19,20). This is described as blasphemy by God (2Kin 19:20-22) and culminated in Him destroying their whole army. Likewise Goliath's taunts defied God and culminated in the destruction of his army. So it was the same with this man in our chapter. He fought with a man of Israel (v10) and in the process had publically blasphemed and cursed God (see v14-15). Such an attitude was an open and deep rooted contempt for God, and undermined the fragile society God was nurturing.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Rob
24:10 When Israel were in Egypt they were slaves. It might seem strange that the Egyptian married her whilst in Egypt but this must be so even though there was a mixed multitude – Exo 12:38- which would include Egyptians that came out of Egypt with Israel. As the child was old enough to blaspheme and Israel had been in the wilderness for less than three years he must have been born in Egypt.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
What's in a name? A name certainly identifies a particular person. But, in Yahweh's case, His Name is the memorial Name of Israel's God. It carries with it present and future components of His will and character. The Name should only be said in recognition of its meaning, and in reverence and fear. There is no need to avoid saying His Name, if those factors are present. Indeed it is a privilege. The Jews have clammed up and to this day refuse to speak His Name. This is false reverence, as their actions largely do not constitute a faithful following.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
Verses 1-4 The golden lampstand (Exo 25:31-40) with its seven lamps was to be kept burning continually in the tabernacle, and was to be replenished with fuel consisting of pure oil from beaten olives (2), as prescribed in Exo 27:20-21. The lampstand was put in the holy place, which otherwise would have been completely dark. It was the high priest's daily responsibility to attend to the filling and trimming of the lamps (4), since he was the first person to light it (Num 8:3). In Exo 27:21, however, it is made clear that the duties were to be shared with other members of the priesthood, since the ritual was to extend over many generations. Some interpreters following the vision of Zechariah 4, have seen the lampstand as typical of Israel, which in God's purpose was meant to be a light to the ancient Near Eastern nations. But the true light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to His people Israel, was the Lord Jesus Christ (Luke 2:32). The Christadelphian is bidden to let the light of Christ's salvation shine in daily life, to the glory of God the Father (Matt 5:16, Eph 5:8, Phil 2:15).
Carl Hinton [Bedford (United Kingdom)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Carl
Lev 24:2-4 - The lampstand was in the Holy Place and making of the lampstand is recorded in Exo 25:31-40. Many believe 7 is the number of spiritual perfection and perhaps it is connected to the millennial Sabbath day of rest when Christ returns. We must walk in God's light. God's word is a lamp unto believer's feet and a light unto their path Psa 119:105; only in God's Word can we learn about Him and His purpose with the world, centered in the Lord Jesus Christ John 8:12. Perhaps there is a connection in Revelation also (Rev 1:12-20).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
24:17-21 These laws follow on directly from the law that one who curses God must be killed. Thus we see that whilst Israel were commanded to kill in certain circumstances that should not be taken as licence to kill whenever they wished.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
24:14 Even though the blasphemer had committed a terrible sin and had to be punished for it his death was not orchestrated by a lynch mob. Only those who ‘heard’ him were to identify him and then he was stoned. The lesson for us is clear. It is all too easy to follow a crowd and pronounce judgement without actually carefully establishing the facts. Exo 23:2
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
24:8 This injunction that the shewbread was to be changed every Sabbath indicates that the day when David went to the priests at Nob and was given the shew bread was a Sabbath. 1Sam 21:3-4
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
24:2 Pure olive oil gives off no smoke. Impure olive oil, olive oil of lower quality, still burns and gives light. However smoke and a smell is associated with such light. Likewise in our lives unless we are “pure” in the doctrine our “light” is contaminated.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
24:16 Jesus was accused of breaking this law – Matt 26:66. So Jesus’ opponents felt that they had a valid reason for killing Jesus. Of course he never blasphemed God. The very ones who sought Jesus’ death were the blasphemers.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
The LORD will not hold him guiltless
Israel had only just been formed as a nation, and the pillars of that nation were the laws given to Moses, which in turn were built on the ten commandments. The ten commandments were to be the fixed and unchangeable bedrock from which society could function. They were the moral compass for the people, because they would be the one part of the law that everyone could remember and call to mind -- taught to the children so that they could recite them from memory. The Egyptian youth that blasphemed and cursed God (Lev 24:10-16) not only insulted God, but challenged the authority of this most basic law. The commandment states simply and categorically without any question:
"Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain." Exo 20:7
So the law said that there was to be no pardon for those who transgressed this law. Yet the rulers still brought the young man to enquire of God, and I think we can take this as an indication that they didn't know whether God was really serious. Can you imagine the total chaos in a country where the people aren't sure whether the law of the land will be upheld or not? God's answer was to merely repeat the commandment and ask that they carry out the penalty, and I think from then on Israelite society understood that the law was not to be taken lightly.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
24:16-17 The way in which killing the one who blasphemed the name of the Lord and the man who kills another highlights the seriousness of blasphemy. It is equated with murder.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
24:2,4 The two uses of “pure” – the oil and the lamps indicates that our words can pollute the goodness of God’s light – His word – by the way in which we talk about it.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
24:14,23 That the sinner was stoned “without the camp” marks their separation form the things of God by their action.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
24:14 Notice that the man was killed “without the camp” as if to emphasise that his behaviour had defiled the whole camp of Israel and the correct place for such an individuals was to be outside the camp. We do well to reflect that our words and actions impact the whole company of believers we spend time with.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
Leviticus 24:1-2 Israel were required to provide olive oil for the lamps to provide a continual source of light in the Holy place. To produce the oil it was necessary for the Israelites to labour to beat or crush the olives to extract the oil. The oil was given to the priests. Their duty was to maintain the lamps so there was a continuous source of light in the Holy Place of the Tabernacle.
Lessons for us.
Jesus wrote letters to the 7 ecclesias of God, they were candlesticks. (Rev 1:20). Their duty was to ensure they maintained the light of God’s truth in their preaching and way of life. They laboured to maintain the pure light of the Gospel message in very difficult circumstances. A challenge today for each of us?
Our High Priest is the Lord Jesus Christ. “Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.” (Heb 4:14). We have a responsibility to labour to bring the Lev 24:1-2 Gospel message to any who are looking for light in a world of darkness.
Peter Moore [Erith, UK] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
24:2,4,6,7 Notice the repeated use of the word “pure” – just like we find in the construction of the tabernacle in Exodus. One might have thought that the nation would want to give God the best of everything. Against that background one might have thought that “pure” need not be specified. But it is. Our God is not happy with that which is not “pure”. We doubtless start off with the best intentions of giving the best of everything only, as time passes, to let our standards slip a little. But this is not acceptable to our Father.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
24:2 Four time the word “continually” is used in this chapter, along with similar words. It is all too easy to start something only to leave off the task without showing commitment to that task. Some things we commit ourselves in reality have no “end date”. But what tends to happen is that the event is forgotten as other things come along in our lives.
