AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
v.1-9 - These verses bring home to us the reality of the number of wives David had. This was contrary to the requirements of the law for a king - Deut.17:17. David, nevertheless, found favour with God. It is our heart, far more than our actions, which counts.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.10 This list of the descendants of Solomon provides us with a comprehensive list of those who reigned on the throne of the Lord in Jerusalem.
v.15 - 16 The listing of the sons of Josiah and Jehoiakim shows that at the end of the kingdom of Judah the line was not a pure father - son. Hence Zedekiah is called a 'wicked prince' not a 'wicked king' Ezekiel 21:25
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
:1-4 Sons of David born in Hebron
:5-9 Sons of David born in Jerusalem
:10-24 Sons of Solomon
So now the focus is on the families of David and Solomon which traces the kingly line and the other brothers.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
COMBINED FAITH
It always amazes me how that when one person shouts or sings, the noise can be heard within a certain area, but if a whole congregation shouts or sings, even though their individual volumes may be less, the combined noise is greater and can be heard from a long way off. It is the same with light. One candle doesn't make much light, but 100 candles will make a room very bright, though each candle only emits a small amount of light.
The same principle can be true of faith. It took until the days of Hezekiah for some of the clans of Simeon to finish the job of clearing the Canaanites out of the land - a job that was started in the days of Joshua. Yet in the time of Hezekiah Israel and Judah lost more land than they gained - except for the men of Simeon. I wonder who influenced who? Did the men of Simeon, with their outstanding faith encourage Hezekiah to be a faithful and God fearing king? Or was it the faithful rule of Hezekiah that gave the men of Simeon the motivation to perform their faithful acts? It could have been both. Like the combined voices, or candle power, the faith of one will strengthen another.
Let us make sure that our faith is burning so that we strengthen the faith of someone near us, and when their faith burns they will strengthen us. Together with faithful people we can change the world.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
:19 Zerubbabel - who was amongst those who returned from Babylon, according to this genealogy, was the rightful king of Israel - if they were to have a king. But of course he was not the one 'whose right it is' (Ezekiel 21:27) so he was only the 'governor' (Hag 1:1)
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
3:2 In saying that Absalom was born of the daughter of Talmai of Geshur we are given the reason why Absalom fled to Geshur (2Sam 13:38). Often little details in Chronicles will provide an explanation for later events.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.15 No king by the name of Shallum is mentioned in the history of Josiah's sons (2Kin 14, 2Kin 23), but there is a notice of Shallum the son of Josiah(Jer 22:11), who reigned in the stead of his father, and who is generally supposed to be Jehoahaz, a younger son, here called the fourth, of Josiah.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
Six sons were born to David during his 7 year reign in Hebron, and then a further 13 in Jerusalem
(1Chron 3:1-9). It's not clear how many wives he had, although the Hebron family were all born from different wives. It's not surprising therefore that Solomon followed in his father's footsteps, and soon started to take multiple wives.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
Polygamy was practised in the ancient Near-East, although monogamy was also widespread. Abraham and Jacob had multiple wives, while Isaac did not. Yahweh did not prohibit polygamy per se, although it did not conform to the Edenic ideal of monogamy.
The patriarch were not given to idolatry. But, later an injunction was put in the Law because Yahweh foresaw the danger of a man being led into idolatry because of his wives (Deut 17:17). This did not pose a problem with David, but it certainly did with Solomon (1Kin 11:4-8).
The Edenic ideal was restored later under ecclesial leadership (1Tim 3:2;Titus 1:6). This practice is commonly accepted by most people in the world today, and forms a tenet of civil law.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
3:5 Even if Bathsheba was to produce the heir Solomon was not the firstborn, even if we discount the one that died shortly after birth. Another example of god passing over the apparent heir to select the man of His choosing.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
3:5 when we see that Bathsheba was the daughter of Ammiel we maybe see a reason why Ammiel was involved in providing sustenance to David when he was fleeing from Absalom – 2Sam 17:27
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
PREPARE YOUR GENEALOGY
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Robert
3:1 Maybe the fact that Amnon was the firstborn of David provided him with the erroneous judgement that he could behave towards Tamar as he did.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
V.5 Ammiel, the father of Bathsheba, is called Eliam in 2Sam 11:3. This Ammiel is not considered the same person as the Ammiel of 2Sam 9:4,5; 17:27.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
3:2 Maybe being the third born, Amnon now being out of the way, Absalom saw himself as the obvious next king – though we hear nothing of Daniel, David’s second son.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
V.4 David reigned a total of 40 years and 6 months, about the same amount of time as his son Solomon (1Kin 11:42). They were the longest reigning monarchs in the united kingdom of Judah and Israel. However, the longest reigning monarch, and the most evil, was Manasseh who ruled over Judah for 55 years (v.13; 2Kin 21:1).
V.9 Tamar was the only sister to 15 brothers.
Vs.10-19 The lineage of Joseph, the husband of Mary, is paralleled in Matt 1:5-13. Then, the linkage seems to break down.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
3:10-16 this summary provides us with a simple summary of the sons of Solomon who reigned as kings of Judah.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
1Chron 3:5;2Sam 11:3 - "Bathshua" [(1340) means "daughter of wealth"] is the same person as "Bathsheba" [(1339) means "daughter of an oath"] - is this perhaps an inference to a promise or oath to Uriah being broken?
