AUDIO
Visit ThisIsYourBible.com
v.2,3 - Do we do this? Do we remove from our lives completely those things which are designed to take us away from God? Do we actively choose not to watch that program on the television that is so obviously and blatantly appealing to the baser aspects of our nature? or do we join in with the worship of the world? ch.7:5,25-26, Exo.23:24, 34:12-17, Hos.4:13.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.30 The admonition not to enquire how did the nations serve their Gods is a powerful warning to us. There is a vast difference between investigating the beliefs of others in order to combat their error and hopefully enlighten them and going to other religions with the thought that they might have something to offer us in terms of teaching or practice. Of course we cannot be so arrogant as to say that we do know all the truth but we can confidently assert that what we do know is truth - and if we wish to learn more it is 'to the law and the testimony ...' Isaiah 8:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.5-7 - Here is the beginning of the idea of God's dwelling with man through the place which He has decided to place His name there. This place is later stated as being Zion (Psa.132:13,14) and clearly is personified in Christ as he manifests God to the world. We abide in Christ, who is himself the abiding place of God - the spiritual Zion. The verses we are considering from Deuteronomy 12 then take on a new meaning for us.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
12:3 When Gideon threw down the altar of Baal (Judg 6:25) he is fulfilling the command given here in Deuteronomy. It is interesting that Elijah's prayer was because Israel were worshipping Baal.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
12:11 The injunction that a 'place' where worship should be conducted when the enemies have been subdued was the trigger which caused David actually to want to build the temple - see 2 Samuel 7:1.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
When Moses preached to the people about Gods judgements and statutes and what he required from them he preceded this by telling them that the land was a gift in fulfilment of the promises made to the fathers. The principle being the gift preceded the demand, moreover the preaching had to be heard and acted upon. They must be careful to do what the Lord required from them (Deut 12:32). In other words their obedience was to be their obligatory response to Gods love and generosity. Moses in this chapter tells the people that their obedience to God is required through their corporate worship.
Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Roger
12:5 We might think 'his habitation' is a frequently used phrase in Scripture but it is not. Of the 11 occurrences the following (, 2Sam 15:25, Psa 33:14, Psa 132:13) have specific reference to the place which Deut 12:5 is speaking of. So it becomes a touch phrase for the location of the temple.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.12 Although only the males were commanded to appear before the LORD God at the annual solemn feasts (Deut 16:16; , Exo 23:17) It appears that the women were allowed to accompany them 1 Sam 1:3; 23
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
Deut 12:9 speaks of Israel not yet coming to "the rest" which God was going to give them. This is picked up in Heb 4. Before the "Law of Moses" God's rest was the Sabbath Day. Then, the rest became the Promised Land, (or should have done). Then (Heb 4:9) "There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God", that is, the Kingdom. And this becomes our hope, too.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to David
V.26 The tithes mentioned in V.17 are not to be considered normal tithes, which belonged to the Levites, but they were extraordinary tithes or gifts, which the people carried to the sanctuary to be presented as peace offerings, and on which, after being offered and the allotted portion given to the priest, they feasted with their families Lev 27:30
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to John
12:1 ‘all the days’ is picked up repeatedly in Ecc 2:3, 5:18, 6:12, 9:9 thus teaching us that the lessons of the wilderness journey are typical of the lessons of life in general.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
V.23 - "But be sure you do not eat the blood, because the blood is the life, and you must not eat the life with the meat." (NIV) - Christ is the life and the law only pointed to him, it couldn't save. Matt 5:17 - Christ came to fulfil the law and the prophets; thus in Christ we can be saved.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Charles
Deut 12 The repeated point that God was going to choose the place of worship seen in this chapter forces us to realise that our worship should be according to God’s plan, not our own.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
HOW TO WORSHIP
There were some specific requirements God gave to Israel with regards to the way in which they worshipped him. The formula for worship is repeated twice so that its impact would not be lost.
1. They were to go to the place the LORD had chosen. (Deut 12:5,11) For the Jews that place became the temple in Jerusalem. For us, we are told not to give up meeting together (Heb 10:25) which may mean in churches, hired halls, homes or in public places. The important thing is to make the effort to meet together.
2. It was to this place they were to bring gifts and offerings for the LORD. (Deut 12:6,11) The writer to the Hebrews continues saying, "Let us not give up meeting together ... but let us encourage one another." When we meet together to seek the LORD, let's bring our gifts of encouragement and prayer, and the sacrifice of praise.
3. At this time of worship, God commanded that the Israelites must worship with their families. (v.7,12) All too often our church services are not family friendly. Often when we meet together to worship our children are looked after in a creche or at Sunday School and worship is segregated. Yet God's way is that we worship with our families and not to do it just as we please.
4. Lastly they were told to rejoice. (v.7,12) Getting together to worship should not be such a solemn occasion that we do not rejoice. Instead let us count our blessings and rejoice with our families and fellow believers, encouraging them and rejoicing in the blessings God has given.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Robert
V.23 - "We can understand how the words of Jesus, 'Unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood...' shocked the Jews. Of course, Jesus meant 'Unless you take the very spirit of my life into your lives...' Jesus never tried to make his message easy did he? Nicodemus (surely a man not lacking in IQ) had problems with 'You must be born again...'. However, whatever the problems, Peter and the others would not be deterred, 'You have the words of eternal life.'" - per David Budden (UK).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Charles
12:8 In saying ‘Ye shall not do everything whatsoever is right in thine own eyes’ we see Moses laying down a principle which is then presented as being violated in the time of the Judges – Judg 17:6, 21:25
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
Yahweh makes a distinction in the way He is to be worshipped as opposed to the way other nations worshipped their gods (vs.4,31). One distinction is in draining the blood of animals before consuming them (vs.16,23). The heathen nations would leave the blood as a tribute to their hunting gods.