At baptism doubtless the down treading of Jerusalem and the fact that Christ was going to return would form a significant part of our prayers and thinking. But as time passes maybe those things slip into the background in our mind and prayers. You can doubtless supply other things from your own experience.
Commencing a work is good, continuing in that work is better.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
24:9 We might ask why Aaron and his sons had to eat the shewbread in the holy place, or even why they had to eat it at all.
Their sharing it was a token of their fellowship with God and eating it in the holy place was a mark of the fact that God was holy and they had to be so also.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
24:10-11 The “son” blasphemed but he is not named. However his mother is named and the relationship between the father and mother of the son is given. The child was the product of a mixed marriage.
By implication the fault was generated by the family environment. Two parents who were not both “pulling in the same direction” brought up a son who, it seems did not appreciate the holiness of Yahweh.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
EVERYONE’S RESPONSIBILITY
The seven branched lampstand in the tabernacle did not keep burning all by itself. It took oil, care and tending for the light to keep shining. Everyone had a responsibility to keep the lamps burning. This was what God said: “Command the Israelites to bring you clear oil of pressed olives for the light so that the lamps may be kept burning continually. Outside the curtain that shields the ark of the covenant law in the tent of meeting, Aaron is to tend the lamps before the Lord from evening till morning, continually. This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come. The lamps on the pure gold lampstand before the Lord must be tended continually.” (Lev 24:2-4).
In Revelation John saw a vision of Jesus walking among seven golden lampstands. The meaning of his vision was explained when he was told, “The mystery of the … seven golden lampstands is this: … the seven lampstands are the seven churches.” (Rev 1:20).
It was all Israel who were to bring oil for the lamps. They were the ordinary, run-of-the-mill people just like you and me. We should be providing each other with the oil of joy and lighting each other’s way to God’s kingdom. And like the priests keeping the lamps tended, the leaders in our congregations should be keeping the light burning, caring for it, trimming it and making sure it is fed.
So let us encourage one another with the joy from the oil of the word. Every drop of encouragement and joy we receive will help keep our lamps burning. And for those of us who lead, let us care for and tend for the people God has given us in a way that will keep our communal light shining brightly.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Robert
24:16 Whoever blasphemes the name of the LORD shall surely be put to death
** The blasphemer is punished with death (by stoning) (Leviticus 24:16)
** Goliath blasphemed (1 Samuel 17:43, 45)
** Goliath was punished with death (by a stone) (1 Samuel 17:50)
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
Ps.132 is a wonderful Psalm. v. 4,5 tell us of David's attitude - that which made him a man after God's own heart, though the 'habitation for the mighty God of Jacob' ultimately was to be his descendant, Jesus, and through Jesus, us - that we might be part of that spiritual temple created on the chief corner stone - clothed with righteousness and joy [v.9]. And so we come to v.13, which effectively is the culmination, as far as the psalms are concerned of all the points we have looked at regarding Zion. Here we have the perfected Christ and his saints - the body of believers - all represented by this single word - and here God has decided to dwell. Ps.48:1-3, 68:16, 76:2, 78:68,69, 87:2, Isa.14:32, Heb.12:22.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
Psalm 131 David provides a powerful warning about trying to understand things beyond what is revealed. It is so easy to speculate or worry about things which we are not told. So many of the arguments we have can stem from speculation, using non Biblical language, about things we are not told. David says that the 'weaned child' mentality that he had should be ours.
Psalm 132 This Psalm shows that David was thinking about the resting place for the Ark whilst he was a shepherd boy in Bethlehem. 'Ephratah' (v6) is Bethlehem (Micah 5:2). David left Bethlehem around the time he killed Goliath - as a young man. So we see that David's desire to put the ark in Zion was not something that he thought of when he was king. Rather it was the driving force in all his life. - Maybe this is why he is called 'a man after [God's] own heart' (Acts 13:22)
Psalm 133 In likening the anointing of Aaron to unity the Psalmist is showing that there is more than simply ritual in the deals of the law of Moses. Maybe we should look for other indications of the importance of fellowship in the Law of Moses?
Psalm 134 A call to the priests to think about the majesty of God. It must have been so easy just to view working in the temple as just another job. The call to think about the majesty of God was necessary to correct the balance. Likewise we have to realise that whilst we routinely go to the meeting that we are involving ourselves in very important matters.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
133 v.3 - Compare this with Jesus words in John 4:14. Here we have living water provided for those who are in Zion - in Christ.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
131:2 If we view ourselves as mature, no longer babes, we will desire the 'meat' Hebrews 5:14. Indeed if we think that we still need the milk we have to view ourselves as 'unskilful' [Hebrews 5:13] and immature. So seeing ourselves as needing milk is not a sign of humility. If we need milk we are immature.
Psalm 132 - In linking bringing the ark to Zion and :11 the promise of the one who would sit upon God's throne David shows us that we should see a relationship between the bringing of the ark to Zion and the promises of 2 Samuel 7.
133:1 Unity is such an important issue that it forms the first thing that Paul speaks of when describing a living sacrifice [Romans 12] and amongst all the problems the Corinthian ecclesia had it was the first thing he addressed - 1 Corinthians 3.
134:3 The Lord who had created the universe is quite capable of providing blessings to His servants. A certain belief in creation provides the confidence to believe that God will work in our lives.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
131:1-2 Even though the Psalmist sees himself as mature he does not elevate himself in his own eyes.
132:6 In saying that he heard about the ark at Ephratah - Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) the Psalmist shows that David was thinking that the ark should be in Zion even when he was a shepherd boy in Bethlehem - before he was anointed king or had killed Goliath.
133:1 In likening unity to the anointing of the high priest we see the way in which true unity will come - through the work of our high priest, Jesus Christ.
134:2 'lifting up … hands' is a recurring theme with respect to prayer (Psalm 28:2 63:4 141:2 1Timothy 2:8)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
131:3 Hoping in the Lord is to be contrasted with thinking highly of oneself. :1 ‘my heart is not haughty’ demonstrates this.
132:2 The ‘mighty God of Jacob’ is the God of the blessings (Gen 49:24)
133:3 There is debate as to where the judgement will be – Sinai or Jerusalem. However we should think on a broader basis than this. How is the blessing of ‘life for evermore’ achieved in Zion? Is it not through the birth of a man in Zion Psa 87:6 – and this is not to say that Jerusalem is the place of judgement. It is the association with the things of Zion that bring that blessing.
134:3 In speaking of blessing out of Zion the Psalmist is echoing the ideas of Psalm 133 which has fellowship as the basis for the blessing being given.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
Psalm 133 This is another one of those Psalms which Hezekiah used as an appropriate expression of his own experiences and circumstances. Here we have the blessing of a truly united ecclesia outlined. As well, we see David's trust that God will bless him with life evermore in the Kingdom Age.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
"Behold, bless ye the LORD, all ye servants of the LORD, which by night stand in the house of the LORD"
It seems like an odd phrase in Psa 134:1. What does it mean to stand in the house of the LORD? Who would go into the house of the LORD at night, when whilst the doors were shut and guarded?