1Chron 3:6,8 - the two sets of two brothers of the same name (Elishama, Eliphelet) may be questioned (1Chron 14:5-7;2Sam 5:15-16); perhaps 1Chron.3:6 should read "Elishua, Elpelet" and perhaps 1Chron.3:8 should read "Elishama, Eliphelet". Is this a minor corruption of translation or is it the correct mentioning of several names (people often had more than one name) for the same persons?
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Charles
"House of David"
In 1993-94, while work crews were preparing the Tel Dan site in the north of Israel at the foot of Mount Hermon for visitors, a broken fragment of basalt stone was uncovered in a wall. It turned out that the stele fragment mentions King David's dynasty, the "House of David." As the preparatory work for tourism proceeded, two additional fragments of the stele were recovered.
As the fragment and the entire pavement was covered by the debris of the Assyrian destruction of Tiglath Pileser III, in 732 BC, it could not have been laid later.
This discovery provides an archaeological connection to the biblical references to the ruling dynasty established by King David. It is the first mention of King David and the earliest mention of a biblical figure outside of the Bible. Prior to this discovery, some scholars were either sceptical or denied the historical existence of King David.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Charles
3:9 Having listed all the sons of David have you ever considered how few of them are mentioned during the life of David? The Divine record does not simply comment upon families. It focuses on those who are involved in the development of the purpose of God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
3:17 Salathiel is the father of Zerubbabel, the governor in Judah at the time of the return from Babylon – Hag 1:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
Three dead lions, one living dog.
Of David's sons, Amnon the first in line to the throne was murdered by Absalom. Absalom, the third in line, died while trying to usurp his father's throne. The fourth in line, Adonijah died because of trying to take the place of Solomon on David's throne. Thus three out of the four of David's sons nearest to the throne died.
Q: Having learned that bit of information, what might your next question be?
Q: Do you think Ecc 9:4 might apply here? What is the lesson for us?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Rob
3:1-2 Whilst the Bible record is silent about any aspirations of Amnon towards the throne we know Absalom’s intention was to be king. Maybe the opportunity to kill Amnon was part of this plan, Amnon being the firstborn and the obvious successor to David, humanly speaking.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
3:15 This Zedekiah is elsewhere – 2Kin 24:17 – is called Mattaniah
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
3:1-9 Notice that whilst the birth order of David’s sons born in Hebron is given there is no such detail for the sons born in Jerusalem.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
3:19 as Salthiel was the son father of the one who became governor at the time of the return from Babylon we might conclude that Assir had already died, being the firstborn.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
3:17-19 Hag 1:1 speaks of Zerubbabel as the son of Shealtiel. Here we see the more comprehensive family tree Salthiel – Pediah – Zerubbabel
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
3:2 The fact that Absalom had a grandmother in Geshur explains why he fled there - 2Sam 13:38 – after killing Amnon.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
3:2-8 So here we read of all of David’s nine sons. We learn nothing of some of them. Sadly all the ones we learn of, except Solomon, did not follow in the behaviour of David. The first thing we learn is that a godly parent does not necessarily have godly children. Doubtless David wondered why many of his sons did not follow his godly example. In this we can take comfort. If a man after God’s own heart could not ensure that all his children served God faithfully God does not expect the same of us.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
1 Chronicles 1-9 can seem to be difficult chapters to read and understand.
Brother Tony Benson’s book – Family Trees of the Tribes of Israel, by using family trees and explanations highlights much that is in the genealogies in this section of the book.
Copies can be ordered from Peterlforbes@tiscali.co.uk. Cost £5.50 plus postage.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
1 Chronicles 1-9 can seem to be difficult chapters to read and understand.
Brother Tony Benson’s book – Family Trees of the Tribes of Israel, by using family trees and explanations highlights much that is in the genealogies in this section of the book.
Copies can be ordered from Peterlforbes@tiscali.co.uk. Cost £5.50 plus postage.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
3:4-5 The factual listing of where David’s sons were born tracks the progression from his first anointing in Hebron – a city of the tribe of Judah –Josh 15:1,54 – Taking Jerusalem (Jebus) had been a major part of David’s plan to enable him to establish a place of worship in the place that he knew was the place Yahweh has chosen.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
3:5 Notice that Solomon was born in Jerusalem sand he was the planned heir to David. The sons who attempted to usurp the position of Solomon were both born in Hebron 3:2 Absalom and Adonjah. Whilst they both had priority according to birth order they were passed over by God in preference for one of the sons born in Jerusalem.
So Solomon was the first king of Israel born in Jerusalem, the city of God’s choice to place His name there.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
3:5 If the sons of Bathsheba born ot David in Jerusalem are recorded in birth order we learn that Solomon was the youngest son, and yet he was to become God’s choice for the king who would replace David – Just like David was the youngest son of Jesse.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
This whole chapter is a sad indictment on the whole of mankind, but especially on the nation of Israel, who were to be the ones that would crucify the Lord when he came. Mic.7:10, Matt.5:13, Heb.10:29
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
One of the most disturbing passages in the whole of Scripture. An horrible, graphic, description of an harlot which is Israel. However the way the harlot is described draws on language which Yahweh uses elsewhere to speak of the way that he has cared for Israel. Israel had taken that which Yahweh had given them and prostituted it with false gods.
16:10 badgers skins Exodus 25:5
The badger skin mentioned here is only found elsewhere in Scripture in the coverings of the tabernacle.