However, Yahweh did require blood to be used in sacrificial service (v.27). The sacrifices under the law all pointed to Jesus as the perfect sacrifice for all humanity (John 1:29). The blood of this perfect sacrifice is to be drunk, in symbol, by his true followers (1Cor 11:25).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
12:2 ‘Utterly destroy’ in unequivocal. It speaks to us also about our involvement with the things of this life.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
Vs.2,3 Israel was told to destroy every vestige of idolatry. Out of sight out of mind seems to fit the directive. We too must destroy everything that dissuades us from giving full service to Christ.
V.19 Those who devoted themselves to the service of God had to be provided for by the rest of the community. The Law shows why that provision is sound (Deut 25:4). Paul was also dedicated to the work of the Lord. He had the same claim to community support and quoted the same provision under the Law (1Cor 9:9). However, he declined to take advantage of it (1Cor 9:12). He paid his way by continuing his occupation as a tentmaker (Acts 18:3).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
Ignorance is bliss
The children of Israel were allowed to eat meat wherever they wanted (v15). The only stipulation was that they pour out the blood onto the ground, rather than eat it with the meat (v23-24). Why was that? And when they used an animal as a sacrifice, the blood had to be poured out on the altar of the LORD (v27). Why these details in this chapter?
Long before the law of Moses was given, God had given the commandment: don't eat meat with the blood (Gen 9:4). This was then echoed in the law (Lev 17:14, Deut 12:23). So the Israelites were used to this rule. Why did it have to be reiterated now?
The answer may be in the context of the end of the chapter. Paraphrased it reads like this:
23-25 When you eat meat as part of a normal meal at home, don't eat blood with it
|
26 Offerings of animals (which you will eat too) must be taken to a place of worship
|
v27 When you slaughter these animals at the place of worship, don't eat their blood either, just the meat
|
28-30 You're going to displace people who didn't do things this way - don't imitate them!
|
31 They did all manner of bloodthirsty things at their places of worship
|
So you can see where the context is leading, even though it doesn't spell it out. God said "don't even enquire about their practices" (v30). For us, it's often better not to know what other people are up to, both in their daily lives, and also in the context of other religions. If we constantly look inwards towards what has been written for us, we will not go wrong. To look outside of the scripture for inspiration is the beginning of the end, as it was for Israel (Rom 1:21,28).
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Rob
Deut 12:8 - "You shall not do according to all that we are doing here this day, every man doing whatsoever is right in his own eyes;" (RSV); Judg 17:6 - Similarly, we have everyone here doing as they saw fit before they had a king. Many people are the same today doing and worshipping as they see fit - not as God sees fit (2Tim 2:15,17,18;2Tim 4:2-4).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
12:28 The command to do that which was ‘good and right’ was spoken of two of the kings of Judah – Asa 2Chron 14:2 and Hezekiah 2Chron 31:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
12:9 Israel doubtless thought that entry into the land would be the fulfilment of God’s plan. However it was not to be so. He had greater things in store for His faithful. Therefore they are reminded that entry into the land is not the ‘rest’. The writer to the Hebrews confirms that the entry into the land was not the rest – Heb 4:8 – that rest is when Jesus has conquered sin and is back in the earth.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
12:21-22 Notwithstanding the requirement for all males to appear in the place of God’s choosing three times in a year God still made provision for other times in the year. Sacrifices could be made near home in certain circumstances. From this we deduce that whilst God is seeking sacrifices His requests are not unreasonable.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
REJOICE
God had some strict rules for Israel about where and how they were to worship. They were to watch what they did, and they were not worship the LORD in the same way the people of the other nations worshipped their gods. They were to come together in the place the LORD would choose and worship him there. It was to that place they were to bring their sacrifices and offerings.
There was also another aspect to their worship of the LORD that we possibly miss. They were to rejoice. This is what God said to them: They were to go to the place the LORD God would choose, "And there rejoice before the LORD your God, you and your sons and daughters, your men servants and maidservants, and the Levites from your towns, who have no allotment or inheritance of their own." (Deut 12:12) He also said that the Children of Israel were to eat their tithes and freewill gifts at this special place, then added, "and you are to rejoice before the LORD in everything you put your hand to." (v.18)
Israel's God is not a God of miserableness. He wants us to rejoice and be happy. He wants us to count our blessings and enjoy our worship with our families. So let's not come before him as a religious duty, just to remember our sins, or because we want to ask God for things, but let's come to him in thankfulness and love, in joy, rejoicing in the blessings of having the LORD as our God.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Robert
12:16,24 Lev 17:11 teaches that the life is in the blood. Hence the injunction. Whilst this seems to be a simple requirement of the law David understood the spiritual significance of it – 2Sam 23:16-17– when he poured out the water that his soldiers had obtained for him from the well in Bethlehem. Notice the specific echoes when the record of David’s behaviour echoes the command. We find “water” “poured [it] out” and “blood”. SO we might say that these men were living sacrifices as Paul much later would speak of – Rom 12:1
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
12:7,12,18 Notice on three occasions Israel were told that the time of meeting in the “place” of God’s choosing was to be a time of rejoicing. Service to God is not a chore. It is a time for happiness. This is because of the realisation of what God had done for them. He had saved them from slavery. Is this our attitude to matters of service to God?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
12:32 The injunction that what Moses said should not be added to or diminished is a point already made by Moses – Deut 4:2
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
12:31 Ezra – Ezra 9:1 – speaking to the returning exiles records how the words of Deuteronomy has not been observed by the priest.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
12:7 Moses is speaking of the time when Israel would enter the land and take possession of Jerusalem. So it is not surprising that when Israel returned from Babylon with Ezra that Ezra reminded the people of what Moses had said – Ezra 3:11,12,18
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
12:5 Whilst the inhabitants of the land of Canaan offered sacrifices in every high hill Israel were to be different. Yahweh was going to select a location where sacrifices were to be offered according to His decree. Thus Israel were being taught that whilst they were a nation made up of many people living in different locations they were one nations with one God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
12:9 The “inheritance” that God has in store for Israel is not the land for the days of their life. Rather it is inheritance of the land for ever which they should have realised required resurrection form the dead to eternal life.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
12:32 we find a similar command from the lips of Jesus – Rev 22:18-19
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
12:14,31 God warned Israel here about the dangers of taking the ways that the nations in the land worshipped their man made gods and build such activities into their worship of God.