There was only one function that could be performed in the temple at night, but we don't find it stipulated in the Law. We find the answer in the words of Solomon (1Kin 8:29, 2Chron 6:20), and Nehemiah (Neh 1:6), which all mention prayer in relation to the temple at night. So the Psalmist is saying that by prayer to God, we may stand in His house, wherever we are. It is those who pray by (or on) their beds that are described as being in the sanctuary v2. This is significant for us, because we have no other temple to go to.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Rob
132:1-5 This vow is not elsewhere recorded. It expresses, in strong language, David's intense desire to see the establishment of God's worship, as well as of his kingdom.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
Unity among Brothers and Sisters binds us together. SeePsa 133. Just like the holy anointing oil which joined Aaron’s head to his feet. It flowed down the whole body.
And unity amongst us is also like the dew. The same dew fell on Mt Hermon in the north, and on Mt Zion in the south. Let’s pray for spiritual unity within our Brotherhood.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
132:8 This Psalm speaks of David's desire to bring the ark to Zion. This verse is quoted by Solomon - 2Chron 6:40 - when he dedicated the temples which was what David wanted to build when he was planning to bring the ark to Zion - 2Sam 7:25
133:2 Wee should note that the word 'skirts' <06310> when speaking of Aaron's garment could equally be translated 'hole' as in the collar. We need not think of Aaron being soaked in anointing oil when he was anointed. Here is a place where it is translated hole Exo 39:23 And there was an hole <06310> in the midst of the robe, as the hole <06310> of an habergeon, with a band round about the hole <06310>, that it should not rend.
134:1 So it appears that those who kept watch in the temple at night had a job to do. We might have thought that there would be no people coming into the temple at night so the night porters would have nothing to do. The Psalmist tells them that they should use their time to praise God. How often do we think to praise God or pray to Him at times in our lives when we have nothing to do?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Peter
These four Psalms convey the desire to be in the presence of God, and the joy and satisfaction experienced when the desire is fulfilled.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
132:4-18 - David was unhappy as the tabernacle was divided in two different places with the ark temporarily captured, rejected, and returned to Keriath-jearim "the city of the woods" while the altar with the main part of the tabernacle was in Gibeon. In v5 David wanted to find a home or "place" Heb."maqom" (4725) for God's house. There are often different levels of interpreting scripture. The capture of the ark perhaps reminds us of how Christ's mortal body was temporarily captured and crucified outside Jerusalem by sinful people who rejected him only to have him resurrected with a unified nature and body in God's house and who will soon rule the earth from Zion in a millennial rest. In v5 "habitation" Heb. "mishkan" (4908) means "tabernacle, grave, residence, the temple, dwelling (place), habitation, tent", etc. while the "habitation" in v13 perhaps refers more to the future kingdom and uses Heb. "mowshab" (4186) meaning "a seat, a site, an abode, population, assembly, inhabited place, dwelling", etc. We have the mention in vss 8,14 of "rest" using the same Heb. word "menuwchah" (4496) meaning "repose, peacefully, consolation (specifically as in matrimony), abode, comfortable, ease, quiet, rest", etc. so perhaps this points to the millennial day of rest when Christ is united with his bride, also at the end of v8 we have the word "arise" which could refer to a resurrection. In vss 9,16 we read of priests and kings which reminds us of a millennial age (Rev 5:10; 19:8). In v10-11 we have mention of David's anointed and the fruit of his body (Acts 2:30) who will be set on his throne and this likely encompasses a millennial application. Vss 13-14 we have the mention of Zion as the rest forever. Vss 17-18 we have the "horn" (according the NIV this symbolizes strong one or king) of David who will bud (could this budding refer to the branch/Christ Jer 23:5-6;Zech 3:8;6:12;Luke 1:69) and that a lamp (John 8:12;Matt 5:14-16 - Jesus in the line of David is the light of the world) has been ordained for God's anointed (David? Christ?) whose enemies will be clothed with shame (Dan 12:2 - the day of judgement for those whose who rejected Christ?). V18 ending with his crown to "flourish"<6692>.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Charles
Psalm 131: Some think that this psalm is an account of David’s vindicating himself. But others believe that the ascent psalms are about the captives. In that case, then, this psalm would be an account of how the captives comported themselves under the bonds of their captivity.
Psalm 132: Some have attributed this psalm to either David, Solomon, or to one of the captives at the end of the captivity. If you are following the captive theme, the second temple, and the ark, is referenced (v.8).
Psalm 133: Following the rebuilt dwelling place of Yahweh in Psalm 132, the priests will be united in temple service.
Psalm 134: This is the last of the ascent psalms. It urges the priests to praise Yahweh in the temple.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Michael
The psalmist's humility and mind & spirit
The psalmist aim in life was to be humble, regardless of the situation that was allotted to him. The love of God which was reigning in the heart, subdued the self-love which can easily overtake us. The psalmist was well reconciled to every condition the Lord placed him in.
As a child is at the disposal of his mother's arms, we must become as little children as well (in the arms of God) Matt 18:3
Let us quietly wait for the salvation of the Lord under every condition & trial of life
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
Psa 134:1 we have just read in the Lev readings about a job for the priest at night Lev 24:3 the tending of the lamps. The tending of the lights in the darkness of the night would lead them to contemplation of the majesty of God and cause them to praise Him Psa 134:3
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
132:9 The Psalmist’s desire that the priest would be clothed with salvation is an idea taken up by Isa 61:10– speaking of those who will inherit the kingdom through the death and resurrection of Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
132:4 David’s sentiments regarding finding a place for the ark are presented by Solomon - Prov 6:4–as a more general instruction to the ‘son’ about his life before God. So whilst we are not seeking a place for the ark as David was we must still have the same degree of enthusiasm for God’s wisdom which enlightens the ‘son’.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
Unity among brethren is precious in the sight of Yahweh (Psa 133). Paul emphasizes this among brethren who constitute the body of Christ (Eph 4:3-6). Jesus hates any disunity of His body (ecclesia), and will not take too kindly at the judgement to those who have caused divisions. That is the reason for Paul's appeal (Rom 16:17; 1Cor 1:10). Jesus loves those who are peacemakers (Matt 5:9). And so, let us do everything we can to promote unity within His body.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
UNITE
There is something special about unity that goes well beyond the scope of just agreeing with each other. The two illustrations the Psalmist gives us about unity give us some fascinating insights. "It is like precious oil poured on the head, running down the beard, running down on Aaron's beard, down upon the collar of his robes." (Psa 133:2)
As well as being good and pleasant, unity is a priestly action. A lot of different examples could have been used to describe unity, yet it was the anointing oil on the high priest that was chosen. It was the symbol of God's blessing on his chief servant that teaches us of unity. When we make the effort to live in unity with each other, God looks on us as he looked on his high priest in the Tabernacle.