16:11 chain on thy neck Song of Solomon 1:10
16:13 beautiful Song of Solomon 6:4
16:14 comeliness Song of Solomon 1:5
The bride of the Song of Solomon provides a description of a beautiful woman, beautiful because of the provision that Yahweh has made for his bride. However the use of the same language in Ezekiel 16 is to show that those wonderful things that Yahweh had given to Israel had been taken and given to others. The blessings of Yahweh were used to 'finance' false worship so that Israel developed the way of thinking which presumed that the false gods had actually provided the blessings.
16:46 younger sister Song of Solomon 8:8
The 'younger sister, picks up the lament in the Song of Solomon to show that there was no instruction from the one to the other, Samaria instead of providing the good example had gone into captivity to Assyria, and Judah had not even learnt from seeing the Northern kingdom being taken into captivity.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.8 sets out a clear and irrevocable picture of just what God has done for mankind. He has, regardless of the great rift which is between Him and us because of sin, nevertheless come so close to us, through the work of Jesus (which applies in all generations because even though the work was still future it was still the means to salvation for all ages) that here he describes his closeness to his people by language of the closest type of relationship we as human beings understand. Let us remember this close bond we have - entirely the Father's doing - and behave in such a way as to respect it, as Israel didn't.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
16:10 The badger's skins which were a covering in the tabernacle demonstrates that God's care for Israel was to be seen not only in the provision of material things but also in the provision of a place for worship and, by implication, a system of worship. Do we view the provision of God only in material things? Or do we ever thank God for His provision of the 'house of God' - the ecclesia?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
RESPONSE TO SAVING
The story of the abandoned baby girl that the LORD found, cared for, brought up and gave his best for, is one of those pictures we can all relate to. The story is about Jerusalem and the people who live in that city. At the beginning they were nothing. They were a people despised and in slavery in Egypt when God called them out and brought them up in the wilderness. He gave them a new life, land, cities and riches they had not worked for. Everything that Judah and Jerusalem had, everything they were, everything they had become (in all the best ways) was given to them by the LORD. Without the LORD they would have still been slaves in Egypt.
The LORD their God should have been their everything. But Judah and Jerusalem rejected him, served and sacrificed to idols and lived as though their God had never existed. They used the gifts he had given them to sacrifice to their idols. As the LORD continues his story he names her as a prostitute, an adulterous wife who pays her lovers.
The beginning of this story is also identical to our story. When we were called we were nothing, dead in sins. But God has given us his most precious gifts - including his Son, Jesus Christ - and has brought us back to life. Judah and Jerusalem concluded their story by growing up to be a prostitute ready to be punished. How we write the rest of our story, whether we are faithful or unfaithful, is up to us.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
16:13,14 Beautiful Song of Solomon 6:4
comeliness Song of Solomon 1:5
These two quotations from the Song of Solomon highlight the height from which Israel had fallen. Their 'bridge groom' was willing to describe Israel in such a way - but she had turned away to idol worship and sullied herself in the process. We are counted righteous and sinless (Romans 4:1-9) we must take care that we do not fall from this lofty position.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
16 This chapter speaks of Jerusalem and the nation of Israel as a beautiful woman who has debased herself and sold herself as a harlot which contrasts with the way that Jeremiah (6:2) speaks of Jerusalem before the captivity.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.22; 43; 60 Forgetfulness of our Heavenly Father's love is the source of man's sins. Israel forgot her deliverance by God in the infancy of her national life, but as we see in V.60 God will not forget the promises he has made.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
V.37-43 The punishment of the adulteress prefigures the destruction of Jerusalem
He would gather her lovers and expose her nakedness to them. Hos 2:12
|
|
He would judge Jerusalem as an adulteress. John 8:4-5
|
|
Her lovers would turn against her, dismantle the city and the walls. Hos 2:3
|
|
She would be brought so low that so that she would nothing to pay. Eze 23:48
|
|
He would bring Jerusalem to remember the LORD'S grace to her. Psa 78:4
|
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
Gen 19:4-5 - Emphasizes the sexual immorality of Sodom. In Eze 16:49-50 - We get a more comprehensive depiction of her and her daughters behaviours which included: arrogance, being overfed, lack of concern, not helping the poor and needy, haughtiness, doing detestable things.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Charles
Vs.3,45 Yahweh calls the Amorite father of Jerusalem and the Hittite mother. The land of promise was already occupied by the Amorites and Hittites when the exodus occurred (Exo 3:8).
Yahweh expected Israel to rid the land of the Amorites' and the Hittites' idolatry (Exo 23:23,24). Unfortunately this did not happen. In fact two of the greatest indictments for Amorite idolatrous worship, and beyond, were against Ahab (1Kin 21:26); and Manasseh (2Kin 21:11). Yahweh was so angry, particularly with Manasseh, that he vowed to destroy Jerusalem and Judah, and would not relent (2Kin 21:12).
Thus, Ezekiel's description of Jerusalem as the daughter of idolatrous parents is apt. His diatribe against her is a confirmation of Yahweh's promise of destruction.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to Michael
This is a fascinating chapter. A godly man finds a little baby girl, newly born, but forsaken by her parents. The man takes her home, lavishes love and attention on her, gives her everything including some costly presents, and brings her up. When she is grown he falls in love with her, and marries her. But she throws it all back in his face, and commits adultery with other men. She is even worse than a harlot, and actually pays money to her male lovers (Eze 16:34). That girl is Israel. God chose her, lavished His blessing on her, and gave her everything a nation could possibly want. But she played the harlot, and went after other gods.