The counterpart in our lives is to try and justify some of our action ad thoughts as if they are art of our worship of God.
He has laid out the principles and patterns we should follow. We must not import our own ideas into our worship of Him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
12:5 That Yahweh was going to choose the place for worship teaches us a principle. God is in control, or should be, of our worship. It must be offered according to the instructions He gives. Without His instruction we would have no idea how to worship Him.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
12:1 the way that Moses calls the people to reflect on “all the days that ye live” is a concept that is built into Solomon’s prayer at the dedication of the temple that he built – 1Kin 8:40.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2025 Reply to Peter
v. 1 - A bit of a shot in the dark here, but is this possibly connected with Jacob at Bethel? Bethel means 'the house of God', and in Gen 28:16,17 Jacob, on awaking from his sleep with a vision of a ladder (Keep thy foot?), says 'this is the gate of heaven'. Surely (the ladder idea aside), we are being exhorted to 'keep our foot' on that path which leads to God. The way to do that - according to this verse - 'be more ready to hear'
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.20 remembering Ecclesiastes 1:11 2:16 5:20 9:15 11:8 12:1 is a recurring theme in Ecclesiastes. Israel, and ourselves, need to remember the way that God works in our lives. Israel fell in the wilderness because they soon forgot [Psalm 106:13] God's work in their lives.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.2 seems to be telling us something about the nature of our prayers. It warns, I suggest, against taking an attitude of over familiarity with God in our speaking to Him, recognising His supremacy at all times, taking to Him aspects of our lives which are appropriate to our walk towards His kingdom.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
5:2-4 Wise counsel is given here. It is so easy, in the heat of the moment, to make a rash promise which we are unable or unwilling to keep. We are better, says the wise man, not to vow than to make such rash promises.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
:1 The association of ideas - keeping our feet when we approach God and listening rather than offering a fool's sacrifice - shows that the way we speak and the promises we make are not divorced from our worship. Actually our praise to God is seen in the way we speak and act.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
Contentment is the idea behind Solomon’s words in vs. 19; the point he is making is, it matters not whether we are poor or wealthy, humble or distinguished if we always accept that our portion is a gift from God then we will enjoy our lot with contentment. It is the apostle Paul who considers this principle in his letter to 1Timothy 6:6; “But godliness with contentment is great gain for we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. And having food and raiment let us be therewith content”. It is therefore vain and foolish to rebel against our appointed portion and to challenge the wisdom of Gods providential hand at work in our lives. If we believe that our lives are being directed and organised by God then this divine principle will become the very nucleus of our contentment.
Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Roger
On Eccl. 5:2, the word used here for foot is 7272, but the primary root is 7270 which means: to walk along, but only in specific applications, to reconnoitre, to be a tale-bearer (i.e., slander); also (as demon. from 7272) to lead about:-backbite, search, slander, (e-)spy (out), teach to go, view. KJV marg. ref: Isaiah 1:12, backing up for context: (10) Hear the word of the LORD, ye rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah. (11) To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. (12) When ye come to appear
before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? (13) Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and Sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity (marg: grief) even the solemn meeting. You new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them. (15) And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers (marg. multiply prayer), I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. Perhaps it could mean to be very careful in the way we approach YHWH, i.e., come into His presence, the method we use to honour Him must be the way He has laid out for us. The churches of today, as well as the Jews then and of the time of Christ, were teaching the "traditions of men" instead of the commandments of God. We, of course, are no longer bound by the Laws of Moses, but the principle of them are taught by Christ in the NT, and of course, Christ is the only mortal who was ever able to keep the Law. The rest you know.
Susan Brown [] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Susan
5:4 The 'fool says 'there is no God' Psa 14:1. The man who does not keep his vows is a fool because his behaviour implies that he does not believe in God. Integrity is the touch word for brethren. We should be men and women of our word- our Father always keeps His word.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
V.7 "but fear thou God" The reverent man holds God in awe as the supreme reality, " the living and true God"; While to the shallow man God is only the channel for the indulgence of his own emotions. In that radical difference lies the reason why the one is humbled before God and the other inflates himself; and so the offering of one is accepted while the pouring out of the emotions of the other man is in vain.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
There’s a huge lesson for us in Ecc 5:19. Having food and drink is a blessing enough, but if God has “given him power to eat thereof” that’s a real reward. There’s an old hymn which says “I cannot draw another breath unless Thou givest me power.” Today's verse is picked up again in tomorrow’s chapter (Ecc 6:1,2) where Solomon says that it is a great evil if a person has plenty of food but someone else comes and eats it.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2005 Reply to David
5:6 So we see it is our mouth that causes us to sin. Of course this is not always so. However we commit ourselves to things with our mouths but do not fulfil what we have promised.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
V.2 - as Peter Cresswell notes, this seems to be relating to the nature of our prayers. "...let thy words be few". An elderly bro, recently deceased, who had attended where I meet on Sunday gave possibly the most eloquent prayers I ever heard, always brief, and every word counted. We are reminded of those who like to be heard, the vain repetitions of the heathen, and that God knows our needs before we ask Matt 6:5,7,8
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Charles
5:5 The preacher realises that it is not easy to keep one’s words – therefore it is better not to vow. Jesus develops this point further – Matt 5:34. Jesus’ focus is that we are unable to guarantee our promises
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
Rash vows or careful deliberation
The advice concerning vows (or dedications) in v1-7 is very well illustrated in the examples of Jephthah and Hannah. Jephthah, buoyed up by his promotion to leader of Israel, made a rash vow to God (Judg 11:11, 29-33). It was the work of an instant. Hannah, in contrast, prayed to God out of "the abundance of my complaint and grief" (1Sam 1:16). Both these people vowed to give their child to the Lord, yet only Hannah's vow was blessed.