The other illustration is that unity "is as if the dew of Hermon were falling on Mount Zion." (v.3) Then the psalmist adds, "For there the LORD bestows his blessing, even life for ever more." (v.3) In God's sight our unity with each other is as refreshing and cleansing as the dew. It is also life giving, just like the dew gives life to God's creation. And just as the dew covers the whole ground, so our unity affects everyone around us. Unity is so important to God that it has his special blessing of life for ever more.
God's word should not be a source of contention, but of love and encouragement. As God's people we must make every effort to unite.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Robert
132:8 The way that the Psalmist has David speaking is actually echoed by Solomon when he dedicated the temple – 2Chron 6:41
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
134:1 The servants of Yahweh are asked to praise Him. But why is this request made to those who would be in the House of Yahweh at night? The Hebrew word for night used here is layil (the same as layla, which is used in other scriptures and also used in Modern Hebrew). These words mean night in the literal, physical sense, but also mean adversity in the figurative sense (the evil associated with the absence of light). And so, those servants, who are suffering adversity, are in the House of Yahweh praising Him (for His mercy, help and protection). Likewise, we, as servants of Yahweh, also offer our praise as we call upon Him for help with the trials that we suffer.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
Psa 132:11 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King
This is an everlasting covenant sworn to David, and it did not take place in David's lifetime 2Sam 23:3-5 but there will be a future fulfilment Psa 89:3-4. Psa 132:11 is quoted in the New Testament and applied to Jesus Acts 2:30, Acts 13:22-23. This shows that Jesus will be the future King.
For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16.
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Roger
132:17 In speaking of the horn of David budding we see a concept with is taken up in the rest of the Old Testament, for example Jer 23:5, 33:15
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
132:1-6 David’s desire and plans when he was but a young man to bring the ark to Zion contrasts markedly with Saul who was on the throne at this time who seemed to have no interest in Jerusalem even though it was in the territory promised to Benjamin.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
1. Psa 131:1 - "my heart is not haughty<1361>" - compare with Matt 26:39 with Christ's humility and yielding to his Father's will versus unseemly pride. Our hearts should not be haughty either.
2. Psa 131:1 - "neither do I exercise myself in great matters, or in things too high for me" - Christ refused to be a political Messiah (John 6:15;18:36).
3. Psa 131:2 - Jesus had to learn (unlike God who knows all things 1John 3:20) and be weaned from his mother to do his Father's business (Isa 7:14-15;Luke 2:40-52).
4. Psa 131:3 - "Let Israel hope in the Lord...for ever" - perhaps this has application to the Kingdom on earth with Jerusalem as the world capital (Isa 2:2-4).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
1. Psa 132:3,5,7,13 - V3 "tabernacle"<168>, V7 "tabernacles"<4908>, V5 "habitation"<4908>, V13 "habitation"<4186>.
2. Psa 132:4-5,8 - Jesus didn't sleep in Gethsemane but slept when he found the "place"<4725> or standing and then arose as the ark of God (Matt 26:40-46 - the disciples had three sleep periods in Gethsemane and then arose perhaps echoing Christ's three days followed by the resurrection).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
1. Psa 133:1 - God desires brethren to dwell in unity (John 17:17-23;Eph 2:12-22;1John 3:14).
2. Psa 133:2 - unity and fellowship among the brethren is like consecrating/sanctifying oil so we can approach our high priest Christ (Exo 30:23-31).
3. Psa 133:3 - "the dew" is like a blessing of divine refreshment throughout all Israel (north and south) culminating in "life for evermore" (i.e. the resurrection Psa 110:3;Isa 26:19); "commanded the blessing" reminds of the freeing Jubilee beginning on the Day of Atonement (Lev 25:9,21-28).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Charles
133:3 The promise that God will show the blessing which He has commanded shows the fulfilment ofLev 25:21 where the release of slaves prefigures the redemption from sin and death.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Wes
UNITY
"Keep on loving each other as brothers."(Heb 13:1).
"I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with each other so that there may be no divisions among you and that you may be perfectly united in mind and thought."(1Cor 1:10).
"Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace." (Eph 4:4).
"I plead with Euodia and I plead with Syntyche to agree with each other in the Lord."(Phil 4:2).
"Greet all the brothers with a holy kiss." (1Thess 5:26).
"May the God who gives endurance and encouragement give you a spirit of unity among yourselves as you follow Christ Jesus."(Rom 15:5).
"As God's chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience. Bear with each other and forgive whatever grievances you may have against one another. Forgive as the Lord forgave you. And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity." (Colossians 3 v 11 - 14).
"Make my joy complete by being like minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and purpose."(Phil 2:2).
"How good and pleasant it is when brothers live together in unity!"(Psa 133:1).
If it is important to God, let's make sure it is important to us.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Robert
LONELY SERVICE.
One of the duties that we are rostered on to do in our congregation, is hall cleaning. Once a week, the people who are rostered on will go in and mop the floors, vacuum, clean windows and toilets, and generally tidy up. On other occasions we have a working bee around our hall, when lots of volunteers will turn up to tidy up, renovate or whatever needs doing. It's easy to spend quite a few hours at a working bee, helping other people and working together. But doing my duty of hall cleaning, though it usually takes less than a couple of hours, can really drag through doing it alone.
Serving at the temple during the day must have been a pleasure. People would be in and out all day, it would be busy, and it would seem like it had barely started before it was time to finish. But those serving at the temple at night could have found it quite different. When nobody else is around it is harder to keep up our motivation.
So the psalmist encouraged and prayed for those on night shift. "Praise the LORD, all you servants of the LORD who minister by night in the house of the LORD." (Psa 134:1).
Let us also encourage and pray for those who are serving the Lord alone, or in lonely times. They need our prayers and support.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Robert
132:13 The Psalmist speaking of God choosing Zion as His “habitation” speaks of the establishment of the “place” that God had chosen to place His name in –Deut 12:10-11
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
132:16,18 Notice the contrast. Whilst the faithful will be clothed with salvation God’s enemies will be clothed with shame. God’s enemies are, therefore, like Adam and Eve Gen 3:7 but salvation from the death that Adam and Eve experienced will be for the faithful.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
Psalm 131
"LORD, my heart is not haughty, nor mine eyes lofty: neither do I exercise myself in great matters, or in things too high for me."
What does David mean when he says "my heart is not haughty"? The English word "haughty", translated from the Hebrew "gabahh", has its first occurrence in the Bible in 1Sam 10:23, and that's no accident. Here we read about Saul, the newly chosen King:
"And they ran and fetched him thence: and when he stood among the people, he was higher (gabahh) than any of the people from his shoulders and upward."