How terribly sad the Lord God must have been! BUT, in the end, He will forgive her, and take her back (Eze 16:60-63). That’s real love!
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
16:2 Whilst this chapter speaks of the awfulness of Judah the purpose of highlighting it all is to ‘cause Jerusalem to know …’ Again God is seeking repentance, not destruction.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
V.3 It is interesting to note the Canaanite aspects in both the history of Jerusalem, and of the people of Judah. Jerusalem was an Amorite city at the time of Joshua (Josh 10:1,5) also a stronghold of the Jebusites (Judg 19:10). Both the Amorites and the Jebusites were Canaanite peoples. Three of Judah's sons were born of a Canaanite mother. Only one of these sons survived (Shelah) and his dependants formed part of the tribe of Judah (1Chron 2:3, 1Chron 4:22-23) It is also worth noting that Zedekiah, king of Judah was a descendant of Judah through Tamar.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
16:48 In saying ‘Sodom thy sister’ Ezekiel is reminding Israel that Isaiah had already spoken of her leaders as rulers of Sodom – , Isa 1:10
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
16:3 Israel’s father and mother were not Amorites and Hittites. However spiritually speaking they were. They did the work of their father and mother. As Jesus said to the Jewish leaders, they were not Abraham’s children –John 8:44
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
V.4 All these elements spelled death for the infant. Israel, in its infancy in the Land, was subject to death because of its abominations (v.3).
Vs.6,7 It is because of Yahweh that Israel flourished.
V.8 I spread my skirt over thee (KJV); I spread the corner of my garment (ESV) is the act of betrothal. Consider Boaz and Ruth (Ruth 3:7-9; 4:13).
V.12 a jewel on thy forehead (KJV) is more correctly translated a ring on your nose (ESV). In the Ancient Near East, women were adorned by a gold or silver ring which was pierced through the right nostril.
V.16 divers colours (KJV); colourful shrines (ESV) is an allusion to tents made of different colored panels. These tents (shrines) were used in the worship of Astarte (Ashteroth; Ishtar; Venus; Aphrodite are the same goddess, so named by different nations).
V.17 The phrase images of men is quite gender specific. It is probable that the idolatrous, lustful women of Judah took silver and gold and fashioned images of the male phallus.
V.26 Israel made alliances with Egypt with whom it shared abominable idolatry (Eze 20:7,8).
V.29 The gods of every nation from Egypt to Babylon (from the Nile to the Euphrates) were worshipped by Israel.
V.37 The very nations whose gods Israel worshipped: will uncover your nakedness (punish you openly and publicly).
Vs.44,45 Like mother, like daughter. Israel’s mother was a Hittite (v.3). The Hittites were one of the most prominent Canaanite tribes in the Land. The idolatrous Hittite mother spawned an equally idolatrous daughter, Israel.
V.46 Judah was directly related to Israel (Samaria) and its idolatry. But, Judah was also related, distantly, to Sodom and its abominations.
Vs.48,51. However, Judah’s abominations were worse than either those of Israel or Sodom.
Vs.61-63 In a future time (the kingdom), Judah will reflect and be ashamed of its wayward behaviour. Yahweh will give her sisters for daughters (the promise is that the heathen nations (sisters) will be subject to the mother (Judah)).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
v51 "Samaria did not commit half your sins" reminds us that this prophecy is against the two tribes making up Judah. Samaria is the name used for the Northern Kingdom of 10 tribes, and had already been judged. The comparison here is directly between Jeroboam and Manasseh, and how the latter acted far worse than the first. Much of this chapter finds its counterpart in 2Kin 21:1-18.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Rob
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
16:15 Israel’s problem was that they trusted their own beauty. This is rather like thinking that we can save ourselves rather than to trust in the provision that God has made for us in Christ.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
16:25 The “whoredoms” relate to their following after other gods. Just as Hosea’s wife – Hos 2:2 – 150 years or so earlier – had played the harlot, literally, as a lesson for Israel to consider, the people are now actually mimicking Gomer rather than learning from the lesson.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
16:17 God had found the neglected Israel and bedecked her with jewels – His blessings- but the nation, ignorant of what He had done for them, ascribed their blessings to the gods of the nations around them. Where do we think our material things come from? Our own endeavours? Or from the one who gives us “good things”?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
1. Eze 16:1-34 - Jerusalem as an allegory of God's unfaithful wife:
2. Eze 16:3 - the children of Israel were behaving like Canaanites (Gen 10:15-16;15:13-16;Deut 20:16-17); Jerusalem was an Amorite city in the time of Joshua (Josh 10:1,5).
3. Eze 16:4-5 - Israel was despised; proper care would have been to rub babies with coarse salt to make them strong and bind them with swaddling clothes for up to 40 days to make their arms and legs straight.
4. Eze 16:5 - "thou was cast out" (Acts 7:17-19).
5. Eze 16:6 - "Live" - the reviving of Israel (Exo 3:7-8).
6. Eze 16:6-14 - God cared for Israel.
7. Eze 16:7 - Israel multiplied (Gen 22:17) and became beautiful.
8. Eze 16:8 - "I spread my skirt over thee" (married like Ruth and Boaz Ruth 3:9-14;Isa 54:5); Yahweh delivered this people when they were about to perish in Egypt; God caused them to multiply and then entered a covenant with them; God married them upon their entry to the promised land.