The key difference in these two cases is highlighted in this passage in Ecclesiastes. "For a dream comes through much activity" (v3) and again in v7 "in the multitude of dreams and many words there is also vanity". The word "activity" is "business" in the AV version of the bible. Solomon seems to be saying that when business is going well, we're at the most danger of dreaming about what we can do for God as Jephthah did. Notice that it was when he was doing well for himself, being promoted overnight to commander of Israel's armies, that he made his vow. In contrast, Hannah's acceptable vow was from her humility. She had no dreams, only pleas.
There is nothing wrong with offering part of our lives to God, but it should be done after much careful deliberation. God does remember even if we don't. God will hold us to our vow. Yet, if we make our pledge in the honesty and humility of our hearts, as Hannah did, God may bless us as a result.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Rob
5:9 The need to eat is a great leveller.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
V.2 A modern version states this verse as: Think before you speak, and don't make any rash promises to God. He is in heaven and you are on earth, so don't say any more than you have to. Jephthah serves as an example of not employing this wisdom (Judg 11:30,31).
V.5 Better not to promise at all than to make a promise and not keep it. This applies initially as a promise to Yahweh, but it should be equally applied to our dealings with each other. If you promise something, make sure you keep your promise.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
LISTEN, GOD SPEAKS
"Guard your steps when you go into the house of God. Go near to listen rather than to offer the sacrifice of fools who do not know that they do wrong." (Ecc 5:1)
How well do we listen? When we come to church we usually listen to Bible readings, prayers, sing hymns and songs, and hear a message from the Bible designed to encourage us or help us as we live for the Lord. In the hour or so we attend church, among all the different activities, there is bound to be some way in which God is trying to speak personally to us. Maybe there is something he is trying to teach you about himself, about your salvation, about your attitude toward him or toward your fellow believers. Maybe he is trying to convict you of sin so that you can repent, turn and come closer to him.
It is part of our nature, though, to sit in church and not listen. Or if we do listen, we hear only the lessons that our neighbour needs to hear and we hope and pray that they are listening! Let's not be like that any more. Let's go to listen rather than to sit there thinking that we are in no way misguided ourselves. It's not to each other we need to look, there is a lot of improvement we each need to make in ourselves first. Let's open our ears and our hearts to God. When they are open he will speak to us.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Robert
5:1 the warning to ‘be more ready to hear’ is quoted in James 1:19. Note the context in James it is all about the way we communicate with God.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
V.1 The same advice can be taken by brethren of Christ. Before coming to the altar of Christ (in breaking bread for example) we should be at peace with our brethren. Then, self-examination is necessary to determine if we are spiritually amiss. The Lord can see through hypocrisy and will not accept any vow if the heart is not right.
V.2 Weigh words before addressing God in prayer.
Vs.10-12 The increase of worldly wherewithal brings increased responsibility and expense. But, happiness does not increase accordingly.
Vs.15,16 These verses remind me of some humour: Two Jewish colleagues, Shapiro and Goldberg were attending the funeral of their friend Finestone. Shapiro turns to Goldberg and says, “You know that Finestone was a very wealthy man – how much did he leave?” Goldberg looks sharply at Shapiro and says, “All of it!”
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
5:3the word ‘business’ is the same word translated ‘travail’ throughout Ecclesiastes. Notice the relationship between this verse and the previous verses. This is highlighted by the use of the word ‘for ...’ Our life’s experience causes us to ‘dream’ and those ‘dreams’ cause us to want to speak to God. However we must think carefully about how we are going to pray to God rather than just utter the first thing that comes into our minds.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
The Forgotten Art of Listening
Listening is the forgotten art. We are so busy making sure that people hear what we have to say that we forget to listen sometimes. Here in Ecc 5:1, we are instructed to have the attitude of being open and ready to listen, not to have preconceived ideas, not to dictate to God about what we think He should do.
The art of listening is not that difficult to master. If we can train ourselves to keep our mouths shut most of the time, we will be great listeners. Listening is a magnetic and strange thing, a creative force. Think how the friends that really listen to us are the ones we move toward, and we want to sit in their radius as though it did us good, like ultraviolet rays. Jesus was a good listener, and people drew to him.
Ecc 5:2 - "... therefore let they words be few"
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
5:2 The ‘rash’ mouth and ‘hasty’ heart are actually associated in real life. The wise man will always ponder in his heart what he is going to say before opening his mouth. How often do we say things with little thought for the consequences only to wish we had said something different, or even said nothing?