David is saying that he will not make the same mistakes that Saul did in lifting himself up above the people. David will remain a humble servant. In comparison with Saul, another King called Jehoshaphat was "lifted up in the ways of the LORD" (2Chron 17:6). What about us? Do we lift ourselves up in pride, or are we lifted up by the ways of the LORD?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Rob
Psalm 132
Clearly at an early age David became concerned that the God of Israel was dwelling in a tent. We can gather this because of his mention of his own tent in v3 and the tent of the Ark in v7-8. Ephrath was the home of his father Jesse. Later in his life, in 2Sam 7:2, he states his wish to resolve this issue more definitely.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Rob
Psalm 133
In v2 and v3 David is likening the dew of God that runs down the mountains of Israel and brings life to the people of Israel every morning, to the anointing of the High Priest. When Aaron was anointed, the oil was poured onto a plate (the crown) tied to his mitre which had engraved on it "Holy to the LORD" (Exo 28:36-37). Holy means "set apart". Perhaps David is drawing the comparison to say that all people of the land can be equally special to God no matter where in it they lived - whether Hermon to the far North or Zion to the South? He is also making the point that while the source of the river Jordan is Mount Hermon, the source of salvation is from Zion.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Rob
131:3 Israel’s problem, historically, was that they placed their hope and trust in false gods. But this will all change when they are given a “new heart” Eze 36:26 at the time of the kingdom of God on earth.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
Nick Kendall [In Isolation] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Nick
132:9,16 The similarity between these two verses indicates that salvation and righteousness are linked. Without righteousness salvation is impossible. Wonderfully righteousness is counted to those of us who have faith I the death and resurrection of Jesus even though we do not deserve such a high position.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
Nick Kendall [In Isolation] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Nick
134:3 Notice the way in which the Creation is woven into the way in which God is concerned with “Zion”. We cannot disregard the detailed Creation account of Gen 1 as if it is not relevant to an understanding of God’s involvement in the world.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
IT'S NOT YOUR WORRY!
Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven." (Matt 18:3-4).
It is almost as if David and Jesus had been talking and had come to the same conclusions together. David expressed himself this way: "My heart is not proud, O LORD, my eyes are not haughty; I do not concern myself with great matters or things too wonderful to me. But I have stilled and quieted my soul; like a weaned child with its mother, like a weaned child is my soul within me." (Psa 131:1-2).
David's definition of pride was to concern himself with great matters and things too wonderful for him. When Jesus told his disciples to humble themselves and become like little children, they were arguing about who was going to be the greatest in the kingdom. It's not our worry! Anything outside our control is not our worry. It is only pride in us that says it is.
Instead, like a child in its mothers arms, we can trust God completely and we don't have to worry about a thing! So let's become like little children, resting in the embrace of God, without worry and without pride.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Robert
“Behold and how good it is for brethren to dwell together in unity.”
"'Pleas for unity’ are out of place while the truth is being trifled with; they are dangerous; they are treacherous, however well meant. They will not be listened to by those who are set for the defence of the gospel.”
Brother Robert Roberts, 1867
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Valerie
134:1 Do we think that we are allowed time off from our service to God? Those involved in temple worship had a 24 hour a day job. Do we see our responsibilities in a similar way?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
132:16 Whilst the Psalm speaks of the priests being clothed with salvation - Isa 61:10– extends that salvation beyond the priest to everyone.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
132:1-5We see that David had an earnest dire from his youth to find a “place” for the Ark of the Covenant.
That desire was based on his understanding of Gods plan. It is amazing when we realise that David was but a youth, caring for the family sheep in Bethlehem, when his appreciation of God’s plan started.
That is why David became the “beloved” of God. Our Father loves those who identify with His plan and seek to bring it about.
Isn’t it wonderful that sons of Adam – you and I – can be loved by the Creator?
We are privileged to know His plan, just as David did.
One way in which we can pursue that plan is to pray, in the words of Jesus, “thy kingdom come …”
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
132:12 God promises to David which is the focus of this Psalm are wonderful. However they are conditional. It is only those who respond to the chastening hand of God who will inherit the promise of eternal inheritance in God’s kingdom.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
134:3 An example of priest standing in the house of the Lord is seen – 2Chron 35:5 – in Josiah’s day.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
132:4,5 I will not give sleep to my eyes ... until I find a place for the LORD
David was consumed with a desire to bring the Ark to Jerusalem. Michal, David's wife, did not share his enthusiasm and falsely accused him of lewdness and "despised him in her heart" (2 Samuel 6:16). (Note: people who do not share spiritual goals often perversely take the moral high ground and accuse those who are spiritually motivated of base motives. It is a way of appeasing their conscience).
When married partners do not share the same aspirations and goals, tension will follow. Imagine Michal's anger when the Ark unsuccessfully came to Jerusalem the first time, when Uzzah died. Michal would think "I thought my husband's obsession with the Ark would soon be over and we could be back to playing King and Queen, but now he is back to living day and night with this obsession. When will it end?" Tension abounded.
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce
v.9 - The level of faith of certain individuals is recorded for us to take note of. We need to have faith - we need to believe that God will heal our problems from a distance in the same way that this centurion did - and our problems involve death too - that which is inevitable for each one of us and would be final, were it not for faith. Let us then try to develop it and use the example of Israel as a starting point from which to do better, that we might not suffer the same punishments as they did, but that we might be grafted into their stock and share in their promises by our faith. Matt.15:28, Rom.3:1-3, 9:4,5.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.23 If we wish to think of Jesus as being one who went about bending over backwards in order to please men we would be mistaken. Matthew 11:6 13:21 57 Mark 6:3 John 6:61 Whilst Jesus knew that what he had to say would offended many he was concerned that his followers would not be so dismayed. Matthew 11:6 His concern was that his Father's will might be known. This is offensive to the flesh - therefore he prayed that his disciples would not be caused to stumble as did his adversaries. John 16:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
7:36-49 Given that the Pharisee knew what sort of woman it was who was washing Jesus' feet we must question how she had managed to get into the house. The Pharisee must have seen it as a wonderful unexpected opportunity to trap Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
LOVE AND FORGIVENESS
We all owe a debt to God for the wrong we have done. Some of us owe more than others and yet, no matter how many times we have sinned, or how bad our sins have been, or how incurable we think we are, by the love of God we can be forgiven and be saved from sin and death.
We need to do as the sinful woman did when she came to Jesus. She wept and anointed him in an action of love and showing in her actions a new beginning. After her encounter with the Lord Jesus he told her that her sins were forgiven and to go in peace. She had shown a great amount of love and had been forgiven for a great amount of sins.
Forgiveness breeds love, and love helps us to forgive and be forgiven. The more we forgive, the more loving we will become and the more God will forgive us. If we have been forgiven a lot we will love God more and our anguished, guilty lives will be freed from their pain, and we, like the sinful woman, will be able to go in peace.