9. Eze 16:13 - Israel prospered in the reign of Solomon.
10. Eze 16:15-17,20-21- unfortunately Israel used God's blessings to become unfaithful, apostate, idolatrous even to the extent of sacrificing her children to idols (Deut 32:15-18;Exo 23:23-33;1Kin 11:1-8;2Kin 21:1-12).
11. Eze 16:26,28,29 - instead of turning to God, Israel turned to Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon.
12. Eze 16:30 - Israel was weak willed.
13. Eze 16:32-33 - (NIV) "...You prefer strangers to your own husband! Every prostitute receives a fee, but you give gifts to all your lovers" (2Kin 16:17-18).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Charles
14. Eze 16:35-43 - the judgment of God's unfaithful wife:
15. Eze 16:37 - does this have application to the time of the end when Israel will be friendless?
16. Eze 16:38,40,41 - Jerusalem is to be punished like a harlot, adulteress, and a child murderer (Lev 21:9;Lev 20:10,2).
17. Eze 16:44-59 - Jerusalem compared to her sisters Sodom and Samaria:
18. Eze 16:49-50 - the sins of Sodom.
19. Eze 16:47,51 - Jerusalem was more depraved than Sodom and Samaria.
20. Eze 16:48,52 - could Ezekiel's allegory extend to AD70 or to perhaps the future judgment when Christ returns (Matt 10:15)?
21. Eze 16:56 - Jerusalem was proud.
22. Eze 16:58 - Jerusalem to be punished for "lewdness"<2154> and "abominations"<8441>.
23. Eze 16:60-63 - the new covenant:
24. Eze 16:60 - "an everlasting covenant".
25. Eze 16:63 - "shame", "pacified"(<3722> can mean atonement).
26. future restoration [Lev 26:44-45;Jer 31:31;Eze 37:26;Isa 59:21;61:8;Jer 3:14;Hos 2:14-16
("Ishi"<376> can mean my husband, "Baali"<1180>);Zech 14:21;Heb 8:1,6-13].
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Charles
16:13 Ezekiel laments that Jerusalem was once “exceeding beautiful” reflecting the feelings of Jeremiah – Lamentations of Jer 1:6
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
16:10 Outside the use of the word in the details of the tabernacle the word translated Badgers’ skin is only found here. There are other words in this chapter which are also found in the description of the tabernacle. The way that the tabernacle was designed was to reflect the way in which God cared for Israel.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
16:4-5 God is describing the way in which He called Israel even though she was not appealing to man. In a similar way we are called, not because of our appearance. Rather we are called as the Father has seen something pleasing to Himself in us – maybe our attitude to His word.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
16:8 The way in which God saved the polluted nation of Israel - in figure spreading His skirt over them – is exactly the way in which Ruth – Ruth 3:9 – asked Boaz to redeem her. Maybe this gives us an insight into Ruth’s appreciation of God’s purpose.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
Jerusalem is a harlot city. This city was given everything by Yahweh: location, wealth, royalty, safety......and the whole lot was wasted because of the idolatry of Solomon and his descendents through Rehoboam.
Jerusalem today is frequently called "the holy city", but she is not holy. She is full of false religions, and immorality, even to having "Gay Pride" marches. One of the sins of Sodom that are listed was her "pride".
This all links in with the harlot city of Revelation 17 and 18. The city where " in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth." Rev 18:24
Modern Jerusalem, a city with 800,000 people, has been spread out, since 1967, onto 7 mountains.It is far larger than at any time in history.
For those who want to believe that Rome is "mystery Babylon", please note that the city sits on 7 mountains, not hills, in the Greek text.
And no prophets were ever killed in Rome, but they were in Jerusalem:
For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord
Ellen Reid [St Arnaud, Australia, Isolation] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Ellen
16 Ezekiel 16 and the Parable of the Good Samaritan
The Parable of the Good Samaritan – Luke 10:30-36
Links with Ezekiel 16
Luke 10 |
language |
Ezekiel 16 |
Language |
stripped him |
naked and bare |
||
Passed |
passed by |
||
Passed |
passed by |
||
compassion |
compassion |
||
saw |
saw |
||
bound his wounds |
polluted in thine own blood |
||
::34 |
oil |
oil |
One might have thought that the Jews who listened to Jesus as the parable unfolded might have seen the contrast between the way in which God cared for Israel when he “found” her and the way that they are presented as treating the wounded man.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
16:5-7 Isa 54:6 – has already spoken of God taking Israel as a woman that no one wanted. The way that He cared for Israel is an indication of His love for those who He calls to salvation.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
16:49 Whilst we might see that the problem of Sodom was the sexual immorality spoken of in the Genesis record here we learn the root problem. It was “pride” and being well supplied with what they needed to live. The pride was that they did not need God and thought they knew better than His laws and morality.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
16:60-63 God in His mercy had compassion on the nation as on an abandoned baby – 16:6 – but the nation did not live up to its calling and salvation afforded by their God. That is why the northern kingdom was taken captive by the Assyrians and the southern kingdom by Babylon.
However God had made a covenant – that he would bless Abraham’s seed. He will keep that oath and “all Israel shall be saved” –Rom 11:26– when they turn to God. It is through their unwillingness to accept the salvation in Jesus that God offered the nation that gentiles – the likes of you and me – have the offer of salvation.
But are we going to behave like rebellious Israel? Or are we going to behave like faithful Abraham?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
16:2 The Jews regarded Jerusalem with great reverence as the place where God was to be found, especially in the temple that they constructed. Here God reminds the leaders that Jerusalem was special only because God had chosen it. Its origins were quite ignominious.