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
5:8 Following his realisation in Ecc 4:1-2 that there is no justice in the human judicial system due to corruption Solomon now returns to the theme. ‘Marvel not’ he says and then adds, by implication that God will judge as He knows what is happening.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
5:10 So true it is! The one who strives after material things always wants more. The same point has been made in Ecc 4:8 The desire for material things can take over one’s life, shutting out everything else.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
1. Ecc 5:4 - (NIV) "When you make a vow to God, do not delay in fulfilling it" (Deut 23:21).
2. Ecc 5:6 - (NIV) "Do not let your mouth lead you to sin" (James 3:5-10).
3. Ecc 5:8 - when the poor are oppressed by those over them, such oppression is noticed by those even higher - nothing escapes God's eye (Prov 5:21;Heb 4:13).
4. Ecc 5:15 - (NIV) "...and as he comes, so he departs. He takes nothing from his labor that he can carry in his hand" - when you die, you can't take it with you.
5. Ecc 5:19 - enjoy the bounty from God - Paul learned to be content in various circumstances (Phil 4:11-13).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Charles
5:16 Jesus was “in all points” – Heb 4:13 – tempted like we are. However he overcame sin. If he had not done so that all would indeed be labouring for the wind. It is because Jesus overcame sin and is now alive forever that there is value in trying to learn from the way in which God works in our lives.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
5:11-12 In 5:7 we saw the inspired preacher talking about dreams. Now he explains that grand dreams, if fulfilled, bring their own problems. So the labouring man’s sweet (unbroken by extravagant dreams) sleep of great value.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
5:7 The human spirit is such that it has dreams and aspirations. However such dreams should be tempered by a knowledge of God’s will and plan. We should curb our dreams that they might not conflict with God’s plans. We should not be selfish.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
5:18 The book of Ecclesiastes could be taken as presenting life as quite a depressing environment. However there are five times – Ecc 2:24, 3:13, 5:18, 8:15, 9:7 – where the inspired preacher advises that God has given, amongst other things, food and drink to be enjoyed in the labour of our lives.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
Summary of Ecclesiastes 5
5:1-7 think carefully before making promises
Silence is better than rash promises
And fear God
5:8 don’t be surprised that God is in control
5:9-17 Whether a king or poor man earth’s provision is for all
Wealth does not profit
Because everyone will die and leave the wealth behind
5:18-20 So it is good to be satisfied with what God gives us
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
5:4-5 The way in which the inspired Solomon speaks here echoes the words of David – Psa 76:11 – in the Psalms.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
5:3 We live in an age where there are so many people wanting to give us their opinions. We can find the pinions of others on so many things. Often then opinions are so trivial and ill informed. Do we join in such activities? Do we comment when we have nothing in particular to offer but just want to get our voice heard? If that is so we are in grave danger of appearing a fool.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
5:2 the counsel given here is explained in Prov 29:11
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
5:2 Jesus spent all night in prayer (Luke 6:12). Solomon offered a long prayer when he dedicated the temple (1Kin 8:12-53) using the same words often. Yes Jesus counselled against “vain repetition” (Matt 6:7). The prophets of Baal used “vain repetition” (1Kin 18:26). The counsel here in Ecclesiastes is not against long prayers, or even repeating the same phrase. Rather the counsel is against meaningless words – it seems that the prophets of Baal repeated the same words over and over again and said little or nothing else.
We can tell God what he knows – Solomon did that repeatedly. We can make the same request more than once – Jesus did. Our prayers, long or short, using the same phrases from time to time mingled with what God already knows is perfectly acceptable as long as God’s purpose is followed in our words.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
5:5 Firstly we should appreciate that God hears our “vows” - :2 - The rash will quickly make commitments without thinking about the consequences. The faithful will carefully consider what is possible before making any commitment.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
5:2 The wise man does not respond immediately to a question. He will reflect on what has been asked. He will know what he wants to say but will spend time thinking of the best way to say what he wants to say, Our answer may be correct but the way in which it is said may alienate the one to whom we are speaking.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
5:1-20 So for the one who has a relationship with God care must be taken not to abuse that relationship. Lest one were to think that maybe it would be better not to be challenged by God the latter part of the chapter – (::10-20) –re-states the futility of chasing after the things that this world offers.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2025 Reply to Peter
v. 2 - In this case, unlike that of Elijah (1Kings 19:11) God was in the rushing mighty wind. Compare Eze.3:12,13 and 37:9,10, also John 3:8 and Acts 4:31.
Peter [UK] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
v.23 As Jesus was 'delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God ...' demonstrates that the death of Jesus was not an accident. Nor was it something that the Father was not in control of. That it was orchestrated by God shows His mercy. 'God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself' 2 Corinthians 5:19. If He was willing to do this for us and His son was willing to submit his will to that of His Father then the command 'Offer your bodies a living sacrifice ...' Romans 12:1 is so much more pertinent to us.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 Reply to Peter
We will realise that unity is an issue which forms a major part of the letters in the New Testament. Acts provides a theme advertising the unity between the believers
2:1 | one accord |
2:46 | singleness of heart |
4:24 | with one accord |
8:6 | with one accord |
15:25 | with one accord |
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Peter
DEVOTED LIVES
Three thousand new believers, determined to start a new life in Christ, were baptised. The decision to make a change in your way of life is easy - it is carrying it through that can be difficult. So these new believers devoted themselves to four things to help them concentrate on living the new life.
- They devoted themselves to the apostles teaching. This meant a new set of beliefs, new principles to be guided by, to teach, discuss and to think about. It was a positive base for their new life.
- They devoted themselves to the fellowship. They realised that to be successful they needed the support of like minded believers to encourage them and help them in the way.
- They devoted themselves to the breaking of bread. This was the way Jesus said he wanted to be remembered. "Do this in remembrance of me," he said. Regular meeting for breaking bread keeps our focus on Christ.