So let us repent of our sins, show our love for our Lord, forgive each other and enjoy the love, peace and forgiveness that flows from our Lord.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
:2 Not only was the centurion a gentile. He was an important man in the occupying army. One would, therefore, think that the Jews would have little love for him. However they describe him as 'worthy' (:4). From this we must conclude that he was a very special gentile as far as his attitude to the Jews was.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
V.11 This is the only time that this village is spoken of in scripture. Christ, it appears only visited the village this one time. It is a little to the south of Mount Tabor, about twenty kilometres from Capernaum.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
7:9 Here is a contrast! Jesus 'marvelled' - it was usually the people who marvelled at what Jesus did for example (Matt 8:27 , 9:8 , :33)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
John sent his disciples to Jesus with a question, for their sakes not for his (vs.19,20). His disciples had to know that they should now be following Jesus and no longer John.
The woman of vs.37,38 should not be confused with Mary (John 12:3). Mary was in the house of her father (see my note on Matt. 26, Jan 24) while this woman was clearly not.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Michael
7:3 The ‘elders’ ask Jesus to heal the centurion’s servant but the Pharisees object to Jesus healing on the Sabbath! There must have been some arguments between the elders of the synagogue and the Pharisees who came from Jerusalem!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
v 4,5 where the Jews are impressed with the centurion's works, is contrasted with v 9 where Jesus is amazed by his faith. The lesson for us is obvious, and often emphasised by Paul.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
There is much debate as to whether John sent his disciples to Jesus for his own benefit or for theirs. I think we do not have to exclude the benefit to John as in v 22 Jesus specifically tells them to go & tell John about what they have seen. Jesus compares John to Elijah, whom we know had crises of faith, but God strengthened him, and he is known as a great prophet.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
in v 41, Jesus is giving a picture of what is in Simon's mind. Before God there are no big sins and little sins, or big sinners and small sinners, but we all sin & fall short. In his own mind though, Simon saw this differentiation cp Luke 18:10-14. When he goes on to speak of forgiveness in v 47, he doesn't mention Simon's sinfulness, but his lack of forgiveness & love. We cannot be forgiven if we do not admit to our sins & repent, and if we do not repent we have no relationship with God & no love of Him.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Wendy
The harlot who came to Jesus obviously hadn’t planned to weep (Luke 7:36-50). No-one plans to cry. She had gone home and picked up her most prized (and possibly her only) possession. She brought the alabaster box with her, obviously intending to give it to Jesus. As she stood at His feet, knowing she was in the presence of the Son of God, and also surrounded by a number of prominent citizens, suddenly her emotions got the better of her, and she started to cry. Her sobs and her tears continued, and she began to realise what was happening. No-one had washed the Master’s feet, and her tear drops were leaving terrible streaks down His dusty feet. She had to do something, quick. Grabbing her long hair, she used that as a towel, and dried His poor dirty feet. (This would have made her hair really matted and unpleasant, but that didn't matter to her.) She then kissed His feet in a real act of worship. And then an idea struck her. She broke the expensive box to release the perfumed ointment, pouring it over His tired feet. It was the best present she could give to this wonderful Man. And He gave her a present, too. He forgave her sins, which were many.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to David
7:35 In saying ‘wisdom is justified of her children’ Jesus is saying that the works of a man show what he is really like. The ‘wise’ – Jesus and John showed their wisdom by their actions. The Jewish leaders showed their foolishness by their actions.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
John's question to Jesus in v.19 was for the benefit of his (John's) disciples. John clearly knew his mission and remained steadfast to his calling. His faith never waned - a fact that was attested by Jesus Himself (vs. 24-28). John had explained to his disciples that his role was that of the friend of the bridegroom - Christ being the bridegroom (John 3:25-36). In the Near East, the friend of the bridegroom was the person responsible for all the preparations for the wedding. Once wedding day arrived, then the bridegroom took over while the friend faded into the background. Although John had explained his relationship vis-à-vis Jesus to his disciples, he needed the Master to confirm the situation to them so that they should be in no doubt of whom to follow.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Michael
7:2 This is the essence of the gospel. The servant answers to Israel – spiritually dead. The centurion is the caring master. Whilst he could replace this servant he loved that servant and so wanted to save him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
7:8 In comparing himself to Jesus saying ‘I also under authority’ he is recognising that just as his authority came from his appointment by Rome Jesus did not act on his own authority but was working at the sanction of a higher authority.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
Vs.11-15 Jesus went to Nain and raised the dead son of the widow. The report of the incident is plain, and shows the power of Yahweh. But, is there any deeper significance?
The meaning of the name Nain is green pastures. Right away, an echo of Ps. 23 is triggered. David's psalm talks about himself, but also talks about Jesus. The psalm talks about Jesus' suffering and death. He had to: walk through the valley of the shadow of death. But, He would be brought back to life to: lie down in green pastures. This is an image of lushness - green being the eternal colour.
Jesus would obtain (and has now obtained) eternal life. His true followers will also obtain eternal life. These people are represented by the complete (full circle) rainbow (emerald is green, the eternal colour) (Rev 4:3).
The raised man in Nain was the only son of the widow. He was the sole breadwinner in that family. Without her son, the widow would be left destitute. Jesus is the head of His family. If He were not raised from the dead, His spiritual family would be left destitute - they would have no hope of eternal life (1Cor 15:14).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
7:27 In quoting Mal 3:1 Jesus gives us the authority to see John’s ministry in the prophecy of Malachi. Now Malachi’s message is directed to ‘the priests’ – Mal 2:1 etc: - John was not just telling people that Jesus was coming He witnessed against the religious authorities right from the beginning of his work – Matt 3:7
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
7:12 Two details. That the woman was a widow and that her son was her only son reinforce the point that without the saving work of Jesus her name would be blotted out in Israel. This stands as a parable of our situation. Without Christ our future is just as bleak as this widow.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
7:6 The centurion’s ‘trouble not’ differs from the servants of the ruler of the synagogue – 8:49. Admittedly the child of the ruler was dead whilst the centurions servant was just ‘sick’. However there is a difference to be seen between the servants and the centurion.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
“…What went ye out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken with the wind?...”
The parallel passage may be read in Matt 11:7-15.
Reeds, or bulrushes grow along the banks of the Nile, and other marshy areas. Because they are easily blown by the wind and easily broken, they are symbolic of weakness and fickleness (1Kin 14:15). Many times in Scripture it alludes to the unreliability of Egypt as an ally (2Kin 18:21; Isa 36:6; Eze 29:6). By using this allegory, Jesus was, in fact, pointing out the reliability and constancy of John, that he was anything but a reed shaken by the wind! John’s followers knew that his testimony and his way of life did not change to please his audience no matter who they were and however powerful!