We do well to reflect on this if we ever think of ourselves as special in any way because of our own merits.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
In Eze 15 we read the degradation and pride of Judah and Jerusalem became so bad that they became a fruitless vine, not fit for anything (Eze 15:4), “good for nothing” (Jer 13:7,10) and, thus, given over to desolation (Eze 15:8).
In Eze 16, Adonai Yahweh identified Jerusalem of the land of Canaan wherein resided the Jebusites, Amorites, and Hittites (Josh 15:8,63; Gen 10:15,16; Deut 7:1). These nations were to be completely destroyed (Deut 20:17), but they did not drive them out completely (Judg 1:19-35). Thus, they repeatedly fell into sin, idolatry and immorality, calamity after calamity, yet remained unrepentant, as a whole. They were eventually taken as captives to Babylon.
God reminded them when He found them they were helpless, neglected, cast out babies left to die and needed to be rescued. On these abandoned, dying children, polluted in their own blood, God pronounced, “Live” (Eze 16:3-7)! He spread His skirt over them and covered their nakedness (v. 8). God became their Redeemer, and they became betrothed and entered into a marriage covenant with Him (Exo 19:1-10; cf. Isa 54:5; Jer 3:14; cf. Ruth 3:9; Hos 2:19). They turned into beautiful maidens, washed, covered with costly clothes, anointed with oil, and decked with expensive gold and silver jewelry. They looked regal. Their fame spread throughout the heathen (Eze 16:9-14), but Judah and Jerusalem became proud (Jer 13:9,15; cf. Prov 16:18), turned to idolatry, harlotry, became baby killers, and made phallic images with the silver and gold God gave them (Eze 16:15-34)! They forgot the covenant they made with their Redeemer who in His grace and mercy they were looked upon with renown (Eze 16:10-14,43; cf. Prov 2:17). Judah, like Israel, broke wedlock, and shed the innocent blood of babies. Jerusalem was declared to be worse than the ten tribes of Israel in Samaria and Sodom (Eze 16:44-52; cf. Matt 11:24)! Wow! Yet, despite all the abominable sins committed by Israel and Judah, Yahweh in His grace and mercy bestowed favour upon all those who repented with the good news of another covenant, an everlasting one (Eze 16:60,61)!
God has provided for us atonement through His son that we may “Live.” He cleansed and washed us by the water of the Word (Eph 5:26), washed in the blood of the Lamb (Rev 1:5), we became living sacrifices salted with salt (Rom 12:1; Mark 9:49), God clothed us in priestly garments sharing in Christ’s priestly status (1Pet 2:5,9; cf. Rev 1:6), by adoption, made it possible to become rescued from certain death (Rom 8:15-17; cf. Gal 3:26-29), and become espoused to Christ, not as given under the old covenant, but as given now under the new (Eze 16:61; 2Cor 11:2; Rom 7:4.We just need to remember who we were, who we are, and whose we are!
Yahweh’s light will shine again over Jerusalem with Yahoshua sitting on the throne of his father, David, ruling the nations from Jerusalem in righteousness. “Jerusalem! Jerusalem! Sing for the night is o’er! Hosanna in the highest! Hosanna forevermore!"
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Valerie
16:15 It is against the fact that God had given Israel so much – notice the repeated use of “I” in the preceding verses- that we see that Israel felt that she had achieved all she had by her own status and position (beauty).
How self-sufficient do we feel?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
v.7 - This seemed to be a phrase that the Jews used to demonstrate long life. 1Sam.14:45, 2Sam.14:11
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
12:14 man who made me a judge ... over you Exodus 2:14
v.1 Consider that number of people that is implied by 'innumerable'. Also consider, generally the crowds that came to listen to Jesus at different times,
v.10 'Blasphemies against the holy spirit' in the context of the Pharisees is the accusation that Jesus cast out devils by Beelzebub - Luke 11:15, an accusation only recently made.
v.37 'he shall gird himself ...'. We see that Jesus actually did this - John 13:4 etc. One wonders whether the disciples remembered this comment on that occasion.
v.51 - 53. This comment shows that Micah 7:6 has a fulfilment in the time of Jesus. Firstly in the way his own family responded to him and secondly it is to be seen in the response of families to the beliefs of the followers of Christ. In a Jewish context, where being 'put out of the synagogue' was the price that was paid for being a disciple of Jesus, being ostracised would be common for Jews who accepted Jesus as Messiah.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
Matt 24:43-44 | |
Matt 24:45-51 | |
Mark 13:12 |
Here Jesus presents teaching to his disciples - notice the way the record emphasises that the words are for the disciples -:1,15,16,22 - which he later develops in private discussion with his disciples in the last week of his life.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
:1-12 Jesus speaks to his disciples
:13-14 Jesus is interrupted and responds
:14-21 Jesus directs a parable about covetousness to his disciples, not the covetous man who had interrupted him.
So Jesus uses the interruption, not to teach the man but rather to use that man's problem as an object lesson for the disciples.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
12:51 So returning to the 'division' that Jesus is going to bring on the earth. We should appreciate that this division is because most will not submit to the teaching of Jesus. The tolerant Jesus of secular Christianity has no counterpart in Scripture. Jesus repeatedly challenges his followers to put him first.