- And they devoted themselves to prayer. Without the help of God we will flounder. Prayer also keeps us focused and gives us strength.
If we, like the early believers, devote ourselves to these four things, it will greatly help us in our life in Christ.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 Reply to Robert
The giving of the Holy Spirit echoes an aspect of Luke's gospel record. The opening of Luke has a powerful outpouring of inspired words with the words of Zacharias, Mary, Simeon and Anna. This is matched with the giving of the Holy Spirit to the apostles.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Peter
The apostle Peter in this ch quotes Psa 16; in vs. 27, 31, as a consequence of Jesus being raised from the dead. David had looked through the eye of faith to this time when the fruit of his loins would be raised up. But Peter adds that David also looked forward to the time when Christ would sit upon his throne. Does this mean that Jesus is now sitting upon David’s throne, well no because Peter goes on to say that Jesus has been exalted to the right hand of his father, in harmony with Revelation 4:11; "Jesus is now set down on his fathers throne". Why then hasn’t God fulfilled that which he promised David? The answer to this question is found in another Psalm of David which Peter goes on to quote in vs. 34, For David is not ascended into the heavens but he saith himself, "The Lord said unto my Lord, sit thou on my right hand, until I make thy foes thy footstool"(Psa 110:1). David himself knew there would be an unknown period of time before Jesus returned to bring Gods judgements upon mans rebellious and wicked lifestyle and then eventually would “put all his enemies under his feet”. This verse of the same Psa is quoted by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15: also focusing upon the resurrection of Jesus, and those who will be raised including David at his return, "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the first fruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.----------1000 years approx----------- "Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet (Psa 110:1;) The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death”.
Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 Reply to Roger
V.16-21 Peter likened the out pouring of the Holy Spirit to that spoken of by Joel. Joel 2:28-32 In the last days God would pour out His spirit upon all flesh. The events recorded on the Day of Pentecost did not provide a complete fulfilment of Joel's prophecy.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to John
2:22 Whilst Peter says that Jesus was 'approved of God' in the miracles, wonders and signs it was just those features of Jesus' ministry which alienated the Pharisees!
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 Reply to Peter
2:1 Pentecost is 50 days after Passover. Jesus ascended to heaven 40 days after the resurrection (1:3) so these events are a very short while after the ascension of Jesus. Or, putting it another way, the disciples have been ‘on their own’ for a very short time.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Peter
V.17 To prophesy does not only mean to foretell the future. Its main meaning is to teach. The simple act of teaching is not only prophesying. to prophesy is to declare those things which cannot be known by natural means. The Apostles were about to preach those things, which a short while ago they did not fully understand. This can apply to the past, present, and the future. One may suggest that we have a problem with "Daughters prophesying" , when Paul taught that they were not permitted to speak in the churches (1Cor 14:34-35; , 1Tim 2:11-12) Paul here is referring to speaking in the ecclesia, he does not prohibit prophesying outside of such gatherings. We read in Acts 21:9 of four daughters who prophesied, he accepted their hospitality, yet there is no mention of Paul's objection to their teaching.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to John
...then Jesus started to reign, and everything was different. The meek, scared, uncertain disciples who had been huddling together in a rented room, now burst forth with power and authority. How was this possible? Jesus was reigning thought them! Jesus was moving the lips of Peter. Jesus was opening the ears of the listeners. Jesus was orchestrating signs and miracles. All of a sudden it was as if he had never left!
A limited mandate
But this outpouring of power and authority was to be for a limited time only. The reason for it is given in v21 "That whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved", but the previous verses are very illuminating: "I will show wonders... before the coming of the great and awesome day of the LORD". So it would last for a limited time and end on that day. What was that day? Well, it was the same prophecy as in Matt 24, and you will notice the similar wording in Matt 24:29 to Acts 2:20. This prophecy appears to be talking about the destruction of Jerusalem in AD70 by the Romans (Luke 21:20,22). Here we have the purpose of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in a nutshell. Jesus had a limited time in which to reach the Jews before destruction would finally come upon them for their rejection of him and his Father. He had prophesied this before his death, saying:
"I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes: some of them you will kill and crucify... that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth.. Oh Jerusalem, Jerusalem... See your house is left to you desolate." (Matt 23:34-38).
So the Spirit gifts would last until this was fulfilled. The question, maybe more pertinent for us, is "will there be a second fulfilment of this prophecy?". Most of it seems to have been fulfilled at Pentecost, but there are certain elements which leave us guessing. Tantalising isn't it?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 Reply to Rob
2:42 Notice that ‘fellowship' is something that those who were baptised continued in. ‘Fellowship’ is not a set of beliefs which mark us out as different from others. Fellowship is a way of living. We will, if we are in fellowship with each other, seek to spend time with those who share our beliefs. We will attend whatever meetings we can and seek to spend time at a social level with fellow believers also.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to Peter
There are a number of unfinished quotations in Peter’s speech in today’s chapter:
a) Acts 2:21 stops part way through Joel 2:32. Why? Because there wasn't deliverance as yet in Jerusalem.
b) Acts 2:28 stops part way through Psa 16:11. Why? Because the pleasures of the Kingdom are not yet there.
c) Acts 2:30 stops after Psa 132:11. Why? Because the “children” of David are not to reign yet.
d) Acts 2:35 stops after Psa 110:1. Why? Because the rod was not yet to rule from Zion.
All of these part quotations show us that the prophecies have dual meanings – part to be fulfilled when Christ came the first time, and part to be completed when he comes to reign. If we have doubts about this idea of “unfinished quotations” just look again at b). This concludes just half a verse from the end of the Psalm.