From Jesus’ testimony of John the Baptist, it cannot be supposed that John’s faith ever wavered. However, some of John’s disciples’ faith did waver. They were not convinced that Jesus was the Messiah (verse 23). John knew this. Furthermore, Jesus understood that John did what he did in order to get these two disciples to go him and be convinced, not willing that any should perish. Jesus knew the wisdom behind it and said what he said (verse 22). Why do I say this? Because after performing miracles before these unconvinced disciples, Jesus immediately gave a powerful witness to John’s character, his reliability, and his constancy, that we may also know of his unwavering faith. He would not have so spoken if John had stumbled in him. John already heard and knew of Jesus' miracles from his believing disciples (Luke 7:18; Matt 11:2), and did not need to hear them again to be convinced by two more disciples! He sent them for their sake, not his! While reeds bend with every gust of wind (see Eph 4:14), John did not bend, nor was his faith weakened because of his imprisonment.
John was a man who lived in the barren Judean desert, wore camel’s hair with a leather belt around his waist, and ate locusts and wild honey for sustenance (Matt 3:4; Mark 1:6; Luke 1:80). John was a rugged man (Matt 11:8), able to deal with the extreme hot and cold temperatures of desert living. Why, if we had to live like that we would probably fall apart, but not so with John. He was anything, but a reed shaken by the wind! John’s faith was undaunted; he was strong in the Spirit, in wisdom, and the grace of God was upon him (Luke 2:20); he was anything, but a reed shaken by the wind! It was recorded of him in Scripture that he was the greatest man that ever lived (Matt 11:11). He was anything, but a reed shaken by the wind! John preached the way he saw it; he cut down right to the heart of the matter and called it like it is. He did not water down his words, but gave the hard-core reality of God’s Word (Luke 3:7-10). It eventually cost him his life (Mark 6:14-29). John was anything, but a failure in his mission, anything but a reed shaken by the wind!
Scientists always come up with new theories, change their mind, interpret and reinterpret their observations, lives change, and world-views change. Life is like standing on shifting, shaking, and forever changing grounds. John, however, stood firmly on the unchanging Rock (cf. Heb 13:8), and whether under the canopy of billions of stars, or in Herod’s prison, he enjoyed this peaceful easy feeling. It could not be anything but, because no matter what, he was standing on firm ground (Phil 4:4-7).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Valerie
Summary Of Luke
7:1-10 In Capernaum Fifth Miracle Healing Centurions servant
7:11-18 Next days Sixth Miracle – raising to life the dead son of the widow of Nain
7:19-23 John Baptist’s messengers arrive and see miracles
7:24-29 After John’s disciples leave Jesus asks “what did you go to see when you went to see him in the wilderness?
7:30-35 Pharisees rejected John’s teaching so Jesus challenges them
7:36-50 Jesus invited to the house of a Pharisee
:37-38 Woman anoints Jesus
:39-43 Jesus told parable to Simon the Pharisee
:44-48 Jesus drew attention to what the woman had done and forgave her sins
:49 People eating with the Pharisee find fault with Jesus
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
What is the link between Jesus and John the Baptist?
This chapter revolves around two groups of people:
v29: All the people that heard him, and the publicans, having been previously baptized of John.
v30: The Pharisees and lawyers, not baptized of John, who rejected his words.
These two groups of people are categorised by whether they had been baptized of John the baptist or not. The implication is that the baptized group had repented, and the un-baptized group hadn't (see Mark 1:4).
The baptism of John was there to prepare people to hear Jesus's message, thus those who rejected baptism also couldn't hear the message of Jesus properly.
The chapter concludes by explaining why this should be so. (v41-50) tell us that the one who is forgiven most will love Jesus the most, and the ones who didn't feel that they had need of forgiveness, wouldn't love him at all. We can see that these two groups coincide with the groups we started with. John's message prepared repentant people to want to seek Jesus - because Jesus was the one doing the forgiving. This gratefulness naturally leads us to want to listen to what he has to say. We also should repent and be baptised, or otherwise the message of Jesus will mean nothing to us. Notice how the unforgiven man (Simon) couldn't even believe that Jesus was the prophet that all the other people clearly saw him to be (compare v39 with v50).
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Rob
7:3 So we see Jews asking Jesus to heal a gentile’s servant! Maybe we are told of this event to show that gentiles will be invited into the kingdom because blind Jews reject him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
“And, behold a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster box of ointment, And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet and anointed them with the ointment.”
A reader writes: “... I rely on your wisdom and knowledge to set me straight on this issue… Is this woman of the city, the sinner Mary (sister of Martha)? … John 11:2 makes the identification for us and John 12:1-3 further identifies this Mary… Does this make Simon the Pharisee father of Mary, Martha and Lazarus?”
My reply: In Matt 26:6 and Mark 14:3, Jesus enters the house of a Simon identified as a leper, who very possibly was healed by Jesus at the beginning of his ministry (cf. Lev 14; Matt 8:2-4). It is highly unlikely that Simon the leper is the same person as Simon the Pharisee. The very conduct of Simon the Pharisee toward Jesus would make this very dubious.
Simon the Pharisee lived in the city of Nain, which was Lower Galilee, 8.7 miles (14 km) south of Nazareth. Bethany was near Jerusalem, 60 miles from Nain (91 km). Simon the Pharisee spoke of this woman in the third person and knowing her character spoke of her very disparagingly. It is highly unlikely he was her father.
Mary of Bethany anointed Jesus twice; the first being six days prior when Jesus appeared to raise Lazarus from the dead, the second two days before Jesus’ death (Matt 26:2; Mark 14:1-3; John 11:6,17).
Because of the apparent similarities, Mary, the sister of Lazarus and friend of Jesus, is made out to be the prostitute of Luke 7, when in reality she is not. Two different women anointed Jesus, one lived to the north, the other to the south. What we have is different episodes occurring at different times at different places by two different women.
A writer on this issue believes there was only one woman, Mary, the sister of Lazarus. He writes that Matthew, Mark, and John account all the details of this incidence, but that “… Luke has failed to follow his Lord’s instruction!” What a statement to make about Luke who wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit!
It is, indeed, really important to pay attention to details: the woman who anointed Jesus did not live in the Pharisee’s house, and anointed Jesus at the beginning of his ministry. Mary anointed Jesus in her house towards the end of Jesus’ ministry.
In the three accounts given of Mary’s anointing Jesus, she is criticized for pouring out the expensive ointment; the hosts are amicable and believe in the divinity of Christ; the disciples became angry preferring to sell the ointment; the Lord defends Mary’s action; Jesus links the anointment with his sepulture only – there is no demonstration of forgiveness; in Matthew, Mark, and John, they deal amicably with the two sisters, consider them worthy, console them and keep them in their company. Neither was a public sinner.
In Luke’s account the person who is criticized is Christ for allowing himself to be touched by a sinner; the host, a Pharisee, is hostile towards him and doubts that Jesus is a prophet not knowing what type of woman he touched; no one is angry about pouring out the ointment, there is no defense because no one objected; here we saw a demonstration of Jesus’ divinity and forgiveness; here this woman was considered a public sinner unworthy of associating with the Jews.