13:13 In that the woman was 'made straight' literally experienced the fulfilment of Isa 40:3.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
12:24,27 Jesus is not suggesting that one should not work to provide the necessities of life for the natural man. Rather, it means that if even these creatures are the objects of God's concern, then surely we, whom God has endowed with gifts and talents enabling us to plan and to work, will be provided for.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
12:15 The parable of the bigger barns which proceeds this verse seems to be talking about materialism and the man who came with the question, however Jesus now speaks to ‘them’ – the disciples – so we see Jesus has been using the man with the problem as an object lesson for the disciples.
12:35 When Jesus says the disciples should have their "loins girded about you" Jesus is speaking of more than clothing. He is speaking of being mentally prepared for the work. Peter (1Pet 1:13) explains this for us.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
V.5 Hell is translated from the Greek word Gehenna. Gehenna (the valley of the sons of Hinnom) was a place on the south side of Jerusalem where refuse (including the bodies of dead criminals) were burned. Fires were kept burning continuously for this purpose.
Jesus draws on the never-ending quality of these fires to illustrate the perpetual death that Yahweh will impose upon the wicked. It does not mean that the wicked will burn forever in unquenchable flames while being tortured in a conscious state for eternity. Such is the popular, mythical notion of hell.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Michael
WHILE THERE IS YET TIME (V.54-59)
Jesus used a very vivid illustration here. "When you are threatened with a law-suit, come to an agreement with your adversary before the matter comes to court, for if you do not you will have imprisonment to endure and a fine to pay". The assumption is that the defendant has a bad case against you and you will lose in court.
Every man has a bad case in the presence of God, and if he is wise, he will make his peace with God while there is yet time.
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
12:20 In pronouncing ‘thou fool’ to the man in the parable we can possibly identify the Old Testament event which formed the basis for the parable. The ultimate ‘fool’ in the Old Testament was Nabal – for that is what his name meant. He was not rich towards God when he had a good harvest because he did not share what he had been blessed with David and his men – 1Sam 25
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
We all have been richly blessed, and as a result we have many treasures. What is our greatest treasure? We would suggest that along with our spiritual and natural families, we have three treasures that stand out far above anything that the world can offer. The first we would suggest is the Word of God, it has been preserved over the years, translated into our own tongue, and above all, we can be made wise unto salvation from it. Second, we would suggest is the fact that not only we can read it, but it has been put into our hearts and minds. It is the Truth, a price can not be put on it, it is yours and mine, it can not be taken from us. It has not been given to the rich and the wise of the world. Finally, we would suggest the third treasure would be the knowledge that our Heavenly Father will never leave us, or forsake us, nor will He ever test us beyond the point that we are able to cope with, and is always available by means of prayer.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
12:14 The reproof ‘ who made me a judge or a divider over you’ quoting Exodus Exo 2:14 is a powerful reproof when we realise those words originally spoken to Moses who was rejected as the saviour are now spoken to Jesus who was to be rejected as the saviour.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
12:19 The man in the parable’s problem was not the building of bigger barns. It was his attitude to the blessings of God. ‘I will take my ease’ is hardly an appropriate response to God’s blessing. This is highly pertinent for those of us who have been able to leave employment with a good pension. How are we to spend our time now?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
V.5 The parallel passage in Matthew says: And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell (Matt 10:28).
Men can only kill the body, but Yahweh is able to kill both the body and the soul (breath, spirit which animates the body).
Disciples of Jesus should not be worried about physical death. The same God who can destroy all remnants of life, can also restore life. And, this is what is promised to those who love and obey Him (1Cor 15:52-54).
The question is: Are we now eagerly working towards being accepted by Jesus when He returns (Matt 16:27)? The choice is between this fleeting life of imperfection and eternity in perfection. No contest!
V.15 We live in a very materialistic world, one in which people are defined by what they possess. Let us not become caught up in the things of the world, but concentrate on the Kingdom (v.31; Matt 6:19,20).
V.40 The disciple of Jesus has to be ready and waiting for his/her Lord’s return at any time. If he/she is not ready, then he/she will miss the marriage feast (Kingdom) (Matt 25:1-13).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
12:22 In saying 'take no thought’ Jesus is representing his own words that he spoke to the disciples in the Sermon on the Mount – Matt 6:31
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
WHISPERED IN THE DARK
Talking about other people behind their backs is one of the easiest sins to slip in to. We are nice to their face but when their back is turned we question their motives or even go as far as abusing them while they are out of earshot. Would we say any of those things directly to that person? Probably not. We are too polite. But when Jesus talks about what we have said in the dark or whispered in the ear, I wonder if it goes further than just talking to other people. We all do a lot of self talk, and though we may not speak our thoughts directly to anyone else, if we are concerned about what could come out of our mouths, then we need to cut the thoughts off before they develop.
None of us want to be humiliated by the words of Jesus when he said, "There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight; and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs." (Luke 12:3-4)
In our dealings with other people, let us upgrade our opinions of them to the height of the words we would say to them face to face. One day we will be found out as to what we have said in secret. Let us hope that the words we have said are words we are proud to have everybody hear.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Robert
12:2-3 relates to the things that the disciples have been disputing about previously. The ‘darkness’ does not refer to night time but their state of mind.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
"Are not five sparrows sold for two farthings, and not one of them is forgotten before God? But even the very hairs of your head are all numbered... ye are of more value than many sparrows."
Comparing these verses with Matt 10:29-31, we see that those who were prepared to spend two farthings for four sparrows were given an extra sparrow for free. The word "farthing" was a shortened version for a fourth of a penny. In other words, a farthing was worth a 1/4 penny. Thus, this fifth sparrow was the least significant, being worthless.