David Simpson [Worcester (UK)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to David
2:4 In the days of Babel, God brought confusion and divided the people into language groups, now God showed that through His Word, which needed the gift of tongues to teach, all nations would come to a unity of faith and would contribute to the building of a holy temple unto the Lord (Eph 2:21)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 Reply to John
2:5 That those introduced to us in this chapter as ‘devout Jews’ is important because they are then contrasted with the Jews who opposed the work of the apostles
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Peter
Vs.4,6 The Holy Spirit clearly gave the ability to people to be able to communicate in foreign languages. There is no reference here to the popular notion of speaking in tongues as unintelligible sounds.
The days of the first century commenced the beginning of the last days (v.17). Our present time is close to the return of Jesus to earth and to the beginning of a new era. They are at the end of the last days. I prefer to use the term end times to describe the present time.
V.34 David was a man after mine (Yahweh's) own heart which shall fulfil all my will (1Sam 13:4; Acts 13:22). It is interesting that this faithful man did not go to heaven at death. The false pagan notion, of the reward of the faithful going to heaven, is espoused by most Christian churches today.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Michael
V.31 - The resurrection of Christ did not allow his ["soul" KJV or "he" NIV from the Greek word "psuche" (5590) and primarily means a creature man or animal, or life] to be left in or abandoned to ["hell" KJV or "the grave" NIV from the Greek word "hades" (86) which means the grave, hell]. When Christ left the grave it was a full bodily resurrection not some rising spirit or ghostlike soul as evidenced by Luke 24:12,22,23,39,40. When people or animals die they always go to hell (hades) which is the grave Ecc 3:19-20. Our only hope (should we pass away before Christ returns) is a bodily resurrection from the grave and a merciful judgment when Christ returns to set up his kingdom on the earth Dan 12:2; Matt 25:31-34; Rev 5:10.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2008 Reply to Charles
2:1 That the outpouring of the Holy Spirit came at Pentecost – 50 days after Passover – is significant in the way it enabled the gospel to be spread through the Roman world. Pentecost was one of the times when Jews from all round the world would be in Jerusalem – Deut 16:16 - and who would return to their homes carrying the message of what they had heard and seen in Jerusalem whilst at the feast.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Peter
There will be a resurrection of the just & unjust - Acts 2:34; 17:31; 1Thess 4:16; Mark 13:26-27; John 5:28-29; Dan 12:2 [note: KJV says, '"many" (i.e., not "all") of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake']; Acts 24:15; 2Tim 4:1; 2Cor 5:10 . Not all will arise - Isa 26:14,19; Isa 43:14-17; Psa 49:12-20 (note: vs.15 in KJV says 'redeem my "soul"' but vs.15 in NIV says 'redeem my "life"'.); Prov 21:16; Jer 51:39,57.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Charles
V.13 new wine is more correctly sweet wine. The phrase is translated from the Greek word gleucus which refers to the sweet substance that is distilled from the grape before it is pressed. This results in a very strong, sweet wine. The substance gleucus is better known in English as glucose.
V.15 The third hour was 9 a.m., and was the time for prayer. And so, Jews would not be eating or drinking at that time.
V.20 This verse echoes Jesus’ words (Matt 24:29). The heavenly bodies represent the civil and religious authorities. The notable day (period of time) of the Lord (KJV) has a double reference. First, it talks about the fall of Jerusalem which happened in 70 AD, about seven years after the writing of Acts. Second, it is talking about the day that Jesus returns to earth from heaven. That will be a turbulent time as Jesus puts down all civil and religious authority on the earth and establishes His kingdom.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Michael
Acts 2:30 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King
This is an everlasting covenant sworn to David, and it did not take place in David's lifetime 2Sam 23:3-5 but there will be a future fulfilment Psa 89:3-4. Psa 132:11 is quoted in the New Testament and applied to Jesus Acts 2:30, Acts 13:22-23. This shows that Jesus will be the future King.
For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16.
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 Reply to Roger
2:13 Clearly those ‘mocking’ were unable to discern the foreign languages that were being spoken. Maybe it was the religious leaders in Jerusalem who were the ones ‘mocking’ who would have maybe had a knowledge of Greek as well as Hebrew but might have been far less familiar with the other languages being spoken. As they were opposed to the claims of the resurrection they would oppose the preaching of Jesus’ followers.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 Reply to Peter
2:6 If we can visualise the scene. The disciples, in the temple precincts, were speaking in tongues. Those who were close by heard it and the news spread throughout Jerusalem. So we can conclude that the disciples speaking in tongues lasted for some considerable time.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2011 Reply to Peter
2:12 Those in Jerusalem for the feast doubtless heard about the events that had happened less than seven weeks earlier in Jerusalem. Maybe having heard the stories in their home occasions they dismissed them as 'idle tales’ – after all the disciples who were actually in Jerusalem at the time though they were. However now in Jerusalem themselves the multitudes are experiencing something very strange and so one would expect that the ‘idle tales’ as they thought they were maybe had more substance than they had credited them with.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2012 Reply to Peter
2:34 Psa 110:1 is quoted to prove that Jesus is raised to God’s right hand. A point made later when Hebrews was written – to Jews living in Jerusalem –Heb 1:3
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Peter
Wes Booker [South Austin Texas USA] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Wes
Peter boldly proclaims the purpose of God in Jesus. He declares to the Jews what they have done to Him “ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain” And having heard and seen the power of the Holy Spirit in the gift of tongues given to the apostles and Peter's wonderful testimony from the OT, the realization of the enormity of what they have done comes upon the Jews. Acts 2:37 “Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?” Acts 2:38 Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.”. What they wanted and needed was the gift of forgiveness whereby they could be saved.
In Rom 5:16 -18 the apostle Paul talks of “ the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.” Rom 6:23“For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” And this is available to all who embrace the truth Acts 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Richard Snelling [Swansea] Comment added in 2013 Reply to Richard
2:17-21 Being familiar with the speech of the apostles to the crowds on the Day of Pentecost we might overlook the way in which Peter started his speech. He quoted Scripture. Herein is a lesson for us in our communications about the gospel message.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2014 Reply to Peter
2:33 In emphasising again that Jesus is “by the right hand of God” Peter is emphasising the Messiaship of Jesus as the priest after the order of Melchisedec. He not simply saying that Jesus is in heaven. He is developing the implications in Psa 110.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2015 Reply to Peter
2:14 When we read that Peter was with the “eleven” we see that Mathias, as soon as he was selected to be one of the apostles, is there with them preaching.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2016 Reply to Peter
2:27 Whereas the phrase “Holy one” occurs a number of times in the Old Testament all occurrences in the New Testament refer to Jesus Mark 1:4, Luke 4:34, Acts 2:27, 3:14, 13:35, 1John 2:20
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Peter
“For David is not ascended into the heavens…”
Christ said, “And no man hath ascended up to heaven” (John 3:13). Popular theology is in antagonism to these verses; therefore, they must be in error. If the heavenly angels were once human, how would they now be in heaven? We would have to assume an awful lot not revealed to us and be hard pressed explaining these and other Scriptures:
The dead are “asleep” (1Thess 4:13-16).
The dead sleep “in the dust of the earth” (Dan 12:2; Isa 26:19).
David, a man after God’s own heart (1Sam 13:14; Acts 13:22) is not in heaven, neither are any of the heroes of faith mentioned (Heb 11) and not mentioned. They sleep awaiting their resurrection when Christ returns. If then none of these faithful men are in heaven, how can anyone possibly conclude we go straight to heaven after death? They wrest/or misinterpret the Scriptures using most frequently, “In my Father’s house are many mansions… I go to prepare a place for you, And if I go and prepare a place for you I will come again, and receive you unto myself.” There is absolutely no promise here of our going to heaven, but of Christ returning to earth! He gives a hope of his return, to call to himself the dead and living saints, and to give the faithful ones an inheritance in the Kingdom he will establish. Heaven is not our inheritance, “but the earth hath he given unto the children of men” (Psa 115:16; Matt 5:5). Scripture affirms this in very plain language.
Valerie Mello [in isolation, TN, USA] Comment added in 2017 Reply to Valerie
2:7 The assertion that those speaking were “Galileans” was true. However there fact is that these men were not from Jerusalem. They were not amongst the elite in interpreting the Law and the prophets. This is the point that the record is making. Peter goes on to explain how, using about 10 quotations from the Old Testament, how that Jesus who had been crucified and was risen from the dead was Messiah. This is something that the “wise” men I Jerusalem could not see in the Law and the prophets.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2018 Reply to Peter
2:22 The way in which Peter speaks of Jesus status being authenticated by the “miracles and wonders” that he did is echoed – Acts 15:12 – by Paul and Barnabas’ work in preaching to gentiles.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2019 Reply to Peter
2:15 Peter, in saying it is the “third hour of the Day” is speaking of the Jewish “clock”. The “day” started at 6.00 am as he is using Roman timing not Jewish.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
2:12 The question, “What meaneth this?” quotes Exodus 16:15, assuming that the AV marginal alternative for “It is manna”, namely, ‘What is this?’, is correct. Certainly, this fits with the explanatory comment, “for they wist not what it was” (Ex. 16:15). The two were similar for manna represented “every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God” (Mt. 4:4) and the Spirit gift enabled men to “speak … the wonderful works of God” (Acts 2:11). Furthermore, the manna was “rained down” (Ps. 78:24) and the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost was an incipient fulfilment of Joel’s prophecy of “the rain” (Joel 2:23).
Nigel Bernard [Pembroke Dock UK] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Nigel
The Fellowship of the Early Believers
-The Five Principles of Ecclesial Development — v. 42
"Continuing steadfast" — A firm commitment and perseverance.
"in the apostles' doctrine" — Academic Instruction in the Teaching.
"and fellowship" — Practical Application in Sharing Association.
"and in breaking of bread" — Acknowledging the Principles of Atonement.
"and in prayers" — Personal and Communal Expression.
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2020 Reply to Peter
2:15 Peter’ in saying it is the “third hour of the Day” is speaking of the Jewish “clock”. The “day” started at 6.00 am as he is using Roman timing not Jewish.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2021 Reply to Peter
2:11 The mention of Cretians is an indication, when we consider that Titus was sent to Crete – Titus 1:5 – that some who were in Jerusalem at this time were baptised and went back to Crete and formed the basis of the ecclesias that Titus was charged with caring for.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2022 Reply to Peter
2:12-13 During the ministry of Jesus there was often a division amongst those who listened to him. Some seeing him as a credible teachers, others an imposter. This division was not resolved by the resurrections of Jesus and it still exists today. The challenge for us is to see the evidence and respond appropriately.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2023 Reply to Peter
2:22 Whilst the title “Jesus of Nazareth” is used a number of times in the gospel records we might recognise that it is part of the title that Pilate put over the cross – John 19:19 – So in this first use of the title in Acts Peter and John are reminding their audience of Jesus who was crucified and who was now alive again.
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2024 Reply to Peter
2:4 In the apostles being filled with the holy spirit we see John the Baptist's words fulfilled – Matt 3:11. The apostles are now qualified to start the commission that Jesus gave them in Mark 16:15-18
Peter Forbes [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2025 Reply to Peter