Judas Iscariot is identified as the son of Simon (John 6:71; 13:26). Which Simon is he the son of? If the leper’s, then he would have been identified as the brother of Martha, Mary, and Lazarus, which he is not. Besides the fact that Simon was a very common name, both Judas and his father, Simon were from Kerioth, which was in Moab (Jer 48:24; Amos 2:1-2) – land given to Caleb and the children of Israel (Josh 15:25). Judas was the only Apostle not from Galilee (cf. Acts 2:7).
We often hear that, “the devil is in the details,” which means that small things when overlooked can cause serious misinterpretations later on. There is another cliché that states: “No detail is too small” – in other words, we must be attentive to even the smallest details. This, in turn, leads to another cliché, “God resides in details.” We must never overlook the small when thinking of the big.
These passages that deal with the anointment of Jesus are great examples of how necessary it is to notice details to correctly interpret Scripture. Chronologically and topographically speaking, Mary of Bethany is not the unnamed woman of Luke 7, despite the Biblical cross references trying to link it. We do not, nor should we, imaginatively forage what is said; instead we should take notice of what is clearly stated.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Valerie
7:49 The murmuring amongst the other guests is an extension the inward thoughts of Simon when Jesus allowed the woman to anoint him – Luke 7:39
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
7:10,19 We are introduced to two groups who were sent. Both saw the evidence of Jesus’ healing power. The disciples of John saw the evidence that Jesus was Messiah. Those who saw the healing of the centurion’s servant saw the same evidence. They could have concluded that Jesus was Messiah, on the basis of what they saw. The religious leaders, at least, would not see the evidence and would not be converted.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
7:4 We might conclude that the animosity to Jesus’ miracles working came from the religious leaders in Jerusalem whilst in Galilee, where Capernaum was, there was a lot less animosity to his miracles. So we see an instant request that the servant of a gentile would be healed.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
CRITICISM
Why do we have to criticise all the time? When we think about it, we are actually happy with most things that happen in our lives, but when we open our mouths and speak, we choose to focus on the things we disagree with or are critical about.
Jesus commented about the people of his generation and their criticism. He said, “For John the Baptist has come eating no bread and drinking no wine, and you say, ‘He has a demon.’ The Son of man has come eating and drinking and you say, ‘Look at him! A glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’ Yet wisdom is justified by her children.” (Luke 7:33-35).
They criticised John the Baptist and they criticised Jesus, even though they both behaved different ways from each other. There was plenty to admire about both of them, but they focused on the negative.
Let’s take a challenge to spend a week saying nothing negative. No criticism. Be positive, thankful, grateful. Build people up with your words instead of pulling people down. Find things to celebrate instead of things to disagree with. Make this week a week of positive thoughts and words.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Robert
7:50 we might ask how it is that faith saved the woman. It relates to the forgiveness of her ins and her belief that God could do that, through Jesus’ words. She was justified – that is counted righteous – because of her belief. This is based on God’s dealing with Abram –Gen 15:6
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
7:50 we might ask how it is that faith saved the woman. It relates to the forgiveness of her ins and her belief that God could do that, through Jesus’ words. She was justified – that is counted righteous – because of her belief. This is based on God’s dealing with Abram – Gen 15:6
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
“And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her, and said unto her, Weep not.”
It isn’t always easy to show compassion, or extend kindness to those we don’t know; don’t know well, or sometimes even to those we know well. Yet, compassion is a characteristic of Jesus, and is the manifestation of who the Father is (Psa 86:15). To be one with the Father and Son (John 17:21), it stands to reason that this characteristic must also be a part of who we are. To be one is to walk with them in thought, word, and deed, and Scripture clearly teaches this to be the definition of “oneness.” We are walking in the same direction together, not the opposite.
To be empathic toward others is to be kind, sensitive and show emotional warmth to the feelings of those around us. It is to be compassionate, and this ought to be our norm. To be mean, insensitive, and cold towards others is not to have the mind of Christ. When we share a part of ourselves, is anyone listening without being judgmental? Do they even care?
Saul, later called Paul, was notorious for the violent persecutions of Christ’s disciples, yet was referred to as a “chosen vessel” by Jesus! It was hard for Jesus’ disciples to accept him, but they did. I expect it was even harder on Paul when he reflected on Saul. He had to learn compassion too – self-compassion!
When we are self-compassionate, it is then that we are able to heal and show compassion to others. It is to treat others as we would have them treat us. It is part of God’s moral law (Matt 7:12). To tell someone we care is not enough; we must show it. It, truly, all starts with us individually! Reflecting and self-compassion is healing; it is so important. It allows us to grow beyond the past, withhold self-judgment, and look toward the future.
In Rev 3:20, we read that Christ “stands” at the door and knocks, and invites the lukewarm Laodicean ecclesia to open the door of their heart and let him in and have fellowship with him. He is not “seated,” as he will be at the bema judgment, so, it is never too late for anyone of us to grow and change. God’s word is powerful to change and transform us. Let us, therefore, be imitators of God and walk in love, as also Christ did (Eph 5:1,2), and give thanks, “To the only wise God, our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen” (Jude 1:25).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Valerie
THE HEART OF JESUS
I think we sometimes lose sight of the fact that the same Jesus who is up in heaven at the right hand of God, is the same Jesus who walked the earth 2000 years ago.
When Jesus approached the town gate of a city called Nain, a dead man was being carried out with his grieving mother behind - a widow, now destitute. Listen to the reaction of Jesus: "When the Lord saw her, his heart went out to her and he said, 'Don't cry.'" (Luke 7:13).
His heart went out to her. We might not see the same miracles of the dead being raised to life or miraculous healings every day as those with Jesus witnessed, but we can be sure of this: that the heart of Jesus is with us. He has compassion. He feels for us. If we are weeping, sad, grieved, hurting or destitute, he cares and his heart goes out to us. He is the same compassionate saviour today as he was then.
We don't need to go through life alone. Jesus is with us. He will never leave us or forsake us. He will be with you and his heart will go out to you.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Robert
7:12 those who were familiar with their bible – what we call the Old Testament – would be aware that this was not the first time that a dead son had been raised form the dead. 1Kin 17:20-23
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
7:39 It has already been stated that the people considered Jesus as a “prophet” - :16 – and now we see the Pharisee looking for evidence that Jesus was not a prophet.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
7:16 the “fear” that the people showed was rather respect and admiration and wonderment about what was going to happen with this new teacher seeing his miracles as evidence that in reality God had visited his people – like we see in 1:68.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
7:35 Yet wisdom is justified by all her children
Who are wisdom's children?
Answer: Repentant sinners (v34) who respond to God's wisdom by being baptised (v29). Thus the Pharisees and lawyers were not the children of wisdom (v30).
Bruce Bates [Forbes Australia] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Bruce