In Jesus' eyes, even the fifth sparrow was of worth, and, likewise, none of us are considered least significant. God never forgets about us and considers us of more value because of the Spirit Word that abides in us.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Valerie
12:12 The promise given to the disciples here is seen fulfilled in Acts 4:8-12 which is the first time that Peter is brought before the religious leaders.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
v35 It's interesting that Christ uses the phrase "Stay dressed for action" within the context of his comments on wealth, possession, food and clothing. "Dress for action like a man" is how God addresses Job (Job 38:3, 40:7) when he speaks to him from a whirlwind.
Joshua Carmody [Eastern Suburbs] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Joshua
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Wes
12:26 We do well to take heed to Jesus’ injunction here. There is so little we can do to ensure our future – though we often think that we can do a lot – so given that we have that understanding we should realise that we cannot do the more crucial things like provide food without God’s involvement.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
12:13 Notice that the man who asks the question has not really been listening to what Jesus was saying. He buts in, interrupting Jesus with his own selfish concerns. Therein is a warning for us. We should not let our own concerns get in the way of Jesus’ teaching.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
Treasure in heaven
When Jesus has told the parable of the man building bigger barns, he concludes with:
"So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God." Luke 12:21
However, it's not the end of his discourse on the subject, as you can see in his further conclusion several verses later:
"Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." v33-34
The point is that anything we store up on earth leads us to be bound to the earth in our thinking. For example, if we have stocks and shares, we might feel compelled to check the stock markets several times a day -- leading us to think or focus on money. Our heart is drawn to where our treasure is. On the other hand, if our hope is in eternal, heavenly things, our mind will wander towards thinking about those throughout the day. David summed up where his treasure was when he said:
"O how love I thy law! it is my meditation all the day." Psa 119:97
Keeping God's laws actually was the biggest cause of monetary increase for the children of Israel, and David knew that full well. By focusing on heavenly things, David's earthly needs were also taken care of. When we choose to focus less on storing up treasure on earth, we will not necessarily have less at all (v27-31), but most importantly will gain eternal life.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Rob
12:7 When we understand that God numbers the stars – Psa 147:4 – we should have little trouble believing that God knows everything about us.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
12:20 There are many Old Testament passages which talk about the folly of trusting in riches. One is Psa 49:9 – but look at the whole Psalm to see a more complete picture.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
12:16-21 The way in which the man who had much but was not able to eat the fruits of his labour is drawn from Prov 6:2
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
12:19 Jesus puts into the mouth of the man in the parable words from Ecc 9:7. It is as if the man takes the implication that what he has experienced is the blessing of God and so now he is free to enjoy himself. However Ecclesiastes 9 is not encouraging complacency. It is encouraging a realisation that God is in control and will require us to live in an acceptable way.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
“But and if that servant say in his heart, My Lord delayeth his coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants and maidens, and to eat and drink and be drunken;” The Lord of that servant will come in a day when he looketh not for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with the unbelievers.”
The servant at one time looked for the return of the Lord, otherwise, there would be no point in believing his coming is delayed. Those who do not expect Christ’s coming have no reason for saying his coming is delayed.
The servant was once wise and faithful (v. 42; Matt 24:45), “but and if” the wise and faithful servant loses his love, faith, and zeal, and smites his fellow servants, this clearly illustrates a backslidden heart. This is a servant who looked for Christ’s return, but lost hope over time, and took the attitude, “he’ll come when he comes,” but lives like Christ is not coming. We have been warned to “watch” (v. 37; Matt 24:42).
Scoffers exist both within and without the ecclesia, spreading the idea that the return of Christ may well be decades away. This is very tragic because it eliminates the motivation to overcome sinful human nature and to prepare and be ready for Christ’s return (v. 40; 2Pet 3:1-4).
We set a very dangerous precedent when we do not take God and Christ at their Word, and use our own reasoning to accept what we will! God’s Word is Truth (John 17:17), and we need to pay attention to Him. Otherwise, our lot will be with the hypocrites and unbelievers, having our faith in the traditions and rationalizations of men while smiting those who do not agree with us (cf. Matt 24:48-51).
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Valerie
12:17-19 The man is called a fool” Luke 12:20 This answers to Nabal. So it is noteworthy that four time in these verses the “fool” says “my” just as in 1Sam 15:11 Nabal says “my” four times
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
12:28 That God “clothes the grass” draws on what the Psalmist says – Psa 104:14
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
12:2-3 Whilst Jesus’ word have particular relevance to the disciples in his own day we do well to remember that there is nothing that we say – or think for that matter – that is not noticed by our heavenly Father.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
12:11,22,25,26 Being anxious about the basic needs in this life should not be the focus of the disciples of Jesus. Notice that Jesus made this point four times in this section of the gospel of Luke extending the concept to even cover persecution!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
12:28 That God “clothes the grass” draws on what the Psalmist says – Psa 104:14
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
13:14 The response of the “ruler of the synagogue” contrasts markedly the response of an earlier “ruler of the synagogue” - Jairus – Luke 8:41. The status of the ruler was no guarantee of as faithful response to Jesus. We ought not to regard individuals on the basis of their status. Rather we should recognise the attitude held towards Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
12:4-5 The way in which the Pharisees and other religious leaders gained control over the people was by threats and dire warnings and ultimately shutting them out of the synagogues. They were the ones that Jesus was speaking of when he spoke of those that “kill the body”. Rather, Jesus said, have “fear” of God. That is respect.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter